EPTParallel World Mafia: Chaos of GreY - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
It does end in about 12 hours right? | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
What's up with that objection? a joke cause sloosh said it? | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
About me not giving reads, NOBODY is giving real reads at the moment only they lean one way or another or simple "I have read his filter and he seems townie." I was called out specifically and I answered. Would you have preferred "I read your filter I like you." ? Even you austin, with all your posts have not come out and said I feel strongly about one person or another. Sure you came out and made a decision with you objection, but none of those were "I feel he is sure town" before you confirmation. About the whole swap idea. I still think it has potential since I said at the beginning I like facts and using the swap system to get facts about "confirmed townies" is good.The idea of the second scummiest is that we will have the flip from their most scummiest target before we had to make a final decision on ours. So if it was a one or the other option and the main target was scum then good, one down. If we got that decision wrong then at least the second target will die a day sooner. and that still leading towards the confirmed townie thing I like. If somehow we got both targets wrong then that's probably on the town for messing up rather than the idea being invalid. There is a valid concern about stacking one side with mafia so they will be able to control the vote, but I think if mafia control the vote that way they will be exposing themselves. And worst case scenario they swapped us their second scummiest and he turns out scum and their primary target was townie. That still leads us with a decent lynch target who the mafia will have to make direct defenses of if they want to save him. And after that they still only have 3/(11-9 depending on if we mislynch today and if they kill somebody from our world) votes which is not enough to control the vote. Dunno, maybe 3/9 is cutting it too close since 5 out of the 6 non mafia have to vote against the mafia. At the time it felt like a good idea, and I'm still not convinced the idea itself is bad, although there might be better ones. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
 I'll get working on it i guess. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: The best information the town has is from the start of the game "each world will begin with 2 mafia". So far people have not taken this into high consideration As far as I know only one person came up with a plan to take advantage of this (sand) Who was coincidentally mafia's first target. Oh, and who know who was sand's biggest (only) supporter of that plan? ME. So if your going to call it a good idea to focus on that fact you should realize who supported actions which would take the biggest advantage of that fact. On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: randombum? Yes, definitely mafia. Why? General avoidance to any topic of discussion. He simply has not said anything about anything the town is talking about. What has honestly been "discussed". Nearly everybody has had the same/similar opinion. There was lynching you which everybody agreed on. There was austin's list which everybody pretty much narrowed it down to the same 3 or 4 people. The only real discussion (read divided opinions involving more than 2 people) was how to use the swap mechanic and I was there. On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: randombum never talked about myself or marvellosity when the two of us were having a larger penis contest. I felt it pointless to get into a penis contest when it started as A: "B is scum!" and B responses "No, A is scum!" Apparently B won that since the whole town agreed to lynch you. On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: His lynch was avoided because one or two people said they thought he was innocent (I believe austin and clarity were the two, could be wrong though). You write that as if I somehow escaped getting lynched (Note: that was your lynch that was avodied) If you actually read the threads it was neither austin or clarity that supported me. The only person to throw suspicion on me was austin, and even his post was along the lines of "he's on my list and I like him LEAST" Also, there was not a single vote for me ever that day, so I don't know what I'm supposedly avoiding. On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: Given that he was one of 4 choices to be lynched he was awfully quiet I don't know what you consider quiet. I responded to direct questions and posted my opinions. I wasn't nearly as vocal as austin, but that's because he has like 2/3 the posts in the thread since he's been here. On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: He random voted for Palmar day 1 without any justification (read his filter if you don't believe me), hopped on the Kenpachi bandwagon, and hasn't said anything since. The vote on Palmer was random, but I don't see how that points towards an alignment on day 1. The kenpachi vote was because there was under an hour before deadline, and not enough people wanted to lynch austin to check his role. I hopped on the wagon because I was trying to help avoid a no-lynch and he was everybody's choice. And by choice he was really more like the least bad choice. Why I haven't said anything since? Its barely been 24 hours and it happened to be Friday night and Saturday afterwards. I had other things to do. The bulk of your post has so many mistakes which to me implies you are not really reading the thread and are trying to avoid getting lynched tomorrow and the fact that you lock onto the only target that some people have showed some doubts on to try to save yourself in a last ditch effort. I mean you even accuse palmer when you claim this about austin On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: It should be apparent from Austin's filter that he's either a town trying to do something or he's mafia with some master grand scheme using his role to confirm his mafia buddy as he watches the town crumble (the latter is very unlikely). And this On December 16 2012 06:55 Foolishness wrote: Again Austin is the only true town player here Either he's town and Palmer is town, or he is mafia which you call very unlikely. I cannot see a scenario where austin is both town and Palmer is anti-town. I don't think anybody who reads the thread can come up with that scenario either. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:40 austinmcc wrote: Randombum, What did you mean by this statement to clarity? (This was from D1, when he swapped Keirathi and I) That was more of a knee-jerk reaction. I saw foolishness getting swapped over as bad and wanted to blame the person I saw responsible. Don't make much of it. | ||
| ||
