EPTWitchcraft Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
We're already sheeping on him and he's the only one in this game with some real scummyness. The whole MrZ situation caused a lot of reactions but it didn't do anything for me other than raise very light suspicion. As for town reads i'd rather not disclose them at the moment. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 16 2012 08:14 drazak wrote: Wat. I don't think anyone is sheeping on him. I really don't like how you're sheeping on him and agreeing that you're sheeping. You don't seem to have a lot of real reason for your vote other than sheeping, and I really don't like taht. ##vote Morbidius Random much? | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 16 2012 08:25 drazak wrote: How is this random? You just said that you're sheeping and joining a bandwagon with 0 reason. Sounds like you're trying to push a potential mislynch. I don't know how JX plays at all so until I get a chance to look through some of his other games, I don't think I can vote on him. I voted for him due to the supposed ''slip'' followed by his increasingly desperate attempts to push MrZ. But indeed, other players have been too passive during this situation, which makes me think we might be doing a mislynch. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 16 2012 17:19 Hapahauli wrote: Can you give your own thoughts on MrZ? Or anyone other than JX for that matter. He has played a pretty scummy game so far i gotta say, he just goes around spreading shit or saying things which lead to no progress at all such as stuff about lurkers or just plain whining, and as i said JX has got a few good points against him. If it wasn't for JX ''slips'' I'd say MrZ is the scummyest of them all here. I just woke up, gonna get some breakfast before saying my other reads | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 16 2012 17:49 Hapahauli wrote: Since you didn't answer this before - it sounds like this isn't your first game... what experience you have playing mafia? Haven't seen you around here before. Also, I'm particularly interested in hearing your reads on Drazak, kush, and Djodref. Though I won't read 'em until tomorrow since I'm going to bed. Have played it mostly irl, and a couple of times on other forums. Now Drazak has been weird, you could say he's inactive or you could say he's playing lurky mafia game. Either way its hard to get a proper read on him. Kush raises very light suspicion for me, his posts seem a bit inconsistent... My read on Djo is null but its leaning towards townie. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 16 2012 21:04 DarthPunk wrote: My vote was a pressure vote. And I don't like his lynch for a couple of reasons. Firstly the initial bandwagon came up on him very easily with no resistance whatsoever which makes me think scum may have been on it. Secondly, his response to the case since he actually got in the thread seem townie enough for me to hesitate. Agreed, i have a feeling mafia is pushing for a mislynch here. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 17 2012 01:35 kushm4sta wrote: can we stfu about mrz and jx? I think they are both bad lynches. I see a lot of effort from both of them to be involved in this game. * We need to start focusing on who we are going to lynch, since im pretty sure we have to lynch in 4.5 hours. There are actually more lurkers than I would there would be yesterday.. this is because people either haven't kept their promise to be active or have started posting minimally to avoid a modkill. THREESR: I think he's gonna get replaced, so we should ignore him for now. As I see it, these are the acceptable options: DOYOUHAS: This guy's posts are decently long, but I didn't even know he existed until I looked at the player list. He is invisible. He is a lurker who is putting some effort into not looking like a lurker. MORBIDUS: classic lurker Bad options: ENYA: fuuu i thought he was gonna get replaced but he's talking for now. Not the best choice IMO because he looks ready to contribute now. CHEESECAKE: Also looks ready to start contributing more. NOTE: If threesr comes back in the thread to avoid a modkill then he goes on the lynch list. You are seriously going places with your lurker hunt, can you tell me why you think random lynching would be a better option over voting on JX or MrZ? | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 17 2012 02:03 Eywa- wrote: Oops... Messed up that last post (but can't edit) anyhow, the game isn't about finding who is the most active, that's easy to do and can be done by running a light scan of the post history, the game is about finding guilty vs innocent. I don't give favoritism based on activity... Seems like something that someone would do to chop off some town votes because they are "easy targets". Sorry about double post, but yes kush is very suspicious at the moment. You should change your vote however, your case against hapa is very weak and i doubt anyone would back you up here. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 17 2012 04:16 MrZentor wrote: Kush, I'd rather lynch scum than a lurker. We should kill Morbidius. Hmm i made some light accusations against you and now you're full on calling me scum? That's quite the overeaction,which certainly doesn't help your case. I already had in mind the fact that you're either very noob town or noobish mafia. Either way a flip is worth more than you. ##unvote ##vote MrZentor | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 15 2012 23:21 MrZentor wrote: ##Vote JieXian Just sheeping, going with the crowd. On December 16 2012 02:02 MrZentor wrote: Okay, I think I've established my townieness. I should be more or less actually helpful from now on. ''OMG guys look i'm town! Now lets go get the scum overthere!!!1one!!'' Says he established his townieness without establishing shit On December 16 2012 07:19 MrZentor wrote: I think "Lurking is the most effective scum strategy for its difficulty," would be a more accurate statement. On December 16 2012 08:28 MrZentor wrote: KILL HIM KILL HIM NOW On December 16 2012 11:33 MrZentor wrote: I'm not a lurker, kush..... Useless garbage to pretend he's not a lurker. On December 16 2012 13:43 MrZentor wrote: Whether somebody is a lurker or not isn't based on the content of their posts, but their activity. And I'm pretty sure JieXan is scum. On December 16 2012 14:45 MrZentor wrote: Meh, at this point I think our best chance of winning, as sad as it is, is to lynch lurkers until more people become active. Changes mind quickly as soon as the bandwagon kinda stops but still is playing timidly and passively. I know some of you might say this is a defensive play due to him voting on me but you can check my posts and see i already thought he was the scummiest player around for a while, JX posts have plenty of good reasoning against him despite supposed ''scum slips.'' | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
| ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 17 2012 04:56 kushm4sta wrote: I have a request for you hapa. Look at DYH filter real quick. In a way he is the scariest lurker of all. That would be a lurker lynch i support. Also Eywa can you go more in depth about your hapa acusations? | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:01 MrZentor wrote: I don't care if morbidius is posting and threesr isn't. Morbidius is scum, and threesr isn't, so why would we kill threesr? More completely unsupported accusations. JX accused you and you jump on the sheep against him. I say he might be right and as soon as everyone unvotes him you jump on me. You don't have good arguments and no good reads. You just post random one liners and random accusations and hope people will go for one of them. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
You could've read my posts from yesterday where i said you were my next in line to lynch due to scum suspicion. Again saying its omgus and throwing random shit at me fits your style much better. | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:18 MrZentor wrote: You're so lucky your scum buddies are shifting the lynch on to somebody else and the town is going with it. Quoting my introduction post out of context again? If i said that out of the blue then i'd agree with you on a scum read, but i said that as a response to an ongoing argument on whether we should lynch lurky players or not. | ||
| ||
