EPTOn December 20 2012 01:42 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I already told you I dropped it because there was a .1% chance of 6 other people going for the lynch in that frame of time. Don't know what else to tell you.
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2012 01:40 JieXian wrote:
Am I supposed to be flattered with your attempt to bribe me hahahahahahahaha and keep giving me townie reads ever since?
You still haven't answered my questions yet: (Taking off the spoiler because people might miss your lies (trying hard to be nice here, you know what word I had in mind) and incoherence)
For that matter, I already mentioned that I was back meaning I'm done with the catching up and I wasn't satisfied with the lack or MRCC = scum attention below: ie You don't have a good rebutal ie you're scum
I'm down for a hapa or mrcc lynch, now let me address the voting
On December 19 2012 04:01 Hapahauli wrote:
@ JieXian
Please catch up on recent thread events. I don't have my vote on you atm. In fact it's probably best just to go start at page 70 and work your way onwards. Less angry and whatnot.
@ JieXian
Please catch up on recent thread events. I don't have my vote on you atm. In fact it's probably best just to go start at page 70 and work your way onwards. Less angry and whatnot.
Am I supposed to be flattered with your attempt to bribe me hahahahahahahaha and keep giving me townie reads ever since?
You still haven't answered my questions yet: (Taking off the spoiler because people might miss your lies (trying hard to be nice here, you know what word I had in mind) and incoherence)
On December 18 2012 02:59 JieXian wrote:
Hapahauli wrote:
Those are "non-controversial" reads in the sense that you didn't do anything useful. Your read on me and DP was unoriginal (since everyone thought we were town), and your top scumread was just the "troll" of the thread.
I have 4 people voting the people whom "everyone thought were town".
........hello?
Hapahauli wrote:
Those are "non-controversial" reads in the sense that you didn't do anything useful. Your read on me and DP was unoriginal (since everyone thought we were town), and your top scumread was just the "troll" of the thread.
I have 4 people voting the people whom "everyone thought were town".
On December 15 2012 10:55 Djodref wrote:
You can only vote for one no-vote.
Do you have even Witchcraft vote Hapa ? Maybe you would be more interested in the way you have to use them if you did ?
##Unvote
##Vote Hapa
On December 15 2012 10:49 Hapahauli wrote:
The thing is that you can't live in fear of things like that. I mean when it really comes down to it... who cares about blue roles? A town can win without blues. All we can do is play the game and try to find mafia. If someone gets shot, so be it.
In fact I'm half tempted at this point to have a policy of never voting blues. That way, we'd have a 10-3 setup of 3 mafia goons vs 10 VTs, which IMO is town favored.
On December 15 2012 10:44 Djodref wrote:
Yeah, okay, but I really think that we should avoid it if we can.
I know it's going to be very difficult, but we have to refrain ourselves from doing it while the Witch Hunter is alive...
Yeah, okay, but I really think that we should avoid it if we can.
I know it's going to be very difficult, but we have to refrain ourselves from doing it while the Witch Hunter is alive...
The thing is that you can't live in fear of things like that. I mean when it really comes down to it... who cares about blue roles? A town can win without blues. All we can do is play the game and try to find mafia. If someone gets shot, so be it.
In fact I'm half tempted at this point to have a policy of never voting blues. That way, we'd have a 10-3 setup of 3 mafia goons vs 10 VTs, which IMO is town favored.
You can only vote for one no-vote.
Do you have even Witchcraft vote Hapa ? Maybe you would be more interested in the way you have to use them if you did ?
##Unvote
##Vote Hapa
On December 15 2012 12:41 Hapahauli wrote:
Why DP is Scum
+ Show Spoiler +
Strange Tunnel on Djo
Two things to note about the red/bolded passage:
1) DP does everything short of sucking my dick here. He buddies me just about as hard as you can in this passage. For example, I made no claims that a 10-3 setup is "super town favored." Nor is it actually "super town favored." Yet he goes and exhalts my idea as "really really good."
2) One of DP's main reasons for suspecting Djo at this point is that Djo disagrees with my assessment on the 10-3 setup thing. Part of the implication here is that DP agrees thtaThis is odd, considering his next post.
Despite agreeing with my "10-3 setup" stuff earlier, DP all of a sudden is assuming that Djodref is correct in his setup theory without any clarification from the mod in the mean time.
This doesn't make sense at all. How could you agree with my comments and speculation, then go and post something like this? Very simply, DP lost track of the reasons he was tunneling Djo. His tunneling doesn't have a townie thought-process behind it - he's just trying to heap as much suspicion on Djo as he can.
This is pretty clear by his next post on the subject:
This sounds so desperate to me. It's very clear by now that the argument between me and Djo is simply a misunderstanding of the OP, yet DP twists the hell out of his words and flips a shit.
Other Stuff:
Firstly, DP's first post:
The only purpose of this post is to stifle discussion. There's zero reason you should be so against policy talk before it even starts.
Secondly, when I vote him - mind you I'm the ONLY person to be suspicious of him so far - he whines about it:
The whining is completely disproportionate to the suspicion put on him. In addition, DP doesn't hate playing town. Fact.
Why DP is Scum
+ Show Spoiler +
Strange Tunnel on Djo
On December 15 2012 11:05 DarthPunk wrote:
Wow your an idiot.
##Vote: Djodref.
Votes Zentor for meaningless self vote. That was obviously meaningless.
Doesn't want to give town reads which is just ridiculous.
Votes for Hapa whom actually brings up a really good point. 13-3 all vt all goon is actually super town favored.
There is no way a rational townie could believe hapa is scum based on the game so far.
So either Djo is being retarded or he is scum. Either way that is enough to get my vote day one.
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2012 10:55 Djodref wrote:
You can only vote for one no-vote.
Do you have even Witchcraft vote Hapa ? Maybe you would be more interested in the way you have to use them if you did ?
##Unvote
##Vote Hapa
On December 15 2012 10:49 Hapahauli wrote:
The thing is that you can't live in fear of things like that. I mean when it really comes down to it... who cares about blue roles? A town can win without blues. All we can do is play the game and try to find mafia. If someone gets shot, so be it.
In fact I'm half tempted at this point to have a policy of never voting blues. That way, we'd have a 10-3 setup of 3 mafia goons vs 10 VTs, which IMO is town favored.
On December 15 2012 10:44 Djodref wrote:
Yeah, okay, but I really think that we should avoid it if we can.
I know it's going to be very difficult, but we have to refrain ourselves from doing it while the Witch Hunter is alive...
Yeah, okay, but I really think that we should avoid it if we can.
I know it's going to be very difficult, but we have to refrain ourselves from doing it while the Witch Hunter is alive...
The thing is that you can't live in fear of things like that. I mean when it really comes down to it... who cares about blue roles? A town can win without blues. All we can do is play the game and try to find mafia. If someone gets shot, so be it.
In fact I'm half tempted at this point to have a policy of never voting blues. That way, we'd have a 10-3 setup of 3 mafia goons vs 10 VTs, which IMO is town favored.
You can only vote for one no-vote.
Do you have even Witchcraft vote Hapa ? Maybe you would be more interested in the way you have to use them if you did ?
##Unvote
##Vote Hapa
Wow your an idiot.
##Vote: Djodref.
Votes Zentor for meaningless self vote. That was obviously meaningless.
Doesn't want to give town reads which is just ridiculous.
Votes for Hapa whom actually brings up a really good point. 13-3 all vt all goon is actually super town favored.
There is no way a rational townie could believe hapa is scum based on the game so far.
So either Djo is being retarded or he is scum. Either way that is enough to get my vote day one.
Two things to note about the red/bolded passage:
1) DP does everything short of sucking my dick here. He buddies me just about as hard as you can in this passage. For example, I made no claims that a 10-3 setup is "super town favored." Nor is it actually "super town favored." Yet he goes and exhalts my idea as "really really good."
2) One of DP's main reasons for suspecting Djo at this point is that Djo disagrees with my assessment on the 10-3 setup thing. Part of the implication here is that DP agrees thtaThis is odd, considering his next post.
On December 15 2012 11:21 DarthPunk wrote:
1- you are valuing blues to highly
2- That is a ridiculous proposition
3- So you were voting someone for a plan that was impossible. But you knew that. So you are essentially voting for someone for not reading the OP?
Do you think town or scum are less likely to read the OP?
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2012 11:19 Djodref wrote:
1) Because I don't want us to lose blues / obvious townies
2) I honestly think that we can scumhunt without stating our townreads
3) True, but impossible in this game
On December 15 2012 11:13 Hapahauli wrote:
So answer me this Djo:
1) Why are you so fearful of the witchhunter?
2) Why are you pushing a plan that compromises our scumhunting?
3) True or false: a 10-3 VT-Goon setup is town favored.
On December 15 2012 11:09 Djodref wrote:
I'm not retarded, I'm town, I'm interested into the way I should use my witchcraft votes, obviously you both don't
I'm not retarded, I'm town, I'm interested into the way I should use my witchcraft votes, obviously you both don't
So answer me this Djo:
1) Why are you so fearful of the witchhunter?
2) Why are you pushing a plan that compromises our scumhunting?
3) True or false: a 10-3 VT-Goon setup is town favored.
1) Because I don't want us to lose blues / obvious townies
2) I honestly think that we can scumhunt without stating our townreads
3) True, but impossible in this game
1- you are valuing blues to highly
2- That is a ridiculous proposition
3- So you were voting someone for a plan that was impossible. But you knew that. So you are essentially voting for someone for not reading the OP?
Do you think town or scum are less likely to read the OP?
Despite agreeing with my "10-3 setup" stuff earlier, DP all of a sudden is assuming that Djodref is correct in his setup theory without any clarification from the mod in the mean time.
This doesn't make sense at all. How could you agree with my comments and speculation, then go and post something like this? Very simply, DP lost track of the reasons he was tunneling Djo. His tunneling doesn't have a townie thought-process behind it - he's just trying to heap as much suspicion on Djo as he can.
This is pretty clear by his next post on the subject:
On December 15 2012 11:47 DarthPunk wrote:
Holy shit. Djo be scummy. Look at that un-OMGUS as soon as Hapa unvotes. also. Both his votes have been weak as shit.
Djo. Are scum or town less likely to read the OP?
Holy shit. Djo be scummy. Look at that un-OMGUS as soon as Hapa unvotes. also. Both his votes have been weak as shit.
Djo. Are scum or town less likely to read the OP?
This sounds so desperate to me. It's very clear by now that the argument between me and Djo is simply a misunderstanding of the OP, yet DP twists the hell out of his words and flips a shit.
Other Stuff:
Firstly, DP's first post:
On December 15 2012 08:48 DarthPunk wrote:
sup kids. I hate policy talk. That is my policy. I am vanilla town.
sup kids. I hate policy talk. That is my policy. I am vanilla town.
The only purpose of this post is to stifle discussion. There's zero reason you should be so against policy talk before it even starts.
Secondly, when I vote him - mind you I'm the ONLY person to be suspicious of him so far - he whines about it:
On December 15 2012 11:55 DarthPunk wrote:
Fuck I hate playing town. People always want to lynch me day one.
Source: my last three town games. and this game.
Fuck I hate playing town. People always want to lynch me day one.
Source: my last three town games. and this game.
The whining is completely disproportionate to the suspicion put on him. In addition, DP doesn't hate playing town. Fact.
On December 15 2012 12:10 DarthPunk wrote:
No. the vote wasn't for voting against your plan. It was for voting you when there was absolutely no reason for you to be scum. I didn't really care about the plan at all.
It was also for being an idiot about not sharing town reads.
I didn't change the reason Ivoted for him. The reason I voted him still stands regardless of the fate of your 'idea' he was voting you for absolutely no reason and was justifying it with something that was not alignment indicative.
The thing I noted later was not the 'new' reason for my vote but an ADDITIONAL reason.
Also whining is not alignment indicative. Which you should well know. I whined as town in Mario.
Your case is a dog that needs to be put down. I actually can't see town hapa making a case this horrible. But I have seen scum hapa make shitty cases like this.
##unvote
##vote: hapa
On December 15 2012 12:02 Hapahauli wrote:
Well the problem is that DP tunneled you (Djo) without having ever even asked or cared about one of the key points he found you scummy for. DP found you initially scummy because he seemingly believed that a 10/3 setup was achievable.
But as it turns out, Djo was right. And then DP turns around and completely forgets about it and tunnels him for the opposite.
But on top of all this, he has one vote on him, and he's already whining...
Lynch this sucker. He's scum.
Well the problem is that DP tunneled you (Djo) without having ever even asked or cared about one of the key points he found you scummy for. DP found you initially scummy because he seemingly believed that a 10/3 setup was achievable.
On December 15 2012 11:05 DarthPunk wrote:
Wow your an idiot.
##Vote: Djodref.
Votes Zentor for meaningless self vote. That was obviously meaningless.
Doesn't want to give town reads which is just ridiculous.
Votes for Hapa whom actually brings up a really good point. 13-3 all vt all goon is actually super town favored.
There is no way a rational townie could believe hapa is scum based on the game so far.
So either Djo is being retarded or he is scum. Either way that is enough to get my vote day one.
On December 15 2012 10:55 Djodref wrote:
You can only vote for one no-vote.
Do you have even Witchcraft vote Hapa ? Maybe you would be more interested in the way you have to use them if you did ?
##Unvote
##Vote Hapa
On December 15 2012 10:49 Hapahauli wrote:
The thing is that you can't live in fear of things like that. I mean when it really comes down to it... who cares about blue roles? A town can win without blues. All we can do is play the game and try to find mafia. If someone gets shot, so be it.
In fact I'm half tempted at this point to have a policy of never voting blues. That way, we'd have a 10-3 setup of 3 mafia goons vs 10 VTs, which IMO is town favored.
On December 15 2012 10:44 Djodref wrote:
Yeah, okay, but I really think that we should avoid it if we can.
I know it's going to be very difficult, but we have to refrain ourselves from doing it while the Witch Hunter is alive...
Yeah, okay, but I really think that we should avoid it if we can.
I know it's going to be very difficult, but we have to refrain ourselves from doing it while the Witch Hunter is alive...
The thing is that you can't live in fear of things like that. I mean when it really comes down to it... who cares about blue roles? A town can win without blues. All we can do is play the game and try to find mafia. If someone gets shot, so be it.
In fact I'm half tempted at this point to have a policy of never voting blues. That way, we'd have a 10-3 setup of 3 mafia goons vs 10 VTs, which IMO is town favored.
You can only vote for one no-vote.
Do you have even Witchcraft vote Hapa ? Maybe you would be more interested in the way you have to use them if you did ?
##Unvote
##Vote Hapa
Wow your an idiot.
##Vote: Djodref.
Votes Zentor for meaningless self vote. That was obviously meaningless.
Doesn't want to give town reads which is just ridiculous.
Votes for Hapa whom actually brings up a really good point. 13-3 all vt all goon is actually super town favored.
There is no way a rational townie could believe hapa is scum based on the game so far.
So either Djo is being retarded or he is scum. Either way that is enough to get my vote day one.
But as it turns out, Djo was right. And then DP turns around and completely forgets about it and tunnels him for the opposite.
On December 15 2012 11:47 DarthPunk wrote:
Holy shit. Djo be scummy. Look at that un-OMGUS as soon as Hapa unvotes. also. Both his votes have been weak as shit.
Djo. Are scum or town less likely to read the OP?
Holy shit. Djo be scummy. Look at that un-OMGUS as soon as Hapa unvotes. also. Both his votes have been weak as shit.
Djo. Are scum or town less likely to read the OP?
But on top of all this, he has one vote on him, and he's already whining...
On December 15 2012 11:55 DarthPunk wrote:
Fuck I hate playing town. People always want to lynch me day one.
Source: my last three town games. and this game.
Fuck I hate playing town. People always want to lynch me day one.
Source: my last three town games. and this game.
Lynch this sucker. He's scum.
No. the vote wasn't for voting against your plan. It was for voting you when there was absolutely no reason for you to be scum. I didn't really care about the plan at all.
It was also for being an idiot about not sharing town reads.
I didn't change the reason Ivoted for him. The reason I voted him still stands regardless of the fate of your 'idea' he was voting you for absolutely no reason and was justifying it with something that was not alignment indicative.
The thing I noted later was not the 'new' reason for my vote but an ADDITIONAL reason.
Also whining is not alignment indicative. Which you should well know. I whined as town in Mario.
Your case is a dog that needs to be put down. I actually can't see town hapa making a case this horrible. But I have seen scum hapa make shitty cases like this.
##unvote
##vote: hapa
On December 15 2012 12:51 thrawn2112 wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote Darthpunk
##Unvote
##Vote Darthpunk
........hello?
For that matter, I already mentioned that I was back meaning I'm done with the catching up and I wasn't satisfied with the lack or MRCC = scum attention below: ie You don't have a good rebutal ie you're scum
On December 19 2012 00:11 JieXian wrote:
Ok now that I'm back, why is everyone forgetting MrCC?
##Vote MrCheeseCake
My case is based on the scumminess in his attitude towards thrawn. I feel very tired repeating myself to scum because they aren't in the position to listen because it involves claiming to be scum.
and his defense was exactly why he was scummy in the first place
MrCC dropped it before people were even around to post their thoughts
Ok now that I'm back, why is everyone forgetting MrCC?
##Vote MrCheeseCake
My case is based on the scumminess in his attitude towards thrawn. I feel very tired repeating myself to scum because they aren't in the position to listen because it involves claiming to be scum.
On December 18 2012 01:03 JieXian wrote:
let's look at your justifications on your vote for morbid
L O fucking L
Here are my reasons to vote for thrawn
Do you know what happened after you posted the case on thrawn?
you chatted with eywa against going for hapa
and GAVE UP
No one influential came in to discredit you yet -- neither hapa nor DP. And you shove away the only person who agreed with you = me
On December 18 2012 00:48 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I made a case on thrawn. I dropped it because nobody else wanted to lynch him. Getting 6 other votes onto him would have been impossible. You "push it".. that's one vote. I get my vote off Morb and risk a no-lynch. I want to lynch somebody and not nobody.
I called him a random ass person because you have no reason to vote him, I do.
On December 18 2012 00:47 JieXian wrote:
Mrcc care to explain all that?
Makes a case on thrawn -> drops it -> I push it -> claims he's not talking to me -> said he'd lynch thrawn -> calls him a random ass person
HELLO?
On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why.
If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why.
On December 17 2012 06:02 JieXian wrote:
well you did post a case against the random ass person
On December 17 2012 05:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
And onto any other random ass person?
Rofl.
On December 17 2012 05:58 JieXian wrote:
You seriously should have read my filter wth
I'm trying to swing the vote away from morbid
shit
On December 17 2012 05:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Lol JX, what reason do you have to vote thrawn? Also, didn't you think I was scum? Why would you agree with me.
Lol JX, what reason do you have to vote thrawn? Also, didn't you think I was scum? Why would you agree with me.
You seriously should have read my filter wth
I'm trying to swing the vote away from morbid
shit
And onto any other random ass person?
Rofl.
well you did post a case against the random ass person
On December 17 2012 05:53 JieXian wrote:
Ok join me
#Vote thrawn2122
On December 17 2012 05:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WANTS TO BRO, WHAT U WANT FROM ME.
If anyone else wants to vote thrawn, please do so.
On December 17 2012 05:42 JieXian wrote:
shit
it was about the acoltye = townie not a scumslip thing
morbid is a bad idea I'm down for a mrcc lynch
WHY ARENT YOU LYNCHING THRAWN NOW THEN?
shit
it was about the acoltye = townie not a scumslip thing
morbid is a bad idea I'm down for a mrcc lynch
On December 17 2012 03:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
[quote]
Jx, you're really paranoid.
If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why.
[quote]
Jx, you're really paranoid.
If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why.
WHY ARENT YOU LYNCHING THRAWN NOW THEN?
BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WANTS TO BRO, WHAT U WANT FROM ME.
If anyone else wants to vote thrawn, please do so.
Ok join me
#Vote thrawn2122
Mrcc care to explain all that?
Makes a case on thrawn -> drops it -> I push it -> claims he's not talking to me -> said he'd lynch thrawn -> calls him a random ass person
HELLO?
I made a case on thrawn. I dropped it because nobody else wanted to lynch him. Getting 6 other votes onto him would have been impossible. You "push it".. that's one vote. I get my vote off Morb and risk a no-lynch. I want to lynch somebody and not nobody.
I called him a random ass person because you have no reason to vote him, I do.
let's look at your justifications on your vote for morbid
On December 17 2012 02:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Ill think about it honey.
On December 17 2012 02:58 kushm4sta wrote:
cheesey baby, will you lurker lynch with me? morbidus sound good?
cheesey baby, will you lurker lynch with me? morbidus sound good?
Ill think about it honey.
On December 17 2012 04:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Fuck it, may as well...
##Unvote
##Vote Morbidius
Fuck it, may as well...
##Unvote
##Vote Morbidius
L O fucking L
Here are my reasons to vote for thrawn
On December 16 2012 23:53 JieXian wrote:
hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it
I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative
Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him.
On December 16 2012 20:47 thrawn2112 wrote:
lol you should have just called it a scum slip if that's what you're trying to imply
my read on zentor is still null.
On December 16 2012 20:45 JieXian wrote:
Your inference is based on the assumption/information that he's townie
On December 16 2012 20:40 thrawn2112 wrote:
frustrating, uncooperative, etc
frustrating, uncooperative, etc
Your inference is based on the assumption/information that he's townie
lol you should have just called it a scum slip if that's what you're trying to imply
my read on zentor is still null.
hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it
I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative
Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him.
On December 17 2012 02:52 JieXian wrote:
read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply
On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Yes we need a vote count.
I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?
On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote:
we really need a vote count...
We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch.
Who are teh viable lynches at this point?
Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?
we really need a vote count...
We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch.
Who are teh viable lynches at this point?
Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?
Yes we need a vote count.
I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?
read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply
On December 17 2012 02:54 JieXian wrote:
I'll do it for you
I'll do it for you
On December 16 2012 23:53 JieXian wrote:
hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it
I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative
Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him.
and hapa, I've changed my mind about providing reads on those 3 people and I think I shouldn't post read on them for now.
For now the burning question is: What the hell are you contradicting yourself that badly?
I made the most controversial post here and instantly got 4-5 votes on me. You yourself thought my reads were terrible
On December 16 2012 20:47 thrawn2112 wrote:
lol you should have just called it a scum slip if that's what you're trying to imply
my read on zentor is still null.
On December 16 2012 20:45 JieXian wrote:
Your inference is based on the assumption/information that he's townie
On December 16 2012 20:40 thrawn2112 wrote:
frustrating, uncooperative, etc
frustrating, uncooperative, etc
Your inference is based on the assumption/information that he's townie
lol you should have just called it a scum slip if that's what you're trying to imply
my read on zentor is still null.
hahaha :D just probing man but now that you've mentioned it
I can imagine the mafia QT to be you asking him to post something and being all frustrated because he's so uncooperative
Reading through your filter I can see NOT ONE single post of you asking him to "participate". I see one from drazak. All you did was say you had a null vote and attack me and kush who were directing attention towards him.
and hapa, I've changed my mind about providing reads on those 3 people and I think I shouldn't post read on them for now.
For now the burning question is: What the hell are you contradicting yourself that badly?
I made the most controversial post here and instantly got 4-5 votes on me. You yourself thought my reads were terrible
Do you know what happened after you posted the case on thrawn?
you chatted with eywa against going for hapa
On December 17 2012 02:03 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Town want to convince others that their top scumread is actually scum. Presenting a case with justification does that. Parking your vote on Hapa and telling people to go searching on their own isn't going to convince people.
On December 17 2012 02:00 Eywa- wrote:
Because people who play are meant to read the thread, I made the point of "why", if you read you'll understand the justification. Whether or not you agree is up to you.
On December 17 2012 01:53 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Why don't you make a case, then, if it's scummy behavior?
On December 17 2012 01:44 Eywa- wrote:
Just read up, he's hopped onto about 4-5 different people for no other reason than it seemed to be a good idea based on one previous post or because someone said it was a good idea.
On December 17 2012 01:34 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Care to elaborate?
Care to elaborate?
Just read up, he's hopped onto about 4-5 different people for no other reason than it seemed to be a good idea based on one previous post or because someone said it was a good idea.
Why don't you make a case, then, if it's scummy behavior?
Because people who play are meant to read the thread, I made the point of "why", if you read you'll understand the justification. Whether or not you agree is up to you.
Town want to convince others that their top scumread is actually scum. Presenting a case with justification does that. Parking your vote on Hapa and telling people to go searching on their own isn't going to convince people.
On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Yes we need a vote count.
I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?
On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote:
we really need a vote count...
We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch.
Who are teh viable lynches at this point?
Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?
we really need a vote count...
We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch.
Who are teh viable lynches at this point?
Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?
Yes we need a vote count.
I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?
and GAVE UP
No one influential came in to discredit you yet -- neither hapa nor DP. And you shove away the only person who agreed with you = me
and his defense was exactly why he was scummy in the first place
On December 18 2012 00:48 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I made a case on thrawn. I dropped it because nobody else wanted to lynch him. Getting 6 other votes onto him would have been impossible. You "push it".. that's one vote. I get my vote off Morb and risk a no-lynch. I want to lynch somebody and not nobody.
I called him a random ass person because you have no reason to vote him, I do.
I made a case on thrawn. I dropped it because nobody else wanted to lynch him. Getting 6 other votes onto him would have been impossible. You "push it".. that's one vote. I get my vote off Morb and risk a no-lynch. I want to lynch somebody and not nobody.
I called him a random ass person because you have no reason to vote him, I do.
MrCC dropped it before people were even around to post their thoughts
I'm down for a hapa or mrcc lynch, now let me address the voting
I already told you I dropped it because there was a .1% chance of 6 other people going for the lynch in that frame of time. Don't know what else to tell you.
lol? Just note the time everyone (it's in chronological order):
On December 16 2012 08:25 Blazinghand wrote:
Vote Count!
Jiexian (6) - thrawn2112, DarthPunk, DoYouHas, MrZentor, Hapahauli, Morbidius
Morbidius (1) - Drazak
The deadline is in 21.5 hours at Sunday, Dec 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) aka 21:00 GMT (+00:00). Please make sure to vote and to cast your secret witchcraft votes by then. Anyone who has not voted by the end of the day will be subject to moderator action.
Vote Count!
Jiexian (6) - thrawn2112, DarthPunk, DoYouHas, MrZentor, Hapahauli, Morbidius
Morbidius (1) - Drazak
The deadline is in 21.5 hours at Sunday, Dec 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) aka 21:00 GMT (+00:00). Please make sure to vote and to cast your secret witchcraft votes by then. Anyone who has not voted by the end of the day will be subject to moderator action.
On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Yes we need a vote count.
I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?
Show nested quote +
On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote:
we really need a vote count...
We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch.
Who are teh viable lynches at this point?
Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?
we really need a vote count...
We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch.
Who are teh viable lynches at this point?
Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?
Yes we need a vote count.
I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?
On December 17 2012 04:37 DarthPunk wrote:
yeah. I just woke up. I really don't want to lynch Jiexian right now. I'm thinking we all consolidate onto Morbidius.
##unvote
##Vote: Morbidus
yeah. I just woke up. I really don't want to lynch Jiexian right now. I'm thinking we all consolidate onto Morbidius.
##unvote
##Vote: Morbidus
On December 17 2012 05:41 Blazinghand wrote:
Vote Count!
Morbidius (7) - Drazak, MrZentor, DP, kush, MrCheesecake, DoYouHas, threesr
Currently Morbidius is set to be lynched!
The deadline is in ~35 minutes at Sunday, Dec 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) aka 21:00 GMT (+00:00). Please make sure to vote and to cast your secret witchcraft votes by then. Anyone who has not voted by the end of the day will be subject to moderator action.
Vote Count!
Morbidius (7) - Drazak, MrZentor, DP, kush, MrCheesecake, DoYouHas, threesr
Currently Morbidius is set to be lynched!
The deadline is in ~35 minutes at Sunday, Dec 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) aka 21:00 GMT (+00:00). Please make sure to vote and to cast your secret witchcraft votes by then. Anyone who has not voted by the end of the day will be subject to moderator action.
A common trait in liars = they make up to many stories to remember them
