Liquid`

Team Liquid Liquipedia

EST 21:29
CET 03:29
KST 11:29

Forum Sidebar

Events/Features

I would like to say something about StarCraft (UMS) SWITCHEROO *New* /Destination Edit/ BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ What monitor do you use for playing Remastered? BW General Discussion

[BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET SLON Grand Finals – Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB SemiFinals - Saturday 21:00 CET

Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta

National Diversity: A Challe…

I decided to write a webnov…

James Bond movies ranking - pa…

StarCraft improvement

Newbie Mini Mafia XXXII

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 02 2012 02:54 GMT

#21

/in

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 02 2012 06:56 GMT

#36

I am just gonna have to rage at everyone I think, gotta keep my meta going.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 02 2012 07:22 GMT

#39

My goal will be to make someone cry this game.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 02 2012 23:46 GMT

#64

Make them scum team, I want to lynch oats for last game.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 01:41 GMT

#172

Got home from school early hurray.

This will be my third game, my first game was Mario Mini Mafia where we won as town, my second game was Newbie Mini Mafia XXXI where I lost as scum. On lurker lynch policy I am of the opinion you lynch top scum reads, that is the goal of the game after all. If someone lurking seriously becomes an issue then they can be dealt with at the adequate time.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 01:49 GMT

#177

That depends entirely on how much the person is lurking and many other factors. Point is enacting a lurker lynch is silly because if everyone says "Ok we will lynch lurkers" then why would mafia lurk? Trick question - they wouldn't. The goal is to find scum - anyone putting any other objective above this is suspect to me.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 01:51 GMT

#180

Not sure why so many of you are hung up on discussing lurker lynch, say what you have to say and move on as it is a pretty useless discussion in terms of trying to discern peoples roles.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 01:55 GMT

#182

Yes, that is why you say "don't lurk or else" and move on, not spend numerous pages discussing it and asking questions about policy lynching - spending tons of time discussing policy lynch is unproductive. As soon as everyone agrees that lurking will make people seriously consider lynching you move on.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 01:58 GMT

#186

There is no bad argument around policy lynching yamato. Either you agree with policy lynches or you don't. I said I agree to them to the extent that if someone is lurking beyond what I deem acceptably then I would consider them, but overall scum reads take priority. I don't really like how hung up you are on arguing about policy lynches.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 01:59 GMT

#187

I said what I had to say about it, if you don't like my answer that is not my problem. I am going after top scum reads, if a lurker is one of my scum reads that is just an added bonus. If I have no real scum reads that I am comfortable lynching then I will lynch a lurker sure.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:04 GMT

#190

Rephrase your question, it makes no sense to me. I am saying that if I have a strong scum read on someone I am pushing that read over a lurker lynch, but if I have no strong read I would be fine with a lurker lynch. I have no idea if I will get a scum read or if I get one how strong it will be, there isn't enough to go on yet.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:06 GMT

#192

O yeah that reminds me, I am down for lynching Oats due to his play last game. Anyone else?

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:06 GMT

#193

jkjk

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:09 GMT

#197

Which would be true.

Sort of jkjk

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:12 GMT

#201

Yeah I was going to ask if I was the only one who had a hard time reading anything axle posted, seems I am not alone.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:12 GMT

#202

@ Rad

That my friend is what we call a joke, hence that post directly under it that says "jkjk"

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:17 GMT

#210

Yamato has it pretty much right. I have a bad habit of going after things which I deem dumb, but dumb doesn't mean scum.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:18 GMT

#212

@Rad

So if I was actually serious about what I had said what would you have done?

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:19 GMT

#215

Oats why are you taking what people say to the extremes? You did it with me now you do it to jidol.

Kickstart

United States1941 Posts

December 04 2012 02:32 GMT

#227

What cheese just asked is what I was getting at Rad, I was being a bit more subtle but you just kind of brushed it away after I questioned you about it. I wanted to see if what I had said would have made you try and push me as a scum read.

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh

Refresh

Next event in 1d 10h

[ Submit Event ]

Refresh

StarCraft 2

PiGStarcraft473
Nathanias

149

StarCraft: Brood War

75
NaDa

25

Dota 2

League of Legends

Counter-Strike

tarik_tv4544
m0e_tv321

Other Games

summit1g5716
Sick193
Mew2King64
febbydoto29

Organizations

Other Games

gamesdonequick968

StarCraft 2

Blizzard YouTube

StarCraft: Brood War

BSLTrovo
sctven

[ Show 18 non-featured ]

Upcoming Events

OSC

1d 10h

Korean StarCraft League

2 days

OSC

2 days

IPSL

2 days

Dewalt vs Bonyth

OSC

2 days

OSC

3 days

uThermal 2v2 Circuit

3 days

Replay Cast

4 days

Patches Events

4 days

1.

ByuN
2.

TY
3.

Dark
4.

Solar
5.

6.

sOs
8.

soO
9.

1.

Rain
2.

Flash
3.

5.

Bisu
6.

Mini
8.

Sidebar Settings...