|
On December 06 2012 10:37 Kickstart wrote:LOL just read the flavor text. Oats: "I am a fireman" Prom: "then why is there no fireman hat" Show nested quote +On December 06 2012 09:35 Oatsmaster wrote: I am Tommy the Fireman Dont mislynch me off nothing. roflrofl
I was impressed at how fast that flavor text appeared. GJ hosts.
|
I'll be tunneling Yamato when I get home tomorrow. I'm sure Kickstart will be rolling over Rad.
|
On December 06 2012 12:02 yamato77 wrote: If you get too annoying with your "tunnel" of me I'm liable to ignore you. Just a heads up.
Okay, scum. We'll see.
|
Because of the red flip...
At first I thought you were just town going crazy, which is entirely still possible because it's you.
But you kept calling Oat's efforts "town-motivated" and shit, so I'm rethinking it.
|
>Null read causing OMGUS, lol.
|
On December 06 2012 12:31 yamato77 wrote: Like I said before my opinion of Oats at the time I said those things was positive because he was pressuring a player I thought was suspicious. In hindsight, I see how he was just scum trolling the thread. I am apparently highly susceptible to this.
Yeah, don't get worried about my tunneling--I'm just going to bring up stuff that's really awkward. I think you tend to get a read of someone then stick to it a bit much -- so you may want to reconsider some things going into tonight and D2 (if thouest live). How the votes went, who pressured who, who didn't have much interaction with Oats, etc.
We've got plenty of time, I don't see how we could really lose the game at this point unless we fuck it up real good (bad?).
|
On December 06 2012 12:34 yamato77 wrote: Also, I used OMGUS as a term to describe a reaction to an unfavorable read. I think you've done a good job making people see you as town this game so me not seeing you town could have caused your reaction.
Nah, it's cool, be suspect of me if you like I completely understand. Don't trust anyone. They're all lying scum.
|
On December 06 2012 14:18 AxleGreaser wrote: I have question.
If I vote do people want to see the argument or just the vote?
The argument.
|
Should we just get rid of him tomorrow? I mean, it's a coin flip either way. Better than killing ourselves I guess.
Although, he probably doesn't know how to send in night actions if he's scum. He probably couldn't find his way to the scumQT.
|
@Kick
You forgot the part where Yamato was rolling his face over me for criticizing Oat's shitty case. Point
On December 05 2012 03:02 yamato77 wrote: Ok, so you agree that Oats could conceivably find kick suspicious? Then you are basically only disagreeing with his method of applying pressure which is a stylistic choice. Why criticise Oats for making a town favored play if you think it might actually catch scum?
Unless, that is, you know kick isn't scum.
Implying Oats was at all town favored.
I'm leaning towards Yamato for the last scum. Imo Rad actually thought you were scum--I found him slightly suspect at first, but now I'm not so sure. Darn sure tries a hell of a lot harder to push your case. Ofc, I don't think the people who voted for Oats have a better chance at flipping scum, simply because scum did not need to bus Oats. Could have easily not voted for him and went for the no-lynch. Especially Arn, he could have simply just not voted Oats and been done with it.
|
I still have no idea why Yamato insisted that we shit up the thread with that 2 page long conversation where he just attacks me for telling Oats his arguments weren't that valid in a case against you. He kept going "Omg it's just a pressure play, y u mad about it?" How did he know it was JUST a pressure play and not a real case?
|
On December 05 2012 01:33 yamato77 wrote: Oats I don't understand how you say you have a scum read on me and then attack kick for the same read.
Actually, i just found this quote so IDK if you were in the team with Oats. Scum usually don't point out stuff like that to each other (in the QT, they would, not in the thread).
Being all flip floppy right now.
That said, scum usually have difficulty keep the same read on their partner. They can fake reads for the rest of the town, but when it comes to their scumbuddy they typically have difficulty reading where they stand in the thread. A bunch of WIFOM, I know.
Also, Oats said that lynching him for 180ing his read on you was stupid >.>.
|
On December 07 2012 06:15 yamato77 wrote: Also, nice opportunistic timing on posting that. Wait until kick posts his suspicion of me and then throw some weak WIFOM association bullshit on top of it.
Association cases are valid atm because we have a red flip. Don't get all butthurt plx.
|
Us 3 are the only really active ones in the thread either way, lol. Don't expect much from anyone else :p
|
Make you less suspicious of me? All I'm doing is giving a bunch of random stuff that could make the Oats/yamato scumteam make sense... some stuff just doesn't fit.
|
On December 07 2012 07:23 Rad wrote: Sorry I have to be a lurker during the day guys, I have to work =/ I'm much more active at night. Posting a lot during the day (when I'm working) in past games made me wonder if I should even play this game at all (and is why I skipped last newbie), so I'm really forcing myself to not get too drawn into it until I'm done working for the day.
Please take note though that yamato and I are most suspicious right now because we've put ourselves out there for town scrutiny. Had either of us lurked and throw out our opinions sparingly and jumped on the oats train, we'd be in the same position as the other lurkers. Both of us, instead, interacted, made our thoughts known, and stuck to them.
Take that however you will, but I'm getting an angry townie feel from yamato, the same one as your last game. He's given that same exact vibe for most of this game. I think it's especially interesting that he's not convinced in town CC. Talk about picking the hardest target to throw suspicion on...
Ugh, that's the read I've had on Yamato entire D1 and it infuriates me hehe. Still can't trust you though, sorry Raddy boy. I just don't see why mafia would bus their own guy D1 when they could have easily went for no-lynch. First two were lurkers who sheeped off my case, and then arn went off syl when I told him he didn't care about the lynch. Could be them I guess, but what's the point in getting your own dude lynched D1 when you could be in a way better position D2?
|
I guess that's true Rad. Lurkers be lurking like cray cray. Jidol came in randomly to put his vote, sylencia gave the whole post with reads and shit on it, then voted Oats. That was the 4th vote which almost tipped the tide--maybe they thought his lynch would be inevitable with us 2 and a lurker on him. Could that read post be a bus?
|
Kick, you're an expert at obvious busses, what's your thought on the lurkers that voted for Oats?
:3
|
Ugh, the next lynch I have a feel is going to be a shitfest.
|
Look at Arn's voting behavior. He has it on Kick, then when he realizes Kick will probably not be lynched, he unvotes. Then he votes the most suspicious lurker. Then he votes Oats after I call him out for not giving a fuck about who dies.
Idk. Blendy people are blendy.
|
|
|
|