EPTI am done talking to you scum, I am going to go back to making my case that will be up shortly.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXII - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
I am done talking to you scum, I am going to go back to making my case that will be up shortly. | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
Rad just made what has to be the scummiest play thus far this game. I showed earlier that his reaction to my joke post about voting Oats for a previous game could be a scum move (would like to note that I find it interesting that it was in regards to Oats, because as things currently are Oats and Rad are extremely scummy and it seems Oats started a shit wagon on me (as I pointed out earlier based on blatant lies)) and now Rad just hoped on in the most obviously scummy way. Earlier we had an exchange of posts, On December 04 2012 11:11 Rad wrote: You're down for lynching strictly based on his play from last game (where he was town) rather than scum hunting and lynching your biggest scum read? What exactly do you expect to get from this? That is him trying to form an easy wagon, though he quickly has to drop it because I am too hasty to point out that I clearly stated it was a joke. On December 04 2012 11:16 Rad wrote: @kick sorry missed the jkjk =/ I'm quick to jump on shit ideas ^^ Yes scum are often quick to jump on shit ideas. It is interesting that you say that you are quick to jump on shit ideas, then later in the game you immediately jump on my wagon for what can only be described as shit reasoning: On December 05 2012 14:03 Rad wrote: I'm curious, kick. Do you want to vote for people you think are scum, or people you think are dumb? (oh wait, we just found out the answer to that) ##Vote: Kickstart Now here I have Oats and Rad's best attempt at making a case on me. Now I encourage you to look at what they claim I have done, and then read my actual posts in the thread - doing this will show you that their cases on me are based on blatant misrepresentation. Note that I have pointed this out already to them, but they (mainly Oats as he is the most active, Rad is in and out of the thread and never really engages in much conversation thus far) are desperately trying to keep this wagon going. Their cases on me spoilered: + Show Spoiler + On December 05 2012 01:41 Rad wrote: I'm all caught up now. @kick Not sure what else to say to you about your concerns with me but TBH that's just my play style. I'm a bit embarrassed that I totally missed the jkjk but what happens is I read something really stupid and then feel the need to jump on it immediately. Feel free to glance over my previous games (XXIX and XXX) if you'd like to see this in action. @CC 1. "I have no idea who to lynch, but I can justify it because of this post!" - this hasn't happened, why even speculate that it will happen? What's the point of casting suspicion on me for something I haven't even done? 2. If kick's idea was sincere, I'd have major problems with it (as I've already said). My concern there was your quoting "shit idea" as if it wasn't one. I thought perhaps you read his idea differently than how I did, thus my question. 3. Kick literally FoS's yamato then immediately turns around and says "weeelll maybe I'm being too harsh, what's everyone else's thoughts?" Looks like useless trying to be useful. I wanted to get him to talk more about it instead of letting him push it back out onto everyone else. Thoughts so far: - leaning scum on kick - just my gut initial feeling, I'm going to focus more on looking into it when I have time after work tonight - leaning town on yamato - he's acting just like last game IMO, I feel like he'd have to change things up if he were scum - mind blown trying to understand axle, but I'm happy that he's trying now (his change feels super newbie town, so leaning town) and want to see where he goes with his oats discussion - leaning town on CC, I feel like he was much less confrontational in his scum game and he's asking good questions Other reads are pretty null Going to be fairly lurky today, until tonight when I'm off work and can focus on everything, but wanted to get this post out there in the meantime. I will try to get chances throughout the day to respond when possible. On December 05 2012 01:29 Oatsmaster wrote: Kickstart is scummy. Last game, we lynched lurkers and it didnt go too well, vets posted and said that its unlikely that a scum is a lurker and STILL Kickstart posts this. It reads as very wishy, washy allowing him to keep all his options open. Lynching a lurker is good for scum because it doesnt really show strong opinions either way because its a lurker, coinflippy. This vote is so bad, no explaination why this is scum.. Kickstart is looking for town support here, he doesnt want to vote yamato if no one else votes for him... His whole case on yamato is just him jumping on a small thing that he doesnt even explain how it is scum aligned or even aligned at all. ##Vote: Kickstart Now again it is important that you read what they claim I said, and then read what was actually said. A portion of my case against them is asking you to go back and read the discussion between us to see that the scum motivation that I have pointed out (their starting of a bad wagon and determination to keep it going) is really there and for that I apologize because I wish I could just post it all here but then I would be posting our entire filters. This isn't perhaps as comprehensive as I would have liked for reasons I already apologized for but if you have any questions or wish me to expand on anything please ask. | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
On December 05 2012 15:07 Arnarnion wrote: I'm becoming less and less sure about who is scum at this point, I am beginning to think that it may be possible that two sides of town have started going at it while scum can easily sit it out with having to contribute much. This heated debate is not producing much more meaningful information from either side and I think the conversation needs to calm down and be reconsidered, since there seems to be a lot of rash and reactionary voting going on, which I don't believe is productive to town. The thread is turning into a brawl, which will make it easier for scum to sheep a vote without much more reason than jidolboy gave. Given that, I myself am going to ##Unvote for the meantime until the conversation becomes a little more productive and informative. There is some truth to this Arn, but realize that scum will have to put their vote down at some point so what you have to do is evaluate the circumstances and reasoning they give for their vote. Like look at Rads vote on me, and you see someone who is just sheeping onto a wagon that is beyond weak - clear scum play. | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
I don't like that jidol gave no reasons, but I do think he is on the right side  . I would have to submit that him just throwing down a vote without even a word is not really what he should be doing, not sure if you can say it is scummy though because we have no idea what his motivation or intentions are. | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
When I get up I hope to see some responses to my case and I will answer questions or expand on things if asked. Again I know I asked a lot in terms of reading everything but doing so will show that their play thus far is extremely scummy. | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
Another point is that I jumped on Rad, Rad painted himself as the "easy target" and claims I just jumped on him. Lol, way to claim scum, scum. First of all, don't listen to his crap about being an easy target, then look at how he has played up until now as I have already pointed out; HE looks for an easy person to jump on, and he does it. He tried to jump on me almost out of the gate, then he jumps on me when there is a wagon on me already (had 2 votes on me), all he says is "why you make that vote blahblah" and throws a vote - scum play. The Axle vote was not even a serious vote, I have been very clear all along that I will lynch my top scum reads and I have been explicitly clear on who those were at any given time. Yamato and Rad began as my top reads now I have moved to Rad and Oats. Axle was annoying me because I could not understand a thing he was saying so I asked him to stopp, then when he didn't I threw a threat vote down (kind of the same thing I jumped on Yamato for I guess :D). | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
You voted on me for putting a vote on Axle but what have you neglected to mention anything about Yamato's vote on him? Too focused on your wagon to notice? | ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
|
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
He needs to start being serious and making posts that we can understand. | ||
| ||
