Our problem is you made an odd post that makes no sense from a town perspective. Town players are naturally suspicious of almost everyone, because we start out knowing nothing. The only people who start out with information and therefor are just inherently not suspicious of anyone are scum.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXII - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
Our problem is you made an odd post that makes no sense from a town perspective. Town players are naturally suspicious of almost everyone, because we start out knowing nothing. The only people who start out with information and therefor are just inherently not suspicious of anyone are scum. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
wat? | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
Because dumb. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
##Vote: AxleGreaser | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
##unvote ##Vote: Rad You were already scummy, you jumping on my wagon is all I need to tunnel you to shit till you are gone. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
The events we are discussing happened a few minutes ago and you want me to post a huge case on it already? Just shut up. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
To me it seems that Oats started a completely bogus wagon on me (his case was completely false, nothing about it was true). Now I have scummy feeling about him aside from this but him distorting (basically lying) about my posting to form a case on me doesn't do him any favors either. Now it seems Rad has been waiting for an opportunity to jump on me for awhile now. He tried to with my joke post, then once that got shot down he up and ditched the thread for awhile, but then immediately jumps in and throws a vote on me when he sees an opportunity to join his scumbuddies wagon. Am I on to something? | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
I encourage anyone to read my filter and compare it to Oats or Rads. Yes it have a bunch of ranting in it, but remember that while I have had to defend myself against two scum trying to start a wagon on me I have also been giving well reasoned reads on people, UNLIKE THEM. Oats and Rad have provided NO real substantive reads on anything. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
On December 05 2012 04:37 Kickstart wrote: Are you kids for real. I have a HUGE post on why exactly I was suspicious and why yamato got the FoS, but every one of you saying that my play is odd decided to completely ignore it. Yes when I posted the FoS and all that I didn't expand on why immediately but I gathered my thoughts and provided the most comprehensive post on my thoughts I could. FoS = finger of suspicion, meaning I was throwing out there that I found what yamato was doing to be suspicious, which I think I explained adequately. Oats has completely twisted my view on lurker lynch and what I said, I said that I will lynch scum reads over lurkers unless I have no solid reads. Don't know how he is able to twist what I say to suit his meaning as I thought I was very clear in what I thought about policy talk. If you are going to make a case against me for FoSing yamato, then you better start addressing the actual points I made (check the huge post I made about yamato and rad), otherwise I am going to ignore you. On December 05 2012 04:44 Kickstart wrote: Yeah reading Oats "case" on me is just infuriating, none of it is true at all. First he says I said I was fine with lynching lurkers, which I spent the whole beginning of the game arguing with every fucking person about saying I will lynch scum reads over lurkers, yet he claims I am being wishy-washy about it - right. They he says my "vote" is bad when all I did is throw out a FoS, and adequately explain it, and then I get shit for asking peoples opinions on what I have said? Yeah ok, because you haven't asked a million stupid questions about things but when I ask if anyone else felt the same about my read then I am suspicious. On December 05 2012 04:53 Kickstart wrote: Yeah I just have to stop reading what Oats said, it is too much bullshit. Before that stupid case he said I spent the entire early game talking about policy voting - this kid clearly did not read the thread and see what I had to say about it because at the time everyone was fucking crying their heads off that I said I am lynching scum reads over lurkers. Oats can you try and be less stupid and more productive than you were last game? So far you are doing a shit job if that is your goal. And this last one is actually in response to Arns "case" one me but it deals with the same false points that you are trying to push against me: On December 05 2012 11:57 Kickstart wrote: Since you asked kindly I will entertain you. Your first claim against me is that I am stalling. This is just untrue. I started out the game telling everyone to shut the hell up about policy talk and move on (but Oats said earlier in the thread that I was saying to just lynch whoever is lurking and it seems everyone just reads what he said about what I said (WHICH IS IN NO WAY ACCURATE AT ALL) and not even bother to look at my posts and see that that is the complete opposite of what I actually did.) Then, I tried to spur discussion by looking for things that I found suspicious and pointing them out to the thread (yamato and rad), and I made a larger post shortly after explaining my suspicions on both of them IN DETAIL. Now I made reads on people who a) no one was really suspicious of before (or at least no one had posted about) and b) are not one of the "easy targets" (there are several first timers here, some of whom are lurking, and I did not go after any of them) So how you can say I am stalling when I am bringing up new points against players who had no pressure at all on them is strange to me. You then call me wishy washy about my suspicion of Yamato. Maybe you should look up what wishy washy, because I have been nothing but firm with my stance that I found his interactions with Axl and his general posting up until that point to be suspicious. You then accuse me of trying to start a case on someone without providing anything to back it up (which is strange since right after you post my large post). I have given a more comprehensive post on why I have my suspicions than anyone thus far - so your accusation is just false. And finally you attack me for quoting myself and twist and contort the meaning of my post. Read my post, I was supportive but I also told him that he needs to be posting. Nowhere in that post was I being a kiss ass and trying to buy towny points from anyone. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
| ||