EPTYou really think a scum would do that d1????????????????????
Hero Mini Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
You really think a scum would do that d1???????????????????? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 03:58 Vivax wrote: Wtf, debears, I disagree with all three points. 1. It's not because he posted reads. It's how he posted reads. 2. BL has been able to blend in quite well so far, lately he's only been contributing when asked. 3. You think scum sheeps cases looking bad?So they can explain why they support them with their own reasonings? BUT HEY, WTF IS THIS: A Freudian misspelling?A scumslip?A stupid mistake?A town BL? Is there maybe another reason why you only suspected Adam for questioning thrawn while djodref was doing the same in the beginning? Do you want to grow some balls and actually call me scum? That's the town perspective. Clarity failed to address that his actions can be explained by a bored/lazy townie | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote: The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else. At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later. The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active. Clarity, if you think your case on jay is so good, why in the fuck are you not rallying people to jay?????? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:01 Clarity_nl wrote: He has a couple of one liners that aren't alignment indicative at all. Exactly. And that's the majority of his filter. Clarity here's the link to his filter, I don't think you've read it http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=384953&user=235418 There is only one big post in there. And he makes comments about three people Where are you getting this nonsense from? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:06 Clarity_nl wrote: Because a lot of people showed they disagreed and there is no momentum. I also don't have anything to add about jay since making that case, and repeating myself a lot seems pointless. I can easily revisit it tomorrow, today I want BL lynched. Lol. This is not a townie mindset at all You believe so strongly you are right? We have what, 6 hours til lynch? And you aren't pushing your lynch???????????????????????????????????????????????? The fuck>? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:09 Clarity_nl wrote: Read my goddamn case and stop burying it in your disjointed thoughts spread out over 5 posts. I say his filter shows he cares about his appearance too much. You say he clearly doesn't because he has one liners. I say his one liners aren't alignment indicative. You say his filter is only made up of one liners. BUT ITS FUCKING NOT, READ MY CASE yes it is On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote: So the very first thing BL does is post a massive "rapid fire scum reads and suspicions" that no one asked for. + Show Spoiler [giant post] + On December 10 2012 21:37 Bluelightz wrote: Alright, from reading the thread here's some rapid fire scum reads and suspicions - as well as answers after I play some games after posting this. Firstly, thrawn. What I find suspicious about him is that first, he only answers questions when pressured, this is an example of trying not to give information to town and because he has a bunch of one-liners in his filter. Also, shall we take a look at his vote? Oh, it's on WBG, why is it on WBG??? He says that WBG has rubbed him the scummiest out of all the responses, but I think his vote is justified, and thrawn's point is not. Because WBG says because his vote (at the time on thrawn) is because of LALiars, which is possibly true because we don't know thrawn's alignment and his intentions in doing that (although thrawn has explained why he claimed Miller, but in his explanation "It first was mostly a joke but it was also intended to jumpstart discussion", wait what? He's trying to shed a good light to his mostly bad action) Second, jaybrundage: It has been said by clarity already but how I think it is, it's a attempt to avoid pressure, also the sentence after: Does he give a bloody explanation on why thrawn is making a good case why he's scum? nope (so where's the info we can discuss bro?). Piggybacking other people's opinion and not giving one's own: Not giving information to the discussion. Also, lastly, I don't understand why he keeps pressuring thrawn for a response, is thrawn's response so pivotal to him? This along with clarity's case, I will vote jaybrundage. ##vote: jaybrundage So on my simple one post suspicions: Why, everyone knows that chances suck balls in mafia correct? This is as same as lying to be frank (does he know more than we do? Does he know more shit so he can base his 80% chance that Palmar is scum? Is this just an attempt to get a good town player d34d through the lynch?) Dude... Its not whether we believe you. Your lying simple. Not a single persons believes your claim its about why are you lying. For no damn reason. And what purpose would town have to do that. It only makes sense from a mafia perspective He says: 1) There's no town mindset in saying it 2) There's a lot of scum mindset Yet, he keeps warning thrawn he'll get lynch if he keeps it up. And the wishy-washiness despite having said the above "Hey he found it but I'll explain this thing he found!" Doesn't bother to read jaybrundage's filter, but simply describes what jay said in his post. Okay game time. Gonna drop my vote off in the voting thread The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else. At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later. The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active. Here is his voteswitch. First off, he doesn't mention why he switched away from Jay. When prompted he answered: Notice the phrasing. He's "losing confidence in his lynch." Because of him "losing confidence" he switches to Adam. He explains why: "Because he will probably be the lynch and because Palmar and my reasons" Since I didn't know his reasons, I asked him what they were. He responded by quoting one of his older posts: But in this post he is not calling Adam scummy. He is calling what he said "strange". Completely non-committal like anything else he's done. This is the second time he sheeped someone but tried to appear as if he wasn't sheeping. Scum cares about their appearance a hell of a lot more than town, and BL has made it quite clear how worried he is. He makes a giant post before leaving for 24 hours to appear active, he then sheeps people but tries to appear as if he's not sheeping. Bluelightz is scum. ##Vote Bluelightz Oh wait i'm sorry There's one big post (which I already mentioned. The post mentions 3 people) I SEE THREE TWO LINERS IN YOUR CASE. WOWOWOWO MY BAD 2 LINERS MAKE ALL THE WORLD OF A DIFFERENCE | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:11 Clarity_nl wrote: I am pushing my lynch, my lynch changed. How is this hard to understand? Lol. You are making no sense right now. Jay has been the second leading candidate behind adam for most of the time. Now, you suddenly want to lynch bluelights when you believe your jay case is so good? Which case do you think is better? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:14 Vivax wrote: Derpbears, push your case against Adam and stop diluting this thread with your mental diarrhea. You're most likely getting your Adam lynch done, why the fuck are you so concerned with two votes on BL? Because I want Adam lynched. And this kind of shit wagon is something that I don't want ruining an Adam lynch | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:16 Clarity_nl wrote: Jay has been the person with the 2nd most votes. Doesn't make him a likely lynch. There was no momentum on him. My BL case is better or I wouldn't have my vote on him. Lol. Wow. I don't understand how you can see posting one liners as caring too much about your appearance. That doesn't make sense. BL is doing exactly what would get him attention, something which scum usually don't want. He's posting one (and two  ) liners and then sheeping like crazy with shitty reasoning. In other words, he obviously doesn't give a shit how the town views him.If you want to lynch BL for doing nothing for town, that's better reasoning. The problem with that is munk-e, tunkeg, jay, and VE all have been afk as fuck d1. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:20 Clarity_nl wrote: Stop twisting my words and stop repeating yourself. Read my case. If you had you would know why I think he cares too much about his appearance. I'm not twisting your words. I'm telling you exactly how it is. but w/e let the vets knock some sense into you | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 05:27 thrawn2112 wrote: how does everyone seriously feel about a lurker lynch? Considering adam, tunkeg, and jay are lurkers, then I'd say pretty good and thrawn, what do you mean by irrational? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 05:37 thrawn2112 wrote: You've made mistakes in logic this game that I don't expect from you. You've also been a weird mix of sometimes angry and sometimes detached. logical mistakes - such as? detached - such as? | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
hahahaha thats hilarious | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On December 12 2012 07:39 VisceraEyes wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: Adam Baaaaaaahhhhh. Myes, myes. Good, good. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Count me in as 3 :D | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
| ||
