Hero Mini Mafia - Page 10
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
Just from looking at munke's filter I'm surprised that hapa hasn't received that much attention. Everything munke said was scummy. Here's his first entrance into the thread: On December 11 2012 00:41 Munk-E wrote: Good morning and hello, everyone! I will be doing a more in depth reading of the thread, but for now, WBG, how on earth did you figure palmer was more likely to be scum than anyone? You said there were 5 people that hadn't participated yet, yet palmer, being one of them had a 2/3rds chance of being scum. Did you sleep through math class, or do you actually have some explaination to back that up? The tone of the post seems fake. At first he acts really friendly and talks about how he's going to do a more in depth reading of the thread... which is implying that he has at least read the thread. And he decides to attack wbg over the stupid wbg 80% remark? He even insults wbg ("did you sleep through math class") so he is pretty committed to this line of questioning. The 80% stuff is a scum topic and he's all the more scummier for it because it was the only thing he talked about. I point some of this out to him and then he posts: On December 11 2012 01:02 Munk-E wrote: I just find it strange how he went from maybe or maybe not policy voting you,(he didn't make it clear either way, which seems like a way to cover his ass in case he made a mistake) to very heavily and arbitrarily tunneling palmer, with no evidence when he had 5 people with the exact same case against them. It doesn't make any sense to me. I mean, he goes from out of nowhere accusing palmer saying he's 80% sure he's mafia, based on absolutely nothing, to when people ask him about it saying "woah, I didn't say i was certain he was scum" Then he lowers the percentage of palmer being scum, probably so if he flips town, he doesn't seem as guilty. It just seems weird to me. He talks about other stuff that makes wbg scummy... why didn't he mention this in his first post about wbg? And the new argument for the accusation he made about the 80% stuff was awful. After all of that his read onw wbg totaled up to "It just seems weird to me." Later on Munke posts: On December 11 2012 01:44 Munk-E wrote:as for WBG, the more i think about it, the more I think he's more likely to be town. If he was scum, this play would either be to bus palmer if he's scum, which would be stupid and unnecessary, or to try to start a bandwagon on him if he's town, which would most likely be futile. He could be trying to appear to be an aggressive scumhunter, attacking harmless enemies though, so he seems town, but then again, aggressive scumhunting seems town. I see his logic now, but it is flawed. I highly doubt that all the scum were lurkers. So now he goes back on his non committal wbg read using a wifom argument and now we're at 0 reads for wbg. He also throws in the completely irrelevant line about not all scum being lurkers.... how does this help us? Then there's his final post, his vote for adam: On December 12 2012 09:45 Munk-E wrote: Woah. Remember that we need 9 votes to lynch someone. With only a half hour left, it's probably too late to start a counter wagon. Even if jay seems more likely than adam, Adam is still worth your vote more. With 9 votes exactly on him, I'm worried that a last second band wagon gives any scum buddies he might have trying to bus him a legitimate reason to turn today into a no lynch. ##VOTE Adam4167 "Woah?" Lol. Is he sitting at his computer reeling in shock thinking about possible last minute scum shenanigans? He hasn't said anything at all about any other player than wbg but he says this important part: On December 12 2012 09:45 Munk-E wrote:With 9 votes exactly on him, I'm worried that a last second band wagon gives any scum buddies he might have trying to bus him a legitimate reason to turn today into a no lynch. ##VOTE Adam4167 I do not believe that a guy who's only contributions to the thread are making a half accusation against wbg which he later takes back and a comment about scum not being lurkers would be so sure and concerned about adam's lynch. He even talks about potential scumbuddies.... which reveals his underlying knowledge of adam's alignment. coming soon - part 2: hapa | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On December 18 2012 08:08 Hapahauli wrote: Well it is rather risky given he's one counter-claim away from an insta-lynch. I wouldn't dismiss his claim as an outright lie until I see some more from him. scum already tried to claim vigi | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
djo just looks really townie lately... what he's done lately is what he would be doing if he's town | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
| ||