EPTThis may be my shining achievement when it comes to mafia cases.
Chrono Trigger Mafia - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
This may be my shining achievement when it comes to mafia cases. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Austin, I'd like to hear if you have any thoughts on S&B, nuke, VE and hap, or maybe just a couple of these individuals if you don't have the time. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On December 03 2012 07:06 TheChronicler wrote: Holy shit I hadn't voted. That was close. Posting this cycle would be kinda nice too. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
What were you planning before? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
 Phagga, if you're not golem, would you mind revealing your actual role name? The reason I asked S&B to commit to checking you is because I couldn't come up with anything else that matches the flavor. Still waiting for VE to reveal the reasoning for his night action. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On December 03 2012 21:56 Acrofales wrote: Additionally, from the OP: @Kita: I find it amazing you would believe SnB regardless of the result. However, as it stands, Syllo says he visited Djodref. I vote we lynch SnB and if he flips scum, we lynch Kita after. Are you kidding me? I'm the one forcing S&B to commit to a check in the thread. Who says I'm believing a word he says. You do realize that I directed him to a source which he can't do damage to if phagga is truthful? Oh, right, you're not town. Nevermind. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On December 03 2012 23:01 Acrofales wrote: I thought the "good news" was Phagga claiming to take no damage, implying you believed something about SnB's claim. If that's not what you meant, what is the good news? The good news was refering to the fact that S&B appears to have been caught in a lie. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
24 hours and VE still hasn't posted? Pew Pew. On December 04 2012 02:52 syllogism wrote: Prom says his role roleblocked everyone who attempted to visit Clarity. I'm not sure if I still understand how his role allegedly works though. Something to note is that I didn't visit Clarity last night, yet I was roleblocked. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I knew I could always count on you even if I'm so cruel in return. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I feel so betrayed. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Is today an event cycle? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On December 05 2012 09:14 Acrofales wrote: At least we now know that Kita is not scum. Still 3P tho. The flipped scum thought so. Must be true. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On December 05 2012 09:16 Promethelax wrote: So I guess Oats, Me and Kita aren't scum based on the actions claimed by SnB and VE. Or there was scum on scum targeting. risk/cave/acro are probably my preference today. risk's inactivity would fit right in with the rest of the team. It would be pretty demotivating to post if two of your scumbuddies have quit on you and the other two have been caught by night actions. cave because I'm starting to get tired of giving him papercuts and hoping he dies from infection. acro because we know he's anti-town and until he is willing to share his win condition, we should assume that we can't share a mutual victory. With only 1-3 mafia players remaining, they have to be shooting town, so I don't see why he shouldn't claim considering the mafia team will never hit him. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On December 05 2012 09:23 Hapahauli wrote: My only reservation with Risk is that he's often a very easy mislych in games that he's town. However in this game, his play just feels waaaay to clean from what I've seen of his game. It looks like he's really trying to be careful and blend in. But at this point it's process of elimination. I have reasons to think just about every other player (save Drazerk) is town/third-party. Risk... not so much. Do you get the feeling that he is playing careful or not playing at all? Could you give examples that made you lead to this conclusion please? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On December 05 2012 09:51 Hopeless1der wrote: Kita, I believe you have silver points. Do you know what you can do with them? Nope.  Anyone wanna sell me something? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I didn't claim it earlier because I felt there was little reason to at the time with the lynches already decided. I couldn't rb night one, night two I was on nuke, three and four I was on toad, five and seven on cave, and six on VE. Just because the roleblock on risk is accounted for, doesn't mean that he is clear. I've already brought up the over enthusiastic town read on sandroba day one and how he shows a contradiction in logic when defending GK for shooting Cave, yet providing a scum read on myself who also shot cave. The use of his role is silly from a town perspective and he provides very few opinions. That being said...town having 3 roleblockers, compared to the single roleblocker flip from the scum team is quite strange...especially considering sandroba couldn't roleblock every cycle and there are so many blues the mafia has to deal with. We know Cave has a roleblocking ability that he claims is a jail. I have a town read on syllo and a slightly weaker town read on prom (mainly due to the strength of his role). Cave, I'm quite disappointed that you decided to pass on the opportunity to provide us with 16 fake claims in the same post. You have a reputation to uphold! | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
@Kita: How could you roleblock Toad while also shooting Drazerk (two nights in a row)? Because that's how my role works. [QUOTE]On December 06 2012 03:20 Acrofales wrote: How did you roleblock Drazerk on N7 when I got the report that my ability could not target Drazerk?[/quote] Not sure. I didn't receive any indication that my shot or roleblock was unsuccessful. [QUOTE]On December 06 2012 03:20 Acrofales wrote: Unanswerable: why did Toad claim the roleblock on N3, but not on N4?[/QUOTE] Dunno. You can try looking for Toad's n4 shot if it makes you feel better. Unanswerable #2: Why did Toad claim to take damage N3, if he was jailed and immune to damage. [QUOTE]On December 06 2012 04:14 austinmcc wrote: Why didn't you claim the risk roleblock earlier? Were you just withholding it or did you specifically want to make risk's claim look fake?[/QUOTE] There wasn't really a benefit to claim when we had the Toad and S&B lynches lined up. [QUOTE]On December 06 2012 06:36 goodkarma wrote: And that leaves CaveJohnson... Am I the only one seriously considering lynching him? I know it's not the most exciting thing to be lynching a lying troll, but everyone else at this point is accounted for...[/QUOTE] I'm not. I'd imagine he is pretty close to death from the night actions various people have targeted him with, but its hard to say how effective the shots have been. | ||
| ||
