Chrono Trigger Mafia - Page 7

On November 24 2012 17:31 Promethelax wrote:


I know who he was pointing at when he got blocked, okay?

On October 13 2012 22:51 sandroba wrote:
What is even there to talk about? Over the time I've been playing mafia I grew more and more away from hard analysis and began to use apparent integrity and sincerity of people's post as a way to tell scum and town appart. That means that the way I do it is completely subjective to what I consider to be a post (from the particular person I'm looking at) to be honest. Of course the method is not flawless and is completely dependant on my ability to make that judgement, but it served me right in the past and I see no reason to change it. From that place you can see clearly that any explanation I provide you with for my reasoning wouldn't apply to everyone and is not verifyable. What you can do is check for the same things I do. The motives and truthfulness behind my posts and see if you think I'm trying to put on a show or I'm speaking my mind without the fear of consequence. If you can make that distinction then you will have a good idea of my alignment.
The stupid exercise of breaking posts apart and endelessly saying things are "scummy" without even defining and not even knowing what scummy means is what brings this tiresome conversation that I refuse to take part of where everyone indulges each other and strikes each other's dicks.

On November 24 2012 20:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
Anyone else think that this is a setup by Sandro and Prome to 'verify' both their alignments?
Lets go through the sequence of events,
1. Sandro posts that he is roleblocked.
2. Prome imply's that he did the roleblock and it had a special ability showing who the target attacked that cycle.
3. Sandro then claims the ability, Shadow and says he targeted Syllo, which basically again, imply's that Sandro is town.

On November 24 2012 20:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
imply. I know your english is bad but..

LOL its an easy bandwagon to jump onto at this point, also easy to jump off it.
Yes I think that we should wait until some flips but meh, just thinking.

Djo why dont you change your vote of VE?

On November 24 2012 21:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
right, Whoops.

How would kita revealing his guess do anything? Like whether he is lying about the guessing game if we lynch the guy other than what he guessed? I really think that adds some unneeded bias into who to lynch

On November 24 2012 22:02 Acrofales wrote:

That is the one point I think is weak, lol. If scum is able to take 3 townies along and still fail the mission, then his party selection is neither here nor there. The more I think about it, the harder it seems for a scum party leader to play the party leader role correctly.

If Sandro is scum and takes 3 incredibly townie people along, yet fails the mission, he is scum through a process of elimination. If Sandro is scum and takes a shady character along, he is scum for bringing his scumbuddy along, because town Sandro should know better. Either way, having someone known for his accurate reads lead a failed party is a recipe for disaster for scum (assuming town has ways of killing scum).

On November 25 2012 02:57 TheChronicler wrote:
Lol djo so scummy. Finally got people to move off sand, better go for it bud!

On November 25 2012 03:56 marvellosity wrote:
It is somewhat tempting just to kill sandroba simply on the basis that kita is at least trying.

On November 25 2012 05:30 Acrofales wrote:

Did you read my case? Do you agree? Disagree? Toad's vote for Kita without reasoning was on purpose (and that's what that exchange with Marv and me was about). For whatever strange reason. I guess that could be construed as an attempt at trapping someone, and thus as scumhunting, but I am unsure that was actually what he was trying to achieve. Maybe Marv got something else from that exchange.

On November 25 2012 05:32 Clarity_nl wrote:


1) Yes you've said this, a lot.
2) No he hasn't.