Newbie Mini Mafia XXXI - Page 9

On November 30 2012 11:49 HeloKnight wrote:
Oats, I don't think that you have contributed much, that's pretty much the reason for the wagon on you. As to your other point, I can see how Aqua could be acting scummy, but not more so than you...
God this is hard.

On November 30 2012 12:49 yamato77 wrote:
Because I'm at work. I did say I thought the cases on Aqua were convincing before the deadline. No one listened. Now you guys have lynched a town player with almost no justification. Good job Oats at saving your own ass.

On November 29 2012 21:36 yamato77 wrote:
two people have said I didn't post a CC case now when I already did. again, it seems like no one actually reads my filter which doesn't bode well.

Oats that post is full of outright lies and you should feel bad. my motivation for choosing who to lynch has been trying to figure out how scum would play and looking at who has played that way. not going to repost that argument.

I honestly didn't know if mafia KP could be role blocked. If it couldn't then one of our blues has a confirmed town which helps the game. that is why I asked.

You have cherry-picked my posts pretty bad to make this bad case of yours. I know I said I wouldn't defend myself and all but I want people to see this terrible case so they know why I voted for you. only a scum would make a case this bad.

##Vote: Oatsmaster

On November 29 2012 15:51 yamato77 wrote:

Oats, though, was a huge hindrance to town day 1. His posting was so chaotic that it was almost certainly designed to cause all sorts of discussion, for better or worse, but in no way could that discussion have been useful to town because nothing he said made any sense or was ever backed up with any solid reasoning. CC's case against him says as much, but as I said before he posted that, I don't think erratic play necessarily indicates scum. He could just be playing a really bad town game. I don't want to lynch people for being bad town.