Ok yes calm down, should there be a counter claim? If there is we trade one for one but everything makes sense. Just say oats is our doctor then there would be no counter claim leaving us at the advantage.

However we lose doctor and our most town posters will die later.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:12 GMT

#896

On November 30 2012 01:10 Oatsmaster wrote:
Well I say we scum hunt because no one will counterclaim
CAUSE IM TELLING HE TRUTH

In that case we should counter claim because no claim would prove you right. Unless we don't have a doctor but the likely hood of a role block hitting the right target would be insane.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:14 GMT

#898

Also if we lynch oats and he is doctor we lose sdm (or aqua if sdm is an amazing scum) Aqua sdm scum team guys (lol) <-- if that happens I would officially quit life.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:14 GMT

#900

So long story short I think there should be a counter claim.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:15 GMT

#902

On November 30 2012 01:14 Kickstart wrote:
Now I am pissed at Oats and SDM so I can't make sense of shit atm.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:16 GMT

#904

On November 30 2012 01:14 yamato77 wrote:
We could have 2 blues that are both not doctors and neither one could counterclaim, but he would still be fake claiming. Even if we can counterclaim, doing so gives scum a really easy target and we trade Oats for our doc.

I'm not sold on this idea at all.

Oh yeah cop jailkeeper... (I would assume we have two blues) a mass role claim would probably be a bad idea at this point as well.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:17 GMT

#906

But! If they have a role blocker then they can block oats assuming he is doc.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:30 GMT

#917

I thought he was doc too but that was a feel day one read which made no sense. I assume you quoted the wrong post though

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:31 GMT

#920

Well it makes it harder not being able to verify a jk claim (with roleblocks not being mentioned)

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:42 GMT

#929

Well, if we were to lynch oats anyway what would we get out of it information wise? If we don't and miss we are in terrible state and if we do and hit we are if good state. I think it is almost 50/50 either way now but what is more useful.

For example if oats flips doc we lose sdm in the night. That is two possibly confirmed town. If doc was to claim we would lose doc without losing sdm. If oats is scum we lose nothing (apart from a lesser town if scum takes that path)

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:45 GMT

#932

Oh and for the record yamato I did look over cc again and didn't find much inherently scummy.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 29 2012 16:49 GMT

#934

On November 30 2012 01:47 yamato77 wrote:

Show nested quote +

If you think he is scum without the claim, that is how you should act.

True but I think the fact he gave us all the time in the world to decide is positive.

It's 3 am ipl starts in like an hour and I doubt I can last till 1pm if I don't sleep. I could get 7 hours sleep and then 3 hours to work though everything but I don't know.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:13 GMT

#989

Hey awake, in XXVII I posted 2000 thousand word cases on everybody, I out contented everybody to the point they ended up ignoring what I was writing.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:18 GMT

#991

I agree with your first point and your second post. The third is not really a tell and the fourth is a possibility. Checking his filter before though I didn't find anything scummy but a careful scum could get away with the kind of content.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:22 GMT

#994

Well if it seems to obvious who is your opinion on that scum with his legs up?

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:23 GMT

#995

On November 30 2012 09:22 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok that convinces me that CC is scum.

It's not going to convince anyone else.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:27 GMT

#998

He is doc almost for sure in my mind, but logically no. If anyone wasn't leaving a breadcrumb it would be oats and he gave us ages to think. He feels like town he always has but he if almost worse than kush...

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:29 GMT

#999

Yes that is what I said, but also I mistyped post and point in my second part of that sentence. Mainly because if felt contrived. Unfortunately he came late enough to get away without the spotlight.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:32 GMT

#1002

Wait he kept his vote on kick? I thought he did a big post against munk. That is a little odd.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 30 2012 00:48 GMT

#1012

Everyone is watching ipl probably lol.