EPTOn November 30 2012 11:28 iamperfection wrote:
You know in my day we sometimes had to do our own vote counts uphill both ways
You know in my day we sometimes had to do our own vote counts uphill both ways
Mad?
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXI - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Mad? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On November 30 2012 11:38 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: I was refering to my part of the case in particular, it's pretty terribad. There are some decent points made against him and I don't think Oats is scum. My reasoning kind of ends there. I have to admit, that's my line of reasoning here too. I literally pulled an Aqua case out of my ass in 15 minutes because Oats doctor is seeming more likely due to the fact of no counter claim, even a JK claim would do. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On November 30 2012 11:40 HeloKnight wrote: I thought we weren't asking for a counter claim, that was the whole plan. Hell IDK, I think the blue would personally take it into his own hands. If he knew Oats was scum, I think he'd come right out and say it to lynch that motherfucker. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Bad case was bad, at the time we didn't see it. It relies solely on the fact that Kick was defending me. He kept his vote on Kick to a) not be responsible for either lynch and b) it shows he doesn't give two shits who was going to be lynched. Not only did he spread suspicion with the "exodus" post, but he covered his own ass hardcore in the same post. Neutral playing I agree fits many people. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
I pray to God that you guys actually think Aqua is scum and aren't just sheeping off me for no reason. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On November 30 2012 12:00 yamato77 wrote: If Aqua flips town I will destroy you all D3. At least you'll finally be doing something. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Hopefully I die tonight so I can bask in the laughter of the /obs | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On November 30 2012 12:11 yamato77 wrote: Fucking absurd. Dumbasses, all of you. Okay scum. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Yamato, Helo, Jacob. Scum is two of them. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
On November 30 2012 12:21 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Question is, did it occur to the potential JK? Even though we said he shouldn't claim? And there's the problem. We'll prolly get a mass roleclaim tomorrow, though right? | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
Anyway, time for bed. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
- No opposition to the Doc claim - The setup is either Cop / doc or Cop / JK (doc/jk is OP in this setup, no way it's possible) - A doc would have claimed 100% - A JK would have likely claimed if he jailed SDM (or someone else for that matter) Therefore, despite Oats being the epitome of scummy play, he is just a newbie town Doc. I do not want to lynch our God damned Doc D2 and leave us with absolutely no leads on D3. If you think Oats is my scumbuddy and I'm trying to protect him, rofl. I began all the suspicion of Oats with that longass case against him, and he's attacked me since D1. The wagon on Aqua was to achieve a few things: If Aqua is scum, obviously he dies and we rejoice. If not, we can garner some information from scum reactions. Aqua said it best: On November 25 2012 11:49 Aquanim wrote: 1) Zero 2) We should lynch the scummiest player. That being said, building up a wagon on a lurker and watching their reaction is an entirely acceptable means of finding the scummiest player. 3) Either suits... but this is truly delicious. Fortuitously, I will be eating some today. In this case, "their" being the pronoun referring to scum. Warning, wifom heaven: What do scum want to do in this situation? Lynch Oats, the blue. That being said, they also have no reservations about also lynching Aqua. Either one will do for them, so it doesn't matter if they switch or not. Sitting with their vote on Oats would seem scummy as hell when he flips blue, so I think that scum purposely tipped the tide in order to: A) Still have Oats as a suspicious target. B) Flame / spread suspicion about how terrible and bad the mislynch was and accuse everyone who switched. C) Not seem responsible for an Oats lynch. Two people sat on Oats: Yamato and Kickstart. Four people sheeped me: Oats, SDM, Jacob, and right at the very end, Helo. I see the reason for the Oats sheep, and to a certain degree, SDM / Jacob. Helo on the other hand, kept saying "Oh, gee wiz, I just don't know!" From the second I posted my case, to the last 15 minutes of the day. This stands out to me. Why the last minute switch? You had a ton of time to decide. Too busy discussing the implications with Z-bo and your scumbuddy? Town Helo has no reason to switch like this, because he was opposed to the entire thing. But suddenly, as if from nowhere, he switches his vote for some random ass paragraph I gave in response to him. Even more damning, he justifies it by saying "Omg I had like one minute left!" when in reality he had like 2 hours since I made my case. Either Kickstart or Yamato is scum because they are the ones flaming over how terrible the lynch is. Town wouldn't be so upset over this mislynch -- It was a green flip, and Oats is likely not scum due to the lack of counterclaim. Getting mad as fuck is not productive. | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
| ||
