but if I vote munk-e now it will seem like I am sheeping. Also I don't see how not voting for the guy with the most votes was sheeping (unless he was actually mafia) particularly when people were leaving the one I voted for.

Also Munkey is very cold along side kick who *Twitch* I will not start an association case on day one *cough*

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 26 2012 23:47 GMT

#461

On November 27 2012 08:43 yamato77 wrote:

Show nested quote +

If your "serious suspicion" is the post I referenced where the entire content is saying you believe me when I say I was sleeping, then it wasn't serious at all, in my opinion.

Give a read on someone that isn't completely terrible.

No the sleeping thing was in your favor. One sec.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 26 2012 23:53 GMT

#464

Well I did have a one liner before the time sleep thing. also there was this

Yamato is a scum read, his bit about.

Show nested quote +

Could be a way to try and get two town lynched with one stone. Saying it black and white like that.

Before posting more than two posts (basically) he posts this

Show nested quote +

Signals he is paranoid about what people think about him.

Then does this

Show nested quote +

whaa?

Show nested quote +

Mentioned this before but it is exactly what he was doing but trying to call someone else out for it.

And he swings a lot. Plenty of contradiction.

[/quote]

Also grabbing from my notes file there was this :"Yamato filter is kinda pathetic early on and he is trying to make people think it isn’t." (no offense it is a notes file

)

I thought I was the initial one to mention your one liners being a problem but it's sheeping? Maybe I missed it but...

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 26 2012 23:55 GMT

#465

I have to admit you are changing my option of you, But I also have to make sure I don't fall into the trap of "cute cuddly scum"

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 00:11 GMT

#466

Vote count?

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 00:26 GMT

#467

I have an alternate theory on munk-e, nobody wants to defend him again. (it seems) This could mean he is scum that people don’t want to be associated with.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 00:26 GMT

#468

Guys? Lynch is in like half an hour right?

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 01:11 GMT

#473

Oh so that was why I was so confused. Hmm looking at the votes like this I can't vote for yamato. Considering I am highly suspicious of kick and munk now voting for someone they are both voting for is illogical and I don't like the case as much as I used to.

##unvote

##VoteMunk-E

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 01:58 GMT

#479

As town or scum you would push the other wagon though.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 02:37 GMT

#486

Just to check do we know if there is three or two scum, it's important. I saw someone mention that there is only two which makes sense.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 02:44 GMT

#489

If you are town I bet one mafia didn't vote for you.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 02:44 GMT

#490

Actually I have a whole theory about that which I will post if need be.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 02:45 GMT

#492

Well maybe I was out of the loop but munk-e seemed to know there were two scum before helo mentioned it. although it is something town should have known by this point anyway.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 02:46 GMT

#493

yeah but I played back in the days of three mafia with 13 people. (or so) Confused me ^^

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 02:57 GMT

#497

Yeah give us your reads before you depart from this world!

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 03:07 GMT

#502

Hmm, well I will post this quickly not completely thought out (and very, non substantial) but it is the thing I referred to in my other post.

There are three people not voting on monkey aqua kick and munky. Assuming monkey is town there is high chance that one of them would be scum trying to avoid a town flip. I like aqua and really don’t like kick but this is feel based.

If munky is town then kick is probably mafia. If kick is mafia then yamato is town due to voting and if kick is mafia there is a weak association case with CC.
It would make sense to split the voting so not all mafia vote for the same person.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 03:17 GMT

#506

I was going to mention it but it seemed to obvious.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 03:57 GMT

#512

Why aqua? I only have a feel read but I am interested in your opinion.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 03:57 GMT

#513

On November 27 2012 12:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
So vote CC anyone?
also yeah how the hell would I mispost that when the 2 sites look TOTALLY DIFFERENT.
Actually I think out of everyone who didnt vote for Munk-e, aqua looks the scummiest

What site looks different.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

November 27 2012 04:29 GMT

#515

Hmm, I could assume you have used a QT before. But I was trying to trap you with that.