How can you claim JK day 1, claim VT night 1 (to mess with scum lololol), re-claim JK during resolution and then find a mass roleclaim suggestion so dumb it's not even worth thinking about.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 07:41 GMT

#2644

Okay, so blazing do you think that if there is a cop, and he claims during resolution, everyone should claim after him?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 07:44 GMT

#2646

On November 18 2012 16:43 Blazinghand wrote:
Absolutely. There's only one blue left given the setup size (unless it's like 2 masons) and if the last scum decides to fake-claim blue, it's important that the last blue counter-claim him.

So you just admitted to not reading Djo's setup speculation at all.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 07:50 GMT

#2651

Sigh, I guess I can't read too much into you not reading Djo's stuff, but you seriously have been pissing me off all game so I have a hard time seeing if you're scum or not.
Anyway, djo proved there could be 4 blues, with the setup Keir used and the current info we have. Although it's unlikely.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 07:58 GMT

#2655

Okay. I agree with the fact that blues should choose whether to claim or not.
If they plan on claiming, during the resolution would be the best time.
If a blue claims during resolution, remaining blues (if they exist) should claim and all the vt's should claim.

What do you think, Djo?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 08:00 GMT

#2656

I now have a town read on blazing because he completely disregarded a possibility of there being 4 blues. Scum fake claiming would not do this.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 08:06 GMT

#2658

Djo it depends on how it's modified, seeing as 1 shot cops dont exist.
But I think we're done with setup speculation for now, if you agree with my conclusion.

On November 18 2012 16:58 Clarity_nl wrote:
Okay. I agree with the fact that blues should choose whether to claim or not.
If they plan on claiming, during the resolution would be the best time.
If a blue claims during resolution, remaining blues (if they exist) should claim and all the vt's should claim.

What do you think, Djo?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 08:08 GMT

#2660

Okay then, moving on. What are your thoughts on kickstart?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 08:10 GMT

#2663

I pulled your teeth, I can pull his.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 08:41 GMT

#2665

Eh well. I'll just assume Djo ran off before I asked my question. When you get back please give me your read on Kickstart, Djo.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 08:46 GMT

#2666

Iamp, even though you might have said it jokingly, how do you feel your "hapa and debears were tunneling eachother to look town" theory is holding?

And with that I'm off, will be around... sort of, but won't be actively reading filters until my evening (8 ish hours from now)

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 09:51 GMT

#2686

I've explained my thoughts on last minute shennanigans. I did this when marv tried to jump on cross too, which is not much of a defense I guess since he flipped scum too.

I'm town. That's my defense. I never aggressively defended hapa or cross, I was against emotionally lynching someone.
Read debears' case on hapa, it WAS omgus.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 09:56 GMT

#2687

The fact that hapa seemed genuine in exchanges with me does not make me scum, it's a dumb point.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 10:03 GMT

#2689

Blazing, your case is rather long with a lot of weak points that you feel, add up to a strong point. Please point out the things you want me to respond to.that I haven't yet.

Is it weird that I took hapa's word that he didn't forge or misinterpret a skype chatlog?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 10:09 GMT

#2692

I mean, is there a defense to that point that I could make that's not wifom?

Debears' case WAS omgus. I wasn't defending debears when it came to the "is cross smurf?" I was attacking debears.
I don't like last minute shenanigans.

Both townies that have died so far had a strong town read on me.
WIFOM: + Show Spoiler +

Why would I kill marv if I'm scum? If you're interested, look up the QT of my last scum game (I was scum). I asked my coach if I should kill the one person defending me to make some kind of super wifom defense, and my coach said: don't be an idiot, and I was like "yeah, that was a dumb idea, you're right"

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 10:13 GMT

#2696

Yeah, that's fair. Never mind.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 10:15 GMT

#2698

Your face is a large penis

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 10:23 GMT

#2701

Keir was my coach. All but 1 of our interactions are in the QT. The one that was a PM to him was because I was asking what he thought about sylver, my scumbuddy.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 10:24 GMT

#2702

I never contacted hapa. I mentioned hapa by name, regretted it instantly and sent a pm to marv (host) to notify and apologize to him. He gave me a final warning and I cried that night.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

November 18 2012 11:31 GMT

#2704

How come there are so many lazy town in this game, but not the fucking newbies I played in.
Kickstarter, I've explained before why just sitting back and saying who you think is scummy is not enough.
Darth, you said the only person you're willing to lynch over zbo was me, make a fucking case.
Hopeless, seriously dude you are the closest we have to confirmed town, you have nothing to fear, this is the perfect time to read read read and get a read going.

I would also like everyone who voted zbo to explain why they didnt switch after his death post. Did it LOOK like a fucking WIFOM bomb? He called the towny players town and he called the scummy players scum.