|
On November 03 2012 11:48 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 11:45 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 11:44 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Here's a topic: I don't want anyone playing the noob card as a defense. Ever. You can make decent arguments / cases even if it's your first game. Don't attribute your actions to "I'm sorry, idk what I'm doing! Newbie town here! Man I suck at this game."
@Djo
Do what you like, dat 30 page filter inc. Really? You didn't want to talk about policy, yet you bring up another? This is not a policy. This is a rule. Just don't play the "Imma newb" card.
Eh. Semantics on my part. Anyways. Why bring it up?
Everyone here was from last game except obzy. And none of them actually played the noov card
|
On November 03 2012 11:52 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 11:12 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 11:11 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 03 2012 11:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 11:09 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 11:04 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Debears you seem really paranoid. On November 03 2012 10:42 debears wrote: Yeah i am. He calls me a liarin red and then peaces out without wanting to hear my thoughts. Aint that scummy? Considering how active he was around lynch time last game, which was only an hour before this He didn't call you, Debears the person, a liar. You're taking Alsn's nit-pick of a post awfully personally. The quick, useless FoS is also the same exact tactic you used last game. Old hat, Debears, old hat. 1) i don't wear a hat2) i rescind my argument. The red text threw me off Scumtell. Howso? Mafia usually wear hats. He's so adamant that he most certainly does NOT wear a hat. Therefore, scumtell. @ CheesecakePlease refrain from joking when talking about scumtells. It's confusing. FoS Cheese
Yeah. Definitely unwarranted fos
FOS Djo
1) he was joking 2) it was obvious he was joking 3) it wasnt confusing
|
On November 03 2012 12:02 Djodref wrote: It is confusing, especially when you are attacking the same guy over semantics just after your joke. It could be also a nice way to influence our read on debears while looking clean. I agree that he was making a joke but please consider the motivations for it.
Town motivations I don't see town motivations for making a joke about a scumtell
Mafia motivations Creates confusion and disturbs the thread. Allows to influence our read on debears while looking clean
You have to be kidding me. Cheese jokes a lot. Did you not read the scum qt from last game? The motivation from both perspectives is to have fun, especially early d1 when there's nothing to talk about.
"Influence your read on debears". Really? Its early day 1. You all have plenty of time to read me.. ill have a big filter most likely.
That's bullshit. Scummy bullshit
|
On November 03 2012 12:09 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:07 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:02 Djodref wrote: It is confusing, especially when you are attacking the same guy over semantics just after your joke. It could be also a nice way to influence our read on debears while looking clean. I agree that he was making a joke but please consider the motivations for it.
Town motivations I don't see town motivations for making a joke about a scumtell
Mafia motivations Creates confusion and disturbs the thread. Allows to influence our read on debears while looking clean You have to be kidding me. Cheese jokes a lot. Did you not read the scum qt from last game? The motivation from both perspectives is to have fun, especially early d1 when there's nothing to talk about."Influence your read on debears". Really? Its early day 1. You all have plenty of time to read me.. ill have a big filter most likely. That's bullshit. Scummy bullshit Please expand on the bolded part of your post I quoted debears.
D1 starts out with nothing to actually talk about. That's why policy is a starter in newbies. Everything starts out of complete nothingness in terms of accusations
|
On November 03 2012 12:08 Rad wrote: @djo
I don't think there's too much mafia motivation in throwing out 1 joke this early in day 1, especially with us all coming from the other game and it being a pretty friendly environment at the moment. I'd consider it the pre-game bleeding into the real game. I'm sure we will all start hating each other soon enough.
Rad cheeses joking is a null tell. Check the scum qt from last game. Its his personality
|
Ebwop
Its not really the pregame. He literally jokes and is pretty funny
|
On November 03 2012 12:13 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:04 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 12:02 Djodref wrote: It is confusing, especially when you are attacking the same guy over semantics just after your joke. It could be also a nice way to influence our read on debears while looking clean. I agree that he was making a joke but please consider the motivations for it.
Town motivations I don't see town motivations for making a joke about a scumtell
Mafia motivations Creates confusion and disturbs the thread. Allows to influence our read on debears while looking clean You also neglect to realize that my joke was in a RESPONSE to his joke. (I don't wear hats). You're really trying to dig where there is nothing. @ CheeseOk, you had motivations for doing this joke but it doesn't really help town while it could be done with mafia motivation. And, at least, I'm trying to dig something. Would you prefer me to discuss how we should use plurality lynch ?
Dig something up? Why? Because you have nothing to actually accuse people with since you're scum?
|
On November 03 2012 12:15 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 11:54 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 11:52 Djodref wrote:On November 03 2012 11:12 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 11:11 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 03 2012 11:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 11:09 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 11:04 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Debears you seem really paranoid. On November 03 2012 10:42 debears wrote: Yeah i am. He calls me a liarin red and then peaces out without wanting to hear my thoughts. Aint that scummy? Considering how active he was around lynch time last game, which was only an hour before this He didn't call you, Debears the person, a liar. You're taking Alsn's nit-pick of a post awfully personally. The quick, useless FoS is also the same exact tactic you used last game. Old hat, Debears, old hat. 1) i don't wear a hat2) i rescind my argument. The red text threw me off Scumtell. Howso? Mafia usually wear hats. He's so adamant that he most certainly does NOT wear a hat. Therefore, scumtell. @ CheesecakePlease refrain from joking when talking about scumtells. It's confusing. FoS Cheese Yeah. Definitely unwarranted fos FOS Djo1) he was joking 2) it was obvious he was joking 3) it wasnt confusing @ debearsSo, it's ok for you to be aggressive in the early game but it's not ok for me ? Would you say that joking about scumtells is ok ?
Its not your aggression that bothers me. Its your reasoning, which is shitty. And yeah its ok. He joked at me. I joked at him. He joked back again when the thread wasnt really moving. Its his personality
|
On November 03 2012 12:16 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:12 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:09 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 03 2012 12:07 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:02 Djodref wrote: It is confusing, especially when you are attacking the same guy over semantics just after your joke. It could be also a nice way to influence our read on debears while looking clean. I agree that he was making a joke but please consider the motivations for it.
Town motivations I don't see town motivations for making a joke about a scumtell
Mafia motivations Creates confusion and disturbs the thread. Allows to influence our read on debears while looking clean You have to be kidding me. Cheese jokes a lot. Did you not read the scum qt from last game? The motivation from both perspectives is to have fun, especially early d1 when there's nothing to talk about."Influence your read on debears". Really? Its early day 1. You all have plenty of time to read me.. ill have a big filter most likely. That's bullshit. Scummy bullshit Please expand on the bolded part of your post I quoted debears. D1 starts out with nothing to actually talk about. That's why policy is a starter in newbies. Everything starts out of complete nothingness in terms of accusations Okay, but you just meant early D1 right, not the entirety of it? It seems rather odd to go: "Yeah we should just joke around for now" Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:13 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:08 Rad wrote: @djo
I don't think there's too much mafia motivation in throwing out 1 joke this early in day 1, especially with us all coming from the other game and it being a pretty friendly environment at the moment. I'd consider it the pre-game bleeding into the real game. I'm sure we will all start hating each other soon enough. Rad cheeses joking is a null tell. Check the scum qt from last game. Its his personality He kept it to the QT though, he was serious in the thread, as he pointed out. We shouldn't try to meta read someone with a sample size of 1, but he is acting quite different than last game, and he was scum in that.
So if he's scum and he didn't joke in the game (which he did) while joking in the qt a lot, wouldnt you say he is being more genuine, which is a townie trait?
|
On November 03 2012 12:17 Rad wrote: @debears
I don't remember too many jokes from cheese throughout last game. Just pregame. Oh, and his "Sandy" response to the hurricane question. Anyway, it doesn't matter, I get a null read from his joke.
@djo
Why are you bringing up the idea of a discussion on plurality lynch? That's not even in our control, is it? Host said plurality, so it's plurality, end of story, unless I'm missing something?
He did joke in game. I can't quote on my phone. Here are some from memory
"Holy meta argument batbears" "A wild djo appears" "Lurkerception" "Why djodref is scum : a compilation of quotes by mr. Cheesecake"
|
On November 03 2012 12:23 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:15 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:13 Djodref wrote:On November 03 2012 12:04 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 12:02 Djodref wrote: It is confusing, especially when you are attacking the same guy over semantics just after your joke. It could be also a nice way to influence our read on debears while looking clean. I agree that he was making a joke but please consider the motivations for it.
Town motivations I don't see town motivations for making a joke about a scumtell
Mafia motivations Creates confusion and disturbs the thread. Allows to influence our read on debears while looking clean You also neglect to realize that my joke was in a RESPONSE to his joke. (I don't wear hats). You're really trying to dig where there is nothing. @ CheeseOk, you had motivations for doing this joke but it doesn't really help town while it could be done with mafia motivation. And, at least, I'm trying to dig something. Would you prefer me to discuss how we should use plurality lynch ? Dig something up? Why? Because you have nothing to actually accuse people with since you're scum? I've clearly explained the mafia motivations I've found for his joke. I'm far to be able to be certain of Cheese alignment but he is leaning slightly scummy right now, hence the FoS. It's also a warning for him to not joke about scum tells in the future. I find you very jumpy and very prompt to call me scum. Are you seriously that sure of my alignment this early in the game ? Why so aggressive ? Could you explain me your motivations ?
You're only part of motivations was that he would be trying to cause confusions, yet you disregard his personality, which is the cause of his jokes. They are a null read.
I'm not certain you're scum at all. I'm being aggressive to get answers. I'm being aggressive to kickstart this thread and actuallu start talking about who is scum.
That post is silly. You call me "jumpy". I'm being active. I didn't suddenly come out of nowhere and jump on you. I jumped on alsn early on. So what?
|
On November 03 2012 12:27 Rad wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:20 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:16 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 03 2012 12:12 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:09 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 03 2012 12:07 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:02 Djodref wrote: It is confusing, especially when you are attacking the same guy over semantics just after your joke. It could be also a nice way to influence our read on debears while looking clean. I agree that he was making a joke but please consider the motivations for it.
Town motivations I don't see town motivations for making a joke about a scumtell
Mafia motivations Creates confusion and disturbs the thread. Allows to influence our read on debears while looking clean You have to be kidding me. Cheese jokes a lot. Did you not read the scum qt from last game? The motivation from both perspectives is to have fun, especially early d1 when there's nothing to talk about."Influence your read on debears". Really? Its early day 1. You all have plenty of time to read me.. ill have a big filter most likely. That's bullshit. Scummy bullshit Please expand on the bolded part of your post I quoted debears. D1 starts out with nothing to actually talk about. That's why policy is a starter in newbies. Everything starts out of complete nothingness in terms of accusations Okay, but you just meant early D1 right, not the entirety of it? It seems rather odd to go: "Yeah we should just joke around for now" On November 03 2012 12:13 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:08 Rad wrote: @djo
I don't think there's too much mafia motivation in throwing out 1 joke this early in day 1, especially with us all coming from the other game and it being a pretty friendly environment at the moment. I'd consider it the pre-game bleeding into the real game. I'm sure we will all start hating each other soon enough. Rad cheeses joking is a null tell. Check the scum qt from last game. Its his personality He kept it to the QT though, he was serious in the thread, as he pointed out. We shouldn't try to meta read someone with a sample size of 1, but he is acting quite different than last game, and he was scum in that. So if he's scum and he didn't joke in the game (which he did) while joking in the qt a lot, wouldnt you say he is being more genuine, which is a townie trait? Why are defending cheese's personality this game? We all get he's a funny guy and likes to joke. We only have 1 game from him to go on, and a scum QT. He could be acting different here for a variety of reasons. Why do you want us to get a town read on him just from being more genuine this game? Town motivation: Be more open and honest and townie. Scum motivation: Everyone knows his real personality now from the scum QT, he needs to switch it up or we'll be suspicious. It's a null tell. Why are you pushing the idea that it's a town tell?
I said its a null tell. And when i said he was "genuine", that would be under the assumption that he didn't post jokes last game, which he did
So, its a null tell
|
On November 03 2012 12:29 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:21 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 12:17 Rad wrote: @debears
I don't remember too many jokes from cheese throughout last game. Just pregame. Oh, and his "Sandy" response to the hurricane question. Anyway, it doesn't matter, I get a null read from his joke.
@djo
Why are you bringing up the idea of a discussion on plurality lynch? That's not even in our control, is it? Host said plurality, so it's plurality, end of story, unless I'm missing something? He did joke in game. I can't quote on my phone. Here are some from memory "Holy meta argument batbears" "A wild djo appears" "Lurkerception" "Why djodref is scum : a compilation of quotes by mr. Cheesecake" @ debearsYou just have showed that he was using jokes when they were serving his scum agenda.
None of the jokes i quoted served a scum agenda. The only one that would come close to that was the title of his case on you. But the title wasnt serving a scum agenda, the case was
|
On November 03 2012 12:35 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:23 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 12:06 Djodref wrote:On November 03 2012 12:00 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 10:50 Djodref wrote: @ debaers
I don't think this one deserves a FoS. When Alsn says that it is technically a lie, that's just Alsn arguing about math and logic. On November 03 2012 11:52 Djodref wrote:On November 03 2012 11:12 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 11:11 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 03 2012 11:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On November 03 2012 11:09 debears wrote:On November 03 2012 11:04 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Debears you seem really paranoid.
[quote]
He didn't call you, Debears the person, a liar. You're taking Alsn's nit-pick of a post awfully personally.
The quick, useless FoS is also the same exact tactic you used last game. Old hat, Debears, old hat. 1) i don't wear a hat2) i rescind my argument. The red text threw me off Scumtell. Howso? Mafia usually wear hats. He's so adamant that he most certainly does NOT wear a hat. Therefore, scumtell. @ CheesecakePlease refrain from joking when talking about scumtells. It's confusing. FoS Cheese The logic is strong with this one. @ CheeseI was re-reading the thread and I really didn't like this "it's a scumtell" joke. I'm not against jokes but scumtells are quite serious business. I've got my eyes on you. There is no reason to tell us that you were reading the thread. We should know you are. This is the exact thing that Nack picked up about my scumplay last game. "This game is serious business" It's a couple hours into the first day, and most of the thread isn't even around. You're really trying to come off as town by plucking this insignificant little fact that everyone else giggled about and passed on by. And - mafia motivation for making a joke? We should get some George Carlins as scum if there is mafia motivation for making someone snicker a little. Also: My humor was mainly kept to the QT last game. Only a few stupid things in the thread were let through. /Engagecheesecakeseriousmode @ CheeseYour joke didn't pose any problem for me the first time (same for everyone I suppose) but I found it weird the second time I past through it. I have no problems with jokes and I'm making some myself. They are a null tell in general. But joking about scum tells is not really acceptable in my opinion and I've explained the possible mafia motivations I've seen behind it.
So first you say his jokes last game served a scum agenda, which means they are scummy.. now you say jokes are a null tell, unless they are specifically joking about scumtells.
Riddle me this.
Why havent you fosed me for my joke fos on cheese in the beginning?
|
@djo
That was addressed to cheese right? I would like to see him defend himself time
|
Also answer my very important question to you
|
On November 03 2012 12:49 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:34 Obzy wrote: I don't think that getting a read off of whether or not Cheese has a joking tone or not really means anything at all. At least, the fact that he's aware of it means that he could manipulate it either way. I agree, this isn't much better than making a Djodref smiley case. I think the two things to take away from all this though: - Debears defended Cheese - Djodref tunneling Cheese Might become useful later.
Besides stating the obvious, do you agree with me or djo on this?
|
On November 03 2012 13:06 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 12:48 debears wrote: Also answer my very important question to you @ debearsDid I answer your question ? I'm not sure which one you were talking about. I guessed it was the one about "why cheese and not me?" I need to go to attend a wedding at Souel Gardien Hoteal soon so I would like to know you have more questions.
Yeah that answered it. Go have fun at the wedding (I've never been to one but I've heard shit gets pretty wild at the reception...hellz yeah)
I can address you when you get back
|
On November 03 2012 13:11 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2012 13:04 Clarity_nl wrote: Okay re-reading your post you're saying we shouldn't focus on one/two people, instead considering everyone and not consolidate on a lynch? @ ClarityExactly, I think you everyone should just vote for his top scumread while giving enough reason to do so and then we start again from there and see who is likely to be lynched, be it 2 or 3 players. I think it's the best way to use plurality lynch. Considering only 2 possibilities narrows the discussion and allows mafia players to have some excuse to lynch town (cf Cheese last game lynching daoud in the daoud/ini match-up). The downfall is that the end of the day could be a bit messy.
seriously.....why are we having to explain this?
1) Scumhunt 2) Vote for your top scumread 3) When the voting comes down to 2 candidates and lynch is near, pick one of two said candidates and give reasoning why you're voting them
Is that clear enough for all of you to understand? Please stop talking about policy
|
@Obzy, Sylver, Dau0d
I expect you all to have contributed something meaningful to this thread by the time I've woken up tomorrow. If not, you're on my shitlist for d1
|
|
|
|