I didn't see his post about being in a meeting, and then I did and didn't want to vote for him because that sucks. Apparently no seeing a post and then reacting to it is scummy now

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 05 2012 23:44 GMT

#928

I knew he'd be hammered, not sure how a no lynch helps scum here. I wanted him to talk and be more active which is why I parked the vote on him originally, as soon as I saw the meeting post I didn't like it, if he had time to defend himself I'm sure he would have, assuming he's town

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 00:39 GMT

#948

I'd have to be a monumentally stupid scum to jump that vote as scum, lol.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 00:44 GMT

#951

tbh I just thought the dick comment was funny, and I hadn't read hope's post yet about returning, I missed some posts somehow, like a whole page

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 00:48 GMT

#957

On November 06 2012 09:46 Acrofales wrote:

Show nested quote +

Town doesn't have their vote on someone they don't want to kill 4 minutes before the deadline in a very contested race.

You cannot tell me that Drazak had his vote there, but was just too careless to take it off in favour of someone he felt WAS scummy. His vote was there because he wanted to make it look like he wanted to kill Hopeless1der. Except when push came to shove he suddenly didn't want to kill Hopeless1der anymore.

Scum doesn't act that stupid. Except they do. Risen pulled that crap in some game (look in the award thread). He was called too dumb to be scum and coasted by on that to an easy scum victory. However, town get last-second jitters too.

My main problem is that Drazak is not explaining his thought process. A town voteswitch would be able to say what was their reasoning. Drazak has NOT explained how he went from "lynch", "wait whoops no, lets not" back to "yeah, lets lynch" in the space of 2 minutes.

what, I explained my thought process, I don't think it's fair to lynch someone on a lurker lynch and then see a post about being in meetings or busy all day, I don't think that's a cool thing to do.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 00:57 GMT

#963

I would have unvoted earlier if he had checked into the thread earlier.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 00:58 GMT

#964

no, I'd rather kill someone other than the lurker, I didn't have much of a read on hope other than lurker, if I did I'd probably have been ok with lynching him and not unvoted.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 01:03 GMT

#967

What other bandwagon was there? I didn't want a no lynch, no matter what you say regarding that.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 01:03 GMT

#968

going to bed

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 15:41 GMT

#990

What didn't I respond to prom?

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 15:47 GMT

#993

You mean the one about my penis already being htere? I thought it was funny and I didn't think he'd actually get lynched. Yeah, I went to bed at 9pm, I'd been up since 2am the previous day, sorry bro.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 15:49 GMT

#996

uhm, I like funny dirty jokes, I thought it was a funny dirt joke, so I said something.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 15:55 GMT

#998

what. there was no penis in mouth joke. what are you smoking.

I made it clear when I fucking put the vote on him, it was to pressure him into active because he was lurking like a bitch and gettinga way with it, I was the first one to call him on lurking.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 21:29 GMT

#1058

I'm sorry guys, I just got really frustrated with you guys, I'm town, yes I flip flopped my vote around, but there's no possibly scum motive there, it's just town who didn't want a mislynch. I've been honest with you the whole time. get off my fucking back please.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 06 2012 21:52 GMT

#1063

I don't like lynching people who might not deserve the lynch.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 07 2012 17:02 GMT

#1162

I'm, working on a case for risk being scum, I'll post more about it in a few hours when I'm not so busy

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 08 2012 16:00 GMT

#1336

I don't know what you want me to do Prom. I'm working the case for risk right now, I fell asleep last night because I was too tired after my day's activities. I've been honest with everyone, I don't know what else you'd want me to do.

drazak

United States479 Posts

November 08 2012 18:48 GMT

#1355

Here's my case on Risk.

Blue Hunting

It all started when he started supporting/explaining kush's blue hunting...

On November 02 2012 23:25 risk.nuke wrote:

Show nested quote +

He's saying he wants 1 vt with a character specific name to claim to test the theory that all vt's have non-specific character names.

And then some more...

On November 08 2012 03:40 risk.nuke wrote:

Show nested quote +

I actually agree, Everyone should claim. Both role and name.

and then he doesn't even think any blues need to be protected

On November 08 2012 04:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Wow, get hostile much?

There are no blues to protect. Might aswell hear everyones claims.

Obviously there's no blues to protect, rofl, half the people have claimed blue. Please please keep going so you can nk all the blues.

I think he's also bussing arco pretty good, probably the remaining scumteam.