EPTOn November 18 2012 10:23 DarthPunk wrote:
Props to debears, Kier and marv for figuring shit out in the obs thread.
Props to debears, Kier and marv for figuring shit out in the obs thread.
Had you figured d1 son
Acme Mini Mafia, Inc - Page 116
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Had you figured d1 son | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
Risk: do you really believe that someone of prp's caliber would replace out because he was scum under pressure? That seemed really dumb but made sense form a getting me lynched standpoint. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 19 2012 10:10 Promethelax wrote: Because I hate sheep. I know that isn't a good reason. I made stupid plays trying to get people besides you playing the game. It went badly. I will not do so in the future. Believe me, I feel bad already, after I was dead Marv sent me a "we need to talk" message and after the game ended Kush sent me a "WTFWTFWTFWTF this game is 100 no 200 percent your fault" message. lolno. It was kush's fault. The one time when his vote counted, he chose not to think (as he did when his vote didn't count). | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 19 2012 12:18 Release wrote: lolno. It was kush's fault. The one time when his vote counted, he chose not to think (as he did when his vote didn't count). A lot of it was my fault. I was in the position to make the difference and I didn't. My fault. Kush managed to put himself in a position where his townieness was being questioned even though he had a green check. Also: you played a pretty decent last few days. I wish you hadn't played so scummily the first few. Why did you fake-claim so much? It really hurt your credibility as town, even though you were being as paranoid as me about Acro and saying the crazy thoughts in my head I still found you pretty scummy. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On November 19 2012 09:36 DarthPunk wrote: What a crock of shit. My claim was no less realistic than Fuba's or thrawns until later. They should have lynched release AND THEN lynched me. THAT was the correct play. Your claim wa 100% impossible given the setup. I hadn't read the game and I knew you were scum the moment you claimed. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 19 2012 12:29 sandroba wrote: Your claim wa 100% impossible given the setup. I hadn't read the game and I knew you were scum the moment you claimed. Hye Sand, why was it 100% impossible? I get why it was unlikely but what makes it impossible? | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
I need to play a game as scum one of these days. I still do not know the difference between how scum and townies play. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On November 19 2012 12:29 Promethelax wrote: Hye Sand, why was it 100% impossible? I get why it was unlikely but what makes it impossible? There was a 1-shot JK, and a full JK (DD). For there to be another full JK, you would have to have 2 more D rolls (DDDD). That would make the full roll CBBDDDD (0 T's). In a 0 T setup, there isn't a SK. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 19 2012 12:39 Keirathi wrote: There was a 1-shot JK, and a full JK (DD). For there to be another full JK, you would have to have 2 more D rolls (DDDD). That would make the full roll CBBDDDD (0 T's). In a 0 T setup, there isn't a SK. oh. Me dumb. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On November 19 2012 12:39 Keirathi wrote: There was a 1-shot JK, and a full JK (DD). For there to be another full JK, you would have to have 2 more D rolls (DDDD). That would make the full roll CBBDDDD (0 T's). In a 0 T setup, there isn't a SK. Wait, I thought the hosts changed the c9++ setup so that setup discussion couldn't be made? I mean, in Can't Believe it was "supposedly" c9++ but it had nothing to do with the C's and BB's and TT's (which I figured out after spending like 3 cycles speculating about it >_> ). | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On November 19 2012 12:52 gonzaw wrote: Wait, I thought the hosts changed the c9++ setup so that setup discussion couldn't be made? I mean, in Can't Believe it was "supposedly" c9++ but it had nothing to do with the C's and BB's and TT's (which I figured out after spending like 3 cycles speculating about it >_> ). I didn't remember you speculating about the rolls in that game, but I just found this gem: On July 13 2012 23:00 gonzaw wrote: Hmm, now that I think about it the more flips there are we can determine how many scum there are. Like, each time a cop flips we add a "C" (or "CC", etc), if a VT flips we add "T", etc. In the end we can know (based on all the Ts,Cs, Bs and shit that flipped or are claimed) exactly how many scum/SKs are and how many of them are. Lolol at the bolded. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On November 19 2012 12:39 Keirathi wrote: There was a 1-shot JK, and a full JK (DD). For there to be another full JK, you would have to have 2 more D rolls (DDDD). That would make the full roll CBBDDDD (0 T's). In a 0 T setup, there isn't a SK. yeah, but even knowing that FUBA or thrawn could have been fake claiming also right? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On November 19 2012 14:58 DarthPunk wrote: yeah, but even knowing that FUBA or thrawn could have been fake claiming also right? Yes, one of them could have been fake-claiming, but not BOTH of them. Once risk and thrawn were dead, setup speculation would have told the thread that you HAD to be scum following standard C9++ rules. But like I said, who knows what bugs does with 0 T's. Oh yea, that reminds me of something else I wanted to comment on: 2 godfathers. No. Never. If you ever start thinking that in a c9++ base mini, you're just wrong. Again, maybe the host could change something to allow it, but no way should that ever be your first thought, and I wouldn't even consider it without seeing empirical proof that its possible. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On November 19 2012 13:02 Keirathi wrote: I didn't remember you speculating about the rolls in that game, but I just found this gem: Lolol at the bolded. Yeah me heavily misunderstanding how c9++ works didn't really help me in that game >_> <_< | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
On November 19 2012 15:20 Keirathi wrote: Yes, one of them could have been fake-claiming, but not BOTH of them. Once risk and thrawn were dead, setup speculation would have told the thread that you HAD to be scum following standard C9++ rules. But like I said, who knows what bugs does with 0 T's. Oh yea, that reminds me of something else I wanted to comment on: 2 godfathers. No. Never. If you ever start thinking that in a c9++ base mini, you're just wrong. Again, maybe the host could change something to allow it, but no way should that ever be your first thought, and I wouldn't even consider it without seeing empirical proof that its possible. SO only once fuba was confirmed town was I 100% fake claiming. Which is what I knew all along. The last day was always going to be the tricky one. It was the one in which I was confirmed scum. I just ahd to hope the town was useless on the final day and I could argue with whoever caught on. And it worked. All those people who are saying they knew I was scum as soon as I claimed are completely wrong. I was confirmed scum based on my fake claim due to set-up only on the final day. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
| ||
