EPTYour Clothes, Give them to me. [mafia] - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
| ||
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
| ||
|
Douglas Quaid
92 Posts
| ||
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
| ||
|
Alex Hesse
72 Posts
| ||
|
Douglas Quaid
92 Posts
On October 20 2012 03:33 Harry Tasker wrote: why is that unlikely at all? Mafia's natural reaction isn't confrontational. I can see how mafia would do something like that, but I think that reaction is more likely from a townie. | ||
|
Alex Hesse
72 Posts
| ||
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
His last post and subsequent disappearance is pretty terribad. He comes in and posts on something randomly happening in the thread, but he says nothing about his main scumread, you, despite the fact you've posted quite extensively today. | ||
|
Alex Hesse
72 Posts
| ||
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
##Vote: Alan Schaefer | ||
|
Douglas Quaid
92 Posts
| ||
|
Douglas Quaid
92 Posts
On October 19 2012 15:12 Alan Schaefer wrote: Right now I'm having trouble deciding whether I want to lynch john matrix or ben more as a second choice to alex hesse. On the one hand, I never felt good about ben's first post, plus he's being indirectly defended by my scumread alex (when alex attempts to put through the john matrix lynch). On the other hand, I agree with (I think it was henry?) who was talking about how good of a plan it is for scum to just not post day one, and how anti-town that is. So I'm undecided. That line strikes me as a bit strange, since he isn't posting alex nearly as hard as he should be. He's posting ben harder then alex. However, I sympathize with the overall indecisiveness as that's pretty much what I've been doing. Let's give the guy a chance to post (longer than 30 minutes at the very least) before we swing a rapid lynch on him. | ||
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
| ||
|
Douglas Quaid
92 Posts
Alex and Harry, what do you y'all think about Jack? I think I laid it out well enough here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=374903¤tpage=11#216 | ||
|
Jack Slater
46 Posts
On October 20 2012 01:55 Douglas Quaid wrote: A couple of things: I'm against lynching Ben Richards for now I took a look at Alex's read on Ben and largely agree with it. Ben just isn't thinking as if he was mafia. His NK comment seems absurd for mafia to post, and suggesting Harry's posting style is easy to emulate strikes me as very town. It's not what mafia would think. Combined with his first post (which I still read as "try-hard"), I think he's town. My top two reads are Jack and John John for not posting (duh). Jack for what was a very unsatisfying response to my initial query: Firstly, I don't like how he's "testing the waters" in regard to voting Ben. Why should it matter if we're willing to vote Ben? If he's suspicious of him, he should be throwing down his vote. Secondly, he didn't even respond to the question I asked him and completely dodged it. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=374903¤tpage=7#135 He was suspicious of me in that post, yet he FOS'd Ben instead. What his read is now has no bearing - I'm interested in the logic of that post, and he still hasn't responded to it. 1. I am still implementing my 4 vote at a time plan... Either that or I will hammer any of my top 2 scum reads I have... As with everyone in this game votes are more important than ever... I want to be one of the 4 voting on the lynch. 2. That question was complete bs and you should know it.. I obviously felt stronger about ben flipping scum then you at that time... But your self centered fear of what people think about you is shining on display... At the time I was reading all of your posts not as neutrally as I should have been, I was aware of this but because you were in my final four and I had spoke on you I didn't feel the need to rehash my read... Dq is nervous about my read on him and wants to constantly know exactly what I think of him... Because I may think of him as scum he uses ad hominem against me and then calls me scum with baseless accusations... Some of you pointed out the hypocrisy in his posts and there is more when he says I only have 1 scum read and then quotes a post where I put 4 players as my could be scum list while he only has me and John matrix (which isn't even a read) as his "reads"... Dq is scum lashing back at the thread and myself for trying to organize a lynch that won't allow for a lack of reads or reason behind the votes... This is pushing a scum agenda. Anyone that says my filter looks bad please explain why? I hate being called scum without reason I don't have time to post as much as I want to right now in about 3 hours I will be able to post more | ||
|
Alex Hesse
72 Posts
Scum has absolutely no interest in bussing on day1 because they are not going to get any town credit for it anyway. Which means we need 4 town votes. | ||
|
Douglas Quaid
92 Posts
On October 20 2012 03:44 Harry Tasker wrote: no, that post was a tipping point, not the cause of an emotional reaction. The tipping point? You were null about him until that post and all of a sudden decided to lynch him? That post was far from a tipping point for me. It's strange, yes, but not damning. | ||
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
| ||
|
Alex Hesse
72 Posts
| ||
|
Harry Tasker
107 Posts
On October 20 2012 03:45 Douglas Quaid wrote: The tipping point? You were null about him until that post and all of a sudden decided to lynch him? That post was far from a tipping point for me. It's strange, yes, but not damning. What I hadn't really noticed on my previous look at Alan is the post you yourself reference a couple of posts ago. He couldn't be any more non-committal if he tried, where he says he can't even decide between two *secondary* lynch candidates while not pushing his primary one. | ||
| ||
