Newbie Mini Mafia XXIX - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I actually remember the game very well, I just forgot that the guy I was scum with was debears. You can see he acts liek 10000000 percent different. It was his first game so that's understandable. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 28 2012 08:02 Rad wrote: Ahh yeah, I see. @Kush, why wouldn't debears make a good coach? Because only experienced people should be coaches? Also at that point I'm pretty sure I didn't realize he was my scumbud from 2 games ago or else I wouldn't have acted like a dick towards him. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Oooo i just see that cheese posted a case. I will read that and consider it after I write this case on my new biggest scumread SILVERFYRE He votes for Roco 30 hours before lynch time. Except for lurker policy he says this: On October 25 2012 13:47 sylverfyre wrote: Also geez, as much as I like lynch a Lurker... isn't it a bit early? We're like 10% into day 1! If someone's still lurking when we're getting closer to lynch time, I could be convinced, but I feel like policy lynching lurkers should be something to resort to if we can't find anyone else being sketchy. With that, I'm going to bed. I'll be around most of tomorrow! So to clarify, he thinks lurker lynching should be a last resort (like everyone else basically), but he votes for a lurker 30 hours before lynch time. On October 26 2012 21:35 sylverfyre wrote: Running under the assumption that imcasey and Roco get modkilled if they don't show up, I'd lynch Djo. You say Inig has a lack of scumhunting but scrutinizing people and saying that you can only read town out of them is not a lack of scumhunting. For now, I'm going with lynching the confusing lurker. If he either becomes A) not confusing, B) makes no action at all and makes me believe a modkill is incoming, or C) is replaced and the replacement can make some contribution. Vote Roco69 No reasoning for wanting to lynch djo. All he gives is a reason for his town/null read on Inig. Later when prompted, he does give his reasons. On October 27 2012 00:24 sylverfyre wrote: To make it a more comprehensive list - poor responses to accusations in the past - "You sure are taking policy seriously" -> Attack lurkers aggressively (the contradiction inherent here) - accusing ini of "not scumhunting" when he posted his reads on people, simply because none of those reads were reads of scum (they were townie or null reads, and ini blatantly admitted such) - Emotional levels running awfully high as people mount pressure on you, but not much defense from accusations. - "I don't care if alsn has a FOS on me" is your only defense against him for a long time. Only just now did you even acknowledge his accusations as legit. - Accusing me of sheeping when I've made it clear that I was suspicious of you pretty early. Since then, you've given me more reasons to suspect you. I don't like this case. None of these are indicative of scum. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
| ||