Newbie Mini Mafia XXIX - Page 10

On October 31 2012 00:11 Alsn wrote:
Exactly this, and it's a fucking terrible situation. We are basically forced to lynch them because of the possibility of 2) while at the same time having pretty damn bleak outlooks on the rest of the game if 1) is true.

The annoying part is, if we get lucky and 2) is true, the third scum will just be sheeping onto their lynches anyway, so the game will end up with either 2 vs 1 in favour of town, or Rad winning as SK. So even if we get lucky, we still need to hope to god that Rad wasn't bullshitting us with his vigi claim.

That being said, I'd much rather that Rad win than scum, so yea.

On October 31 2012 00:14 Rad wrote:


I'm not sure what you mean here. Can you clarify?

On October 30 2012 08:58 Djodref wrote:
Guys, I would prefer to lynch Cheese over Ini

On October 31 2012 03:26 nackhtjogger wrote:
Btw people, next time when you play town try to end the discussion about lurker policy as quickly as possible. Loosing to lurkers is awful but it's a different kind of shame than loosing to active scum. It has more to do with the ability to organize and agree on the fact that lurkers should be lynched D1 or let the vig take care of it, rather than a personal failure. This is always the right consensus to be reached for town as fast as possible, doesn't matter if you later bend it a bit.. that's the beauty of it. But you should never consider to debate bending it because it results in a shitstorm.

On October 31 2012 02:17 nackhtjogger wrote:


By process of elimination.. pretty much

On October 31 2012 03:52 nackhtjogger wrote:
The only scenario worth considering right now is that there are 2 scum. I think I've identified Cheesecake as one by pointing out his constant queries into town's approval for his courses of action and considerations, which is what belnding in really means. Blending in doesn't mean you don't notice the guy .. it just means he TRIES desperately TO BLEND IN, actively I might add. Once you have enough experience to know how that manifests you can identify this by simply reading the tone of the post.

Alsn on the other hand is another breed, his actions give away his scummness and the fact that his actions don't add up with what he claims to be thinking. If that wouldn't have been the case he would've either voted for Cheese or never mentioned that he finds cheese suspicious. What he did was .. not only anti-town in itself but it also kept other townies from doing the right thing and voting for Cheese. People started to listen to him when he said Cheese was suspicious but he sabotaged that trust and did exactly the opposite .. even saying that Dandel would be to blame for a Cheese mislynch. Oh really? That would've been 100% my fault obviously but somehow he cracked under pressure and actually believed he was going to get some heat.

I think you, debears, tried persistently to get a leader position going from the start, and I have reasons to believe you feel threatened by my appearance and the certainty I'm emanating. You must feel like I know too much or that I want nothing more than to manipulate. Certain town? Who cares if you're certain town to me or not .. the only scenario that is left for consideration is that there are 2 scum and you have heard that I'm pretty sure cheese and alsn to be it. So what's the problem .. of course I'm drawing the line at this point and I want everybody except those two on my team.

On October 31 2012 04:18 nackhtjogger wrote:
God you noobs are so annoying (>>>>> jk. Jeez. Talking at night is useless. Btw who didn't claim yet and why?!

On October 31 2012 04:25 Dandel Ion wrote:
What good does claiming VT names do anyways?
I assume name division is not made from lore? (no idea though, I don't play SF)