|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 17:47 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 17:36 yamato77 wrote:
Hey bugs will you lynch marv? why/why not? if he doesn't improve his play tomorrow, I might be convinced. However, I am almost sure that there will be a better lynch. If either of Hopeless and tube are alive tomorrow they will both make better lynches IMO.
what is this? I've made the best/only case post-flip, and my play in general has been quite ok, except for Palmar salivating all over me.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 10:59 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 10:51 marvellosity wrote:
the case only depends very slightly on my alignment, really. I mean obviously if you knew I was town it'd be much easier to roll with it.
But the fact remains he flipflopped according to the sentiment in the thread, and his tunkeg attitude just doesn't add up, and that's nothing to do with me really.
Keirathi - you've got some experience with Cheesecake and debears. I'd like you to tell me what you see. debears is trolling with chezinu, which I assume means they are probably masons (have they actually claimed masons? I don't remember seeing it if they have. maybe I just haven't gotten there yet). Dunno who initiated the masonry, though. Probably debears, since he seemed quite concerned with mason stuff early game. Probably town, then. I don't have any experience playing with CC, and I generally just don't attempt to meta people that I haven't played with, but I did like kush's statement that CC was more jokey as town and more serious as scum, at least in the past. Nothing in his filter screams scum to me, though. You seemed quite willing to lynch him, so do explain.
debears and chez are highly unlikely to be masons, because that means one of them masoned the other, and I just don't see that happening.
I want to lynch Cheesecake because his play isn't like anything I've seen before from him, but ALL the differences are maria oriented - lurking, not caring about the lynch, not pushing any cases.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 11:04 Keirathi wrote:
Also @marv:
You are quite good, as scum, at taking things townies do and using them as cases to get hte lynched, no? I mean, you win quite often as scum, and your lynches get pushed through. So saying your alignment has no bearing on the case on MZ is just flat out wrong.
Say the case I wrote, the name at the top was kitaman. How does it change the case? Or is it just objectively good?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 18:37 Lazermonkey wrote:
So I woke up...
Marv may very well be scum after all. Two slow alignment cops seems quite unlikely, espesially given that we had a day cop as well.
I actually like his case on MZ tho. Especially the points regarding Tunkeg. But I'm puzzled. I'm not keen at lynching him at all tomorrow because most likely both of them are NOT scum. And I'm more suspicious of Marv.
A vigi shot on tube is bad also imo. The vigi(s), if there are any, should be aiming for the most suspicous person. Not a retarded lurker
You better explain all of this drivel. You like my case, but MZ is most likely not scum? Why? Seriously, explain yourself.
Why is a vig shot on tube bad? Have you even read the thread this night time? Did you see the comparison filters that Foolish/I put forward? How on earth is he a bad shot in light of that?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 21:33 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 18:37 Lazermonkey wrote:
Marv may very well be scum after all. Two slow alignment cops seems quite unlikely, espesially given that we had a day cop as well.
I actually like his case on MZ tho. Especially the points regarding Tunkeg. But I'm puzzled. I'm not keen at lynching him at all tomorrow because most likely both of them are NOT scum. And I'm more suspicious of Marv.
A vigi shot on tube is bad also imo. The vigi(s), if there are any, should be aiming for the most suspicous person. Not a retarded lurker
The case on Hopeless
...(tldr) Hey Lazer you are wishy washing hard on Marv. You will or will not want to lynch marv tomorrow? Also I think you are scum esp that middle part. Can you clarify what you meant there, making clearer who you think is most likely town. * Also I have irrefutable evidence that marv is scum. I will post this at work later.
you are now a good lynch because of LAL
well done kush
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 19:09 supersoft wrote:
not at night. I don't wanna catch a bullet :D
that's why i am not raging like a madman after you killed BC and not marv.
yeah, you said you had a scumread on BC too, so you just need to shut up. Both you and Palmar are 0/2 and probably one of you are scum.
On January 05 2013 07:56 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 07:55 supersoft wrote:
oh god what happened.
I feel really sick right now and i was sleeping. Can someone shoot marv tonight?, please?
*facepalm*
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
except there's like at least severeal ppl I'd lynch before Sentinel. so ho hum
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm not at all sure he's scum, and there are far more likely scummers, like MZ.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
tube, cheesecake too. And I haven't looked into Hopeless yet, but he seems more likely at this stage than Sentinel.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
well, good for you dear. That Jackal one earlier in the game was a cracker.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm not snippy. You don't know me if you think that's snippy.
Anyway, because I like you I'm going back to look at a previous game or two of Sentinel's (LIII and Redux filters are open in my tabs presently)
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
this game has led to a certain unavoidable snippiness level, by dint of sheer stupidity and bigheadedness (Palmar) and sheeping of said stupidity and bigheadedness (lots of town)
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 22:06 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 21:39 marvellosity wrote:On January 05 2013 18:37 Lazermonkey wrote:
So I woke up...
Marv may very well be scum after all. Two slow alignment cops seems quite unlikely, espesially given that we had a day cop as well.
I actually like his case on MZ tho. Especially the points regarding Tunkeg. But I'm puzzled. I'm not keen at lynching him at all tomorrow because most likely both of them are NOT scum. And I'm more suspicious of Marv.
A vigi shot on tube is bad also imo. The vigi(s), if there are any, should be aiming for the most suspicous person. Not a retarded lurker
You better explain all of this drivel. You like my case, but MZ is most likely not scum? Why? Seriously, explain yourself. Why is a vig shot on tube bad? Have you even read the thread this night time? Did you see the comparison filters that Foolish/I put forward? How on earth is he a bad shot in light of that? I don't see how its strange. My thought process 1.) I think your are quite suspicious 2.) I think you have some good points about MZ, making me somewhat suspicious of him as well. 3.) You both are probebly both not scum 4.) I find you more suspicous than MZ 5.) Thus I don't think it's very likely that MZ is scum 6.) If you actually are town, then I'm truly suspicous of MZ once again.
you really don't know how to play mafia, do you
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
seriously, #3 in that list is totally out of place. How you can't see that is totally baffling.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
oh, it's a syntax thing. Ok.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Lazer, you need to give a really good answer on why I am more suspicious than MZ, given our relative contributions this game. My case on MZ alone is already more contributions than MZ.
Please do so about now.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 22:10 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 22:08 marvellosity wrote:
Lazer, you need to give a really good answer on why I am more suspicious than MZ, given our relative contributions this game. My case on MZ alone is already more contributions than MZ.
Please do so about now. Read Palmars filter. You shall find the answer!
no, that's not good enough.
YOU need to give a really good reason why I am more suspicious than MZ this game.
Look at our relative contributions, look at our relative investment.
Stop jerking your puny little dick in Palmar's direction because you're too fucking pathetic to think for yourself.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 05 2013 22:14 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 22:12 marvellosity wrote:On January 05 2013 22:10 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 05 2013 22:08 marvellosity wrote:
Lazer, you need to give a really good answer on why I am more suspicious than MZ, given our relative contributions this game. My case on MZ alone is already more contributions than MZ.
Please do so about now. Read Palmars filter. You shall find the answer! no, that's not good enough. YOU need to give a really good reason why I am more suspicious than MZ this game. Look at our relative contributions, look at our relative investment. Stop jerking your puny little dick in Palmar's direction because you're too fucking pathetic to think for yourself. I don't see how it's a problem. Another thing that makes me doubt you is the fact that already 2 DTs have flipped, one was day slow DT...
It's a problem because when morons like you who refuse to think themselves sheep someone and they're wrong, that means all of a sudden a third of town is voting for someone because they can't utilise their own brains.
Please use yours. You just made a pretty decent case on Hopeless, so now do your own work on me.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
This game is giving me a rapidly increasing list of players I never want to play Mafia with again  makes me sad.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
like, Cheesecake SHEEPED debears who was SHEEPING Palmar.
Fucking sheepception.
THIS IS NOT MAFIA GUYS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
