|
On October 13 2012 11:27 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:24 kushm4sta wrote:On October 13 2012 11:19 EchelonTee wrote:
However you were able to push me, your top scumread, and you did nothing.
I gave you 3 votes. Austin said he would outvote. I backed off (i figured you would lose to sandroba next round anyway so no reason to get into a voting war with austin) You have also written 0 posts about why you think I'm scummy, yet you continuously seek to jab at me and aggravate me.
false. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372945¤tpage=15#295 In that post you said I didn't scumhunt. I responded to you that I did scumhunt. In my post, I said you put 0 posts on me. You respond to me that you did. You see a pattern? We're arguing about nothing. Just stop.
What is the pattern? That you are wrong? You said I put 0 posts on you. I linked you one. 1>0 That you responded to it does not cancel out its existence.
What is so scummy about ON? Just his 2 ninja votes at the end of r1? Or his afking? Hypothetically if he does not post at all d1, rules state that he will be modkilled or replaced. What is wrong with letting that happen?
|
@ET know you are being bombarded with questions and I know that can be frustrating. So sorry. You ignored this part of my post. Not your fault but I want it answered. I have difficulty in understanding why you think ON is scummy? What is so scummy about ON? Just his 2 ninja votes at the end of r1? Or his afking? Hypothetically if he does not post at all d1, rules state that he will be modkilled or replaced. Wouldn't that solve the afk issue?
|
@sandroba I thought you were getting drunk today and not posting?
|
On January 13 2012 17:11 sandroba wrote: Also it's ridiculously easy to figure out my alignment not only because I suck as scum, but also because I hate it and usually can't keep up with the thread after a few days. So yeah, you don't have to worry about that because I'm thankfully town this game.
This is a quote from TL Mafia L. Sandroba rolled scum. He's right. I think every game in which Sandroba rolled scum features long periods of afking into an early lynch.
This djodref is either very dumb or scum. You would never as town (and inteligent) feel that a person that is standing up to you against the majority trying to lynch would be scum. Prpl and mementos are prob scum. What happened to ON? Previously you thought he was the best lynch:
On October 12 2012 05:17 sandroba wrote: Look at the cases people posted, which is the strongest? Definetely the case on ON. How can you ever say that I'm not trying to get scum lynched or that my play has been uninspired? You can't. Right now I'm thinking that this holiday was merely a convenient excuse. And yeah I don't want to lynch ON for reasons I have already stated and mods have yelled at me for bringing up.
Sandroba x1 Not like my 1 vote even matters though.
|
MOMENTOSS hypothetically ON could be replaced right? Wouldn't that solve the problem?
|
On October 14 2012 01:03 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 00:53 kushm4sta wrote: MEMENTOSS hypothetically ON could be replaced right? Wouldn't that solve the problem? Yeah it would, but the hosts don't seem to keen on it so Im not sure. Mods aren't keen on the discussion of it. This is from the op.
Activity: You must post in this thread regularly. If you fail to follow activity rules, you will be inactivity modkilled.
@mementoss+ Show Spoiler + also rza should not be allowed to rap ever
|
@austin you are wrong no one fought for ON. I fought for him last round purely because he is a null read. ET pushed him through with 6 last minute votes. I just wish ET hadn't done that so would could lynch 1der today.
Also you make a pretty good point about the replacement. If I had to guess based on the OP, I would guess that ON is going to get modkilled. So what is better? Lynching ON so he doesn't get modkilled or lynching sandroba and letting ON get modkilled? Right now I'm leaning towards the option that gets them both killed. I dont want to have to lynch Sandroba d2 if he continues on his path of lurking/not giving a shit.
|
Im really curious about ET's opinion on Sandroba's earlier posts. He seemed confident that he could tell town sandroba from scum sandroba.
|
On October 13 2012 16:00 sandroba wrote: If you people stopped one second to look at this thread you would come to realise that is simply no way I'm scum purely based on how this situation came to be. What about how this situation came to be proves that he isn't scum?
|
prplhaze are you talking about sandroba or 1dr??
|
Why are no scum stepping up for sandroba? Sandroba is notoriously bad as scum. If he is scum, the longer the game goes, the clearer that will become. I don't think scum would risk trying to defend him. They would see him as a lost cause.
But that brings up a separate point. If he is scum, according to his meta, the scumminess will just become more obvious as the game progresses, as he will continue to mostly afk.
Really want to hear from ET since he is seems confident in being to read sands meta.
|
Sandroba has a better chance of flipping scum...lynch sandroba. This day has been SUPER long and he has had ample time to show us he is town. He hasn't though. His defense, non-defense, whatever you want to call it, did not convince me.
I'll go through his recent posts soon and quote some stuff. But for now I'm leaving my one measly vote on Sandroba.
@Austin if you want to give me your votes, whatever it's kind of weird but I'll take them. Put those bitches on Sandroba.
|
also it sucks that ET only shows up after the lynch
|
On October 13 2012 16:00 sandroba wrote: I'm not going to fight against this lynch. This is simply too stupid to fight over and I don't feel like it. If you people stopped one second to look at this thread you would come to realise that is simply no way I'm scum purely based on how this situation came to be. Also there is no case against me. I refuse to defend myself against the ignorant uninformed opinion of a bunch of riotters. This is no way to play mafia. You have to look at the intricacies and not follow the mob rule that is usually driven by scum. I leave you sheep to your fate.
Everything in this paragraph is wrong. I fail to see how it's impossible for him to be scum because of "this situation." I think his scumbuddies would be happy to bus him due to his total failure as scum in the past. There is no case against him? Not true. Well he hasn't given us anything to go off of, so all the cases are based on meta. His meta is very consistent, which makes those cases stronger. The rest of OMG about following sheeping or whatever, but I don't feel like that has really happened here.
|
@sandroba in the round where it was you vs me you had way more votes. It would have been pretty hard for scum to make that happen I think.
|
it was 4-2 in his favor then ON removed 1 to conserve votes i think.
|
it does kind of seem like he is trying too hard to not be lynched to be scum,, as weird as that sounds.
|
yeah as scum he would just let this lynch happen.. that is what he has done in the past
|
im having doubts about this sandroba lynch. I really wanted ET's input on the matter since I am by no means an expert on sandrobas meta, and that is what the case against him is based on.
|
austin vote ON for me please. im changing my mind about sandroba lynch
|
|
|
|