• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:49
CEST 08:49
KST 15:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202529Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder4EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced38BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BW General Discussion Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Shield Battery Server New Patch
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Flash @ Namkraft Laddernet …
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 536 users

Looney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 6

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 10 Next All
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 19:58 GMT
#1339
Alright, fuck it. Austins case on my and tunnelling could be either way.

1) He could be tunnelling me so hard as town because he really thinks I'm scum. Its not scum to be wrong. Alot of his points in his case are good. A lot of points in his case are bad. (NK speculation and dangerous townie espeically forced)

2) He could be using this over aggressiveness as a way to defend himself as scum. But why? Why would he go about it this way? Why would he spend all that time and effort to make a third case about me? Is my mis-lynch THAT important to him as scum? Does this make sense?
-> My mis-lynch would bring negative attention back to austin the next day, espeically being high on everyones list, and the fact people already brought up some WIFOM shit y r u not dead yet?
-> Wouldn't it be easier for scum austin to go with the flow with the rest of the town and withdraw his read on me and consider me town post hopeless post along with most people. Espeically someone he considers a "dangerous townie".
-> He couldn't push da0d the easiest target because of his defense on him all game, but there are definetly easier targets, aka "Hiropro" pre replacement.
-> His case, it seems far far far too agressive for scum austin. Compare his case on me this game to his case against me in aperature which he was scum:

+ Show Spoiler +
On October 03 2012 03:45 austinmcc wrote:
Concerning Mementoss Gonzaw, he and keirathi are sort of right up there with each other for the people I'm considering for active scum.

It's a couple little things:

(1) His comments on me feel slightly forced
Show nested quote +
On October 01 2012 00:29 Mementoss wrote:
Austinmcc

On September 30 2012 15:44 austinmcc wrote:
...

I appreciate things getting off to a nice start, but really? Was I the only person who assumed that Keirathi didn't actually have some giant scumread on Mattchew? Given the reasons that he decided to vote mattchew (amg mattchew has used the term town and hasn't claimed a role that doesn't exist), I don't see the unvote as scummy. Vote for weak reasons, unvote for weak reasons.

Drazerk you ACTUALLY think it's anti-town to do that?


The fact that austinmcc can't see what drazerk is trying to say is mind boggling since austinmcc is not a noob. It was pretty clear to anyone reading the thread that Keirathia plan was done in the incorrect way as I went into above and as mattchew explained a bit further in his post. Also, austinmcc thinks this is getting off to a good start?? It seems pretty dead to me. On top of this weird misconception, his explanation for why the unvote is not scummy is lackluster. Vote has a lot more power than actually getting someone lynched. He's also asking sarcastic rhetorical questions, in which the answers are fairly fucking obvious. The lack of logic here is scummy, and trying to make drazerk look bad without reason to/ target the easiest player to target day 1 in this game, makes me think austinmcc is scum.

##Vote: Austinmcc
I can't see what Drazerk is saying. I think the game is getting off to a good start. I don't explain why the unvote isn't scummy well enough for mementoss's liking. I lack logic. I am trying to make Drazerk look bad.

I addres some of those points here:
Show nested quote +
On October 01 2012 01:09 austinmcc wrote:
The good start bit is relative to other recent games. It may seem dead, but, comparatively, this game started much quicker.

So you don't see Keirathi's early play as scummy, you find it poorly executed town play.

I didn't find it scummy and asked Drazerk whether he actually does, which was not a rhetorical question (The other ones, sure, but the final question to Drazerk is for realsies). You even want "more explanation" from Drazerk in the future, which is what I wanted because I didn't see Keirathi's entrance as third party. I know that Drazerk gave some comments on why an uninvested survivor would give up so easily, but look at his actual vote:
On September 30 2012 14:00 Drazerk wrote:
##vote Keirathi

I'll be honest only a survivor / third party / idiot would back off a case that early with that little pressure against it.

Now I'm going to go to bed.
The vote lays out survivor/third party/idiot. What makes Drazerk sure it's the first two and not the third? I'm wondering why, if it can be any of the three, he's so focused on the third party options. Maybe I'm just paranoid, but Drazerk and third party have a history in themed games, and want to know why he's zoning in on third party options rather than what would appear to be bad townie.

It's not that I can't see what Drazerk is saying, but I want to know where that option for Keirathi's play went.

See GSL Open II for slow start, which I'd just been killed in. See Drazerk's vote for an option that Keirathi was an "idiot," yet he never really addressed why he was dismissing that option and finding Keirathi to be third party. At least not that I've seen.

Note also that in this post I say I didn't find Keirathi's conduct scummy. I say this. I didn't find Keirathi's early play scummy.


(2)
Show nested quote +
On October 01 2012 07:23 Mementoss wrote:
@Gonzaw I think that it is still weird that austin completely switches stances on the Drazerk/keirathi squabble after I make that comment calling him scummy. I asked him why he came to flip flop on the issue and hasn't answered the question yet. Leaving my post on him, the way he commented on the situation seemed really weird for me.
By the time mementoss posts this, I was finding Keirathi scummy because of the EXPLANATION that he was giving for his mattchew vote/unvote:+ Show Spoiler +
I look further into Keirathi
On October 01 2012 03:18 austinmcc wrote:
Keirathi, I'm a little troubled by this when I look back through your explanation:

Show nested quote +
On September 30 2012 13:01 Keirathi wrote:
Of course my case is bad. I certainly don't think you are scum for something so...inconsequential. But this thread needed to move past setup speculation and into people giving real, meaningful opinions and thoughts that they can be held accountable for. Although, I was hoping that other people would weigh in on it before you responded

##Unovte
When you unvote, you specifically note that you want real, meaningful opinions that people can be held accountable for. So you're interested in getting discussion going in general.

Show nested quote +
On September 30 2012 14:20 Keirathi wrote:
Matt took my case seriously, and gave a solid response. I don't need to wait for other people to come into the thread to tell me that. No reason to leave my vote on him anymore, it accomplished my goal.
This seems to not match up. If you wanted people to give opinions, how was your goal accomplished when only Mattchew responded?

Show nested quote +
On September 30 2012 14:22 Drazerk wrote:
You need other people to comment on something before you dismiss it especially when the only person commenting was the person the case was built around.

Show nested quote +
On September 30 2012 14:26 Keirathi wrote:
That doesn't make any sense. Why do I need someone else's opinion on my case to make up my own mind about how well Matt defended himself?

Now you seem to be responding to Drazerk that you were only concerned with Mattchew and not other people's opinions. The initial justification says you wanted opinions, now you don't even want them.

Show nested quote +
On September 30 2012 15:10 Keirathi wrote:
Here was my thought process: I started reading the thread, and I saw the last few posts all speculating about the setup in a closed setup game. And I'll admit, I even threw my own comment out there. Then I realized that setup speculation wasn't doing anything to actually benefit town. So I went back and looked for who started the discussion, and it was you. Then I looked back at your earlier posts, remembered you seem to roll scum a lot, and you were doing a thing that I've personally used to identify scum.

Back to wanting discussion.


Why the two inconsistent explanations? You may think this has been covered ad nauseum, but some of your explanations aren't really matching up.
On October 01 2012 05:03 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 01 2012 04:15 Keirathi wrote:
@austin:

On September 30 2012 16:14 Keirathi wrote:
I think the misconception here is that people seem to think that I wanted my case on Matt to generate discussion about Matt. That's not really the case. I just wanted to generate discussion, period. If that discussion was about Matt? Great. About me? Great. About people who jumped in to defend or attack one or the other of us? Still great.

Anything besides trying to guess how many scum there are. *snip*


Again, I didn't need my case on Mattchew to generate discussion about HIM. I would have happily discussed it with other people if they came into the thread before he responded, but once he did and I was satisfied with his response (plus my meta check through his games), I really had no reason to leave my vote there. I'm certainly not sure that he's town or anything, but his response was townie enough that I unvoted.

Here's a question for you, though. What's my scum motivation for doing that?

There's just a little disconnect there between wanting discussion and being happy to discuss Mattchew with others and then "why do I need someone else's opinion on my case." Like...if your case was meant as a tool to get discussion, then it doesn't matter much what mattchew says or how he responds, because your primary concern is discussion and not his alignment. His response gives you a starting point for MORE discussion, asking people how they feel about his response, etc.

Scummy motivation? Just look at your explanation, that you wanted to stop setup speculation and move into something else, generate discussion, because it would help town. RAWR, i am keirathi, the hero who saved town from a slow game, scum would never do that, feed me your town cred!


Ymmv, but I'm pretty clearly focused on Keirathi's explanations for the entire thing, not the ease at which he unvoted, which is what I was initially defending/not finding scummy:
Show nested quote +
I appreciate things getting off to a nice start, but really? Was I the only person who assumed that Keirathi didn't actually have some giant scumread on Mattchew? Given the reasons that he decided to vote mattchew (amg mattchew has used the term town and hasn't claimed a role that doesn't exist), I don't see the unvote as scummy. Vote for weak reasons, unvote for weak reasons.
I'm not concerned with the vote/unvote in the posts that have happened between mementoss's case and this, I'm concerned with Keirathi's explanation for the whole Mattchew shebang, that he wanted opinions yet stopped before he got them, and then stated he didn't need anyone else's opinion.

So I don't get mementoss's post:
Show nested quote +
On October 01 2012 07:23 Mementoss wrote:
@Gonzaw I think that it is still weird that austin completely switches stances on the Drazerk/keirathi squabble after I make that comment calling him scummy. I asked him why he came to flip flop on the issue and hasn't answered the question yet. Leaving my post on him, the way he commented on the situation seemed really weird for me.

we may just disagree that I completely switched stances. Which is fine. I said I didn't find Keirathi's early play scummy. After looking at his explanation further, I did. I'm probably splitting hairs in trying to separate the vote/unvote from the explanation, but that's because I still don't find the vote/unvote with ease scummy, but I DO find the explanation scummy. They point in different ways for me.

But the bolded part here gets stuck in my head. I don't see any post concerning me "flip flopping." I don't see a comment in his initial vote on me about that. I don't see a comment at any point while I'm going back and forth with Keirathi about me flip flopping. This is the first time I see it, and I have no idea what it's referencing. This is ODD. It gives off scummy vibes, because it indicates that mementoss misremembers what he was calling me out for (not focused on actually calling me out, more focused on just making a case), or, the more paranoid option, that this is part of some planned attack and there's a post that should have come, calling me a flip-flopper, but never did. Neither option gives me a townie feeling.

(3) Then he's got this post as well:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2012 03:49 Mementoss wrote:
On October 02 2012 01:43 austinmcc wrote:
On October 02 2012 01:15 Mattchew wrote:
austin why arent you voting iamperfection with me?

Oh noes, I forgot.

##Vote: iamperfection

Sorry about that.

##Unvote
snip


This exchange read extremely weird for me, especially since before this austimccn has never mentioned Iamperfection.
That post does read weird, because he's reading it seriously. Like I said to keirathi, + Show Spoiler +
On October 02 2012 04:12 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2012 03:53 JingleHell wrote:
On October 02 2012 03:49 Mementoss wrote:
On October 02 2012 01:43 austinmcc wrote:
On October 02 2012 01:15 Mattchew wrote:
austin why arent you voting iamperfection with me?

Oh noes, I forgot.

##Vote: iamperfection

Sorry about that.

##Unvote
snip


This exchange read extremely weird for me, especially since before this austimccn has never mentioned Iamperfection.


You know, that's actually an intriguing point. Mind explaining, austin?

Found Mattchew's question to be real but posed in a silly way (What is your read on iamperfection?). Gave him a real answer, but started with a silly beginning.
On October 02 2012 04:34 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2012 04:22 Keirathi wrote:
On October 02 2012 04:12 austinmcc wrote:
On October 02 2012 03:53 JingleHell wrote:
On October 02 2012 03:49 Mementoss wrote:
On October 02 2012 01:43 austinmcc wrote:
On October 02 2012 01:15 Mattchew wrote:
austin why arent you voting iamperfection with me?

Oh noes, I forgot.

##Vote: iamperfection

Sorry about that.

##Unvote
snip


This exchange read extremely weird for me, especially since before this austimccn has never mentioned Iamperfection.


You know, that's actually an intriguing point. Mind explaining, austin?

Found Mattchew's question to be real but posed in a silly way (What is your read on iamperfection?). Gave him a real answer, but started with a silly beginning.

I could buy that answer, but it still doesn't explain why after your Vote+Unvote, you kept talking about iamperfection like you wanted to lynch him.

On October 02 2012 01:43 austinmcc wrote:
Why am I voting iamperfection over others?

*snip*

Why am I lynching iamperfection over the other two? *snip*


That was your first mention of him, and you seemed to be saying that you thought he was the scummiest of the 3 "lurker" and that one of them was almost certainly scum. But immediately afterwards, you started talking about JH and in your next post, you hopped on the JH wagon.

Oh, no. It was meant as a silly response and vote, not that I'm finding him more scummy than the others. That question isn't "Why am I voting iamperfection? Let me tell you!" It was "Why am I joining you in voting for iamperfection when these other two look almost the same?" Not actually hopping on the wagon.


Mattchew's question looked silly. I gave a silly answer. I am sometimes silly in thread. But mementoss pulls this up later:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2012 08:58 Mementoss wrote:
Also @gonzaw, austin is most likely town for what?

Sheeping onto iamperfection when mattchew told him to? Trying to counterwagon a last minute switch onto keirathi?

Dude, either your out of it this game or scum not sure.

Read my vote/unvote. I'm not sheeping onto iamperfection because Mattchew asks me to. I vote him as a JOKE, unvote him, and then ask why I should be lynching iamperfection over ghost/nisani, and why I find the three to be similar. I do not know how this is interpreted as me jumping on a wagon. If I were jumping on a wagon, I wouldn't unvote and ask why I was lynching one instead of the other two. I was joking and then seriously asking mattchew why he was on iamperfection over others.

Again, it's this weird disconnect where mementoss doesn't quite seem to be reading my responses. Or he just dislikes my responses but never really voices that when they come out. I misread him in Rock Band as scum when he was town, and I'm not getting as strong a scum read here, but flip flop posts that don't actually exist, not really reading my posts but continuing to just poke at me don't result in a townie feel.


This quip stuck out to me as well, just as very interesting:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2012 09:25 Mementoss wrote:
If your town mafia will kill you night 1 anyways lol.

(Mementoss, why is Gonzaw the N1 kill? I'd like to see your reasoning behind this statement)



Beyond that, I agree with all three of these:
Show nested quote +
Mementos:
He didn't do anything at all throughout D1. Same heuristic here as well, he hasn't been part of any discussion even though he was active (like when ghost asked him a question).
He didn't heavily push iamperfection so his vote on him doesn't mean anything, specially since unvoting him would not change anything.
Still, it doesn't seem right that he'd bus his scummate that early and never try to shift attention to some other townie, so I'll keep that in mind.
I remember him being around a good bit, I remember some posts of his, but I'm not sure that I would if he didn't attack me. He kind of blended in, and there were some major points (Mattchew trying to drum up iamperfection lynch, the JH discussion, the ghost/keirathi bit at the end) where he's just not seeming concerned. But yet he didn't move off of iamperfection, and attacked him early, and also responded to keirathi about iamperfection's meta.


A lot of his posts on me just confuse me. They don't give me a townie vibe, but he's picking up on things that I would probably pick up on as well. The joke-vote looks really odd when it's just text and I didn't put a disclaimer as to what I was doing. But it feels like he's detached from actually pushing me, just like he was detached from pushing iamperfection. And that "flip-flopping" comment...I can't figure out where that comes from. Am I being overly paranoid thinking there was some sequence of posts he thought he'd made?

I'm still more sold on Keirathi as the active scum. But mementoss is my secondary candidate, and if I'm being purely speculative, one of the people I could most see being third party. It's the only way I can really rectify my read based on his general play AND the fact that he voted for scum. So I want to keep an eye on him even though he voted iamperfection.



-> Read austin in the QT of that game, he was careful, calculated. Hell he was conservative. Reading the QT the mentality of his tunneling against me, it feels different. Did he do this on purpose as scum? Risky as fuck, espeically being a man down already. Also the way harder route.

IRC:
On October 12 2012 08:56 HiroPro wrote:
Aperture IRC Logs:

+ Show Spoiler [day1] +

[14:38] <austinmcc> test test
01[14:41] <@HiroPro> sup
[14:42] <austinmcc> not much, responding to keirathi i guess
[14:43] <austinmcc> don't terribly want to drop a vote on him right now, i usually vote pretty late, but I think his explanation has holes to poke at
01[14:43] <@HiroPro> yea
[14:43] <austinmcc> everything so different from this alignment
01[14:43] <@HiroPro> but it's like really nitpicking
[14:43] <austinmcc> it is, but i've actually done it before
[14:44] <austinmcc> i caught talismania in a game where he suggested some plan to get everyone active and then fumbled with the reasons he wanted to do that
01[14:44] <@HiroPro> eh do what you think is right for you I guess
01[14:44] <@HiroPro> s&b man
01[14:44] <@HiroPro> that guy could be third party
01[14:44] <@HiroPro> gonzaw looks kinda weird also
[14:45] <austinmcc> snb was REALLY inactive in GSL 2
[14:45] <austinmcc> was travelling or something, i'm unsure how active he is
01[14:45] <@HiroPro> yea, but like drazerk's point is valid
01[14:45] <@HiroPro> s&b has played so many games with drazerk
[14:45] <austinmcc> yeah
01[14:45] <@HiroPro> he knows by now that draz will hunt for third parties
[14:45] <austinmcc> bah, drazerk doesn't hunt for third parties, drazerk hunts for HIMSELF. Always rolling third party
01[14:46] <@HiroPro> lol true
[14:46] <austinmcc> it seems like we've got too much KP for a third party
[14:46] <austinmcc> actually, i have nothing to base that on
01[14:46] <@HiroPro> nah i don't think so. everyone in town will have a role
[14:47] <austinmcc> gonzaw said he was busy for a few days, snb may be busy, got a couple lurkers
[14:47] <austinmcc> trying to think who poses the biggest threat
01[14:47] <@HiroPro> "Hiro goes on my town list because no anti-town faction would be dumb enough to say that.
01[14:47] <@HiroPro> "
01[14:47] <@HiroPro> rofl
01[14:47] <@HiroPro> i feel good
[14:47] <austinmcc> haha
[14:48] <austinmcc> i haven't played with town drazerk in a real game i don't think
[14:48] <austinmcc> nor with nisani
[14:48] <austinmcc> nor much with ghost
01[14:48] <@HiroPro> i played with town draz in bastard 2
01[14:48] <@HiroPro> nisani was town also in that game, ghost 3rd party
01[14:48] <@HiroPro> might want to check it out if you have time since it's a very heavy themed game also
[14:48] <austinmcc> okay, I'll reread that over the week
[14:49] <austinmcc> i read it as it was played, but i'll refresh
[14:50] <austinmcc> Dunno if Jingle will be tunnely this game or will try to help out
01[14:50] <@HiroPro> well i'm not too familiar with him, but if ptp3 is anything to go by, he's not a threat at all
[14:51] <austinmcc> yeah. That can't be his normal play though
[14:51] <austinmcc> he's been in a few newbies, and I think he was standoffish in a couple but not all
01[14:51] <@HiroPro> i remember someone coming into the ban list thread to complain about him while the game was ongoing
01[14:51] <@HiroPro> might have been shady
01[14:52] <@HiroPro> if gonzaw has time he can be dangerous
01[14:52] <@HiroPro> no one will listen to him, but draz picks up on things
01[14:52] <@HiroPro> ghost and s&b can be decent
01[14:53] <@HiroPro> mementoss too i guess
1[14:54] <@HiroPro> matt is really up and down, dunno what he's going to be like this game
[14:54] <austinmcc> yeah, i was remembering shady and jingle sniping at each other in the one game
[14:54] <austinmcc> hmmm
[14:54] <austinmcc> i agree on gonzaw
[14:54] <austinmcc> i guess we see how this game feels, but he's someone to take out before he can spam
[14:54] <austinmcc> although he also seems to get off track sometime and just clog up thread
01[14:54] <@HiroPro> thing is right now the game is kinda dead
[14:54] <austinmcc> if snb's super inactive i'm not overly worried about him
01[14:55] <@HiroPro> gonzaw is a good guy to correct that
[14:55] <austinmcc> yeah
[15:46] <austinmcc> ooooh
[15:46] <austinmcc> looks like we might get PTP3 JingleHell
03[15:47] * iamperfection (webchat@69.177.214.63) has joined #makemoneyfast
[15:47] <iamperfection> sup
[15:49] <austinmcc> nothing, just scummin' it up
[15:50] <iamperfection> what you think of my role seems like nerve gas will be the most usefull
01[16:25] <@HiroPro> ok i think i'll goad gonzaw into jumping on JIngle again
01[16:25] <@HiroPro> if he does that, the thread will turn into crap
01[16:26] <@HiroPro> perfection your role, uh, nerve gas is useful yeah, if we think we have a vig definetely use the 500 watt button and also stack it with austin's ability
01[16:26] <@HiroPro> that way they'll likely die instantly
01[16:44] <@HiroPro> what the hell lol
01[16:44] <@HiroPro> jinglehell actually dropped that just on 1 statement I made?
01[16:44] <@HiroPro> hrm
01[16:45] <@HiroPro> and i didn't even provide any quotes or games ol


+ Show Spoiler [Night 1] +

[21:11] <austinmcc> check check 1 2
[21:11] <austinmcc> i don't have very long, but i can hop in here for a bit
01[21:12] <@HiroPro> hey
01[21:13] <@HiroPro> wait so what exactly where you trying to say with the mattchew thing?
01[21:13] <@HiroPro> i didn't really get it
[21:13] <austinmcc> yeah yeah, it came out wrong
[21:13] <austinmcc> ugh
[21:13] <austinmcc> even in QT i misspeak sometimes
[21:13] <austinmcc> so
[21:13] <austinmcc> my role has an anti-bus driving property
[21:13] <austinmcc> if i hit a bussed player, BOTH bussed players get shot
[21:13] <austinmcc> so we know there's a bus driver somewhere
[21:14] <austinmcc> if we think it's just bus driver and not other protective roles, and that a bus driver would bus mattchew to protect him
[21:14] <austinmcc> then me shooting mattchew makes the most sense
[21:14] <austinmcc> hit 2 targets
[21:14] <austinmcc> but i think that we can't rely on no protective roles
[21:14] <austinmcc> and we can't rely on a protective mattchew bus
01[21:15] <@HiroPro> hm, so what exactly do you want to do?
[21:19] <austinmcc> i think we can leave mattchew up
[21:19] <austinmcc> sorry, trying to also get back into another game, was so focused on this game today
[21:19] <austinmcc> i think we can leave gonzaw up tonight
[21:19] <austinmcc> i think we can leave mattchew up tonight
[21:20] <austinmcc> i'm down with a memntoss kill\
[21:20] <austinmcc> killing Crossfire is a waste. snb is a waste (but could be fun for sheer oddness). JH is a waste. Nisani is a waste. That's 6 people entirely out if you count us out
01[21:20] <@HiroPro> drazerk is pointless.
[21:20] <austinmcc> leaves ghost, mattchew, gonzaw, drazerk, keirathi, mementoss
[21:21] <austinmcc> i agree with drazerk, and there are some suspicions on him as well
[21:21] <austinmcc> so ghost, mattchew, gonzaw, keirathi, mementoss
[21:21] <austinmcc> i don't think we should shoot ghost
[21:21] <austinmcc> or gonzaw or matt
[21:21] <austinmcc> i kind of come down to keirathi or mementoss
[21:21] <austinmcc> for the actual factional KP
01[21:21] <@HiroPro> definetely prefer shooting mementoss
01[21:22] <@HiroPro> keirathi has actual suspicion on him and is kind of zoned in on nisani
[21:22] <austinmcc> agree as well
[21:22] <austinmcc> we're all good on factional then. And I don't think mementoss seems like a good protect target or anything tonight
[21:23] <austinmcc> as for my shot, i've never actually been lynched, so I think I can avoid it
[21:23] <austinmcc> at least for tomorrow
01[21:23] <@HiroPro> ok we need that
[21:23] <austinmcc> so we need someone we want to kill next night
01[21:23] <@HiroPro> the burn then right
[21:23] <austinmcc> i don't think we can possibly aim at someone being bussed
[21:23] <austinmcc> it's just a .5 KP shot
[21:23] <austinmcc> so i can fire 2x on one guy
01[21:23] <@HiroPro> no but it's free right?
01[21:23] <@HiroPro> you can use it twice in one night?
[21:24] <austinmcc> ach night you may target a player and fire .5 silent kp at them (target will not be notified they were hit or protected from a hit). If the target is bussed with another player, both players will take the .5 kp because portals don't care about bullets.
01[21:24] <@HiroPro> yea you can't save that shot
01[21:24] <@HiroPro> you need to fire 0.5 each night
[21:24] <austinmcc> yeah, but it won't kill until tomorrow
[21:24] <austinmcc> so we've got to slightly think ahead
[21:24] <austinmcc> i could want mattchew or gonzaw gone after 2 days maybe
01[21:24] <@HiroPro> yes
[21:24] <austinmcc> i'm also slightly worried about some of the oblivious town players
01[21:25] <@HiroPro> well i think i can manipulate gonzaw
[21:25] <austinmcc> JH is super duper towny to me but maybe not to others
01[21:25] <@HiroPro> doesn't matter if he is townie or not
[21:25] <austinmcc> and Crossfire looks townie to me, if i'm viewing things objectively
[21:25] <austinmcc> well, it matters late
[21:25] <austinmcc> you're our best chance for endgame
[21:25] <austinmcc> and you're set up well
[21:25] <austinmcc> but if it's you and the two of them left
1[21:25] <@HiroPro> jh is so irritating and obssesed with himself that townies will suspect him
[21:25] <austinmcc> i'd be lynching you in a heartbeat
[21:26] <austinmcc> because they're so silly and towny. Everyone else might feel otherwise though and want to lynch JH for being JH
01[21:26] <@HiroPro> i'm going to go into endgame with crossfire and drazerk
[21:26] <austinmcc> lol
[21:26] <austinmcc> i wouldn't be surprised to see someone take drazerk out before then
01[21:26] <@HiroPro> yea it's possible
[21:26] <austinmcc> or at the very least someone can bring up lynching him for the good of endgame
01[21:26] <@HiroPro> fine i'll take gonzaw and jingle lol
01[21:26] <@HiroPro> i'm not scared of gonzaw
01[21:27] <@HiroPro> matt might still be able to figure me out
[21:27] <austinmcc> i'll be interested to read the thread if you guys are the final 3...
01[21:27] <@HiroPro> oh man that shit would be awesome lol
[21:27] <austinmcc> i'm not overly scared about gonzaw either, but he's more threatening right now than someone like snb
01[21:28] <@HiroPro> yea s&b will get lynched
01[21:28] <@HiroPro> the guy has no thread presence
01[21:28] <@HiroPro> he came in today close to the lynch and all he said was drazerk is scum
01[21:28] <@HiroPro> didn't say a word about perfection
01[21:28] <@HiroPro> that kind of stuff will seem really scummy
[21:28] <austinmcc> yeah
[21:29] <austinmcc> he's been entirely missing the last couple games i've played with him, while he was at CERN or coming back
01[21:29] <@HiroPro> nisani can be lynched too i think
[21:30] <austinmcc> i think nisani, snb, drazerk, JH without me on the vote, and even maybe ghost/keirathi can be lynched
[21:31] <austinmcc> gonzaw has some neat little suspicions on ghost, but i don't know that they'll catch. Keirathi had that comment about iamperfection looking townie off meta
[21:31] <austinmcc> which added to his other stuff makes him feel lynchable
[21:31] <austinmcc> also, gonzaw and ghost seem to find him scummy, and iamperfection's flip shouldn't make him seem more townie, even if they don't care about his iamperfection read
01[21:31] <@HiroPro> yes
1[21:32] <@HiroPro> so who's the burn target? matt? crossfire? gonzaw? i'm leaning to matt
01[21:33] <@HiroPro> actually the frame might be even more important
01[21:33] <@HiroPro> if I can just try to figure out who the cop would target
01[21:34] <@HiroPro> probably nisani/s&b/drazerk right?
01[21:34] <@HiroPro> well you and kei are possibilities too
01[21:34] <@HiroPro> but my frame only makes people look guilty, not inno
[21:35] <austinmcc> i don't see a cop checking snb N1
[21:35] <austinmcc> I could see cop checking nisani, drazerk, me, kei
01[21:36] <@HiroPro> we need to breadcrumb hunt
01[21:36] <@HiroPro> ugh it's so tiresome lol
[21:37] <austinmcc> i don't even know how you'd crumb in this game
[21:37] <austinmcc> i guess you can crumb the equivalent of your role in a normal
01[21:37] <@HiroPro> they'll do names
01[21:37] <@HiroPro> or yea equivalents
01[21:37] <@HiroPro> names of people
[21:37] <austinmcc> like if I crumb some portal word
[21:38] <austinmcc> nobody knows what that would be
01[21:38] <@HiroPro> names of people
[21:38] <austinmcc> but yeah, crumbing targets and equivalents
[21:38] <austinmcc> also, i'm guessing there are a lot of roles
[21:38] <austinmcc> everyone loved aperture for the roles
01[21:38] <@HiroPro> yea def and we have no rber left lol
[21:38] <austinmcc> people will be so disappointed if they join Aperture 2 and get no role
01[21:38] <@HiroPro> yep
01[21:38] <@HiroPro> i bet there's one troll green though
01[21:39] <@HiroPro> like the lemon thing
01[21:39] <@HiroPro> or the one that got a report of who was going to die at night at the daypost
[21:40] <austinmcc> i'm going to shoot matt i think
[21:40] <austinmcc> either matt or snb/crossfire
[21:40] <austinmcc> if one of those two die
[21:40] <austinmcc> i can claim vig or something, weeding out lurkers
[21:40] <austinmcc> or weeding out people we don't want in endgame
01[21:40] <@HiroPro> you can't claim vig, we only have 1 kp itll be too obvious
01[21:41] <@HiroPro> oh wait
01[21:41] <@HiroPro> yes you can
[21:41] <austinmcc> yeah
01[21:41] <@HiroPro> but its not a good idea
[21:41] <austinmcc> i held my shot N1
[21:41] <austinmcc> or
01[21:41] <@HiroPro> like role!=alignment
[21:41] <austinmcc> i couldn't shoot til x
[21:41] <austinmcc> yeah
[21:41] <austinmcc> but
[21:41] <austinmcc> how you use the role can show alignment
[21:41] <austinmcc> why would scum weed out a lurker
[21:41] <austinmcc> that town didn't want to take to endgame, but probably wasn't going to lynch
[21:41] <austinmcc> why wouldn't scum kill a stronger town player
[21:42] <austinmcc> i only like those as kill options because I think they provide a strong argument that the use of the role is townie
01[21:42] <@HiroPro> not crossfire
01[21:42] <@HiroPro> people would lynch you if you claimed that
01[21:42] <@HiroPro> cause he voted for perfection
[21:42] <austinmcc> yeah, true. only gonzaw suspicious of him
[21:42] <austinmcc> remember he didn't know it was plurality
[21:43] <austinmcc> so gonzaw's right, even though silly, about crossfire's vote not being a great towntell
01[21:43] <@HiroPro> no but someone will go, "that's a sign of him not having teammates to tell"
01[21:43] <@HiroPro> which is true
01[21:43] <@HiroPro> like if your teammate is up for lynch
01[21:43] <@HiroPro> you're going to know the damn voting rules
[21:43] <austinmcc> yeah
[21:43] <austinmcc> okay so
[21:43] <austinmcc> mattchew or snb
[21:44] <austinmcc> mattchew gets rid of townie. mattchew might be protected. mattchew might also be bussed
[21:44] <austinmcc> actually, i don't care AT ALL about bussing
01[21:44] <@HiroPro> wait your thing will have flavor dude i just realized
[21:44] <austinmcc> because i only do .5 kp. Horribly unlikely i'd be able to finish the person off
01[21:44] <@HiroPro> like if someone cross checks with aperture 1
01[21:44] <@HiroPro> they'll think you're scum
[21:44] <austinmcc> sure
[21:44] <austinmcc> sure
[21:44] <austinmcc> well, less sure there
[21:45] <austinmcc> i can claim to be a converted sentry gun
[21:45] <austinmcc> or whatever else
01[21:45] <@HiroPro> -_-
[21:45] <austinmcc> like...i can either claim a slightly different name
[21:45] <austinmcc> converted sentry
[21:45] <austinmcc> huggably soft sentry gun
01[21:45] <@HiroPro> that sounds so dumb lol
[21:45] <austinmcc> renegade sentry gun
[21:45] <austinmcc> this is how my mind thinks lol
[21:46] <austinmcc> or claim like...sentry gun remote
[21:46] <austinmcc> i dunno
01[21:47] <@HiroPro> wait so we have 12 people right
01[21:47] <@HiroPro> 11 after tonight
[21:47] <austinmcc> yeah
[21:47] <austinmcc> asked grey in QT about kill flavors
01[21:47] <@HiroPro> how many mislynches do we need?
[21:47] <austinmcc> if it just says "x got shot" and not "x got shot by a sentry turret" then kill flavor won't matter
[21:47] <austinmcc> even like "riddled full of holes" is fine
01[21:47] <@HiroPro> yea
[21:47] <austinmcc> assuming no protects and no vigis
01[21:48] <@HiroPro> if your thing is flame
[21:48] <austinmcc> 11 tomorrow, mislynch 1 to 10, 8 with NKs, mislynch to 7, 6 with NK, mislynch to 5, game ends that night
[21:48] <austinmcc> my thing is bullets
[21:48] <austinmcc> i'm an infinite bullet sentry turret
01[21:48] <@HiroPro> oh ok
[21:48] <austinmcc> so that's 3 mislynches
[21:48] <austinmcc> to win
01[21:48] <@HiroPro> 3 mislynches?
[21:48] <austinmcc> assuming no third party
[21:48] <austinmcc> no vigis
[21:48] <austinmcc> no protects
[21:48] <austinmcc> no nothings
01[21:48] <@HiroPro> and we need 2 of your kills or 1?
01[21:49] <@HiroPro> 1 right?
[21:49] <austinmcc> 1 kill
[21:49] <austinmcc> the second kill would take us to 3 players left with 2 of us being scum, so we'd win whether i get that kill or not
01[21:49] <@HiroPro> i don't think we can get 3 mislynches if you shoot s&b
[21:49] <austinmcc> if I die before that last night
[21:49] <austinmcc> then we'd need 4 i think
[21:49] <austinmcc> okay
[21:49] <austinmcc> i'm good shooting mattchew
[21:49] <austinmcc> that's true that we're going to need good mislynch targets
01[21:50] <@HiroPro> yea
[21:50] <austinmcc> and i guess it frees up tomorrow night's factional for anyone who comes out too strong
01[21:50] <@HiroPro> yes
1[21:51] <@HiroPro> and ill carry out the kill on memen
01[21:51] <@HiroPro> my role might be an issue later on... cause i won't know what i show up as visiting
01[21:52] <@HiroPro> cause i copy the visits of the person who i visit lol
01[21:52] <@HiroPro> but it does give me their alignment so i should still use it
[21:54] <austinmcc> yeah. as long as you don't use it on me you'll come off town to DT checks. the only risk is...what. someone rolechecking the person you target and getting back your role
[21:54] <austinmcc> then, if things go late, you might get tripped up if a roleclaim was forced
[21:55] <austinmcc> even if you had a fakeclaim name, you couldn't really show you'd done anythign to anyone
[21:55] <austinmcc> that's so far out there that it isn't worth orrying about though
[21:55] <austinmcc> okay so
[21:55] <austinmcc> kill mementoss
[21:55] <austinmcc> .5 KP mattchew
[21:55] <austinmcc> i'll write a case on mementoss tomorrow
[21:55] <austinmcc> and some other normal night stuff


-> The case on me that game was planned, and this time, it has been gradual and you could tell he thought I was scummy throughout.

http://www.quicktopic.com/48/H/FmyTwBWuTQ3H

Austin was scared of me in the QT. Austin does not feel scared. Austin did not take the easy route out. Fuck me.

I am sure Austin is town? Nope. Am I comfortable lynching him anymore? Nope. SHeit.

1 da0ud
2 djodref
3 hiro
4.austin
5 kushm4sta
6 Thrawn2112
7 Hopeless1der
8 mementoss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 20:02 GMT
#1340
Kush:

kush has some super scummy posts day 1 trying to get 1der through hard and sandroba lynched, but he was the hammer on ON. kush was super scummy all of day 2. But kush defended me before it was cool (pre hopeless post) why would he do that as scum? Kush also pointed out hiros play day 1 looks townie, which it does. Kush pushing the hardest target, thrawn with little to no support and actually made a case on him. Overall, I think hes town, and might have got caught on the wrong end of that day 1 ON stuff.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 20:19 GMT
#1342
On October 18 2012 05:08 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 05:02 Mementoss wrote:
Kush:

kush has some super scummy posts day 1 trying to get 1der through hard and sandroba lynched, but he was the hammer on ON. kush was super scummy all of day 2. But kush defended me before it was cool (pre hopeless post) why would he do that as scum? Kush also pointed out hiros play day 1 looks townie, which it does. Kush pushing the hardest target, thrawn with little to no support and actually made a case on him. Overall, I think hes town, and might have got caught on the wrong end of that day 1 ON stuff.

I had good reasons to vote 1der over ON and I would do it again next game given the same circumstance. He was gonna get modkilled probably I thought, so I saw no sense in lynching him.
1der was a scum read and ON was null. I prefer to lynch scum over null.


yeah it was similar to my thought process as well, then I realized I didn't want to lynch sandroba so the only option was ON
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 21:16 GMT
#1353
On October 18 2012 06:12 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 06:11 kushm4sta wrote:
On October 18 2012 06:07 austinmcc wrote:
On October 18 2012 06:00 kushm4sta wrote:
@austin What would they say if there was only 1 night action? "Send your night action?" They are trying to not give it away.
Your read on memetoss is suffering from serious confirmation bias.
It's not right that you only have 1 real scum read, and then me and djo for some votes r3 d1.
In other news, you are looking scummier and scummier:
You admit to thinking memetoss is scum in EVERY game you play with him, yet you don't even consider the possibility this game that you are wrong about him. Well you consider it, perhaps, but not enough for you to have other scumreads.
I would think as town you would realize your inherent confirmation bias on memetoss and move on to other suspects.

@town Does austin usually tunnel this hard? He wasn't doing this in liquid city.

@austin why are you even bringing up power roles again?

I did not think mementoss was scum in Liquid City.
I did not think mementoss was scum in Aperture 2 (Or, to be more specific, I would not have thought so IF I were town that game)
In Rockband I thought he was scum.
In LVII I didn't, but I think he replaced in after I was dead.
In PTP3 I was convinced he was town.

So actually, scratch that. I swear there was another game where I thought he was scum but I can't find it going through recent filters. GOOD NEWS EVERYONE! I DON'T think mementoss is scummy in every game I play with him. Just had a string of games (I SWEAR THERE'S ANOTHER ONE BESIDES ROCKBAND) where I think he's scum, and then faked a case on him in Aperture 2.

So this was a lie or what?
On October 11 2012 00:17 austinmcc wrote:
I think I've been suspicious of townMementoss in every game I've played with him, something he does always gives me a mafia read on him.


As far as I know, that's actually a lie. I swear there's another game where I accuse him of being scummy, but it turns out when I go look through them that I'm not always scummy on him.


Im pretty sure its every game but than you think im town later, PTP you thoguth I was scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 21:22 GMT
#1358
Does my logic make sense about austin? Any feedback on it. It just seemed a little weird to me. It put me off compared to aperture mentality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 21:47 GMT
#1366
On October 18 2012 06:35 austinmcc wrote:
VE, when you catch up or do something, I'd like your thoughts on the following:

(1) Why sandroba N1?
(2) Why ET N2?
(3) Do those NKs tell you anything about the identities of the remaining mafia?
(4) Mementoss or Mementoss or Mementoss?


holy fuck man are you this wifom every game? THIS is the weakest part of your case BY FAR, actually it adds nothing, it takes away from your case on me, why are you referencing it.

Do you not realize im a night 3 kill almost every game?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 21:47 GMT
#1367
On October 18 2012 06:33 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 06:29 kushm4sta wrote:
On October 18 2012 06:22 Mementoss wrote:
Does my logic make sense about austin? Any feedback on it. It just seemed a little weird to me. It put me off compared to aperture mentality.

Yeah it makes sense. You are definitely more knowledgeable about his scum meta and town meta than me.

But disregarding meta, I think it is a very attractive option for scum to pick a believable tunnel target. It gives them a really safe and easy way to produce content and look town.
It gives them an excuse for being apathetic towards voting (well my tunnel target isn't up for lynch so I dont care).

That is somewhat true.

I have seen scum drop votes on players who aren't really legitimate lynch candidates and walk away, or just halfheartedly push those targets.

This is not that, however. Sandroba found mementoss scummy as of his last comment on him. ET did as well. Thrawn notes that if I'm town, then I have good, real points on mementoss. da0ud also wrote a case on mementoss. You can say that's just a "believable tunnel target," but at some point it looks like a "believable tunnel target" because the guy looks scummy.

Nor would I characterize my play concerning mementoss as "apathetic." You think I don't care who gets lynched? You think I don't care if mementoss gets lynched?


guy guess who else they both found scummy da0d.

if da0d flips scum your next, forget the meta.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 21:50 GMT
#1370
On October 18 2012 06:48 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 06:38 kushm4sta wrote:
VE I would like your thoughts on the following:

(1) Who is scum?

@austin: I didn't say you were apathetic. I said tunneling allows scum to be apathetic about OTHER suspects, which you are.

bunch of peeps: da0ud scum da0ud scum da0ud scum.

austinmcc: here is why I don't think da0ud is scum.

kush:
Show nested quote +
On October 17 2012 06:00 kushm4sta wrote:
damn austin your posts always convince me.
He does seem quite town from those quotes. I guess thinking prpl was town was a coincidence.


Right off the top of my head I KNOW that I've posted on other suspects, and other subjects. I know that you know this, because you specifically interacted with me about da0ud and found my posts convincing. I'm unsure yet whether you're trying to discredit me or actually think that I haven't been involved in other discussions, despite...having discussions with me.

[spoilers]There may be some subjects about which I am apathetic (listmaking) but, beyond mementoss, I've been pretty clearly concerned with:

da0ud
why those NKs
the R3 ON/hopeless1der matchup

[/spoiler]

guy give your number 2 scum read and why, ive only asked you 50 times.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 21:51 GMT
#1371
also austin you realized you were set to be lynch before I decided to go back and read aperature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 21:59 GMT
#1372
Re-reading djo's filter. Where the fuck does he get all his town cred from, hes pretty high on most peoples lists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 22:34 GMT
#1375
Djodref


Part I: Round III Hopeless vs ON

On October 11 2012 00:44 Djodref wrote:
I'm going to bed now and I'm going to wake up few hours before the first round deadline.
I would like to say that I don't like people who are saying they are voting this one and this one but are not using the voting thread. I don't have a clear view on their motivations. So I'm going to show them the way I would like them to follow.

Show nested quote +
On October 10 2012 19:48 kushm4sta wrote:
voting momentoss because he's afk and I know his reads are bad
voting original because austin has contributed way more already and he's known as a good player
voting dauod because of his weird joke that made no sense... alien invaders what?

bad reasons? yes
subject to change? definintely


This is an example of what I'm not going to do.
On a side note, I don't like lurkers as well.

##Vote
Memento ×1
original ×1


@hopeless

would you mind explaining your gut feeling?

Also I've just noticed that Kush ans ET have used the voting thread


Says he doesn't like lurking and lurking is scummy. But later he defends ON for lurking saying lurking usually doesn't flip scum. Ridiculous double standards whenever its needed.

On October 12 2012 00:38 Djodref wrote:
Day 1 Round 2 Preview

HiroPro/OriginalName

At first glance this MU looks easy but it could be more interesting that it looks like. Once thing I have learned in my previous game is that obvious scum players are usually town (Kush being an exception of this rule^^).
We could all agree that ON looks bad, like very very bad. Casting last minute panic votes (on me on top of that) after zero posts and not even properly explaining his motives is scummy as hell. But thinking about it, I cannot imagine any mafia player being this obvious. So I want to give him a second chance for today and see if he can make it up before the deadline.
HiroPro hasn't posting that much and I didn't like his post encouraging people to share their thoughts and plans about the lynch mechanics. Right now, I would vote him over ON but I don't want to spend more than 3 votes on this (I didn't keep my 10 votes like, let's say, Hopeless).

Prediction: ON advaces against my will to the Round 4 5-3
snip


Gives ON an excuse for being scummy, bringing doubt on putting ON through. Too scummy to be scum. Mafia don't usually flip when they are this obvious. Saying he wants to vote hopeless over ON but wont use more than 3 votes.

On October 12 2012 11:33 Djodref wrote:
@Hopeless

You are my top scumread at the moment so I want to go full force against you. As I might no be able to vote on the last round, I don't mind to spend all my votes on you this round. I'll come up with a case against within 10 hours.

ON is a scummy lurker but, in my opinion, he is more lurky than scummy. And you are still scummier than him


More lurky than scummy, another excuse.

First post with a lot of effort into it is trying to advance Hopeless over ON:

+ Show Spoiler +
On October 12 2012 18:06 Djodref wrote:
As promised, I would like to present you my case against Hopeless.

My main points against him are:
  • Lack of scumhunting
  • Suspicious unvotes at deadline
  • Contradicts himself



Lack of scumhunting

+ Show Spoiler +

He admits it himself in this post in response to Kush

On October 12 2012 03:56 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 02:44 kushm4sta wrote:
From Hope's posts it's clear that he is not concerned with finding scum. What does he care about instead?
-Will you be here for the deadline?
-Don't waste your votes.
Two topics, both of which I consider to be a total waste of time and a way to feign activity.

Addressing more of this:
/snip

You say I'm feigning activity. My activity is poor, and as close to trivial as it gets, but my actions have clear motive in terms of how people have advanced each round. You claim I'm not scumhunting. No, not in the conventional sense, I'm not. There are now 4 players completely out of the running for todays' lynch, but for all I know, all the scum are in those players. I have no flips and very limited information. I realize I'm not giving people much to work with, but I'll deal with that later.

Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:45 Mementoss wrote:
@Hopeless stop defending yourself and give us your two best scum reads or your view of the matchups and who you are thinking of voting

I'd rather not give scumreads because of both the short length of the game so far and the lynch mechanics. I will go through the matchups and give my thoughts on those. Hiro vs ON is already done.


Please note also how he implies that we are going to mislynch (all the scum already out comment). This is not scummy but it is at least not good town mentality. On top of that he refuses to give his scumreads invoking bad excuses (what are the lynch mechanics doing here ?) and for this, I clearly don't see any town motivation.


Suspicious unvotes at deadline

+ Show Spoiler +

I don't know if you have noticed it but his unannounced unvote at round 1 deadline had a influence on the kush/prplhz match-up. He let Kush advanced over Prplhz.
Look at the way he presents it
On October 12 2012 03:56 Hopeless1der wrote:

/snip
I'm getting some flak for my ##Unvote All, part of which is I gave no notice that I was doing anything. However, I had already posted that I was going to be available during the deadline, which no one cared about, and the end result is almost exactly the same. The exception is that you, kush, advanced as a result, BUT Hiro was under the impression that you would have gone through without my 'assistance'. My activity during the deadline had a significant impact, which I would rather people be aware of so that no one is blindsided.
/snip


I'm not accepting his excuse for this. Should I state that I'm going to be present for deadline tomorrow and happily reverse the result of a matchup ? Is this ok ? I don't like the way he presents it, stating that it almost exactly the same, when his actions led to an opposite results for one match-up. He has no choice but to admit it but the fact he has doing it passively (by unvoting) and shifting the focus on Hiro helped him to make Kush advance (or should I say eliminate prplhz from the competition?) quite unnoticed.
At least, I didn't catch up at first. If you guys have all seen this then I'm sorry for bringing this up.

What makes it even more suspicious is the global picture:
  • voting prplhz for one post, voting ON for being a lurker, voting me on a gut feeling
  • passively letting Kush advance (reason=> wants to see how Hiro is going to handle Kush on round 2)
  • not following Kush at all round 2, voting sandroba


I would say that Hopeless doesn't really care about who is going to advance in this bracket. And the question I really would like him to answer is what he is planning to do with all the votes that he has carefully saved ?


Contradicts himself

+ Show Spoiler +


Firstly he did contradict himself while speaking about letting kush advance. I'm sorry but it not exactly the same when you reverse the issue of a matchup.

And here is the second contradiction: I didn't understand why he was so obsessed with people present at deadline and I called him for it. Here is the post he gave me in response
On October 11 2012 23:55 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 11 2012 22:34 Djodref wrote:
And one last thing before studying the MUs.

@Hopeless

On October 11 2012 11:36 Hopeless1der wrote:
/snip

I'll ask again since no one responded last time:

WILL YOU BE AVAILABLE AROUND THE DEADLINE (YES/NO)? PLEASE SELECT ONE RESPONSE.

Hopeless1der: Yes



Deadline is 11am for me and I have a meeting starting at 9am which should end my business trip. So I'm either going to be in meeting or on the way back to Seoul for the deadline. In the latter case, I should be able to check the thread with my phone. Now that I have answered your question, I would really like you to answer mine:
Why are so concerned by people being around at deadline or not ? What are you trying to achieve exactly ?


There is usually a panic towards the end of a day to consolidate votes and have crazy things happen during the final hours. With this lynch mechanic, there isn't enough time to properly consolidate and I think knowing who is willing and able to be active during the deadline is very beneficial to town.

Case in point, go look at the way I voted and my concern makes much more sense.

I asked for people's deadline schedules again because 7 out of 11 players (not counting myself) posted without acknowledging the question. There seems to be a severe lack of reading comprehension going on in this thread. da0ud is evidently foreign enough that he gets a pass. The rest of you bastards, not so much.

What I'm trying to achieve is using my votes in the most efficient way possible to maximize town's advantage this cycle. This, of course, assumes I'm town. I'll explain my reasoning later if necessary.

Show nested quote +
On October 11 2012 21:00 Mementoss wrote:
On October 11 2012 20:59 thrawn2112 wrote:
On October 11 2012 20:56 Mementoss wrote:
It bothers me that these 3 players have the most power in town

ON
Hopeless
Da0

None of them used any votes officially, and all have 10 votes remaining. Coming down to the wire any one of them as scum could sway the results.


If they're scum and that's their plan then they're pretty stupid because they'd be put in the spotlight for doing that.


Not all 3, but it is very possible for one of them to be scum, gaining 2 extra votes after the first round could prove to be a great advantage.


Mementoss, I get that you're suspicious of people having all their votes, but can you look over how I (un)voted and tell me if you think I'm scummy because of it?



OriginalName, you still havent addressed why you felt you needed two votes on djodref, ESPECIALLY when he was already leading his matchup. You were literally throwing away votes.


What I understood from this answer is that knowing who is present at deadline prevents crazy things from happening. I think that the simplest way from preventing crazy thing to happen is to use your votes and sticking to them. Unvoting like you do results in more possibilities for outcome of MUs to change, something you want to prevent by asking everybody if they are going to be present at deadline or not.

I think you want to give yourself some presence in the thread by asking everybody if they are here for deadline or not. In reality you just want to know if you can safely do you unvoting cuisine.



With all this I'm pretty sure that Hopeless is scum. I'm going to go full force in him this round against him because I really want him to get lynched today and I may not be able to use my votes on the next round. I'm also interested to see who is going to vote for his concurrent, the Great Lurker, I named OriginalName.


Please be aware that I'm not forgiving ON in any way with this post. Right now, I really find Hopeless to be the scummiest among us. Prplhz is also looking scummy in my eyes. I'll develop on this later but I would like first to have some feedback on this case, especially from Hopeless.

Hopeless x6



However, he wasn't convinced enough before to use more than 3 votes, WHATS THIS, oh the situation changed, more people are voting ON than he thought. Now he decides he needs to use ALL his votes, that how convinced he is.

+ Show Spoiler +
On October 13 2012 15:09 Djodref wrote:
First of all, I'm disappointed that Hopeless did not advance to the final. Right now, I would like him to be lynched, at least for the confusion he is putting me through. Unfortunately, this is not going to happen today...

I want him to flip so I definitively know if he is town or scum because it is going to bother me for a while. Last game I've been through a lot of WIFOM shit (thank you Kush by the way) and the result was me tunneling the town MVP for almost all game. I don't want this to happen again and I'll try to look for other players for a while. Hopeless explanations make me seriously doubting on my case against him (plus I've said myself that obvious scum is usually town, it might apply here again) but I cannot see him as town yet. Hopeless, I got my eyes on you <3 !


Concerning today's lynch, I don't have any more votes so I have basically no power to change anything. Yet I would like to use my words to convince you to lynch Sandroba over OriginalName.


OriginalName

I think everybody could agree that he is a total lurker. So let's look at the few things we have.
His useless panic vote against is scummy as hell and his explanation for it was weak in my view because he calls me for a post I have made drunk and me backing off from this post later on. I was drunk and I've made a mistake at that time so it was natural for me to back off. But I understand it could be suspicious in another player eye so it could be a valid reason to vote me. Regarding his vote, I think a scum player would have avoided voting like this.
And there it is, that's all we have from him ! I'm saying that it not enough to lynch him today.


Sandroba

Sandroba is also a lurker but he looks scummy enough in my eyes to deserve the lynch. I'm not familiar with his meta but I've been skimming through his filter in the C9++ game and I must say that it looks like night and day when you compare it to his actual filter.
Also, his unexplained hunch for me is a scumtell. I've been looking bad enough (and from my first post apparently) to advance until the semis but he is one of two players to have a town read on me (hello prplhz!). Moreover, he didn't bother to address this point.
Regarding his last post, I was also drunken yesterday, I'm having a big hangover now, most likely I'm going to be drunk tonight again but I'm still trying to invest myself in this game. I imagine he is that disinterested right now because he is scum.


If I had votes right now, I would use them to vote Sandroba. Hence, I recommend you to lynch him.


"His panic vote is scummy as hell but I doubt scum would do this therefore not scum!" - Seems legit. Convincing people he is a total lurker and not mafia. Decides this is the perfect time to mention his scum read on vet sandroba. Wait what, he doesn't want to lynch ON the non vet lurker, but says Sandroba is also a lurker but its scummy for him. WTF. Seriously?
Unexplained hunch is a scumtell. Doesnt explain how.
His meta is different. Also doesn't explain how.

No effort put into this like the effort on hopeless to try and save ON. Hypocrite, obviously biased against sandroba. Makes his whole case up out of nothing to make it look better.

He recommends we lynch sandroba.

+ Show Spoiler +
On October 14 2012 09:21 Djodref wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 14 2012 03:46 austinmcc wrote:
On October 14 2012 03:41 thrawn2112 wrote:
austin are your votes for ON more because you think he's the scummier candidate, or because you are more afraid of sandroba being town and you wouldnt want to lose a town sandroba?

IMO sandroba is scummier than ON, but I am also a coward and I have no problems with a policy lynch... and when you think about it, ON is the perfect policy lynch candidate if there ever was one.

I don't want to lose a town sandroba. I'm not convinced either way on his alignment, and he's a big asset if he's town.

But I don't want to deal with either having him around late game after this D1, OR having to deal with a replacement catching up on 96 hours and then us having to read the replacement while not having much to go off of from ON's time in thread.

To the extent that voting ON for concerns other than "ON scummiest" is a policy lynch, then yeah, I'm in favor of policy lynching him. Right now it's more just weighing what I think of each vs what they each bring. If I'm not convinced on either's alignment, then I'd rather take the chance that we have townsandroba who's useful than townON who isn't right now. If all this meta talk is true, scumsandroba is not particular active and nasty, whereas VE is the first replacement, and I feel like scumVE replacing in for ON might be nastier.

So...I'd rather have townsand over townON. I'd rather have scumON dead than scumsand D1. Based on that, I'd rather flip ON if I'm not sure about the two of them.


I've found some holes in your reasoning. Did you consider the case where ON is scum and Sandro town and the case where ON is town and Sandro is scum ?


More doubt on the lynch.

Part II: Wrong end of the lynch part 2:

On October 15 2012 18:18 Djodref wrote:
I would like to elaborate on why we should attempt to lynch prplhz.
After looking at prplhz filter, I've found:
  • lot of questions and one liners, not so much real content. I'm betting he tries to look active in the discussion while not giving us so much of his thoughts. The latest example I've found is this one when he gave his top scumreads.
    On October 14 2012 11:42 prplhz wrote:
    i'm thinking hiro and da0ud but who knows

    He hasn't given so much explanations on why hiro is on his list.
  • during D1, he's mainly soft-defending ON and tries to push Sandroba's mislynch until last minute when he realizes his plan is failing apart.
  • his attempt to make us believe he had in fact saved Sandroba
  • him wanting to hold the potato (scum move in my eyes, see my reasoning in posts above)


I know there is nothing much here new but I was already suspicious of prplhz and I'm sure right now that he is scum.

I agree that Daoud filter doesn't look much better but, while reading it with my newb townie confirmation biased goggles, I've felt that he may have tried to find scum by looking at vote patterns and lynch mechanics rather than people posts.
During R1, he aslo have been OMGUSing almost everybody who was attacking him (me for my early attack on his first posts, Sandroba for his hunch, Kush for voting him). I would expect a newb scum to be more likely to conciliate.
All of this could make sense from a newbie town player which doesn't clearly know all the principles of this game (no knowledge of the blue roles for example, ninja voting, etc...).

My feeling is that we definitively have a scum between the two but not that the two of them are scum. Honestly, if they were both scum, I would expect them to concede right now. I'm really more confident that prplhz is the scum out of them two.

I would be happy to see them passing the potato to each other


Another weak case that looks like a case just to be looking town and presenting the case.

Also burns his hide just to look pro town.

Part III: Im a Noobie! Guys im friendly town :

+ Show Spoiler +
On October 11 2012 22:34 Djodref wrote:
On a side note, Daoud really looks like a newb townie. I advice him to be careful with early association cases because I also thought I got the complete scumteam on D1 of my last newbie game In a result I just have been tunneling our town MVP until my death...


On October 12 2012 00:38 Djodref wrote:

I don't want to predict anything for this MU



Also the predictions were fucking weird. Acting like he could read the future and shit, maybe its cause he knew what 2 other guys plans were.

On October 12 2012 01:03 Djodref wrote:

I'll check the thread when I wake up and I hope to be here for the deadline


On October 12 2012 10:56 Djodref wrote:

I just have caught up with the thread on my phone. First I would like to say that the predictions were a (failed) attempt to make my comments look like a starcraft MU preview. Thank you Kush for understanding me and believing in me



On October 12 2012 11:24 Djodref wrote:
@Hopeless

It's just that I didn't realize until late that the votes of ON on me were counting for this round. It felt like I was starting with an handicap but whatever...
I don't want to get mislynched so I'll put more efforts in this game so everybody understand I can be a valuable asset for town

Unfortunately I have to work this afternoon so you have to give me some more time.


On October 12 2012 21:45 Djodref wrote:
By the way, I'm going out for the night and I don't know if I would be able to wake up before 11am tomorrow, if you know what I mean


On October 13 2012 15:43 Djodref wrote:

@prplhz

I would really appreciate you sharing with us all the info you have gathered with your questions here and there. I wouldn't mind if it was a long and articulate post. I'm starting to wondering if you are active in your scumhunting or just pretending to be active



On October 14 2012 09:47 Djodref wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 14 2012 09:28 austinmcc wrote:
On October 14 2012 09:21 Djodref wrote:
On October 14 2012 03:46 austinmcc wrote:
On October 14 2012 03:41 thrawn2112 wrote:
austin are your votes for ON more because you think he's the scummier candidate, or because you are more afraid of sandroba being town and you wouldnt want to lose a town sandroba?

IMO sandroba is scummier than ON, but I am also a coward and I have no problems with a policy lynch... and when you think about it, ON is the perfect policy lynch candidate if there ever was one.

I don't want to lose a town sandroba. I'm not convinced either way on his alignment, and he's a big asset if he's town.

But I don't want to deal with either having him around late game after this D1, OR having to deal with a replacement catching up on 96 hours and then us having to read the replacement while not having much to go off of from ON's time in thread.

To the extent that voting ON for concerns other than "ON scummiest" is a policy lynch, then yeah, I'm in favor of policy lynching him. Right now it's more just weighing what I think of each vs what they each bring. If I'm not convinced on either's alignment, then I'd rather take the chance that we have townsandroba who's useful than townON who isn't right now. If all this meta talk is true, scumsandroba is not particular active and nasty, whereas VE is the first replacement, and I feel like scumVE replacing in for ON might be nastier.

So...I'd rather have townsand over townON. I'd rather have scumON dead than scumsand D1. Based on that, I'd rather flip ON if I'm not sure about the two of them.


I've found some holes in your reasoning. Did you consider the case where ON is scum and Sandro town and the case where ON is town and Sandro is scum ?
Oh i'm not saying they're both town or both scum.

It's more just ... if we're going to kill one, and I don't really think either is super scummy, I'd rather take the safer lynch. I want a townsand around more, and I want a scumON around less, so ... I'm more willing to lynch ON.


Ok, I see. I had a little misunderstanding here.

By the way if you don't really think either is super scummy, it's too bad you didn't use your votes to make scummier people advance in the previous stages then (it's just a joke, I've seen your explanations for it)

Personally, I would still vote for Sandroba if I could but I guess it depends on your level of conviction for him to be scum.


On October 14 2012 11:19 Djodref wrote:
LOL

So is this standard to have a total lurker in every scumteam ?

It's the case in all my games so far


Holy fuck, Im done with all the smileys, you get the point he wants to look like harmless friendly old townie djo.

On October 13 2012 15:43 Djodref wrote:

@HiroPro

I might be a newbie and my case might be bad but I'm at least investing myself in this game. So I wouldn't mind you showing me how to make a good case because I'm not able to find any so far in your filter. I would even go as far as there is not so much content in your posts. Also, from what I understand, ON is on your scumlist, but I think we can safely assume that have more than one scum in this game. Who are your top scumreads now that you are dropping me ?



On October 16 2012 23:05 Djodref wrote:
Honestly, I don't know. I hope to be on their tracks
But I would say I'm rather safe because I'm a newbie.

I've had some time at work today so I've checked the filters and I've prepared some cases and a last will because I was bored. I wanted to post it before the deadline for the sake of the last will ^^

I also think it would give my cases more appeal because I'm on a different timezone and I feel a little left out. And people are here for the deadline so I hope there is going to be some discussion about it.


His night 2 posts looked really townie. But they are easy to construct as mafia. Da0d is currently leading, and although Djo wanted nothing to do with his lynch, he isn't trying to convince anyone. He did not try to push Hiro even after he thought my hopeless post made sense. Also, he posted early out of excitment or WIFOM warning, because he knew he wasn't going to die.

Djo, not as fucking townie as everyone thinks. Moving him up my list.

In conclusion recap:
-Hard defense on Ro3 ON vs Hopeless, uses all votes
-Hard defense on ON , trying to convince people to vote sandroba
-puttin doubt on ON lynch
-Double standards on different lurkers, ON vs Hiro/hopeless/me early
-weak case on prplhz, doesn't attempt to look outside prplhz and da0d even though he thinks da0d is town and has a good chance at being lynched
-Trying really hard to look town and harmless, calling himself a noob and bad and smiley faces.
-Isn't pushing his town read day 3 or his scum reads
-pretty much has been floating by without suspicion because of ON's panic votes. WIFOM, ON coulda been bused and coulda been used to make djo look townie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 22:35 GMT
#1376
On October 18 2012 07:07 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 06:51 Mementoss wrote:
also austin you realized you were set to be lynch before I decided to go back and read aperature

I'm pretty sure I'm right up there. That does not concern me, at least not right now.


Why would I go through the effort of using your meta to figure our your crazy tunneling alignment as scum, if I could just lynch you and get you off my back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 22:37 GMT
#1377
changed my shit to reflect it in voting thread
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 22:42 GMT
#1378
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
Page 69.... GET IT AHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 22:49 GMT
#1380
On October 18 2012 07:48 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 07:42 Mementoss wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
Page 69.... GET IT AHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

can we lynch memetoss for this?


I dont think kush gets it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 22:54 GMT
#1381
Also the double standard thing is big I didn't emphasize it, but if you are playing and just using your own thoughts to make posts, you don't have double standards. You have double standards when you try to make shit up and then you forgot what your stance was on it earlier. This is really scummy and should be pointed out, cause its definitely not townie to not be legit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 23:04 GMT
#1383
On October 18 2012 07:58 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 07:35 Mementoss wrote:
On October 18 2012 07:07 austinmcc wrote:
On October 18 2012 06:51 Mementoss wrote:
also austin you realized you were set to be lynch before I decided to go back and read aperature

I'm pretty sure I'm right up there. That does not concern me, at least not right now.


Why would I go through the effort of using your meta to figure our your crazy tunneling alignment as scum, if I could just lynch you and get you off my back.

I'm not convinced I would have ended up being lynched.


For anyone keeping track, townie mementoss makes cases, like the one on djoref. Townie mementoss doesn't do nothing. A mementoss who only starts looking townie after getting called out by multiple players and tunneled by one is less likely to be ACTUAL town than one who starts off looking like townie mementoss from D1.


Wait, why the fuck haven't you made your list yet?
Or ever answered my question about your #2 read?
Holding your list is super anti-town Put one down now. You can change it later. Holding it only shows your trying to fuck with the end results.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 23:06 GMT
#1384
EBWOP: I didn't answer austinmcc's post on purpose because I'm done with answering his tunnelling. Lynching him would be really satisfying. Hes been avoiding making his list at all costs, and giving any scum reads except me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 23:19 GMT
#1387
On October 18 2012 08:11 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 08:04 Mementoss wrote:
On October 18 2012 07:58 austinmcc wrote:
On October 18 2012 07:35 Mementoss wrote:
On October 18 2012 07:07 austinmcc wrote:
On October 18 2012 06:51 Mementoss wrote:
also austin you realized you were set to be lynch before I decided to go back and read aperature

I'm pretty sure I'm right up there. That does not concern me, at least not right now.


Why would I go through the effort of using your meta to figure our your crazy tunneling alignment as scum, if I could just lynch you and get you off my back.

I'm not convinced I would have ended up being lynched.


For anyone keeping track, townie mementoss makes cases, like the one on djoref. Townie mementoss doesn't do nothing. A mementoss who only starts looking townie after getting called out by multiple players and tunneled by one is less likely to be ACTUAL town than one who starts off looking like townie mementoss from D1.


Wait, why the fuck haven't you made your list yet?
Or ever answered my question about your #2 read?
Holding your list is super anti-town Put one down now. You can change it later. Holding it only shows your trying to fuck with the end results.

Why is holding one's list anti-town? Mine most likely looks something like this, but I'm not entirely sure and I'd like to see VE in here and get some thoughts from him/on him.

You
Potentially kush given recent developments?

hiro/VE(?) / djoref

thrawn/hopeless

da0ud
me

But, seriously, why is holding one's list anti-town? I find it interesting you'd say that.


1- easier to sheep others list
2- holds back discussion or questions based on your list
3- mafia can do the math and strategically place players in areas that benefit them
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
October 17 2012 23:20 GMT
#1388
On October 18 2012 08:16 austinmcc wrote:
You've been very quick to say that x or y is anti-town, but not so quick to explain why that is so.


Cause Its pretty obvious
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
DaveTesta Events
01:00
Kirktown Chat Brawl #7
davetesta51
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 269
ProTech61
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 173
TY 64
Backho 42
Yoon 33
Sacsri 32
Bale 25
Hm[arnc] 22
sSak 4
ivOry 4
ggaemo 1
League of Legends
JimRising 652
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1272
Super Smash Bros
Westballz49
Other Games
summit1g9679
NeuroSwarm32
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1289
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 59
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH301
• Hupsaiya 62
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1042
• Stunt441
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
3h 11m
Online Event
9h 11m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
Online Event
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs TBD
OSC
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Roobet Cup 2025
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.