EPTLooney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 38
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:53 prplhz wrote: could be austin or mementoss instead of da0ud since i don't really noticed them this game  for you not noticing Confused face for me being scum. If you were scum, and one of your scumbuddies was up for lynch, would you give away 6 of your votes? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:59 prplhz wrote: dunno, dunno, about zero which was why i switched you don't still think i'm scum do you? I don't know. It was a weird timing combination of you, kush, and by association austin (for giving votes) that pushed ON over the edge... once again that's assuming that sand is town. I don;t remember the exact timings so I'll give my reads on that once I go back and read through the last round of voting. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 14 2012 12:04 thrawn2112 wrote: I agree with most of that post but still I'm hesitant to believe that memtoss would have bussed ON so early on in the last round. However that's assuming that sand is town which isn't confirmed. Yeah, that throws everything off. I get really zoned in on the associative bits though (see how I'm referencing them again?). Need to see exactly where votes were on each candidate when he dropped his votes. I'm also, for some reason, less willing to give him townie points for voting ON when he has a scumread on Sandroba and voted ON anyway for lurking. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
10:50 I tell austin to put votes on ON. My votes and his would be enough to lynch ON. 10:51 prpls change his votes to ON. Then he makes a big deal about it like it proves his innocence. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5262 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:39 thrawn2112 wrote: ET is that a serious acusation? I'd kinda like all the people who voted for sand (or didn't vote at all including you and djo) to say who they think is scum just off the top of their head you realize you've asked me 3 different questions for which I've answered every time that I think da0ud is scum? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5262 Posts
On October 14 2012 12:11 kushm4sta wrote: forum time: 10:50 I tell austin to put votes on ON. My votes and his would be enough to lynch ON. 10:51 prpls change his votes to ON. Then he makes a big deal about it like it proves his innocence. ding ding ding we have a winner | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
Could you explain your scum read on me ? I've just skimmed through your filter and it looks like you have suddenly changed your mind. But I may have missed something because your filter is a clusterfuck ^^ | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:05 austinmcc wrote: The super paranoid players might point out that, at the time you voted, kush had changed his vote and had yet to use my 3 votes. ON would have been the leading vote-getter had you swapped or not. You guys are an hour late! | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
He made the vote at 10:52. At 10:51 he says in this thread "ok lets lynch ON" | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5262 Posts
Here's hoping for WIFOM or blues or whatever | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 14 2012 12:15 sandroba wrote: Djoref is unlikely scum because he didn't unvote hopeless last round to keep his votes and have me lynched instead of ON this round. Well, he could technically still be scum, but that would be pretty terrible play. Don't bother with him till way later. Hopeless was set to be lynched last round until RIGHT at the deadline. There would have been no reason for scum to unvote Hopeless, as he was set to go through and ON would have been safe. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
| ||
