EPTLooney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 36
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:02 prplhz wrote: well at least i don't have to bother with defending myself now The super paranoid players might point out that, at the time you voted, kush had changed his vote and had yet to use my 3 votes. ON would have been the leading vote-getter had you swapped or not. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5253 Posts
 Nice to come back to this.Not that it really matters anymore, but I wanted ON lynched primarily as a policy lynch, which is not as bad a reason as people seem to think. Letting a lurker live without any measures taken, especially in a mini is absolutely terrible for town. I don't know how many games towns have lost because they reached LYLO with a lurker. Imagine if ON had been replaced, in this case it might've been VE. It's so easy for a replaced scum to float by with the excuse "Don't judge me for my predecessor's actions. Here are 1 or 2 fake cases that will keep you off me until LYLO". Examples: Marv in TL Mafia LV, cccalf in Sum of All Fears, X in Y mafia x1000 | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5253 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:06 sandroba wrote: "this can't be town sandroba, where is his day1 magic?" Thanks for coming back. You lucked out that it was a 9135703809580 hour day lol | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
So is this standard to have a total lurker in every scumteam ? It's the case in all my games so far | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
imo the only possible busser candidates are kush and prp... hiro maybe too but his switch was pretty early on and a buss was not needed at that point. I still don't like the way austin gave away the majority of his votes.... i doubt he was bussing but by giving away his votes he was giving away his responsibility for the lynch so i'm a tiny bit wary of him of course that all excludes the possibility of sand being scum, but i'm getting a pretty town vibe on him purely based on my reads of his emotions before and after lynch | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
ET ignored the lynch all together until minutes after it happened. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5253 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:16 kushm4sta wrote: @ET you have a very fishy schedule I had no need to vote dump ON last round. It attracted a lot of attention and was simply not necessary from a scum perspective. I suggest you get off my case. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:22 EchelonTee wrote: I had no need to vote dump ON last round. It attracted a lot of attention and was simply not necessary from a scum perspective. I suggest you get off my case. I didn't think of it but yeah that vote dump on ON does make you look quite town...unless 1der is scum. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:14 EchelonTee wrote: Nice to come back to this.Not that it really matters anymore, but I wanted ON lynched primarily as a policy lynch, which is not as bad a reason as people seem to think. Letting a lurker live without any measures taken, especially in a mini is absolutely terrible for town. I don't know how many games towns have lost because they reached LYLO with a lurker. Imagine if ON had been replaced, in this case it might've been VE. It's so easy for a replaced scum to float by with the excuse "Don't judge me for my predecessor's actions. Here are 1 or 2 fake cases that will keep you off me until LYLO". Examples: Marv in TL Mafia LV, cccalf in Sum of All Fears, X in Y mafia x1000 Yeah you're right, this post is completely uncalled for / useless and because of that it rubs me the wrong way especially if you combine it with the fact that you did not vote | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 14 2012 11:22 EchelonTee wrote: I had no need to vote dump ON last round. It attracted a lot of attention and was simply not necessary from a scum perspective. I suggest you get off my case. You dropped 6 votes right at deadline. 4 would have put him through. The extra 2 votes, if you've got a 3 man scumteam, represent you and your other scumbuddy's anger at ON for not being around. gg, ET scum. | ||
| ||
