EPTHe shares his crazy thoughts too freely.
Looney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
He shares his crazy thoughts too freely. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
It's better to do it when other people are here but I get that your tome zone is opposite. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Thrawn vs Hope I think everyone agrees on this one but I'm going to talk about it anyway  From Hope's posts it's clear that he is not concerned with finding scum. What does he care about instead? -Will you be here for the deadline? -Don't waste your votes. Two topics, both of which I consider to be a total waste of time and a way to feign activity. Here's his latest comment: OriginalName, you still havent addressed why you felt you needed two votes on djodref, ESPECIALLY when he was already leading his matchup. You were literally throwing away votes. @hope Do you think it's scummy to "throw away votes"? What is scum's advantage to having less votes? Please share your scumreads if you have them. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 12 2012 02:45 EchelonTee wrote: Uh I just did right there? When there is suspicion on two parties and we assume that at least one is town, then it means that mafia are pushing a townie successfully? I'm still not totally clear. You are saying that either djodref or daoud are scum and mafia is pushing which ever is town? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
He tries to push doaud through with no explanation by putting 2 extra votes on him. Also he does it without even saying he's going to do it. When we ask him why, all he has to say is: On October 11 2012 10:36 sandroba wrote: Yo. I want da0ud to go to the next round. I have a hunch and those have been pretty good historically. So a hunch with no reasoning is enough to override the majority's vote? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Original: I'm not going to vote someone because they are busy. Yes I buy his panic votes. I think his story about the PM is very believable. He only has 1 post of merit but I think the post is fine. He's definitely not afraid to share his thoughts. He brings up a good point about djodref's drunk post. Did drunkenness cause the vote or did it just cause him to not tell us about it? It bothered me at the time but I forgot about it. But anyway I don't think his 1 post looks scum. Hiropro: Not omgus but my suspicion of him comes from his suspicion of me. It's the only thing that's in his filter basically. He called my argument about the daoud's bye disadvantage a "contradiction" and he has not sufficiently explained how so. And he wants me so bad that he added another vote to put me over the edge at the last second? His arguments don't back up that kind of suspicion IMO. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 12 2012 05:17 sandroba wrote: Look at the cases people posted, which is the strongest? Definetely the case on ON. How can you ever say that I'm not trying to get scum lynched or that my play has been uninspired? You can't. Where is this strong case on ON? I can't find it. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I'd still like a response to this please. austin was someone you considered good and he directly refuted one of your points so I'm wondering why you didn't try to convince him otherwise, if you didn't accept his view:[QUOTE] #1 Thrawn agreed with him that it wasn't a big tell. #2 I didn't really have much more to say about it. If i were to try to convince him, it would basically just be me repeating myself. #3 I understood why he didn't think it was that big of a tell, even though at the time I disagreed. Back then I did not realize Daoud's level of noobness. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Djo is looking town. Thrawn described him as a cheerful townie and he is indeed super cheerful, open. He loves to share. ET. He has been posting plenty but it's mostly defensive. There is a real lack of scumhunt to his play, especially for someone of his reputation. The defenses are much more than is necessary. They also have some weird logic in them, and he seems quite mad. On October 10 2012 23:40 EchelonTee wrote: While cute that you would accuse me for appearing to "know more about the setup", there is almost no way that the ratio of votes is actually 9x, as you yourself pointed out. No number is even close to that (either 1:11 or 2:10 doesn't work with normal voting mechanics). Therefore, you are making the assumption that I have to be either blue or red without even considering that maybe, just maybe I put down that 9x number randomly? This is the beginning of his long defense against momentoss pointing out his "scumslip" (no I don't think it's a scumslip). After opening with a little condescension, he brings up how the ratio could not possibly be 9x. He just came up with that number "randomly." @ET You put down 9x randomly? I thought you used the number 9 because the ratio is usually 9 town to 3 scum. After ON calls him out for low content and scumlurking: On October 12 2012 02:23 EchelonTee wrote: You have got to be fricking kidding me. Look at my filter. Then yours. I am being low content???? Are you freaking serious? No seriously, coming from THE #1 lurker of Round 1? I don't even understand how you can possibly argue this. This is plain old terrible disruption. You could at least try to look townie. You have done literally nothing to try and help town, and are easily my top pick for champion. This isn't your first game by any respect, you have no newbie excuse. So this is that strong ON case sandroba was referring to? I'm not seeing any arguments that he is scum except for a vague reference to "disruption." There's a lot of anger here and a lot of omgus. Further there is the buddying with sandroba. You defend sandroba on terms of just meta. Why? because he discussed setup? That's not enough. IMO sandroba has not lived up to the meta you describe, and other people who have played with him agree. And you give me 2 votes for no reason other than sandroba's meta. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Only 1 each. I would really like to push ET through, but I would rather do it by convincing people than forcing the issue with all my votes. hope x1 ET x1 hiro x1 | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 12 2012 08:19 thrawn2112 wrote: Kush, the thing about ON is his wtf behavior at the deadline. He comes in placing 2 votes on a candidate that was for sure going to be moving on anyway, and I've yet to see him adequately explain why he did so. He said it was a panic vote.... why was he panicking, why pick djo, and why 2 votes? Those are all questions he needs to answer. He panicked because he got a PM from a mod reminding him. He thought he might be modkilled if he didn't vote. Also what did he 2 random votes accomplish? Nothing, they changed nothing. There is no scum motivation to make votes like that. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
You think he is so worried about deciding where to vote and what that might reveal that he made this story up? Just so he could throw away 2 votes? That seems like a very complicated scum plan for very little gain. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
How are you voting Et vs djo? | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
To me his posts do not seem constructed at all. he is just openly sharing his thoughts. Ill get examples. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Tons of little jokes it this post, starting with the predictions which are useless except to jokingly pretend this is a starcraft tournament or something like that. Once thing I have learned in my previous game is that obvious scum players are usually town (Kush being an exception of this rule^^). (this doesn't even make sense btw but it's not scummy) in reference to his own mu: I don't want to predict anything for this MU He seems way to calm for first time scum. Kinda weak ill admit but my town read on him is not as strong as my scum read on ET. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
He rolled town. His behavior was more aggressive and less careful. His posts were less thought out. He was more focused on finding scum. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Hopeless1der x3 Thrawn x0 EchelonTee x2 djrodef x3 hiro x1 OriginalName x2 sandroba x3 kushm4sta x2 | ||
| ||
