|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On September 30 2012 15:16 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2012 13:59 ShiaoPi wrote:
Shady besides you with your /in post nobody on the list looks like an obvious troll/unreadable kind of guy. (besides grush on the replacement), so I do not think this whole "gambit" as you call it was necessary...
Spare me that kind of crap, you obviously wanted to troll around. you won't get thanks for nothing from me.
Still kind of angry here, I'll be out to grab lunch and cool off... Hey i think your full of crap Shadys actions made you angry enough to leave the computer just because shady ALTernated With cap or typed in ALL CAPS. Come on ya im not buying it and i think you just wanted to weigh in on the situation and then have an excuse to leave. ## Vote shiaoPI Talk to me shiao i wish to know more. [/b][/b]
just got back.
it made me angry, because I know that he can play a good/decent townplay (obsed the game where he was masoned with keirathi) there is no need to resort to trolling/being useless just because some people do not get penalized for it. Onto my so called "excuse". I was angry and also hungry since it was time for lunch....So I say that I am out for a bit of time to eat and cool off a bit......I am terribly sorry for having the human need to sustain myself....
|
I voted for shady because he called me a troll.
There is no one better to vote for atm. I might as well vote for someone who was mean to me and has a history of being mean to me.
Also I'm not a fan of his content.
|
O.o Already started.
GLHF!
|
Hi guys. Didn't expect the game to start tonight, and I'm heading to bed soon, but I thought I'd poke my head in.
To elaborate a bit more on what I'm changing about my play (which I know I probably should have mentioned beforehand), I'm going to be posting more off the top of my head, without spending hours thinking about my posts and ultimately deciding not to post anything. Hopefully this will result in more posts, giving more insight into what I'm thinking. I'm mentioning this because (hopefully) this will be different than my previous meta, and it'll be easier to address it now than later.
Aside from the trolling thing, which he said he was going to do before the game started, Shady just seems like Shady to me.
On September 30 2012 20:03 kushm4sta wrote:
I voted for shady because he called me a troll.
There is no one better to vote for atm. I might as well vote for someone who was mean to me and has a history of being mean to me.
Also I'm not a fan of his content.
What exactly don't you like about his content? So far your vote seems pretty empty.
|
On September 30 2012 20:03 kushm4sta wrote:
I voted for shady because he called me a troll.
There is no one better to vote for atm. I might as well vote for someone who was mean to me and has a history of being mean to me.
Also I'm not a fan of his content.
.........grow up.
|
I like to always have my vote on my top scumread. Even if it's a weak read. FOS is reserved for secondary scumreads.
GLHF
I will try not to act mature and not be an attention whore.
|
ebwop I will try to act mature
|
@kush
You still didnt reply to what you dont like about Shadys content.
|
On September 30 2012 22:30 Kreb wrote:
@kush
You still didnt reply to what you dont like about Shadys content.
I apologize for my lack of specificity. I dislike his content because it is all caps nonsense. Not even proper trolling, just spam.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 30 2012 13:54 Shady Sands wrote:
Yes! Thank goodness the gambit worked.
The whole plan was either to troll hard and have some fun, or enjoy a serious, non-troll game of Mafia by inciting the mod to explicitly threaten a modkill for trolling and scare all the trolls into the straight and narrow.
Shiao, you can thank me after the game is over. With that being said, I find the easy rando-vote at the beginning highly suspicious.
## Unvote
## Vote Z-Boson
Explain your rando-vote without trolling as a factor.
Hi all! Totes wasn't expecting to be going by now.
Shady, why you lie to us?
|
On September 30 2012 22:35 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2012 22:30 Kreb wrote:
@kush
You still didnt reply to what you dont like about Shadys content. I apologize for my lack of specificity. I dislike his content because it is all caps nonsense. Not even proper trolling, just spam.
SO ALL CAPS = SCUM? I don't follow your logic.
|
On September 30 2012 23:11 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2012 22:35 kushm4sta wrote:On September 30 2012 22:30 Kreb wrote:
@kush
You still didnt reply to what you dont like about Shadys content. I apologize for my lack of specificity. I dislike his content because it is all caps nonsense. Not even proper trolling, just spam. SO ALL CAPS = SCUM? I don't follow your logic.
That's why I said policy lynch not scum lynch.
And yeah I realize this is a contradiction from saying top scumread gets vote but I don't have a top scumread so it goes to a policy vote.
Also making too big of a deal of this, but I am happy to entertain any and all questions nevertheless.
|
I've got my eye on ShadySands, annul and Mattchew right now. Pretty sure there's scum buried deep within that trio.
Will you help me figure out who, if any of them, is most deserving of a rope around the neck?
|
On September 30 2012 15:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
Also I'd like to know what you found worth reading in annul's post. First of all, setup speculation (as the mod has pointed out) is useless. Not to mention the fact that he's trying to sell certainties rather than speculating anyway - speculation has an air of questioning and uncertainty, but annul's post brashly made assumptions based on the daypost which I find terribly suspicious.
"this game has light clues."
it seemed like clues to me. it seemed real and certain enough that the mod had to explicitly come in and clarify they are not clues.
|
On September 30 2012 15:19 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2012 15:02 Mattchew wrote:
i re-read shady's "trolling" and it seems extremely forced and thought out. this is either proof to his point of him trying to get warned or him being too nervous to troll casually because he is scum.
Tell me what you think is "extremely forced and thought out" about Shady's trolling please. Use of the word "extremely" should make that exceedingly easy to explain, so I look forward to hearing it. Shady Sands is the most suspicious person in the thread right now though. His explaination for his vote makes no sense with his explanation for his trolling, which also made no sense independantly. Think that didn't make sense? Read it again. And then go read Shady's posts. And be suspicious of him with me. Also I'd like to know what you found worth reading in annul's post. First of all, setup speculation (as the mod has pointed out) is useless. Not to mention the fact that he's trying to sell certainties rather than speculating anyway - speculation has an air of questioning and uncertainty, but annul's post brashly made assumptions based on the daypost which I find terribly suspicious. So I'd like for you to explain what you liked about it if you please.
His trolling didn't read like a player just taking a piss (trying out this expression), he had to try too hard at it with and lay it on thick with the alternating caps. He did however clearly put thought into what he was typing out and didnt just type random non-sense into the thread, like how he calls out players for fluff and shit in all of his posts instead of actually trolling around like others do. This is why his trolling feels off and extremely forced, instead of light-hearted and care-free.
annul's post at the time included important setup discussion that I missed in the flavor despite reading it myself. It turns out to not be true and takes away all value... I am disappointed annul didn't follow up with any discussion about the on-going game afterwards
|
FOSing me for this is probably FOSable in and of itself. 
|
Okay, so just to be clear, was your vote on Shady a policy lynch because:
On September 30 2012 20:03 kushm4sta wrote:
I voted for shady because he called me a troll.
There is no one better to vote for atm. I might as well vote for someone who was mean to me and has a history of being mean to me.
Also I'm not a fan of his content.
Or a scum lynch because:
On September 30 2012 21:54 kushm4sta wrote:
I like to always have my vote on my top scumread. Even if it's a weak read. FOS is reserved for secondary scumreads.
GLHF
I will try not to act mature and not be an attention whore.
On September 30 2012 22:35 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2012 22:30 Kreb wrote:
@kush
You still didnt reply to what you dont like about Shadys content. I apologize for my lack of specificity. I dislike his content because it is all caps nonsense. Not even proper trolling, just spam.
Honestly, either one is terrible reasoning.
|
On September 30 2012 23:31 Mattchew wrote:
I am disappointed annul didn't follow up with any discussion about the on-going game afterwards
i went to sleep dude
|
On September 30 2012 23:18 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2012 23:11 Keirathi wrote:On September 30 2012 22:35 kushm4sta wrote:On September 30 2012 22:30 Kreb wrote:
@kush
You still didnt reply to what you dont like about Shadys content. I apologize for my lack of specificity. I dislike his content because it is all caps nonsense. Not even proper trolling, just spam. SO ALL CAPS = SCUM? I don't follow your logic. That's why I said policy lynch not scum lynch. And yeah I realize this is a contradiction from saying top scumread gets vote but I don't have a top scumread so it goes to a policy vote. Also making too big of a deal of this, but I am happy to entertain any and all questions nevertheless.
Question, what do you think about anyones posting... literally anyone
|
On September 30 2012 23:32 annul wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2012 23:31 Mattchew wrote:
I am disappointed annul didn't follow up with any discussion about the on-going game afterwards
i went to sleep dude
k awake now?
what do you think of shady's shit
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
