|
On October 03 2012 06:13 marvellosity wrote:austin: that's because you always play so fking scummy for most of day 1 dear. iamp: you may only use the term if you bring with it the sense of arrogance I use it with. Anyway, Mattchew, come talk to me about your play, it's looking pretty damn scummy to me right now, especially after the first half of Day 1. You voted kj yesterday lunchtime or so, and we have this post: Show nested quote +On October 02 2012 08:21 Mattchew wrote:
BC mind telling me why you think i am scum?
also, I could get down with an austin lynch. he doesn't feel like he is hunting scum as much as he is hunting for an easy out to vote.
I am willing to ##unvote for the meantime. I am caught up on the thread but don't actually understand some of the arguments.
You 'unvote' here in the thread but you do no such thing in the Voting Thread. You also say you're down for an austin lynch here, but you never elaborate on this again, instead going on with: Show nested quote +On October 02 2012 08:49 Mattchew wrote:
sloosh hasnt done anything after coming in complaining about the thread being bad. You don't talk about austin anymore at all, and instead casually suggest lynching slOosh. Except you never seem serious about it, you're just dropping his name there and off you go, not to be heard of again during the Day. You're gonna have to explain pretty well what you were thinking here as it looks scummy as shit to me. Posting for the sake of posting and not taking actually taking any real stances. Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 02:11 Mattchew wrote:On October 03 2012 02:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Someone shoot him. We can lynch Node easier than Annul, and I want them both dead.
Medics, on me and marv.
DTs, on BC and Mattchew.
We totally got this. I am down with this plan Absolutely nothing to say on how the lynch went down or anything pertinent at all. Scum bro?
I wasn't around for when the lynch went down.
Sloosh should still be lynched, do you disagree with my assessment of it or just my lack of pushing it?
I didn't think that shady did anything (other than come back last minute to the thread) that warranted him being lynched, but because of so many people getting away with little to no information about why their vote was on him or node, I struggle to find the difference there between bad town and scum.
Forgot to unvote, woulda ended up not voting (which is basically what I did). Honestly I just had a really bad day 1 and was not able to really get a strong read on anyone through just overall reading, and then when I looked at sloosh I was away for when I should have been pushing him.
Anyway lets chat about sloosh, BC and annul. These are the players that feel weird.
Sloosh seems to be struggling to post, and seems like he is struggling to type out his thoughts. I think this is because he is scum. I was easy to make a case on because I played like shit day 1. He skews the truth in his case about me when he mentions my stop voting shady sands point. I was clearly saying this to the people that at that moment were voting shady which there were still a lot of at that time (in this thread and +2 to the voting thread). I was also not saying what alignment Shady was, I was just saying that at that time votes on him were stupid.
BC reminds me a lot of foolish playing in Bureaucracy. He knows that a lot is expected of him which makes it really really hard for him to post a lot. He is focusing in on people here and there while not actively driving discussion and calling out bad play. His posting looks really weak for a normally very confident player, and the % of fluff/bs to actual content in his filter is not up to his town-standards
Annul, his 5 page filter has nothing of actual value in terms of reasoning, scum-hunting, or explaining his thought process. He also was extremely active in the hours leading up the lynch and ended up pushing no candidate. Here is annul's last scum game filter, I feel it reads very very similar to his filter this game (link plz click)
|
shoulda done cool bolding while formatting TT
|
i was mod-killed in that game BC i was just looking for it....
|
oh wait, not that game, i was looking for the game with a bunch of masons that could only mason 1 person for a cycle then had to pick someone new
|
On October 03 2012 08:09 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2012 07:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
This stands out to me for one major reason. It makes perfect sense for mafia to push node as a distraction case regardless of the fact shady flipped green. Ask VE or Node if they remember a game in the high 30's or low 40s run by FW with the weird mason mechanic (each player could mason any two players they chose but only two players) where on day 3 or 4 as mafia my entire team sat firmly on two sides of a townie vs townie lynch pushing each.
Also pushing node as a "distraction" case would be perfect if austin is red. Why? Because it got heat off himself.
However, this is me merely clearing up something I find instantly wrong and misleading.
Yes, that's one way to look at it; on the flip side, the right thing for austin to do as townie is to make reads and push things like he did, and like Node very much did not. How are you reading the both of them? I find austin quite townie now. talismania - What is your current read on VE? Do you still think he is scum?
why you no talk to me after i answer you nicely
|
On October 03 2012 08:22 marvellosity wrote:
Mattchew: I think you're nitpicking at slOosh's case when the main thrust of it was similar to what I wrote. Coming back with nice paragraphs about how things went down Day 1 after the fact is very nice and all, but it's all after the fact, when it's a bit late. Somewhat nullish on slOosh because I want him to post more, but he shared similar views to me on you.
With BC, I don't like how he came in, contributed, and left, but that doesn't seem that unusual. When he was here he seemed concerned with actually finding scum, whereas my memory of seeing him play scum last is that he didn't focus on that at all. Comparing him to a different player in Bureaucracy doesn't seem relevant.
And yeah, annul is definitely scummy. I detest him objecting to pretty much every candidate just on the way the wagon went and not pushing people properly himself.
nice paragraphs about yesterday? i merely answered your questions
|
just finished soa
sloosh you gotta be kidding me
|
omg annul sucks, lets kill him
|
|
|
marv you played well and i thought you were town... now I see why you buddy'd up VE so hard
|
i went after kush cause i thought his reasoning for his vote was shit. which it was.
scum find it hard to troll because they are extremely aware of how they post in the thread. normally if shady had not made his post pre-game about trolling, he would be scum 9 outta 10 times. Because of his pre-game post, it makes his trolling non-alignment telling because he was probably going to troll regardless of his alignment. Its not wishy-washy its my thought process. What is scummy about me expressing my thoughts on the matter again?
|
On October 06 2012 06:36 Promethelax wrote:sorry for triple post, Matt's town read on VE Show nested quote +On October 04 2012 01:45 Mattchew wrote:
marv you played well and i thought you were town... now I see why you buddy'd up VE so hard I realized I should have cited this right after I hit post.
i didn't call VE town. I just felt marv's relationship with him was off. i thought marv had a strong town read on him, it turns out he was just scum.
|
hey guys sorry i missed the last 2 days. was away from home all weekend
|
can we lynch bloodyclob for being alive?
|
hey im not afk right this second
##Vote Kushm4sta
|
honestly? look at the last 3 days (i honestly thought i voted hapa) but theres been no real necessary discussion. lynch marv, hapa, kush. We aren't lynching off analysis or discussion, we are lynching off of roles and setup ish.
|
just because i am not concerned does this not make me a citizen?!
but srsly has anything posted other than ve's claim been useful?
and sloosh is clearly scum trying to earlier push the BC 3rd party lynch
|
On October 10 2012 22:28 Kreb wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2012 21:59 Mattchew wrote:
honestly? look at the last 3 days (i honestly thought i voted hapa) but theres been no real necessary discussion. lynch marv, hapa, kush. We aren't lynching off analysis or discussion, we are lynching off of roles and setup ish. Are you trying to say you dont see the benefits of keeping the discussion active?
i see the benefits, i don't think you see how unrealistic and hard it is to get real discussion going when the biggest threat is the mighty feared FOS
|
Thanks BC for that I'll write a case before the end of the night
|
Also kush was being pushed hard and sloosh pushed for the BC 3rd party (regardless if he's right or not) lynch... Someone else should say this but I will cause I thought of it
Inb4 you called out BC too.. I haven't been reading as much as sloosh
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
