._.

Well.

Hapa, I'm gonna save you some time and pre-emptively apologize for the case on prplhz. I thought it was good, I really did. I think more could have been done to defend him. I think you should have claimed about 12 hours out, but what happened, happened.

I'm gonna do some thinking. I'll be back with more thoughts later in the night. Leave questions here.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 19 2012 21:06 GMT

#708

You know what, I take it back. Fuck prplhz and his shitty play and your guys shitty claims. I am sorry he was lynched, but I'm not sorry for how it happened. This was completely avoidable, Hapa, prplhz. I don't know what else to say.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 02:00 GMT

#745

On September 20 2012 08:30 Hapahauli wrote:

Show nested quote +

That's for the post-game rage =/

:|

Well at least you're around until dawn, Hapa. I take back what I said about lynching you D2, naturally. My plans tonight include a rereading of D1 and posting of cases. If you want to someone to bounce ideas off of I'll be on and off for the next several hours.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 02:12 GMT

#746

On September 20 2012 10:26 Bluelightz wrote:
GOD DAMN prplhz/ -_-.

Reading up on any accusations or shit (like questions D

well Bluelightz I got a question for you regarding your thought process near the end of D1.

You made this post:

On September 19 2012 00:07 Bluelightz wrote:
Memen: Aren't you just deflecting pressure onto mkfuba? If you want to answer like that at least explain to me why it's the same, oh and answer my question.

Mementoss made this post about 20 minutes later

On September 19 2012 00:26 Mementoss wrote:

Show nested quote +

Read the thread I answered your questions. And please take off scum shaded glasses everytime you talk to me, I'm not deflecting pressure onto mkfuba, I'm getting verification from Marv, why he is biased towards one lurker over the other.

>>SNIP<<

and you reacted like this, unvoting him and moving your vote onto prplhz.

On September 19 2012 00:55 Bluelightz wrote:
Ah, Memen, I see. Good explanation.

##Unvote: Mementoss
##Vote: prplhz

If he doesn't step up his contributions (so do I), I think I'll keep my vote on him. I'll go into more detail on this tomorrow as I have to sleep.

I'm not sure I see the same good explanation you do. You also mentioned if he didn't step up his contributions, you'll keep your vote on him. I know it's quite early right now in Indonesia but when you have the chance, I'd like to know what exactly about his explanation was good and convinced you you should move your vote. It's worth noting he actually said very little in the passage addressed to you, though he had a bit talking to mkfuba afterwards.

Was his reference to previous posts enough to convince you? now that the lynch has taken place, what is this "more detail" you were going to go into on Mementoss? Please elaborate.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 02:13 GMT

#747

As an aside, I did see the post you made about 24 hours later near the end of D1 explaining your case on prplhz. that's not what this is about. I'm more interested in what caused you to lose suspicion in Mementoss.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 14:56 GMT

#769

Buereaucracy Mafia

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 14:56 GMT

#770

I remember because I was scum with Palm that game. I don't really have a comment on Marv's post at the moment though.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 15:00 GMT

#772

Dude it takes like a couple minutes, tops, to find a quoted passage by a player anyways using the search function http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=thank me later&t=c&f=31&u=Palmar&gb=date&d=

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 15:10 GMT

#774

Well, I'm fairly sure Palmar actually opposed the prplhz wagon, since he was pushing to get you lynched, Marv. I'm disappointed in the quality and convincingness of his defense of prplhz and his case itself on you (though I definitely considered voting you). I don't usually see Palmar push wagons and fail, or put in so little effort.

Of course he doesn't seem to be on hand for questioning at the moment. Now that I'm up I'll reread D1 and drop down some thoughts. let me know if you got any questions for me.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 15:10 GMT

#775

In terms of what we hold Palmar accountable for D1, it's "pushing his case poorly and defending prplhz not at all despite thinking he's town and prplhz being the biggest wagon"

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 15:13 GMT

#777

you know what iamperfection I'm going to be uncharacteristically civil with you.

try reading the rest of the post and the post after it. Basically, If Palmar had been putting in full Palmar effort in the case, it'd be a town-tell. Since his case and his defense of prplhz are not, it is not.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 15:14 GMT

#778

But if you display this level of verbal ineptitude in the future, rest assured that, as usual, I will pull no punches. You're still on my list buddy.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

September 20 2012 15:17 GMT

#781

I have nothing to say to anyone until just before daybreak. If you have direct queries about my D1 play I will address them, and I'll take part in discussion, but my reads, and who they are on, will remain secret until it's too late for scum to change their NK.