EPTNormal Mini Mafia III - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 23 2012 05:23 talismania wrote: dear lord what happened there. I think I typed in the quote: "continuing my trend of what? I never vote early D1. I'm not a fan of how my name keeps floating up for seemingly no reason." On August 22 2012 23:47 marvellosity wrote: I'm quite suspicious of talis; a lot of his posts have this... touchy-feely-careful feel to them. " Actually to be completely honest", "this suggestion felt to me", "which is how I initially read it", and | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 23 2012 05:25 talismania wrote: what is this? Are you completely neutral on him? I can see being completely neutral on some other players in the game but he's stuck out so much it's hard not to classify him into one camp or the other. I would lean town side of null, due to his activity levels and he was less controversial than he was as scum in XXIII. VE gives the scum-side well enough. It's why I want more time with him. What do you make of Lvdr and Kville now he's posted his "I got home" post? I was expecting some scumhunting from Kville but instead only got a terribad defence. They're my two red reads at the moment. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 23 2012 05:51 Lvdr wrote: I suppose my comment about being controversial should have been followed by an intention to play straight up. I haven't done anything crazy right? Regarding Shady, I have a null/town read on him based on his interactions (tunneling) with kville. I don't think he would be a good lynch target for d1because if he is scum we can smoke him out later based on his activity. so who *would* make a good target? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
people best not be voting Lvdr because of that 'scumslip'. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Went back and reread, and I really think you're making too much of the Lvdr thing. You were his scumread, but he was entertaining the notion that you might be town and was trying to get additional information. I get the incongruity that you pointed out, but I can understand the townie side of it too. What did get my attention is Chezinu, though. I don't like his lapse into trolliness at all (and not just because I dislike trolliness!). Both his return to trolliness and his explanation of it seems very much like a defense mechanism. Townies have no reason to be defensive in that situation, mafia do. ##Unvote ##Vote: Chezinu | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 23 2012 14:23 Bluelightz wrote: For now, ##Vote:marvellosity Some reasons 1. Takes the easy lynch target, and only because of him lurking, and doesn't provide additional reasons. 2. His post's are mostly one-liners with the occasional suspicion More reasons later as I read more :/ I can't even describe how lazy and shit this is. You've outdone your own retardometer, grats. Last time you made similarly awful points as 2) it made me think you might be scum, although I forgot about it for some reason. That was NMM2 when BL accused VE of 'fluff' posts in a case. Same for VE as for me, totally alignment unindicative. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 23 2012 19:25 VisceraEyes wrote: Honestly I don't - he mentioned "lapsing" once, and there have been a couple of posts where I was like "Oh Chezinu.." but the vast majority of the time he's not talking about big brother or Brown or Mr Walton or anything like that which are hallmarks of "typical Chezinu" play and I haven't had a hard time following what he's talking about. So you think he's been scumhunting like a baws? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'll look into Obvious more this afternoon. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 23 2012 21:34 Kville wrote: In other words, I'm easier to target and lynch for a scum. So you believe Shady to be scum then... where be your vote? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm not voting for Lvdr today. My original vote on him was predicated on what i thought was a promise to be controversial followed by the opposite, but I'm satisfied that was not what he intended the post to mean. As explained previously, it reads to me that Lvdr got twisted in knots with the whole town/scum VE alignment shizzle. It's also clear at this stage that I'm not getting a Chez lynch through. With him promising for this to be his 'sane' game, he has done spectacularly little with this in terms of scumhunting. But without the support of vets who know him (VE/Palmar) it's not happening. I'm thinking I may have read too much into it. Back to Obvious. His self-vote is just confusing as shit as well as horrible. I particularly don't like it because he started off the game in a light-hearted, jovial fashion, and once under serious pressure he's totally flipped out. The two are incongruous. I also picked up on this when going through his filter: On August 23 2012 13:49 Obvious.660 wrote: ##VOTE: Palmar Still not sure if this one is the serious about his random lynch. Talky please. ##FOS: Kville for being too much like YourHarry. In fact, anyone who exhibits YourHarry-isms will be policy lynched, shot, and lynched again. His vote and FoS look like they're totally the wrong way round here. He has a case on Kville and gives another reason to want to kill him (yourharryisms) yet his vote is on the guy he wants to talk with, and only his FoS is on his scumread. Leaning scum. But: I'd like to present an alternative - Bluelightz. He came into the thread saying he was suspicious of Obvious, but then backed off him because his casual one-liner response was apparently townie. Later he then poops some unfinished thoughts about me into the thread and disappears once again. But most of all, this post: On August 23 2012 12:08 Bluelightz wrote: Well, I'm here. Don't have much time, have to sleep but i'll defend: 1.Is it not bad that people are just flinging around reasonless accusations? (or stuff) 2.Are the people I am accusing of not participating participating? 3.I said I am here, but I got too focused on games 4.Last promise, I'll deliver tommorow on my summary on marv (depending if my read changes or not, if it does change im going to do an analysis on the person its changed to) I'm still suspicious of marv though, so my vote is still on him, there's a small chance I'm going to be there for the lynch as well. This is all just a complete abdication for any responsibility for the Day 1 lynch. He's willing to leave his vote on me, someone who isn't going to get lynched, with only a small chance he'll be back to change it. He's been around in the game but instead of making an effort he's been playing games. He will deliver his summary on me 'tomorrow'. What use is that?? The lynch is today. He's barely making reads, he's totally apathetic towards the lynch, and seems pretty uninvested in the game and with town in general. ##Unvote ##Vote: Bluelightz | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 24 2012 03:47 VisceraEyes wrote: Dat powermove. Obvious self vote does feel contrived. Like, this isn't a large game where his flip by lynch is a drop in the bucket. It is a mini. Every townie is precious. While rethinking consider who you feel is most likely to flip town...we'll lynch the other guy. For someone who posts so much, dear, you have an uncanny knack for saying so much with so little. Do you disagree with me on Bluelightz then?? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
| ||
