PTP3 - Pikachu's Revenge - Page 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
POWER OVERWHELMING ^^ | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Next time I have an unconventional problem I'll come up with a more conventional means of handling it. Lesson learned. You guys enjoy the rest of the game! For the record, I didn't do my pokemon justice - I wasn't feeling very creative when I made it and was depending on the rest of you guys to come up with the good stuff. Judging from my role, you didn't disappoint. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 21 2012 21:47 VisceraEyes wrote: I can kill Zephirdd too, honestly. His filter consists mostly of setup speculation, but this doesn't bother me as his love of the Pokemans is well documented. What bothers me is this. There are a couple of things he could be doing here: he's either a medic claiming in the worst first post in TL town history, he's a townie who is NOT a medic and is attempting to draw roleblocks/NKs, or he's scum attempting something really profoundly stupid. From a strategic viability standpoint, I certainly HOPE it's the second one, but from a realistic standpoint and given everything else he's done in the thread (read: nothing) I'm inclined to believe that he's actually scum. He's almost certainly not a town medic, and if he is I hope I'm never town with him again. This is his next post with "content". In this post he literally sas "I like the idea of policy lynching grush, but I'm not that much of a fan of policy lynching". Literally. It's the very soul of wishy-washy scum posting. The parts I bolded are Zephirdd literally just shoveling shit hoping something sticks. I can get behind a Zephirdd lynch in addition to a Drazerk/Dirkzor lynch. Now, to decide which scummy bastard gets my vote. ##Unvote reposting due to the speed at which it was buried. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 21 2012 23:19 Dirkzor wrote: After looking through it appears it was hopeless1der... I disagree with me hoping on your wagon. I actually decided not to vote you because 5 others had already voted 2 of which had done so with no reason at all. I just voices my opinion about the case and my (wrong) findings. Why would the number of people voting him already factor into why you would vote him or not? Only scum worry about shit like that - town either find someone suspicious enough to vote or they don't, and you seemed plenty enough suspicious, especially considering your "findings" after doing meta research. Obviously your "findings" were wrong because you weren't even looking at the right player, but you thought it was right at the time...so why no vote? You can't even use the excuse of "Oh I was saving it for you" because you mentioned me in that post as well and didn't vote for me. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 21 2012 23:36 strongandbig wrote: what the crap is this man... Are you saying you're ragequitting like bugs did last game? Or are you claiming your role has some kind of restriction or condition that makes you die somehow, like drazerk did in holy roman mafia? seriously, what's with this post? It was me giving up trying to discuss anything with you because your mind is made up. Now I have to flip before you'll shut up about it, and I'm saying that I'm aware of that and concede that nothing I can say is going to convince you otherwise. So good job Big. You caught a townie. Hopefully your aim improves if you're town. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
The whole case on me is "Policy Lynch = Scum" and...what, my lack of scumhunting? While trying to push a policy lynch? HMMMMKAY GUYS! I'm not going to let you lynch me, so get it out of your heads now. Start thinking of other candidates. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 21 2012 23:42 Dirkzor wrote: I didn't vote because I wasn't convinced. Combine that with some people voting for him with no reason whatsoever made me hesitant. And I wasn't saving it for you... that came later. This isn't what you said. What you said is bolded in the original quote. You didn't say anything ABOUT not being convinced, you said "I decided not to vote you because 5 others had already". Yes, you then add that 2 others did so with no reasoning, but the reason you gave for not voting him was "because 5 others had already". This isn't me twisting words, this is me trying to understand what you're saying. So are you NOW saying that the fact that the guy had 5 votes did NOT factor into why you didn't vote for allin, in spite of being in agreement with the case? Even though that was your given reason initially? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
TAKE A STANCE DIRK | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
ANYONE CAN FLIP MEDIC ARE YOU SAYING YOU BELIEVE A NO-PRESSURE FIRST POST OF THE GAME MEDIC CLAIM KURUMI? AM I GONNA HAVE TO SMACK A KURUMI? THAT'S A BAD KURUMI!!! | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 22 2012 00:34 Mattchew wrote: VE what do you think of bugs and allinson Bugs is confusing. Like, okay...my grush lynch wasn't well-received. I expected it, sure...but the fact that he's completely ignoring everything else I do or say is a little suspicious I guess. Not a good lynch today. AllIn I'm definitely NOT convinced of right now. It's being presented as a "solid" case, but honestly I'm not seeing it. I see more of a case to be made against Draz or Dirk or Zeph than I do allin. I can consolidate on allin, but it will be strictly for the purpose of securing a lynch for town...NOT because I believe in the case. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 22 2012 00:47 Dirkzor wrote: VE you can't just deduce my sentence so they make the point you want. "...because 5 others had already voted 2 of which had done so with no reason at all." Was the sentence. That means "I didn't vote because 5 had already voted 2 of which had done so with no reason at all". NOT "Because 5 other had voted". Period. I've never changed my stance about allinson. He appears scummy to me because of his meek and apologetic attitude. I wanted to see how that was in other games to find out how much weight I should put on this info. When he (still wrong) meta came of different the case had more merit. No place have I gone all out bananas calling him 100% scum and being my top target. I have just agreed that the points have merit and more such because of the (wrong) meta. This was however not enough for me to vote him and I didn't. And yes 2 out of 5 people voting on him without reason had an influence and also the fact that the 5 votes on him came relativly fast after eachother. I wanted to see how it progressed without me adding my vote to the wagon. But the case has merit or it doesn't - that's my point. You said the case had merit, verily even MORE merit given your (wrong) meta yet you STILL weren't convinced enough to vote? But, conversely, Wiggles' prod for me to get scumhunting and SnB's confirmation bias because I called his Draz case shitty was enough for you to vote me? Naaaah bro, that's not how we do things. I have a pretty firm grasp on what NOT to do, because I do it so very often. This is a textbook case of how we do NOT do things. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Unless Zeph picks up steam. Somehow I doubt it considering no one is even MENTIONING my case. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() It helps that he sees what I'm seeing in Dirk, but I don't know if I'm suspicious of Dirk because of BC or if I'm trusting BC because of how scummy Dirk seems now... Ugh, no more all-nighters. I could feasibly work with Toad, but he tends to disagree with just about anything I say seemingly because it's me saying it. Not anything from this game in particular, just something I've noticed when we're in games together (it's one of the reasons our LI shenannies were so believable, actually). Bugs never works with me. Ever. I tried to prod Wiggles, but all that earned me was a vote. Bum is suspicious to me givin the way he was posting earlier....not so much his opposition of the grush wagon because that's understandable - more the way he was seemingly trying to argue with me about it without like...arguing with me...if that makes any sense. I'm trying guy. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
It's just that I've been ostracized because of my Policy Lynch talk. It's like I've got damned leprosy. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
| ||