• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:22
CEST 14:22
KST 21:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202520Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced35BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Serral wins EWC 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Help: rep cant save Shield Battery Server New Patch [G] Progamer Settings StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
[BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Flash @ Namkraft Laddernet …
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 569 users

Mad Men Mafia - Page 3

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 07 2012 17:25 GMT
#958
On August 08 2012 02:17 BroodKingEXE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2012 02:06 JingleHell wrote:
I've got to say, right now VE is pretty much the number one scumread.

Most damning of all, the whole rolefishing thing on Talis. It was really bizarre timing to ask, but if the host actually made roles and names line up (which doesn't seem to be the case), that would just be kind of dumb, making it the core of a case doesn't fly.

And then certain things don't line up.


On August 06 2012 03:16 VisceraEyes wrote:

No, my reasoning was to establish my innocence with Bugs FIRST, before anyone else. Not so he could defend me, but so he wouldn't suspect me.



Townies don't need to "establish" their innocence, that just happens through proper behavior.

Along with everything else, you've pretty much topped my reads for the day.


You'e never played a game with VE have you. Establishing his innocence is something he mentions every game. I dont think anyone agrees that Talis' rolefishing had any place in this town, so why not call it out? This reasoning is too shabby for you to be making votes.


You know what? I'm about fucking sick of this stupid shit. If I had the gall to mention in the thread that I've just finished my newbie games, I bet you people would rip me to shreds over trying to use it as a crutch, but any time someone doesn't like something I say or do, they bring it up.

Fuck off. If you want to defend the guy who's been kinda crazy for a while now, that's your call, but don't tell me where to vote.

If someone claims scum every single game, even when they're not, does that mean they're never scum? No. It just means they have useful meta for when they play as scum. Anyways, I have my reasons for my vote. I could reiterate what a dozen other people have said, or I could just reference some of the bigger stuff. Seems easier.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 07 2012 18:25 GMT
#975
Didn't I get chastised just recently for pointing out possible links before flips happened?

Ignoring that, you're talking about lynching someone just to see how they flip to try and establish a correlation that only has meaning under intense WIFOM.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 07 2012 18:30 GMT
#978
On August 08 2012 03:28 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2012 03:25 JingleHell wrote:
Didn't I get chastised just recently for pointing out possible links before flips happened?

Ignoring that, you're talking about lynching someone just to see how they flip to try and establish a correlation that only has meaning under intense WIFOM.
Lolwat. Who are you talking to bro?



Read half a page and figure it out, "bro". Don't go trying to start shit with me because you're still pissed you couldn't get me modkilled for lynching scum when you wanted to ignore the confirmed DT's investigation as townie.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 07 2012 18:39 GMT
#980
On August 08 2012 03:32 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2012 03:30 JingleHell wrote:
On August 08 2012 03:28 Lazermonkey wrote:
On August 08 2012 03:25 JingleHell wrote:
Didn't I get chastised just recently for pointing out possible links before flips happened?

Ignoring that, you're talking about lynching someone just to see how they flip to try and establish a correlation that only has meaning under intense WIFOM.
Lolwat. Who are you talking to bro?



Read half a page and figure it out, "bro". Don't go trying to start shit with me because you're still pissed you couldn't get me modkilled for lynching scum when you wanted to ignore the confirmed DT's investigation as townie.
Are you always like this? o.O


I think I've demonstrated quite effectively that I'm only like "this" when people are being stupid.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349066&currentpage=51#1005

There's you asking for me to be modkilled when I wouldn't change my vote off the guy the confirmed DT had as red.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349066&currentpage=54#1062

There's him flipping.

So, who's unreasonable? You're just trying to start shit for no good reason.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 08 2012 02:02 GMT
#1103
I'm the hidden mason.

D1, BioSC, who graciously, and for whatever reason, didn't reveal me at any point.
+ Show Spoiler +
Original Message From BioSC:
WBG I don't want lynched today. His handling of the mason thing was sketchy, but I really think there are better targets. If he IS scum, this wagon reminds me of Vivax's case on you in newbie 18. Right for the wrong reasons. However, I don't think he's the scummiest.

I'm looking at Talis right now. Something about his filter seems off to me... Thinking about taking an hour break to go to the gym to clear my head xD

Show nested quote +
Original Message From JingleHell:
Damn it. I'm not sure I like this WBG wagon. Since I'm town, I'd be really surprised if both of the masons on WBG are town too, and I doubt they're both scum, since scum would coordinate. I mean, maybe there's 3 per faction, but Erandorr looks like he was looking for a way to start a wagon on bugs.

Maybe it's just an aggressive town play, but it seems off to me.

Any thoughts?

Original Message From BioSC:
Thoughts on Talismania?

Original Message From JingleHell:
I just don't have a solid read yet. If it was a situation of "need a deciding vote" based on current info, I'd probably look at glasse, toad, sloosh or WBG, but there's just nothing to pin anyone down on yet.

Especially with so many suspects. I doubt all of them are scum, and there's probably some scum in lurkers. Hopefully more people will post over the next few hours.

Original Message From BioSC:
If you had to pick someone to target right now, who would it be? I'd be up for backing you up on this should you want to.

Original Message From JingleHell:
Yeah, I don't even have any clear way to target someone to promote discussion. Any time I try, people just start making fun of the noob and ignoring me, and that's kind of the style I've developed, just railroad people to force discussion, and watch the motive.

Original Message From BioSC:
Glasse is a null read to me, half his posts are ok, the other half is dodging stuff.

Scummy or not, Zeph has a point, there isn't much to go on in the thread right now, and we need some discussion on a topic. The mason thing would have been good, but WBG shut that down really well, so as of right now, thats all I have to go on.

Original Message From JingleHell:
That's the ones I've noticed. I'm hoping we can keep some of the masons as a secret weapon, since scum might slip in a private conversation with one of us, but WBG seems to be against that plan.

Original Message From BioSC:
Trying to get in my head the mason list so far,

You, VE and Errandor? Am I missing someone?

Original Message From JingleHell:
Yeah, I'm trying to figure out people's motives from what they're saying, but the way they post is so low-content mostly that it's hard to do.

It feels like almost everyone is more interested in sounding pro-town than being productive right now. I'd almost be willing to give Zeph a pass on that alone, because he's not trying to push his townieness like others are.

Hard to be sure though.

I'm not much liking Toad, either, same sort of reason, but people are giving it a pass like it's totally cool for Toad to do it, which just feels like scum covering for each other a bit.

IDK. It's such a different environment from the damn newbie games.

[quote]


D2 Talis

+ Show Spoiler +
[8/6/2012 4:49:57 PM] Jingle: hey howsit.
[8/6/2012 4:50:01 PM] talismania: hihi
[8/6/2012 4:50:07 PM] talismania: hawaii?
[8/6/2012 4:50:14 PM] Jingle: huh?
[8/6/2012 4:50:20 PM] talismania: oh nm they say howzit there
[8/6/2012 4:50:54 PM] Jingle: nah, I'm in Texas.
[8/6/2012 4:51:27 PM] Jingle: Yeah, I wasn't even expecting to make it this far without getting outed in the current climate, so if you feel the need, I'll understand.
[8/6/2012 4:52:47 PM] talismania: indeed I don't see what difference it will make
[8/6/2012 4:52:54 PM] talismania: as far as NKs go you should be lower priority than toad, for instance
[8/6/2012 4:53:12 PM] talismania: you said you thought it was weird that biosc didn't out you?
[8/6/2012 4:53:22 PM] Jingle: Yeah, given how things went yesterday overall
[8/6/2012 4:53:36 PM] Jingle: I asked him not to, but with the way the day went...
[8/6/2012 4:53:54 PM] Jingle: not outing me ends up looking bad for me
[8/6/2012 4:54:08 PM] talismania: I dunno about that
[8/6/2012 4:54:12 PM] talismania: how do you figure?
[8/6/2012 4:54:44 PM] Jingle: well, all the discussion about "scum won't use their masons if they haven't yet"
[8/6/2012 4:54:54 PM] Jingle: people are already trying to WIFOM masons hard
[8/6/2012 4:55:16 PM] Jingle: and somehow I'm the stealth mason after all the discussion on the subject yesterday
[8/6/2012 4:55:32 PM] talismania: meh I don't think it makes you look bad
[8/6/2012 4:55:48 PM] Jingle: But then, I'm not overly concerned about town scrutiny, since I tend to be able to explain my thought process.
[8/6/2012 4:56:38 PM] Jingle: that's why I decided to mason you. You don't just insta-drop reads at first pressure, but you look at more than one option
[8/6/2012 4:56:47 PM] Jingle: I've got a town read on you right now.
[8/6/2012 4:57:02 PM] talismania: likewise
[8/6/2012 4:57:08 PM] talismania: I'm like 70% town on you
[8/6/2012 4:57:08 PM] Jingle: and wanted to see how you feel about stuff without giant crosstalk and interference
[8/6/2012 4:57:34 PM] talismania: ok well shoot away
[8/6/2012 4:58:07 PM] Jingle: well first, do you actually think I'm crazy on Eran, or do you just think there's bigger fish to fry?
[8/6/2012 4:58:32 PM] Jingle: I really don't like what I'd already seen, but he's starting to drop off the map since the lynch
[8/6/2012 4:58:49 PM] talismania: well to be perfectly honest I wrote him off as town fairly early and haven't really seriously revisited it
[8/6/2012 4:58:59 PM] talismania: however now might be a good time to do so
[8/6/2012 4:59:13 PM] talismania: the reason I thought he was town was that he masoned bugs I think for the reason he said
[8/6/2012 4:59:27 PM] talismania: like, him masoning bugs in that spot, as most people pointed out isn't a great play for scum or town really
[8/6/2012 5:01:00 PM] Jingle: yeah. idk. it seemed strange to me. I've been trying to avoid it coming up in thread, because it sounds like a copout, and don't want to use it as an excuse, but it's hard to catch a handle on some of the players. Posts in the newbie games were usually more comprehensive, with less familiarity between people, so some things that seem scummy to me might just be damn innocent.
[8/6/2012 5:01:39 PM] Jingle: I masoned Bio yesterday because we'd already played once together, so it seemed like a good place to start.
[8/6/2012 5:02:05 PM] talismania: ah gotcha
[8/6/2012 5:02:20 PM] talismania: ok so the other thing that made me think eran was town was his eagerness to skype with bugs
[8/6/2012 5:02:26 PM] talismania: that bugs mentioned a few times
[8/6/2012 5:02:40 PM] Jingle: skype is a townie type thing?
[8/6/2012 5:02:41 PM] talismania: I don't understand that as scum
[8/6/2012 5:02:47 PM] talismania: well not necessarily I suppose
[8/6/2012 5:02:48 PM] Jingle: why, because it's faster paced?
[8/6/2012 5:02:52 PM] Jingle: harder to fake?
[8/6/2012 5:02:58 PM] talismania: it's faster paced, you don't have as much time to think on your feet if you're scum etc
[8/6/2012 5:03:17 PM] talismania: but he seemed genuinely eager to press wbg
[8/6/2012 5:03:28 PM] talismania: was he just doing that because he knew he could rile him up?
[8/6/2012 5:03:31 PM] Jingle: idk, the log seemed pretty shitty on both parts to me.
[8/6/2012 5:03:40 PM] Jingle: like, the very start of the log, he was opening with hostility
[8/6/2012 5:03:42 PM] talismania: I can't say for sure because wbg came into that chat so pissed in the beginning
[8/6/2012 5:03:50 PM] Jingle: they both did though
[8/6/2012 5:03:51 PM] talismania: ok let me open that log
[8/6/2012 5:04:11 PM] Jingle: like, right from the start, eran was talking shit about wbg's play being terrible
[8/6/2012 5:04:28 PM] Jingle: that was one of the things I went after him on, that nobody seemed to think was worth looking at
[8/6/2012 5:04:44 PM] Jingle: and, of course, I wasnt posting big rainbow colored reminders to vote for him
[8/6/2012 5:04:49 PM] talismania: heh
[8/6/2012 5:04:53 PM] Jingle: that said, Hier made me nervous.
[8/6/2012 5:05:11 PM] Jingle: even if I have a good case on someone, I don't like to see a ninja vote on them with nothing in the thread
[8/6/2012 5:05:26 PM] talismania: I thoguht hier made a case on erandorr
[8/6/2012 5:05:38 PM] Jingle: go look in the thread at the time he voted
[8/6/2012 5:05:39 PM] talismania: it was really sarcastic and I thoguht he was breadcrumbing his character because of that
[8/6/2012 5:05:42 PM] Jingle: his vote was out of nowhere.
[8/6/2012 5:05:55 PM] Jingle: timing wise
[8/6/2012 5:06:16 PM] Jingle: like, i'd expect at least a "oh yeah since I forgot earlier" post or something
[8/6/2012 5:06:22 PM] Jingle: brb smoke
[8/6/2012 5:10:17 PM] Jingle: back
[8/6/2012 5:10:26 PM] talismania: cool I'm reading through eran's filter
[8/6/2012 5:11:36 PM] Jingle: but yeah, it's been tricky for me over the weekend and today, since i've been busy. my usual style is to aggressively bulldog on people, and watch the ensuing discussion for people to say things that don't seem to have a townie motive
[8/6/2012 5:12:23 PM] Jingle: usually goes decent for me, but between people just wanting to ignore my cases, and doing other stuff, it hasn't worked so hot. hopefully it will pick up
[8/6/2012 5:14:22 PM] Jingle: but yeah, the logs from eran/wbg seem less conclusive to me, because when wbg popped in talking down to eran, he didn't even try to get things on track, he just swung back.
[8/6/2012 5:14:55 PM] talismania: ok so erandorr masons wbg sometime after this: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&currentpage=15#285
[8/6/2012 5:15:57 PM] talismania: and then later after wbg outs him he makes this post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&currentpage=16#314
[8/6/2012 5:16:17 PM] talismania: which only focuses on wbg outing ve and not himself which is kind of funny
[8/6/2012 5:17:20 PM] Jingle: yeah that does seem weird. although, to try and be objective, if he expected to be outed, focusing on it happening to him would be strange.
[8/6/2012 5:17:43 PM] talismania: objectively he should have mentioned it as either alignment IMO
[8/6/2012 5:17:47 PM] Jingle: but then, that flies against the claimed motive of "confirming" that VE masoned wbg, which is WIFOM without a log anyway
[8/6/2012 5:18:00 PM] talismania: if it was his scum plan to get wbg lynched, and he knew wbg would out him then he should hav eused it
[8/6/2012 5:18:04 PM] Jingle: which there were no logs from anyone at that point
[8/6/2012 5:18:17 PM] talismania: if it was his town plan to see if wbg outed him too he should have mentioned it too
[8/6/2012 5:18:23 PM] talismania: sot hat's a wash
[8/6/2012 5:18:53 PM] Jingle: he really just doesn't make any sense to me.
[8/6/2012 5:19:09 PM] Jingle: And where I can't find townie motive, and can see possible scum motive, I tend to think scum
[8/6/2012 5:19:37 PM] Jingle: obviously, strange play is always possible too, but it just doesn't make sense.
[8/6/2012 5:20:22 PM] Jingle: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15727835
[8/6/2012 5:20:32 PM] Jingle: he was definitely trying to push votes towards wbg at one point
[8/6/2012 5:20:46 PM] talismania: at one point? I recall him doing it at every point
[8/6/2012 5:20:53 PM] Jingle: yeah, I know
[8/6/2012 5:21:02 PM] Jingle: until prp came up
[8/6/2012 5:21:04 PM] Jingle: the side wagon
[8/6/2012 5:21:19 PM] Jingle: that took on a life of it's own and turned into the lynch instead
[8/6/2012 5:21:34 PM] Jingle: shortly after the lynch, he drops off the face of the planet for all intents and purposes
[8/6/2012 5:22:05 PM] talismania: yes he has been inactive or at least I can't remember what he's done for a while
[8/6/2012 5:22:08 PM] Jingle: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15733650
[8/6/2012 5:22:16 PM] talismania: oh I think he perked up when bugs came back
[8/6/2012 5:22:16 PM] Jingle: there's his "defense" against my case
[8/6/2012 5:22:45 PM] Jingle: which is basically a train wreck of "these aren't the droids you're looking for" and blatant misrepresentation.
[8/6/2012 5:23:05 PM] Jingle: like his response to me pointing out that he was talking shit back to wbg in the logs right at the start
[8/6/2012 5:23:15 PM] Jingle: "Did you notice that he insulted me about 100 times before that? And the one time I get so upset as to say what I do in the quote I INSTANTLY APOLOGIZE?"
[8/6/2012 5:24:09 PM] Jingle: and after ignoring or lying as a response to my case, he calls it a malicious case, and then tells me to look at other people.
[8/6/2012 5:24:34 PM] Jingle: if he actually thought it was malicious, there should be a case, not just a continued tunnel on wbg and prp
[8/6/2012 5:24:44 PM] Jingle: but he accuses me of a malicious case and vanishes
[8/6/2012 5:25:07 PM] talismania: hmm
[8/6/2012 5:25:07 PM] Jingle: the shitty part is so many people think i just have a hardon for him that it probably wouldn't work to just point this out in the thread either
[8/6/2012 5:25:21 PM] talismania: well you're tunneled on him and he was tunneled on wbg at that point
[8/6/2012 5:25:35 PM] talismania: I'm not surprised he didn't turn around and make a case on you
[8/6/2012 5:25:52 PM] talismania: ok I'm gonna go through his response
[8/6/2012 5:26:03 PM] talismania: first thing I agree with him on - it was a joke
[8/6/2012 5:26:21 PM] talismania: second thing let's see
[8/6/2012 5:26:34 PM] Jingle: i didn't know it was a joke. goes back to that familiarity thing
[8/6/2012 5:26:53 PM] talismania: yeah a couple of people have made mistakes like that this game
[8/6/2012 5:27:18 PM] Jingle: i did actually apologize and drop that particular facet on the record, iirc
[8/6/2012 5:27:36 PM] talismania: uh ok so second point is that he's prickly about his opinions essentially
[8/6/2012 5:28:03 PM] Jingle: ok maybe i didn't. not sure.
[8/6/2012 5:28:09 PM] talismania: hmm yeah the problem is his personality
[8/6/2012 5:28:12 PM] Jingle: damn its bad when i have to check my own filter
[8/6/2012 5:28:31 PM] talismania: I ge tthe sense that he is infact rather agressive and whatnot
[8/6/2012 5:28:41 PM] talismania: he went after me pretty agressively early on for instance
[8/6/2012 5:29:34 PM] Jingle: yeah i didn't officially drop that in the thread. but i didn't follow up on it either. hard to know what's an inside joke and what's not
[8/6/2012 5:30:03 PM] Jingle: but yeah, aggressive play is good and all, I'm all for it, but he really didn't address the bigger points
[8/6/2012 5:30:38 PM] Jingle: although, as you said, one of them doesn't make sense from any perspective, and the other is kind of down to personality
[8/6/2012 5:30:56 PM] Jingle: idk, maybe he's not scum, but i don't have a better target right now
[8/6/2012 5:31:01 PM] talismania: yeah so point two is essentially that he attacks people who disagree with him
[8/6/2012 5:31:09 PM] talismania: which is what I mean by he's agresssive
[8/6/2012 5:31:28 PM] talismania: and then the problem is to decide if he's hamming it up on purpose to drive a mislynch
[8/6/2012 5:31:30 PM] talismania: or if that's just how he is
[8/6/2012 5:31:45 PM] talismania: and it's not really that alignment-indicative
[8/6/2012 5:32:44 PM] Jingle: there's so much gray area in this game, that short posts, and dismissive posts can be kind of difficult to deal with
[8/6/2012 5:33:18 PM] talismania: I like erandorr's shorter posts in his filter for the most part
[8/6/2012 5:33:19 PM] Jingle: i mean, i've done it too, where something seems absurd and i ignored it, but if there's several people all saying it, continuing to ignore it doesn't seem pro-town anymore
[8/6/2012 5:33:26 PM] talismania: he asks questions, and then more importantly follows up on them
[8/6/2012 5:33:46 PM] talismania: scum do the first easily but are often too lazy to do the second, because they don't really care about the answer
[8/6/2012 5:33:54 PM] talismania: of course good scum do both
[8/6/2012 5:34:10 PM] talismania: ok so point three in your case is about hier and erandorr's respoens to that
[8/6/2012 5:34:33 PM] talismania: my gut reaction to that is that eran's response was townie but I guess in sum it's just null
[8/6/2012 5:34:57 PM] talismania: like if I'm scum I don't blow off a case, no matter how ridiculous it sounds with a one-liner
[8/6/2012 5:35:08 PM] talismania: but I'm also not that agressive
[8/6/2012 5:36:24 PM] Jingle: i actually had a coach, back in one of my newbie games, tell me to blow off weak cases more often. apparently they thought it was a scumslip to over-defend
[8/6/2012 5:36:38 PM] Jingle: which makes sense, but then you're diving into wifom
[8/6/2012 5:36:45 PM] Jingle: and i hate wifom when i can look for motives
[8/6/2012 5:36:47 PM] talismania: no I agree
[8/6/2012 5:36:59 PM] talismania: I mean I think zephirdd made a case on me this game that I prettuy much just ignored
[8/6/2012 5:37:13 PM] talismania: it's just the use of the one-liner that seems genuine
[8/6/2012 5:37:30 PM] talismania: like I honestly think erandorr read hier's thing and went "wtf"
[8/6/2012 5:37:47 PM] Jingle: well, i guess i can at least shift him to null read and just keep an eye on him for now
[8/6/2012 5:38:03 PM] Jingle: since that all makes some sort of sense, with context
[8/6/2012 5:38:18 PM] talismania: now for sure you're right that he doesn't make a much of an attempt to calm wbg down
[8/6/2012 5:38:29 PM] Jingle: that on its own i can't call scummy
[8/6/2012 5:38:35 PM] talismania: they're pretty much both just salpping each other with fish that whole time
[8/6/2012 5:38:45 PM] Jingle: just useless
[8/6/2012 5:38:53 PM] Jingle: but at least we werent subjected to it in thread
[8/6/2012 5:39:09 PM] talismania: if we were I'd say they might have both been scum
[8/6/2012 5:39:48 PM] Jingle: i can still sort of see a potential case on wbg out of that mess, but it's hard to say. frankly, i think he's been overtunneled
[8/6/2012 5:40:13 PM] talismania: wbg makes me nervous
[8/6/2012 5:40:20 PM] talismania: I've been more or less thinking he's town
[8/6/2012 5:40:35 PM] talismania: but his play since coming back from rage mountain has been subpar
[8/6/2012 5:40:36 PM] Jingle: the main thing with outing that i don't like is that it's too obvious of a defense
[8/6/2012 5:40:56 PM] Jingle: "but why would I out them in the thread if i could have done it in the QT if I was scum"
[8/6/2012 5:41:02 PM] Jingle: that scares the hell out of me
[8/6/2012 5:41:19 PM] Jingle: out of the whole thing, that was the only thing to me that made me think it might be worth a case
[8/6/2012 5:41:40 PM] talismania: yeah on balance the speed with which wbg outed them tells me he wasn't planning much devious with it
[8/6/2012 5:41:59 PM] talismania: he genuinely believes that masons aren't that much more valuable in secret, which I agree with
[8/6/2012 5:42:09 PM] Jingle: would he have been an obvious mason target?
[8/6/2012 5:42:12 PM] talismania: wbg?
[8/6/2012 5:42:14 PM] talismania: yues
[8/6/2012 5:42:18 PM] Jingle: it could have been something he planned to do early then
[8/6/2012 5:42:23 PM] Jingle: making the speed work
[8/6/2012 5:42:45 PM] talismania: well the reason I think for outing masons in the thread as scum
[8/6/2012 5:42:49 PM] talismania: instaed of just in the qt
[8/6/2012 5:43:07 PM] talismania: is to avoid risking looking bad if scum wants to nk the masons
[8/6/2012 5:43:29 PM] talismania: like if VE claimed mason like toad did, for instance, and then got killed
[8/6/2012 5:43:38 PM] Jingle: yeah but they can't nk masons now
[8/6/2012 5:43:51 PM] Jingle: unless we have an insane number of masons total
[8/6/2012 5:44:07 PM] talismania: I really hope there isn't another hidden one
[8/6/2012 5:44:08 PM] Jingle: then scum have masons outed too now
[8/6/2012 5:44:20 PM] Jingle: so every dead mason narrows down some scum
[8/6/2012 5:44:42 PM] talismania: well I think if I were balancing the game I would have the same ratio of masons as there are players
[8/6/2012 5:44:51 PM] talismania: but I don't know if bc did that
[8/6/2012 5:44:56 PM] talismania: right now it's 6 total known
[8/6/2012 5:45:06 PM] talismania: so 4-2? 5-1?
[8/6/2012 5:45:23 PM] Jingle: yeah idk
[8/6/2012 5:45:37 PM] Jingle: but theres enough out that i expect the scum have masons visible
[8/6/2012 5:45:46 PM] Jingle: so they cant nk into masons safely
[8/6/2012 5:45:58 PM] talismania: I mean I'm still fairly sure about VE
[8/6/2012 5:45:58 PM] Jingle: after the first couple got outed, the rest getting outed was VERY pro-town
[8/6/2012 5:46:04 PM] talismania: and I have a strong feeling hassbaby is scum too
[8/6/2012 5:46:08 PM] Jingle: who was it who dropped names after wbg? i forget
[8/6/2012 5:46:12 PM] talismania: toad
[8/6/2012 5:46:35 PM] Jingle: well, out of the two who outed, one of them is probably scum
[8/6/2012 5:47:14 PM] talismania: hmm just thoguht of something
[8/6/2012 5:47:14 PM] Jingle: either to protect attempts to nk into masons, or to protect scum masons so they could keep using it
[8/6/2012 5:47:21 PM] talismania: I suppose it could be dangerous to out too many masons if there's lots
[8/6/2012 5:47:26 PM] talismania: since it helps scum bluesnipe
[8/6/2012 5:47:53 PM] talismania: well
[8/6/2012 5:47:57 PM] talismania: actually I doubt that's an issue
[8/6/2012 5:48:08 PM] talismania: there'd have to be like four more out there before that was troublesome
[8/6/2012 5:48:31 PM] Jingle: well that'd make an entertaining game, if there were that many masons
[8/6/2012 5:48:45 PM] Jingle: for some value of "entertaining"
[8/6/2012 5:48:50 PM] talismania: yeah I was thinking of a setup earlier today
[8/6/2012 5:49:02 PM] talismania: everyone is mason and gets to pick one person they can chat to per cycle
[8/6/2012 5:49:15 PM] talismania: catch is that you are required to post your logs at the end of the cycle
[8/6/2012 5:49:28 PM] Jingle: ow
[8/6/2012 5:49:34 PM] Jingle: that sounds painfully difficult
[8/6/2012 5:49:40 PM] Jingle: inane volume of information
[8/6/2012 5:49:46 PM] Jingle: don't think most people would have the patience
[8/6/2012 5:50:44 PM] talismania: lol hier made a diagram
[8/6/2012 5:50:50 PM] Jingle: yeah just saw that
[8/6/2012 5:50:53 PM] talismania: hahahaha
[8/6/2012 5:51:08 PM] talismania: sorry I think it's funny he couldn't keep track of things
[8/6/2012 5:51:19 PM] talismania: it ain't that complicated
[8/6/2012 5:51:41 PM] Jingle: i can't completely either
[8/6/2012 5:51:47 PM] Jingle: but i'm not drawing a flowchart
[8/6/2012 5:52:30 PM] talismania: ok but back on the subject of which mason is scum
[8/6/2012 5:52:32 PM] talismania: VE
[8/6/2012 5:52:42 PM] talismania: what do you make of the meat of my case against him
[8/6/2012 5:52:56 PM] Jingle: sum it up, or give me a sec to re-read
[8/6/2012 5:53:11 PM] talismania: he doesn't read my filter like a townie should before making a case
[8/6/2012 5:53:29 PM] talismania: he ends up making accusations that aren't actually true by mistakenly paraphrasing other players
[8/6/2012 5:53:53 PM] talismania: yet at the same time he shows he's paying enough attention to the game to remember even the most ohbscure posts I made early on
[8/6/2012 5:54:15 PM] talismania: his reaction to my case is interesting too
[8/6/2012 5:54:30 PM] talismania: he's essentially had to back down completely and admit I was right
[8/6/2012 5:54:44 PM] talismania: without admitting that he's scum of course
[8/6/2012 5:56:05 PM] Jingle: well, I can't comment on all of it, but I got to admit, it's pretty damning. I especially agree about the shadiness of wanting to establish innocence. I'm generally of the opinion that it establishes itself unless you're playing clumsily
[8/6/2012 5:56:12 PM] Jingle: of course, i don't know what kind of player he is
[8/6/2012 5:57:03 PM] Jingle: looking up his response right now
[8/6/2012 5:57:06 PM] talismania: search bureaucracy mafia (still on front page I think) and have a skim through his filter
[8/6/2012 5:57:07 PM] Jingle: trying to keep context
[8/6/2012 5:57:15 PM] talismania: if you want to see his normal town meta
[8/6/2012 5:57:24 PM] talismania: he's normally a lot more spammy
[8/6/2012 5:59:21 PM] Jingle: i do think the rolefishing accusation... well, it kind of makes sense, but we can only hope bc is smart enough to have randomized roles to names, not just inverted or something.
[8/6/2012 5:59:33 PM] Jingle: at the least, you should have saved that for later
[8/6/2012 5:59:41 PM] Jingle: but i don't think it makes a solid core of a case
[8/6/2012 5:59:41 PM] talismania: heh yeah couldn't help myself
[8/6/2012 5:59:52 PM] talismania: since don draper was vt
[8/6/2012 6:00:06 PM] talismania: I think it's safe to say char names truely don't mean anything
[8/6/2012 6:00:50 PM] Jingle: yeah ive watched a few episodes on netflix but got sidetracked by season 3 of warehouse 13
[8/6/2012 6:01:58 PM] Jingle: and yeah, his final response to your case is... strange.
[8/6/2012 6:02:07 PM] Jingle: i could see a VE lynch maybe.
[8/6/2012 6:02:23 PM] talismania: I'll see what I can get out of him in pms and chat
[8/6/2012 6:02:27 PM] Jingle: or we could see if we can kill grush again.
[8/6/2012 6:02:37 PM] talismania: oh grush
[8/6/2012 6:02:40 PM] Jingle: scum/vigi got to, why can't the rest of us?
[8/6/2012 6:02:45 PM] Jingle: its not fair
[8/6/2012 6:03:07 PM] talismania: I bet his plan was something silly too like not masoning d1 and then masoning d2 and seeing what happens
[8/6/2012 6:04:21 PM] Jingle: either that or his starsenses got jammed
[8/6/2012 6:05:03 PM] Jingle: I was just having a look over Bio's filter again
[8/6/2012 6:05:07 PM] Jingle: idk what's up with him
[8/6/2012 6:05:45 PM] talismania: he comes on and off my radar
[8/6/2012 6:05:51 PM] talismania: you palyed with him before you said
[8/6/2012 6:05:53 PM] Jingle: yeah
[8/6/2012 6:05:54 PM] talismania: I think I played with him once too
[8/6/2012 6:05:57 PM] Jingle: hes not spammy
[8/6/2012 6:06:01 PM] talismania: no he's not
[8/6/2012 6:06:11 PM] Jingle: but he's under a page of filter
[8/6/2012 6:06:16 PM] Jingle: with a fair amount as pre-game spam
[8/6/2012 6:06:58 PM] Jingle: last thing he said was to call grush scum for being grush, and then dismiss a case against him
[8/6/2012 6:07:21 PM] talismania: ok opened his filter
[8/6/2012 6:07:48 PM] talismania: this sounds dumb and I really shouldn't rely on it but I thoguht he was town when he asked the host for a filter list in the op
[8/6/2012 6:08:06 PM] Jingle: lol why? when he's scum he's pretty cautious
[8/6/2012 6:08:34 PM] Jingle: end of newbie XVIII he was well off radar. he makes careful scum cases.
[8/6/2012 6:09:01 PM] Jingle: granted, i was scum too that game, but yeah, i watched him play scum, and he's careful and quiet
[8/6/2012 6:09:12 PM] Jingle: but then, haven't seen him as confirmed town, so not sure on that
[8/6/2012 6:09:25 PM] Jingle: although I do have to wonder...
[8/6/2012 6:09:57 PM] Jingle: somewhere in his filter...
[8/6/2012 6:10:00 PM] Jingle: dammit can't find it
[8/6/2012 6:10:00 PM] talismania: scummiest part of his filter is his switch to prp
[8/6/2012 6:10:14 PM] Jingle: that's because it's his single long, thought out post.
[8/6/2012 6:10:24 PM] talismania: ewll he has some others of comparable length
[8/6/2012 6:10:38 PM] Jingle: but they're fluff longer posts
[8/6/2012 6:10:38 PM] talismania: I mean I think he was just going along with the twagon
[8/6/2012 6:10:46 PM] talismania: but he sort of overjustified that
[8/6/2012 6:11:14 PM] talismania: it would have made more sense for him to say "I don't wbg lynched, I'm voting prp" given his history
[8/6/2012 6:11:26 PM] Jingle: here we go.
[8/6/2012 6:11:34 PM] Jingle: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15730145
[8/6/2012 6:11:42 PM] Jingle: "My stance on him is about him being less scummy than Grush. I don't really care about meta, never have, probably never will. What I care about is THIS game. "
[8/6/2012 6:12:01 PM] Jingle: i'm all for voting for your stronger scumread
[8/6/2012 6:12:17 PM] Jingle: but having a strong scumread on a troll for trolling sounds ludicrous
[8/6/2012 6:12:53 PM] Jingle: even me, not considering prp a top lynch priority, i would have taken prp over grush as a lynch based on available info at the time
[8/6/2012 6:13:26 PM] talismania: well you have a point there
[8/6/2012 6:13:34 PM] talismania: it's hard to really ever call grush scum
[8/6/2012 6:13:42 PM] talismania: it's easy to call him bad
[8/6/2012 6:13:50 PM] Jingle: i knew him by reputation before i ever saw him in a game
[8/6/2012 6:13:59 PM] Jingle: i knew what to expect before it started
[8/6/2012 6:14:07 PM] talismania: so would you say that this is matching biosc's careful cases as scum?
[8/6/2012 6:14:21 PM] talismania: they dont seem that careful to me
[8/6/2012 6:14:28 PM] Jingle: not really, but i'd say that he's at least not going to miss your filter
[8/6/2012 6:14:54 PM] Jingle: actually, if anything, i'd consider him blue over scum
[8/6/2012 6:15:00 PM] Jingle: but he could still be scum
[8/6/2012 6:15:04 PM] Jingle: i don't know
[8/6/2012 6:15:07 PM] Jingle: it's a hard read
[8/6/2012 6:15:27 PM] Jingle: bio may have just seemed careful that time because i was controlling the thread at that point
[8/6/2012 6:15:31 PM] Jingle: i'm not sure
[8/6/2012 6:15:39 PM] talismania: maybe he shot grush
[8/6/2012 6:15:43 PM] Jingle: plausible
[8/6/2012 6:15:51 PM] talismania: he's my number one vig suspect
[8/6/2012 6:16:00 PM] Jingle: and his inactivity would match the lack of a vigi claim on it
[8/6/2012 6:16:47 PM] Jingle: what about snb?
[8/6/2012 6:17:05 PM] talismania: I think he's town for the most part
[8/6/2012 6:17:14 PM] talismania: there was a period of a few hours where I was thinking he might be scum
[8/6/2012 6:17:23 PM] talismania: but mainly I think he's town
[8/6/2012 6:17:44 PM] talismania: the effort he put in with regards to wbg made me think that
[8/6/2012 6:17:55 PM] talismania: like where he was digging up out of game quotes
[8/6/2012 6:18:03 PM] talismania: hte fact that he reread the thread
[8/6/2012 6:18:24 PM] talismania: he's been generally open-minded too
[8/6/2012 6:18:27 PM] talismania: he asks good questions
[8/6/2012 6:18:29 PM] talismania: dunno
[8/6/2012 6:18:31 PM] Jingle: maybe i just don't like the kill masons idea he posited for some reason
[8/6/2012 6:18:57 PM] Jingle: maybe i'm just crazy, but i think that's a good way to potentially sacrifice a lot of town for minimal scum
[8/6/2012 6:19:09 PM] talismania: I don't think he's saying anything different other than that we should look into the masons
[8/6/2012 6:19:11 PM] Jingle: also, it's a minimal discussion cop-out lynch method
[8/6/2012 6:19:22 PM] Jingle: and discussion kills scum
[8/6/2012 6:19:30 PM] talismania: I don't think he means to policy lynch all masons
[8/6/2012 6:19:35 PM] talismania: that wouldn't work
[8/6/2012 6:19:54 PM] talismania: lylo is at day 4 or something at worst
[8/6/2012 6:20:00 PM] Jingle: plus, realistically, the more dead scum masons we make, the more reliable our surviving masons are.
[8/6/2012 6:20:02 PM] talismania: so not nearly enough time for that radical of a plan
[8/6/2012 6:20:16 PM] Jingle: so if we lynch carefully, the better
[8/6/2012 6:20:28 PM] Jingle: granted, the masons definitely bear watching
[8/6/2012 6:20:35 PM] Jingle: with this many i can't imagine us all being town
[8/6/2012 6:20:45 PM] talismania: yep I'm still locking VE and hassy
[8/6/2012 6:20:51 PM] Jingle: masons should definitely get extra scrutiny
[8/6/2012 6:21:06 PM] Jingle: hassy needs to post more
[8/6/2012 6:21:06 PM] talismania: toad I think is town
[8/6/2012 6:21:22 PM] talismania: the way toad played his role makes a lotof sense from a town pov
[8/6/2012 6:21:35 PM] talismania: he's a clever scum player but that would be really really celver of him to do as scum
[8/6/2012 6:22:23 PM] Jingle: certainly if VE gets lynched and flips red, hassy will bear close watching
[8/6/2012 6:22:31 PM] Jingle: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15713928
[8/6/2012 6:22:46 PM] Jingle: that's him getting in on the rolefishing attack on you
[8/6/2012 6:23:02 PM] talismania: yeah he got baited by that for sure
[8/6/2012 6:23:16 PM] Jingle: if i was going to base a case on that, i'd hope someone would mercy kill me for it
[8/6/2012 6:23:27 PM] talismania: it must be the kind of thing that's just irresistible in scum qt
[8/6/2012 6:23:42 PM] talismania: "holy shit he's literally asking for people's names" etc
[8/6/2012 6:23:56 PM] Jingle: he jumped on that and then vanished completely after voting on WBG
[8/6/2012 6:24:08 PM] talismania: he's not interested in the game really
[8/6/2012 6:24:09 PM] Jingle: i don't like disappearing people who vanish after a wagon much
[8/6/2012 6:24:21 PM] talismania: that's the biggest scumtell
[8/6/2012 6:24:38 PM] talismania: like if you ever want to know if I'm scum, ask if I'm interested or not in the game
[8/6/2012 6:24:54 PM] talismania: I hate playing scum so I tend to be passive and not post as much
[8/6/2012 6:24:59 PM] talismania: hassy may have the same problem
[8/6/2012 6:25:13 PM] talismania: also he has set himself a little trap
[8/6/2012 6:25:22 PM] talismania: he mentions in his logs with toad that he is keeping game notes
[8/6/2012 6:25:47 PM] talismania: so it will be interesting to see if he can actually produce those
[8/6/2012 6:26:02 PM] talismania: as doing that as scum gets tiresome
[8/6/2012 6:27:23 PM] Jingle: i don't keep notes as either alignment. when i played scum in newbie XVIII i avoided notes to force myself to stay contextual, and i do the same as a townie. making myself re-read filters is much better for avoiding stupid miscalculations that lead to mislynches
[8/6/2012 6:27:39 PM] Jingle: at least for me
[8/6/2012 6:27:56 PM] Jingle: notes would make me lazy, and i don't want to form a bad case and turn it into a mislynch because i get lazy
[8/6/2012 6:27:59 PM] talismania: I tried notes twice but I always gave up after D1
[8/6/2012 6:28:54 PM] Jingle: oh shit, i gtg. need to grab a shower before i head out to wife's birthday dinner
[8/6/2012 6:29:00 PM] talismania: have fun!
[8/6/2012 6:29:01 PM] Jingle: i'll catch you later
[8/6/2012 9:22:41 PM] Jingle: i do not understand erand.
[8/6/2012 9:24:13 PM] Jingle: he sits there making all these points about VE, then votes WBG...
[8/6/2012 9:25:04 PM] Jingle: then he throws an OMGUS on me, unless there's an actual case somewhere in the thread (oh right, I'm scummy because I didn't jump on the prp wagon when ordered)
[8/6/2012 9:57:08 PM] talismania: don't understand why he's quitting the game too or if he actually is
[8/6/2012 9:57:16 PM] talismania: drama queen city this game
[8/6/2012 9:57:24 PM] Jingle: yeah no joke
[8/6/2012 9:59:15 PM] Jingle: god people are failing quote tags
[8/6/2012 9:59:17 PM] Jingle: drives me insane
[8/6/2012 10:00:20 PM] talismania: lol love this countdropula
[8/6/2012 10:00:57 PM] Jingle: he's got class. I just wish there were good cases in the thread.
[8/6/2012 10:01:15 PM] Jingle: This game is going strange though.
[8/6/2012 10:01:38 PM] talismania: it's playing like there's 12 people in it
[8/6/2012 10:02:14 PM] Jingle: yeah. I could try to build cases, but ideally, we'd get lurkers into existence first.
[8/6/2012 10:02:39 PM] talismania: it's just about consolidation time
[8/6/2012 10:02:52 PM] Jingle: consolidate what? cases?
[8/6/2012 10:02:56 PM] talismania: votes
[8/6/2012 10:03:09 PM] talismania: maybe tomorrow morning though
[8/6/2012 10:03:16 PM] talismania: well my time
[8/6/2012 10:03:42 PM] Jingle: yeah, I don't think we've had anything productive yet to consolidate on. Maybe tomorrow, I can come out of the closet, and we can use the logs to work from.
[8/6/2012 10:04:15 PM] talismania: mmm I would think about it from the other way around
[8/6/2012 10:04:24 PM] talismania: like find something in the logs that yo uwan to persue, then go for that
[8/6/2012 10:04:39 PM] talismania: just dumping the logs during the last part of the day phase would be too distracting
[8/6/2012 10:04:44 PM] Jingle: true.
[8/6/2012 10:05:27 PM] Jingle: idk, it's going to be entertaining to try and secure votes with nobody playing
[8/6/2012 10:05:57 PM] Jingle: but that's kinda the only thing we can do
[8/6/2012 10:06:02 PM] Jingle: good thing it's plurality
[9:08:10 AM] Jingle: Ok, so I'm starting to wonder about dropula, just because of his nutjob spam shit hes doing
[11:03:55 AM] Jingle: Well, judging by the current activity level, the voting today is going to be kinda stupid.
[12:33:55 PM] talismania: the newb thing will go away after a few games
[12:34:23 PM] Jingle: it's just the dumbest thing you can do in mafia...
[12:34:31 PM] Jingle: discouraging discussion hurts the game
[12:34:45 PM] Jingle: unless bke is scum...
[12:35:02 PM] Jingle: changing the direction of the thread with an argument would make sense.
[12:36:56 PM] talismania: thinking bke probably is actually
[12:37:01 PM] talismania: he was touchy early
[12:38:27 PM] Jingle: well, we've got VE, I think, and unless we're completely wrong about how he's going to flip, then bke trying to stop discussion on VE while VE is trying to scare votes off himself would make sense
[12:38:43 PM] talismania: maybe hier too, maybe synystyr
[12:39:02 PM] talismania: wbg still an outside possibility too but hard to say
[12:39:03 PM] Jingle: plausible. there's so many people with no filter to read
[12:39:10 PM] talismania: oh and hassy of course
[12:39:13 PM] talismania: who's been really gone
[12:40:31 PM] Jingle: the fun wifom, here, is whether VE is trying to ppush eran as a bus or as a mislynch
[12:40:56 PM] Jingle: if he thinks he's more valuable than eran, since eran basically decided to quit on the game, a bus could be valuable
[12:41:10 PM] Jingle: woot lunch just got here
[12:42:59 PM] talismania: no the eran push doesn't smell like a bus
[12:43:37 PM] Jingle: why not?
[12:43:39 PM] Jingle: just curious
[12:44:03 PM] talismania: because ve was on him before I was on VE
[12:44:14 PM] talismania: so ve couldn't have known he was in danger
[12:44:46 PM] Jingle: true, but he has been a focal point for most of the day
[12:44:51 PM] Jingle: but a valid point
[12:45:33 PM] Jingle: i am nervous that we have scum in the people who straight up aren't playing though.
[12:45:45 PM] talismania: the inactives?
[12:45:47 PM] Jingle: but hard to be sure without lynching into the suspicious players
[12:45:48 PM] talismania: we do for sure
[12:45:55 PM] talismania: I mean there's 5 scum
[12:46:00 PM] talismania: bound to be at least one lurker
[12:46:08 PM] Jingle: yeah makes sense
[12:46:09 PM] talismania: but they always post before they vote
[12:46:17 PM] Jingle: the question is more whether its active or passive lurkers
[12:46:21 PM] talismania: that's how you find them, bnased on what they say in that post
[12:46:28 PM] talismania: usually active lurkers
[12:46:32 PM] talismania: like glasse maybe?
[12:46:37 PM] talismania: although he's been loopy
[12:47:18 PM] Jingle: yeah, possible. idk. I think at this point, I'ma wait and see how VE flips, then go back through filters and the voting.
[12:47:23 PM] Jingle: that's where i do my best work
[12:47:57 PM] Jingle: i really don't think ve is gona flip town, of course, but there's never guarantees.
[12:48:17 PM] talismania: I really hope he doesn't or I don't know why he's been playing like this
[12:48:55 PM] Jingle: yeah. I really don't like snb, but I'm pretty sure i just don't like him.
[12:49:02 PM] Jingle: as opposed to a scum thing.
[12:49:11 PM] talismania: mmm I think he's town but we'll see
[12:49:45 PM] Jingle: if lazermonkey is scummy, I couldn't make a case if I wanted to, it would just start an argument after I had to deal with him in newbie XX.
[12:50:01 PM] talismania: lazer?
[12:50:04 PM] talismania: he seems really town to me
[12:50:25 PM] Jingle: Dude was completely irrational, he asked for a modkill on me when I wouldn't switch my vote off the guy who the confirmed DT checked as red.
[12:50:31 PM] Jingle: and he was town at the time.
[12:50:40 PM] Jingle: called it me playing against wincon
[12:51:01 PM] Jingle: so if he ever ends up looking scummy, i can't even make the case myself.
[1:35:08 PM] talismania: you were talking about toad right?
[1:35:12 PM] Jingle: yeah
[1:35:16 PM] talismania: just say that to lazer no need to get mad
[1:35:19 PM] Jingle: blatantly obvious
[1:35:27 PM] Jingle: dude has a problem with me
[1:35:32 PM] talismania: he probably thought it was me or something
[1:39:34 PM] Jingle: he's a pain in the ass
[1:40:02 PM] Jingle: that whole game was dumb, but yeah.
[6:14:12 PM] Jingle: I hope no crazy shit comes up at the last minute, I got to leave about a half hour before deadline for TKD...
[6:14:30 PM] talismania: there's always something
[6:14:38 PM] talismania: I'm interested to see if the 5 or so votes that are missing show up
[6:14:46 PM] talismania: oh nvm I guess it's like 3
[6:15:12 PM] Jingle: if not, we might get some flips... unfortunately, i really doubt the scum lurkers will miss votes, so they wouldn't be helpful flips


The Talis conversation also shows why I stopped being interested in Eran, since I'm sure my in-thread explanation was a bit light in the pants for most people.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 16:47 GMT
#1234
Ok, so I still think VE has a fair shot of flipping scum, but I'd like to propose an alternative to vote.

Dropula. The majority of his posts are when the thread is incredibly busy.

All of his posts are somewhere between insane and recreational hallucinogen use.

He tunnels Zeph, but in a way that makes the case look weak. This is advantageous to a scum regardless of Zeph's alignment if and when he flips.

All of his posts seem intended to provoke arguments rather than thought, reactions rather than analysis.

More in-depth in the spoiler.
+ Show Spoiler +

On August 04 2012 08:19 CountDropula wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2012 10:41 Zephirdd wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:36 JingleHell wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:34 prplhz wrote:
And we're off.

This is a 23 player game and I will not be able to handle it if there is a 130 page spamfest between a couple of people before night1. Seriously, condense your god damn posting. That said, there's also a couple of new/newer people on the list. You guys remember to post your thoughts and stuff on the game. No one here bites.


Do you bite if we ask nicely?

Zephirdd, don't you think there's danger of an early bandwagon voting with no cause like that? It's hard to defend yourself against a vote for no reason.

FoS Zephirdd


What.

If you really think an early bandwagon would come from a vote like that, then you are silly. He doesn't even have to defend himself against non-existant accusations.

##unvote
##vote JingleHell


Zephirdd's change from one unfounded vote to another tells me that

1. He doesn't care who is lynched
2. He doesn't feel comfortable dealing with pressure, so he fires back on jinglehell counterproductively.

Show nested quote +
On August 03 2012 20:02 Zephirdd wrote:
Masoned players should claim IMO.
masons themselves shouldn't unless that would save his life.

toad, why improvise? Are you feeling some kind of pressure that stops you from making a decent post?

Show nested quote +
On August 03 2012 20:27 Zephirdd wrote:
What you said makes sense. Mason'd people shouldnt claim :s

wbg mason does sound scary too



Another example of an unsubstantiated position-taking. After a legit response from toad, another switch.
He sounds way too meek in the latter quote.

Any objections/further evidence backed by specific evidence? Cause I'm leaning toward voting zephirdd.


This is one of his only posts that doesn't sound insane. And he makes a weak case on Zeph, then asks if anyone else wants to lead the investigation. Scummy.

On August 04 2012 10:16 CountDropula wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 04 2012 08:59 Zephirdd wrote:
On August 04 2012 08:19 CountDropula wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:41 Zephirdd wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:36 JingleHell wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:34 prplhz wrote:
And we're off.

This is a 23 player game and I will not be able to handle it if there is a 130 page spamfest between a couple of people before night1. Seriously, condense your god damn posting. That said, there's also a couple of new/newer people on the list. You guys remember to post your thoughts and stuff on the game. No one here bites.


Do you bite if we ask nicely?

Zephirdd, don't you think there's danger of an early bandwagon voting with no cause like that? It's hard to defend yourself against a vote for no reason.

FoS Zephirdd


What.

If you really think an early bandwagon would come from a vote like that, then you are silly. He doesn't even have to defend himself against non-existant accusations.

##unvote
##vote JingleHell


Zephirdd's change from one unfounded vote to another tells me that

1. He doesn't care who is lynched
2. He doesn't feel comfortable dealing with pressure, so he fires back on jinglehell counterproductively.

On August 03 2012 20:02 Zephirdd wrote:
Masoned players should claim IMO.
masons themselves shouldn't unless that would save his life.

toad, why improvise? Are you feeling some kind of pressure that stops you from making a decent post?

On August 03 2012 20:27 Zephirdd wrote:
What you said makes sense. Mason'd people shouldnt claim :s

wbg mason does sound scary too



Another example of an unsubstantiated position-taking. After a legit response from toad, another switch.
He sounds way too meek in the latter quote.

Any objections/further evidence backed by specific evidence? Cause I'm leaning toward voting zephirdd.


I just noticed this gem. Finally that paid off.

Let me explain it to you. It was 5min into the game. I didn't even bother casting those votes on the voting thread. Why? Because they didn't matter, and I'd change them later anyway. It's not that I don't care, it's just that by creating a stupid vote, you take reactions from people. People like you, who is trying to take something as silly as that as an excuse to vote me, when in fact there is nothing there that makes me scum.

I'm not afraid of having opinions change, as no town should be. My opinions did change quickly - and that's pretty damn common for a town player.

You are creating bullshit reasoning to jump into the wagon easily. Nice first post scum.

##unvote (talismania)
##vote CountDropula


Your burst of emotion is suspicious. If your play in the first 5 min paid off, why are you continuing the same behavior in the very response where you out it to the thread? Isn't it over?

You never mentioned my second point in your response.

I'm not the only one who is suspicious of you, but I don't know about a bandwagon. Just give everyone some concrete defense, we will determine that you are green, and this won't take up any more time.


Calls a burst of emotion suspicious, but most of his later posting is intended to evoke emotional responses. That doesn't sound like a trap, that sounds like forcing a case.

On August 05 2012 03:16 CountDropula wrote:
I really think the most important issue for us right now is getting people active. Were giving mafia too much space to hide.
Nevertheless, I'm voting wbg right now though that can change.
For sure watching zeph though, but I need a better case.


Complains about activity. Even though he barely posts, and when he does, it's tunneling Zeph.

On August 06 2012 07:18 CountDropula wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2012 06:13 Lazermonkey wrote:
On August 06 2012 05:56 CountDropula wrote:
On August 06 2012 05:37 Lazermonkey wrote:
Okay, kinda changed my mind and I'm actually starting to like the kill-grush plan. It's impossible to get a read in him anyway if he is going to play like this. Also, a big bonus is that WBG should be somewhat confirmed town if he flips scum.

As for Dropula, his only defense against all of my suspicion was that he was inexperienced and that it was all a mistake. This can be explained in 2 ways.
1. He is inexperienced.
2. He is scum.
If he is town he will most likely be left by scum unless he improves his play by an miraculously amount. If he is scum... Then he is scum.

For all Vigis, I hope you shot these guys tonight, as lynching them tomorrow will not really generate any discussion if they keep on playing like they've done so far.


Which explanation do you like best? Inexperience or scum?
Lolwut.

Well, since I want to lynch you I'd much rather prefer you to be scum : ). You aren't helping town at all atm. If the only defense you have is the noob card then you must die. Preferably sooner than later. Unless you do some actual scum hunting, which it doesn't look like you are trying to. If you do not get shot tonight you will have 48 hours to convince me and everyone else why you shouldn't be the one to be lynched * hint * make some analysis * hint *.


U mad?

On August 06 2012 07:37 CountDropula wrote:
Oh ok. Ur mad. Thanks.


Another attempt to get an emotional response. Laziness.

On August 07 2012 00:56 CountDropula wrote:
Zephirdd, it's time. I'm calling you out.

This post is not me bashing you as a player. I'm picking up on general trends in your play and and using our interaction as an extended example. It's written in the second person because I'm confident you will crack under the pressure. You know this too, don't you?

Zeph. You don't think I read your previous games before our confrontation on d1? You were all about facts and concrete arguments in normal mini mafia 2. So when I tried acting level-headed and nooby (the profile of someone I think your town-self would be comfortable with) to gauge if you were the same town Zeph from that game, you acted in the exact opposite way town Zeph would have. Everything you have against me is against me personally.

Show nested quote +
On August 04 2012 08:59 Zephirdd wrote:
On August 04 2012 08:19 CountDropula wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:41 Zephirdd wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:36 JingleHell wrote:
On August 03 2012 10:34 prplhz wrote:
And we're off.

This is a 23 player game and I will not be able to handle it if there is a 130 page spamfest between a couple of people before night1. Seriously, condense your god damn posting. That said, there's also a couple of new/newer people on the list. You guys remember to post your thoughts and stuff on the game. No one here bites.


Do you bite if we ask nicely? 

Zephirdd, don't you think there's danger of an early bandwagon voting with no cause like that? It's hard to defend yourself against a vote for no reason.

FoS Zephirdd


What.

If you really think an early bandwagon would come from a vote like that, then you are silly. He doesn't even have to defend himself against non-existant accusations.

##unvote
##vote JingleHell


Zephirdd's change from one unfounded vote to another tells me that

1. He doesn't care who is lynched
2. He doesn't feel comfortable dealing with pressure, so he fires back on jinglehell counterproductively.

On August 03 2012 20:02 Zephirdd wrote:
Masoned players should claim IMO.
masons themselves shouldn't unless that would save his life.

toad, why improvise? Are you feeling some kind of pressure that stops you from making a decent post?

On August 03 2012 20:27 Zephirdd wrote:
What you said makes sense. Mason'd people shouldnt claim :s

wbg mason does sound scary too



Another example of an unsubstantiated position-taking. After a legit response from toad, another switch. 
He sounds way too meek in the latter quote.

Any objections/further evidence backed by specific evidence? Cause I'm leaning toward voting zephirdd.


I just noticed this gem. Finally that paid off.

Let me explain it to you. It was 5min into the game. I didn't even bother casting those votes on the voting thread. Why? Because they didn't matter, and I'd change them later anyway. It's not that I don't care, it's just that by creating a stupid vote, you take reactions from people. People like you, who is trying to take something as silly as that as an excuse to vote me, when in fact there is nothing there that makes me scum.

I'm not afraid of having opinions change, as no town should be. My opinions did change quickly - and that's pretty damn common for a town player.

You are creating bullshit reasoning to jump into the wagon easily. Nice first post scum.

##unvote (talismania)
##vote CountDropula


Little did you know, I was the one baiting YOU. Your first posts looked suspicious, but I wasn't sure yet, so I tried to elicit some kind of response. You then validated my suspicion. You blinked first and outed your "plan" to the thread. You weren't being patient. Your goal was not to build a case. Your goal was to make an excuse for the sake of your appearance.
This whole game, all your posts have done is feed the chaos. You don't focus. Examples.
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2012 08:59 Zephirdd wrote:
Hm, thats a lot of shit to skim through since my last post. Holy shit. erandorr/wbg logs are just a crapload of fuckity fuck. ghost_404(I see wat you did ther rastaban) was replaced by the one guy that I found to be scum last game. then there is both talismania and prplhz cases, but nobody cared enough about CountDropula I guess.

talismania's filter - summarized nicely by BKEXE - is terrible. He was helpful during the "discussion that everyone can take any instance and still be town" phase, but not after.

I am not sure about prplhz... I guess he is a decent lynch tho, he did go afk out of nowhere, and last time I saw him doing that he was scum. He's not the kind of guy who just "goes" away.

Well, consolidating votes won't hurt, right? I still want to go back to CD on the future.


You are saying nothing.

Ok now this is interesting. Calling town reads a scummy move, yet posting town reads.

Show nested quote +
On August 04 2012 05:43 Zephirdd wrote:
So I decided to actually read stuff properly now.

Talismania first post containing "Glasse" is:

On August 03 2012 23:51 talismania wrote:
Erandorr what do you think of Glasse?

(That was after hopeless1der voted him)

His second post is exactly the same.

The next instance is asking toad his instance on 4 people including Glasse

On August 04 2012 04:37 talismania wrote:
yep zeph is scummy for exactly why sloosh says. erandorr I thought was for a bit but I don't understand masoning wbg from a scum pov. jinglehell is town, lazer is town, strongandbig is town.  toad I thought was scum at first because of the timing of his patented color text post but he's just been being generally rather toady, which is to say he makes really strange (from my perspective) conclusions about what's good in the setup and what's not with strange (again from my perspective) reasoning behind it. Glasse I thought was hilariously obviously scummy.  Like so blatant I honestly don't know what to think.  Guess I should go dig up another game of his.

Then he mirrors a player that has shown a case, throw a bunch of unnecessary town reads(nobody asked that, why do it) and after some fluff he says Glasse was "hilariously obviously scummy" without giving true reasoning(ie. giving a post and explaining why that was a scum post).

Then he is rolefishing "for his own amusement".

Hmm maybe people weren't wrong about questioning his plans on the beginning.


Show nested quote +
On August 04 2012 04:45 Zephirdd wrote:
"not contributing"? What do you want me to do, pull bullshit out of my ass the way you are doing?

wbg outing masons is a town move because he believes there is scum in the masons; He is outing them in order to pressure them.

VE is town because his posting lines up with cautious blue that wants to protect his supposedly powerful mason role.
Erandorr is dumb, but I'd say he wouldn't be that dumb as scum.

Talismania's posts made sense for me when he posted them, and I still see them as possible town opinions.

prplhz has been baiting scum with certain actions, while making sense with others. He hasn't caused chaos and is doing a good job in keeping the pace of the thread.

Everything else is a null tell.

I hate defending other people. That's their job. I only defend someone when I feel I have someone better to lynch. I don't.

Deal with it.


Your play is getting worse. This last post is swiss cheese. Full of holes.
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2012 23:37 Zephirdd wrote:
'sup folks. Busy sunday yesterday. Didn't read much, so I didn't post. I'm still re-reading some stuff, but I'll post some of my thoughts right now.

The obvious one, CountDropula:
1. Uses terrible arguments to jump into my bandwagon:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&currentpage=22#436

He is using my random votings from 3-5minutes into the day as reasoning to vote me. He is using my change of instances based on someone's else opinion as reasoning to vote me. Neither of these are scum traits, nor do they push scum agendas.
It's entirely reasonable that a town player would change opinions within two posts, given that someone gives the proper arguments.
Random voting someone for the sake of random voting, 5 minutes into the day, is pretty much a bait for scum. A real town would look at that and realize it's not a reason to push someone; It means NOTHING action-wise. Yet, he uses it to make my wagon gain strength. Granted, he never voted me; which is even worse: if you have a suspicion on someone, why would you not vote him?

2. Appeal to emotion: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&currentpage=23#459
(From Ace's thread on how-to-play-scum: a good scum trait is provoking emotion out of town)

I don't know where did he pull that I had a burst of emotion. Besides, why bring it up at all? Again, it's one of these traits that don't determine someone's alignment - in fact, I'd argue it's much more likely that a town player show a burst of emotion than a scum player.

Then he pulls some bullshit "You never answered XXX" when I answered everything. And I even said more a few posts later. He never counter-argued. Then he calls for some "concrete defense" when he nevers says what about my defense is not concrete. Simply put, he is throwing loaded(and VERY loaded) sentences to try and break me down. How the f* does someone give a "concrete defense" on this game? Fucking no one can do that without being an Innocent Child or confirmed-town-dayvig.

There is also these posts:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&currentpage=40#800
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&currentpage=41#802
These posts have no purpose except bringing emotion into the table and - hopefully for him - numbing people's judgement. This is pretty much a scum move.

3. Hypocrisy, blending in:
On August 05 2012 03:16 CountDropula wrote:
I really think the most important issue for us right now is getting people active. Were giving mafia too much space to hide.
Nevertheless, I'm voting wbg right now though that can change.
For sure watching zeph though, but I need a better case.

This makes him look good right, he is calling for people to post...
He has two freakingly terrible posts that only talk about one subject and is calling for people to be active

That's trying to blend in without putting effort into the game. He is a lurker himself and is calling lurkers out.

The more he post, the scummier he looks to me. Well, his first post is red as fuck already, but he is just being worse over time.

So yeah, I'll keep reading stuff but my vote is on him already.
##Vote CountDropula

Please don't ignore this guy.


This is such a complete contradiction of your town play that it's absolutely ridiculous.

Here is a post from normal mini mafia II.
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2012 13:12 Zephirdd wrote:
On July 07 2012 13:04 Sinensis wrote:
On July 07 2012 12:58 Zephirdd wrote:
On July 07 2012 12:42 Sinensis wrote:
Okay, I'm caught up:

sloosh, what are you doing? You vote wiggles with no explanation, people call you out for it, you change your vote to me with no explanation at first, people call you out for it, then your explanation is that I was your first suspicion (even though you randomly voted wiggles first?) because my posting is mechanical? My posting is mechanical and that's why I'm scummy, maybe you could elaborate on that. Even though you seem to have changed your mind again to prplhz before I responded to you. Are you just jumping on the easiest target every time? What's the deal?

Prplhz shouldn't be lynched today. No way in hell. He's gotten too much negative attention from too many people, it seems likely to me mafia is pushing for the easy lynch against an aggressive player. And why wouldn't they? prplhz isn't playing as good or as friendly as he could be. This is the last time I defend him against the rest of the angry mob unless he stops with the "LOL SCUM LOL."

I am going to go with gut for my day one vote. Zephirdd's posting is the scummiest right now in my opinion. He spends a lot of his time telling other, presumably town players, how to play. Something mafia can't seem to resist doing in most of the games I play. He is stating mostly FACTS (people talking like they know something for certain are suspicious because only mafia have FACTS) and very little speculation.

As for everyone who is suspicious of me for lurking, you're right, it's suspicious, my bad. I work during the day (USEAST) and can't post till night usually. Expect my posts then, like I'm doing now. If anyone has any questions for me now is a good time I will be around.

##vote: Zephirdd


Alright, there are a couple of wrong things here.
1. Calls sloosh out, yet considers me the scummiest target

2. Says prplhz has gotten too much negative attention. Can you tell me it is possible to give him a positive trait to his play? No you can't. Because there is NO positive trait to his play so far. He's gotten a lot of negative attention because that's what his play warrants - and you agree with this on your very last sentence. In fact, his lynch has actually gotten an awfully lot of resistance, more than I would like.

3. Reasoning for me being scum is bullshit and does not warrant a vote. I posted an awful lot for day 1 this game, so if you want to point out specific points in my play, do it and I'll counter anything you have.

I've stated things with certainty, because that's what I believe to be true. Stating things as FACTS means being certain of yourself. Maybe they are wrong later, who cares. What's important is that I'm decisive in what I say, and I should be held accountable to that later.

Also, I love how it took you 39mins to arrive at the conclusion that I am scum, when you are behind 10 pages. Will want to hear more from you.


1. Well, at least you can read.
2. I stand by what I said.
3. "Your reason is bullshit because it's bullshit."

Good job.


As I said, I posted an awfully lot. Point me what is scummy specifically, and I'll point out why it is not scummy.

Additionally, I added reasoning for stating things with certainty. That alone should show why it's a bad argument to vote me for that.

Also, I just realized I kinda read your third paragraph wrongly. I thought you were complaining that I was posting with certainty, but you're complaining that I am mostly stating "facts" instead of "speculation".

Guess what, speculating stuff is terrible =_= Oh I think you are mafia oh maybe you are town! No. I look at what people post, and define scum or town according to what they do. Then, I state a FACT and use it to prove that someone is SCUM. In fact, my spreadsheet right now only has facts, and these facts help me determine an alignment. Playing under speculations is a bad way to play imo.

On July 07 2012 13:08 Sinensis wrote:

Yeah, and I don't think he'd post like that as mafia. I don't think anyone would. I don't know how else you want me to explain it to you but I believe what I believe and if you take a look at my history in TL games, it's usually pretty hard to change my mind once I've made it up.


Won't even bother rebutting then :|

No compulsion to go crazy in response to suspicion because you are town in this game. In Mad Men, you say that nothing is concrete because you don't want it to be. You thrive on chaos.

And another one from normal mini. Note the importance he places on facts.

Show nested quote +
On July 07 2012 13:50 Zephirdd wrote:
I knew you'd go quote a bunch of stuff unrelated to what we were talking about and ennumerate them as bolded FACTS

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT
WHAT
WAHT
AWHTAW
THAW
HT
ATA
THSDDS

What the fuck.
How.
What.

I need a break. Look. Can you define a fact in simple terms? I can: it's something that can't be denied.

I posted facts. I literally pointed the obvious. Things that cannot be denied. These things made me infer that someone is scum - scumhunting

I have not seen you pointing out facts about me. I have not seen you pointing out things that can't be denied, specifically, the way I'm doing to an actual candidate. Do you think your vote on me has any chance of gaining any traction to form into a lynch? If you think so, I think you are wrong because your case is substantially weak when compared to what I point out about the actual candidate. If you don't think so, then why are you even bothering with me?

I need a break. I'll grab some beer. Watch EVO. and go to sleep. Don't wait my answers until tomorrow at ~00KST(which should be noon for me).


Day and night.

All you are posting in this game is speculative, your case against me is not complete and irrefutable - actually it's the opposite since its based on so little. Town Zeph would never have done this. This is expected from a lazy scum case. Same thing with that "minicase" on talismania. It's well below the standard of your previous town game.

You voted me at 8.59 August 4. I had one post at the time. one. Ever since then you've been pushing me as scum. How can you draw a conclusion like that from nothing? You know something we don't, and you were trying to create a distraction from more relevant issues.
If you respond with a crazy belligerent post you just lynched yourself. Honestly you are dead with any response you make, because you are so irredeemably bad at playing scum that you will make a mistake and I will pick you apart with it.
Now who's the noob scum?

Guys, don't bury this post. Please give it serious thought, cause I've got a really strong read on this guy. If I'm wrong about this, I deserve to be lynched. Get this guy into the spotlight and he will crack.
Please. Lets lynch Zephirdd and start killing mafia.


Posts a giant read on Zeph, but a lot of it boils down to "baiting" emotional responses. Baiting an emotional response is a scum move, not a town move. An emotional response to a real case is one thing, but this is the first time he actually did anything besides trying to "bait" Zeph.

After this, he stops analysis in favor of his "scumpuppet" horse shit, and continues to tunnel based purely off of the same mediocre evidence.



I'm strongly convinced we're dealing with CountDropula the scum here. However, even if I'm right and he flips red, I don't think that's indicative either way on Zeph, due to the nature of his "case" it could just as easily be an effort to discredit a real case against Zeph.

##Vote CountDropula
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 19:08 GMT
#1241
And if me and Lazer can agree about someone without screaming at eachother, it might just be a bad sign...
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 19:27 GMT
#1247
On August 10 2012 04:26 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2012 04:25 talismania wrote:
He claims to be new::

On August 05 2012 23:28 CountDropula wrote:
Not a smurf, I'm new.

Changing votes like that was a mistake. Honestly i was too hasty, and that's it.
Made a mistake, but is it really that suspicious?

Ya, I know. But you are allowed to lie about being a smurf, right?


Nonsense. People have to tell the truth in this game. Are you mafia?
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 19:27 GMT
#1248
Would kinda eliminate the value of a smurf if you have to admit it, I think.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 19:49 GMT
#1257
On August 10 2012 04:39 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2012 04:34 Toadesstern wrote:
Smurfs never tell people who they are... That's the purpose of a smurf.

Eventually people figure them out or they screw up big time themselves when posting with their origninal account but smurfs lie about wether or not they are a smurf for obvious reasons.

He is 99% a smurf, although I don't agree that he has to be mafia, nor do I think it is likely for him to flip mafia. Though with bugs flipping green the chances increase I guess..
Well I guess the purpose with being a smurf is to avoid people judging you by your meta. Why would someone smurf and then troll the thread to death if he got town? It doesn't make sense. But I guess he could be doing it just to fuck with everyone...


Well, let's be perfectly honest... this game hasn't been an ideal situation of town cooperating and scum hunting based on cases. Maybe he started off trying to make his "case" against Zeph properly, it was getting ignored due to being six times longer than it needed to be, so he started trolling.

It would fit the rest of the game pretty well, and it seems that sensationalism has been creating more lynches than logic, all to no avail so far. So he swapped his methods around to keep trying to push a lynch.

Way I see it, there's three scenarios.

A: Fake bus attempt in case Zeph gets flipped red later.

B: Attempt to push through a mislynch, (if Zeph is town, which I guess is still possible) selling on how long he's been suspicious, without being the one who swings voters.

C: Intentionally useless fluff posting.

His posts and case aren't something I can plausibly call contributory or serious, but they're visible and tunnely enough to keep people from calling them out as scummy right off the bat because he calls so much attention to himself.

I suppose in interest of fairness I should come up with some hypotheticals that match the posting that assume CD is town.

A: He's trying to get the person he sees as the right guy, using the wrong reasons, due to how the vote swings have pushed through. If he's doing this, it's an insult to all of us, and a desperate sort of gamble that most townies don't need to try to take.

B: Playing under the influence or trolling townie.

I kind of find the scum scenarios more plausible, although, to be fair, this is all WIFOM.

JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 21:12 GMT
#1268
It seems, from the OP, town masons don't doublestack like scum ones can.

Mason
At the beginning of every cycle, you may send a PM to me detailing who you would like to Mason with during that cycle. You may PM with that person for the full cycle. You may not choose a person you have already Masoned with for the remainder of the game.


Mason
At the beginning of every cycle, you may send a PM to me detailing who you would like to Mason with during that cycle. You may PM with that person for the full cycle. You may not choose a person you have already Masoned with for the remainder of the game. The Mafia team will have a set number of people to choose as Masons. Mafia with other roles (Roleblocker, Godfather) can double up on Mason roles.


So I'd be awfully suspicious, unless the difference in wording from the OP is an oversight. Should probably verify through BC.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 22:41 GMT
#1283
I take it, then, CD, that while you're living up to that profile of your posting I made, you're not going to defend yourself?

Or were you not reading the thread well enough to spot it, since you're only worried about what's most current in the thread, like scum?
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 22:52 GMT
#1287
On August 10 2012 07:46 CountDropula wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2012 07:41 JingleHell wrote:
I take it, then, CD, that while you're living up to that profile of your posting I made, you're not going to defend yourself?

Or were you not reading the thread well enough to spot it, since you're only worried about what's most current in the thread, like scum?


Shhhh...

Quiet...

Watch the play,

You will see.

You will believe.


I already believe that you're scummy as hell, ignoring cases against you, posting rubbish, ignoring the thread, and hiding among the clutter.

What else, exactly, am I supposed to be seeing?
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 22:53 GMT
#1288
And I'm very much NOT convinced Talis is scum, especially without knowing who's claimed DT.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 23:08 GMT
#1290
I still think he's a strong lynch candidate, for the same reasons I did already, with a mislynch he helped push added on top of it.

However, I think that if people aren't interested in VE, CD is also a great target.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 09 2012 23:55 GMT
#1294
I think knowing who's claiming DT would help a lot. I want more than a claimed redcheck by an unknown. Without knowing why we're supposed to trust them, it smells like a gambit.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 10 2012 00:05 GMT
#1296
On August 10 2012 09:01 marvellosity wrote:
hmm. DT stuff I don't quite get.

Should we just lynch zeph or glasse instead

Glasse especially for his annoying "I'm playing like a dick, but I refuse to stop playing like a dick even though I'm telling everyone I'm playing like a dick" attitude


Right now we don't have a DT. We have what could easily be a fakeclaim.

If it's a scum who's already a high visibility potential lynch, even grabbing one more mislynch for them before dying would be huge.

Without having more information about the claim, I feel safer going into a scummy target. What did you think about my Dropula case?
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 10 2012 00:11 GMT
#1303
On August 10 2012 09:07 marvellosity wrote:
could someone explain to me clearly and succinctly in one post what 'claim' we've had, by who, who it's fingering, and what it means. Lazy yes but it would be extremely helpful


Well, the whole problem is that it's a claim by proxy via mason, saying that Talis is red. He's a decent town read for a fair number of us, and we don't know who's claiming it, which restricts us knowing what it means.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 10 2012 00:14 GMT
#1311
On August 10 2012 09:13 marvellosity wrote:
who the fudge is X?


And that succinctly covers why not many people are voting based on it. We all have the same question. Toad is withholding the info.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
August 10 2012 00:17 GMT
#1317
And for the record, Toad, I've had one for several (real) days, based on reasons I chatted with him about in skype. He doesn't feel scum motivated to me. He's not afraid to change his mind with a reason, he's not afraid to tunnel with conviction.

Unless he's got some amazing scum meta I don't know about, I really got a townie impression out of him. Also, if he was scum, he probably wouldn't have convinced me to drop Erandorr with good persistent logic... you know, the guy people got mislynched yesterday?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 464
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 29740
Horang2 3580
Flash 1390
Bisu 1364
Jaedong 990
Hyun 972
Barracks 748
EffOrt 693
Soulkey 360
Larva 305
[ Show more ]
actioN 303
Mini 279
Killer 198
Last 196
Zeus 128
GuemChi 114
ToSsGirL 109
Backho 98
Snow 96
ZerO 92
JYJ74
Leta 71
Rush 49
Sharp 39
Movie 34
sorry 32
sSak 29
Sacsri 28
sas.Sziky 28
zelot 25
Sea.KH 24
yabsab 23
Noble 19
Shinee 18
Icarus 17
Hm[arnc] 14
[sc1f]eonzerg 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Aegong 4
Terrorterran 2
Dota 2
Gorgc3220
qojqva478
BananaSlamJamma286
XcaliburYe189
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2184
x6flipin711
kRYSTAL_1
Other Games
singsing2180
B2W.Neo935
DeMusliM354
Fuzer 307
hiko241
ToD118
ZerO(Twitch)18
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 77
• davetesta53
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1163
• Jankos760
Other Games
• WagamamaTV236
Upcoming Events
OSC
8m
CranKy Ducklings19
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3h 38m
The PondCast
21h 38m
Online Event
1d 3h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
Online Event
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs TBD
[ Show More ]
OSC
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.