I guess normally at the start of day 1 he has setup shit to ramble on about, which he does not here.
I Can't Believe it's not Themed MiniMafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I guess normally at the start of day 1 he has setup shit to ramble on about, which he does not here. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 12 2012 04:17 NoSmurfHere wrote: It's loosely based on this: Click for C9++ Wiki page However many of the roll chances have been modified to reflect the strength of town usage of power roles on TL being greater than on mafiascum. I.E, the chances for vigilante and mason in particular are drastically reduced while the chance for roleblocker is increased. Also the mafia determiner has been changed to include framers and reduces the possibility of a 2 man scumteam (though that is still possible) At some point if I am convinced that my determiner is balanced I will release it. However I've been tweaking it game to game and examining all the setups that it generates. Luckily I haven't had to throw one out yet so chances are strong that almost any version of the randomizer I've used is reasonably balanced. I just want to find the most balanced one for use on TL. and also this sorry, should have consolidated my last couple of posts | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
In a game full of TL Mafia's best players he led the PM "town circle" as scum in Liar Mafia | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
While you're here, any early suspicions, given your eagerness to get people to post their thoughts? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 13 2012 00:14 talismania wrote: @marv I'm putting together a compendium of the reaction posts so I can look at them altogether. From skimming this morning from where I left off yesterday nothing really stuck out. Actually that's a lie - first I thought austin's response was scummy because it just aped what you and matt had said. But then like literally all these other players I've never played with said the exact same thing as he did with similar looking/composed posts. @matt what about you? You shit on it just like everyone else. that's the problem when a plan is so obviously bad... everyone wants to shit on it, so it's hard to gauge varied reactions when they're bound to all be similar | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
"People shouldn't be 'forced' to make effort, the making of the effort willingly is what helps gives us our reads on people." | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 13 2012 01:34 talismania wrote: I said in my first post "If roleblocker does exist but doesn't want to come out then I kindly request he not use his power at all until it makes sense." I mean that. I mean don't use it unless it makes sense, which means probably don't use it early on. Ah yes. As opposed to the roleblocker using his power when it doesn't make sense. Fun thought game: when someone proposes not doing something, consider the opposite that he is proposing against. "Don't do x stupidly!" "thank god! I was thinking of doing it stupidly" "Don't lynch townies!" "gosh, that's where my thinking was wrong!" "Don't use roleblocker unless it makes sense!" "wow! I was thinking of using it willy nilly for no good reason!" Generic advice-giving with no real purpose as the opposite case is silly anyway. No? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I think RBer (should we have one) should use his RB role how he sees fit rather than listen to general advices about it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Let's talk about metaaaaaaa. On July 12 2012 18:30 Vivax wrote: Speaking of meta, sciberbia doesn't look good based on that.I was with him in two games and I feel like he's being different in this one. s0lstice already pointed out the missing fast posts we're used to see from scib at the start of the game. That alone is forgivable given the posted reasons. But the overall gut feeling is still bad cause of the overall style. Vivax says sciberbia doesn't look good for meta, also quotes s0lstices meta reason on scib. Gut feeling/overall style, more talking about meta. On July 13 2012 01:49 Vivax wrote: No, he doesn't have to be townie. But I initially voted for him cause he didn't post anything, then he posted the metagame info and I found it good enough to unvote him. I remember sciberbia for more concise, compact posts, and I remember him posting really early. He already explained why he didn't post early in this game, so what remains are the posts that subjectively look different to me. But I prefer to not rely heavily on meta, my play changes often aswell and I don't have as much experience. Anyway, I don't like Matt's filter, it looks like he posts rather meaningless content, no active scumhunting in it, rather commenting on what other players already said. He also acts a little differently than in LVI. Reason for unvoting strongandbig: because he talked about meta. Then talks more about sciberbia's meta. Later in the post he talks about Matt's meta. But in the middle of this post he says "but I prefer to not rely heavily on meta". That's literally all he's posted about! Scummy contradiction, heyo! ##Vote: Vivax | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
See LVI where I did not vote Vivax. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 13 2012 02:46 Vivax wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=344514&user=129423 Matt's filter in LVI. You accused me of using too much meta, so feel free to read and quote it for yourself. Weird that you asked about it cause you were in the same game. That's not how it works. You claim he is posting differently. Now explain it to me and the rest of the thread. | ||
| ||