EPTdo you have any other reasons for thinking chezinu is scum?
Bureaucracy Mafia! - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
do you have any other reasons for thinking chezinu is scum? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 10:23 VisceraEyes wrote: Incentive to go read dear. Don't take it personally. if by "incentive" you mean "completely demotivational", then yes, incentive. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 10:26 VisceraEyes wrote: I can't think of any reason for a townie to feel 'demotivated' by anything after a half-cycle in which three scum die in quick succession. But you know...that's just me. Maybe it's because I like the game so much. That's not demotivating. You being unnecessarily sarcastic is. Last time I checked, "what are your reasons for calling someone scum, when the only one presented is setup gaming based on extremely incomplete information" was not an unreasonable question. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 10:32 Foolishness wrote: Okay, tomorrow we lynch either sloosh or gonzaw. lol wat | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 10:31 Probulous wrote: Marv, don't get drawn in. VE is being tricksy. We are in a good position (3 scum baby!) so we need to consolidate it. Given Palmar's flip can you take a look at MZ's filter fo me? Quick pre-question then; given Palmar flipped non-executive, do you find it more likely that below CEO roles were randomised? Else there would be 2 players still left 'above' Palmar | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 10:35 austinmcc wrote: marv man, read foolishness's role PM. He gets to post in thread once per cycle as a ghost. The terrible thing is that I did read his role PM about an hour ago :/// | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 10:38 marvellosity wrote: The terrible thing is that I did read his role PM about an hour ago :/// wait what | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 08:07 marvellosity wrote: Alright, as people are around and hopefully can answer me instead of shouting at me to read... I see plenty of people don't like slOosh's claim. If the claim is fake, what was its agenda in making it? was there anything on this? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
so with regards to this, the theory is that someone else picked up on what Chez wrote and made it into a PM for BH?? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 11:11 Probulous wrote: My running theory is to distance himself as much as possible from his original Foolishness defense. Night 1 had no vigs so mafia assume there are no vigs, or they are delayed. Then when Foolishness flips they know someone will claim that shot, so they claim first. Remember this is a closed setup so we don't know if there are multiple vigs, his claims adds nothing to the discussion because we cannot verify it. All it does it give him a shot at town cred. Unfortunately for him, it was supersoft not someone like Zealos, who counter claimed. The claim itself is my sticking point as well and anyway I look at it, I come up with a null. It doesn't say anything really. What does the rest of his filter say? So hard when that post with pretty colours in is so demanding. Everything lines up so incorrectly, it's so hard to believe his read on Foolish flip-flopped so heavily. town-read -> confident enough to shoot? Initially neutral to the BM case, then wishes Foolish made something other than a BM case, and then HIMSELF goes on to look at BM. "I'm going to shoot you Foolish, but I am both going to agree and expand upon your case on this guy we agree is mafia". ??? My feeling then is that the claim was the play of someone who knew they might be in trouble for their reads previously so thought they may as well try something. I don't buy the validity of the "why would I do this" defence. that said, i would be more confident in either a rastaban or zealos lynch atm. i am more sure with them. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2012 19:07 syllogism wrote: Also we should kill layabout first as his actual behavior "today" was by far most damning. presumably you're talking about his obstinacy with Palmar? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 25 2012 00:50 rastaban wrote: lol, it took 20 minutes to realize you slipped up with that post? matt's not the only one who has listed like that on more than one occasion. Why pick on him and not the others? (e.g. supersoft, katina) | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
| ||
