EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XIX - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On June 29 2012 09:52 NrGmonk wrote: Seems pretty scummy. Telling people to lynch a somewhat arbitrary player when I haven't done anything to arouse suspicion. O_O You seem scummy for calling him scummy. | ||
|
Intact
Sweden634 Posts
Now this isn't going anywhere.. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
Which is exactly what a scum would be hoping for. A visible post that doesn't progress things. That originally joking FoS Anacletus is starting to look serious, rather than just a vital conversation starter. | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50612 Posts
On June 29 2012 07:38 NrGmonk wrote: Good thing monk isn't a role. i don't even know what role you'd fill. Before actually following any sort of policy we need to get people to talk, otherwise we'd be pointing fingers but nothing is going to happen. the fact that JingleHell is going by randomly pointing fingers at people by their username proves that. we need to get people talking. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On June 29 2012 11:06 JingleHell wrote: Yeah, this is getting ridiculous. Come on people, the ABL has recently had complaints about none of us ever shutting up. Get us somewhere where that can be a virtue, and suddenly it ceases to be the case? What are you talking about? I am ultra-analyzing every post and even bought a composition notebook to keep track of this game. As of right now I have 8 pages filled out and several complete profiles made. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
This post: "What about you, monk? The color of the hammer next to your name trying to tell us something? Hell, if nothing else, and we end up with nobody really screaming "scum", we should totally ban the pants off of the banling, just for irony." by JingleHell's name really worries me, he seems to content to kill off someone else for 'the irony' which can only be considered scummy. We need to go after someone, not because it is funny but, because it helps town win. Going after Monk without proof is going against Town's win condition. I don't know if JH is scum but that post seems particularly scummy and I'm not the only one to notice it. In fact just after making that post claiming that we should kill someone just for shits and gigs JH has continued to fill the thread with nonsense, it seems to me that he knows exactly what he is doing too, On June 29 2012 10:06 JingleHell wrote: Which is exactly what a scum would be hoping for. A visible post that doesn't progress things. That originally joking FoS Anacletus is starting to look serious, rather than just a vital conversation starter. See that there? He knows that shitting up the thread benefits Mafia but has done it anyway with these joke votes waiting for one to stick. I think that if one had stuck, as he is trying to make his 'scumread' on Anacletus stick he would follow it through to kill a townie. I think that JH is playing a scummy game and its time we showed him that it isn't that easy to push town around and mislead us. I think JH is probably scum based on his play so far, what do you say? | ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
I am not sharing my thoughts as of yet, I don't think that that is in my best interest to do so. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
I totally see how you could grab a "scum" feel from what I've said so far, but right now I just want people out of their shells, posting, discussing policy, or basically doing anything. Doing something semi-useless is far more productive than doing nothing whatsoever. And, let's face it. If we try to lynch everyone who's made a non-productive post so far, we'd definitely get a grab bag of town, even if we didn't get any scum at all, based on the numbers. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
On June 29 2012 11:39 Promethelax wrote: Anacletus, since you didn't answer me earlier I have to assume that you missed my post. What do your notes say? The only reason to hide your reads from us is because you are scum. We, as town, have to win as a collective and that means sharing information. Share your reads with us. This post: "What about you, monk? The color of the hammer next to your name trying to tell us something? Hell, if nothing else, and we end up with nobody really screaming "scum", we should totally ban the pants off of the banling, just for irony." by JingleHell's name really worries me, he seems to content to kill off someone else for 'the irony' which can only be considered scummy. We need to go after someone, not because it is funny but, because it helps town win. Going after Monk without proof is going against Town's win condition. I don't know if JH is scum but that post seems particularly scummy and I'm not the only one to notice it. In fact just after making that post claiming that we should kill someone just for shits and gigs JH has continued to fill the thread with nonsense, it seems to me that he knows exactly what he is doing too, See that there? He knows that shitting up the thread benefits Mafia but has done it anyway with these joke votes waiting for one to stick. I think that if one had stuck, as he is trying to make his 'scumread' on Anacletus stick he would follow it through to kill a townie. I think that JH is playing a scummy game and its time we showed him that it isn't that easy to push town around and mislead us. I think JH is probably scum based on his play so far, what do you say? Im not understanding your logic just because some one said we should lynch someone means hes mafia? What else are we supposed to do at this point in the game we have zero information besides cryptic bantering. I dont think any value can be put into what someone says on the first day. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On June 29 2012 11:41 Anacletus wrote: I am not sharing my thoughts as of yet, I don't think that that is in my best interest to do so. Dumb jokes aside, that is garbage and scummy behavior for anyone in this game. You would be better off lurking and pretending you weren't here, and even that could be considered suspicious. Our goal this early should be making whatever little reads we can and start building cases. Unfortunately we cannot do that with joke posts. Are you planning on giving us any reads? Right now, you have at best 1 post so far that I don't consider a complete write-off. Everyone has to start somewhere... | ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On June 29 2012 11:57 Hopeless1der wrote: Anacletus you're actively refusing to participate. Not even neglecting to do so (which I was also doing by joking around), but literally saying Dumb jokes aside, that is garbage and scummy behavior for anyone in this game. You would be better off lurking and pretending you weren't here, and even that could be considered suspicious. Our goal this early should be making whatever little reads we can and start building cases. Unfortunately we cannot do that with joke posts. Are you planning on giving us any reads? Right now, you have at best 1 post so far that I don't consider a complete write-off. Everyone has to start somewhere... I'm not actively refusing to participate. I just don't want to throw around accusations because I think that that will be aggressive and more like scum play. I think I'll wait for a few more people to post before I post any reads. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On June 29 2012 12:00 Anacletus wrote: I'm not actively refusing to participate. I just don't want to throw around accusations because I think that that will be aggressive and more like scum play. I think I'll wait for a few more people to post before I post any reads. This isn't a court of law, it's more like Jerry Springer. You talk to people, you lead into questions that get the discussion going the right way, and you start looking for things to poke at. Waiting for someone else to make a case and then bandwagoning looks pretty scummy too, so you're not doing yourself any favors. I'd be poking in other directions more, except there's damn few directions to poke right now. | ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On June 29 2012 12:10 JingleHell wrote: This isn't a court of law, it's more like Jerry Springer. You talk to people, you lead into questions that get the discussion going the right way, and you start looking for things to poke at. Waiting for someone else to make a case and then bandwagoning looks pretty scummy too, so you're not doing yourself any favors. I'd be poking in other directions more, except there's damn few directions to poke right now. Yeah I know, I've played mafia before. It's just that refusing to participate is pretty serious and is mentioned in the rules. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On June 29 2012 12:13 Anacletus wrote: Yeah I know, I've played mafia before. It's just that refusing to participate is pretty serious and is mentioned in the rules. He wasn't suggesting that type of refusal, he's talking about not working with us, despite these reads, and pages of notes you claim to have. If you're not helping us look for scum, you're hindering the hunt. If you're not with us, you're against us. | ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On June 29 2012 12:14 JingleHell wrote: He wasn't suggesting that type of refusal, he's talking about not working with us, despite these reads, and pages of notes you claim to have. If you're not helping us look for scum, you're hindering the hunt. If you're not with us, you're against us. From what I generally see in mafia, the town is the most active in posting when the game starts, while the mafia generally don't post and lurk a while. I've been posting a lot and I really think it's too early to start calling out scum. + Show Spoiler + I said I had 8 pages of notes, that was obviously a joke, I don't know shit, bro! | ||
| ||
