TL Mafia LVI - Page 3

On July 02 2012 06:44 marvellosity wrote:
Not scum, I promise <3

On July 02 2012 06:46 marvellosity wrote:
I'm not voting BKexe today.

ET seemed to have a read on mkmkmk which seemed ok.

Are there any other options?

On July 02 2012 08:34 s0Lstice wrote:
I was feeling pretty good about mKmKmK until I saw how the votes fell on him. Maybe it's paranoia, but like Katina said, it felt pretty easy to get him a majority.

On July 02 2012 08:59 NoSmurfHere wrote:
90% sure VE is scum since most of his vote posts contain almost no reasoning at all. Also, he's not pushing any of the lynches he's on, he's just hopping on already-moving bandwagons (or increasing town sentiment basically)

His votes have gone BKE-BM-Fox and there's minimal reasoning for all of those votes. In addition at each point he's ignored most of the other cases and he's influenced the flow of votes without pushing the lynches himself.

He also misconstrues the case on mK. It's not entirely the Kenpachi rule, though that's pretty good in itself. The scummiest thing about mK is that he said he was excited to play and then upon the game starting he disappeared. No excitement or enthusiasm at all.

On July 02 2012 15:17 drwiggl3s wrote:
So here's what should be learned from day 1.

BKExe gained first suspicions. Votes were put on him. His posting increased at a rapid rate where he wasn't so much as defending himself as he was putting suspicion on others. There was also a increase of posting by a few others who were soft defending him while pointing fingers at others.

mkmkmk get read as scum by numerous people. All while being pretty much just missing in action. Votes are pushed to him as an easy D1 lynch.

Somehow (I have no clue how his posts were read as scum), people hint and drop Fox's name as a possible scum candidate. After testing the waters, a bandwagon is launched on him and it get's the votes. This lynch not only killed a fellow town, but it also netted 0 information on who else could be scum.

I'd like to throw suspicion on those who are actively throwing suspicion onto others. As the people they are reading as scum are giving me no sense of scumminess at all. While the people who do appear scummy seem to have a team of like minded individuals backing up their claims and dismissing others.

For the love of town, if you're town, don't settle for these mislynches. If we were going to lynch someone, it should have been someone that actually had people defending them. At least this way their death (in vain or not) would give us some valuable information on the people posting in this thread. Any lynch that doesn't support this idea, is a lynch that is proposed by the mafia, and we should look to those who propose it as our next targets.

On July 02 2012 17:36 drwiggl3s wrote:
mkmkmk lynch never made sense to me, and unless you give me some justification for it, anyone pushing for this is giving me a scum read.

The only justification I can think of for the Foxtrotter wagon, was that there was a tie between BroodKingExe, Foxtrotter, and mkmkmk. Since they couldn't push enough votes onto mkmkmk to ensure BroodKingexe wouldn't get ninja lynched by some last minute votes, they sprung a new bandwagon on Foxtrotter.

I do agree with Bill Murray in that some people who pushed for the Foxtrotter wagon need to be lynched. Although I'm curious as to who he thinks would be a good target. To me, the best target is already apparent. But since I have no good town read or scum read on Bill, I'd like to hear what he thinks.