|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 21 2012 04:48 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On June 21 2012 04:08 Drazerk wrote:On June 21 2012 04:04 DropBear wrote:On June 21 2012 01:33 talismania wrote:
Acrofales - you said you were going to be ready to claim in full D2. Is that still in the cards? Do it on the deadline I'm worried you're going to have a hit put on you. Why would mafia shoot Acrofales? He's been blindly tunnelling a townie all game and he just shot a detective. Sounds like the perfect person to keep alive. Possibly because he is the only person playing pro town But if he survives another day I kill him because he shouldn't be left alive at that stage. I'm not the only one playing pro-town. Give Tali and ET some credit here. Gonna go over ET's filter in a minute. Could be that ghost_403 shot him.. he was the only one to be suspicious of 4F.
You're the only one I never had any doubt of (And to be fair my theory that you had to kill someone was almost right)
I also doubt it was ghost to be honest he wouldn't of had any time to think things through and taking advice from someone who was banned while playing is kind of.......
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Also until we get a full roleclaim from him my vote is on 201
Also acro you misspelled his name in your vote
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Personally I think you're one of these people who want him dead
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Probably your shot refunded
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Why does everyone get cool roles >.>
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 21 2012 06:10 DropBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 21 2012 05:52 Acrofales wrote:On June 21 2012 05:43 DropBear wrote:
Acro why did you shoot BioSC when you were on my case the entire day? I've explained that twice already. This is true, you did. Show nested quote +On June 21 2012 03:26 Acrofales wrote:However, you came back during the night and I actually liked your posts, so I relented and looked for a different target. I figured DropBear and Nisani are major lynch candidates today, so figured I'd look into the people I hadn't looked closely yet. I almost changed my target to Nisani when BioSC started posting, but his posting style and the case were just so weird (and cute), that they confused me more than convinced me he was town. I couldn't find a scum motive for posting so weird, but it isn't exactly townie either. I then thought of you and remembered that strange posting styles can be employed by scum to seem inoccuous  So I went through with the shot. Wrongly. I have never before seen a vigilante who didn't shoot the person they thought most likely to be mafia. You say yourself you couldn't find a scum motive for what he was saying. I actually don't understand how anyone who was town aligned could be this colossally illogical.
You must of missed that period of time where all the vigilantes shot lurkers instead of scum targets or people who was trolling.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 21 2012 06:20 DropBear wrote:
The person who pushed it the hardest just shot a detective and it's being shrugged off.
See S+B's sig for mine and probably everyone elses thoughts on that
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 21 2012 14:29 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +On June 21 2012 14:25 xsksc wrote:
I'm Sherlock Holmes, the Detective
Every night I can investigate a player, and I'll get told if they're anti-town or non anti-town.
I was told I could be sane or insane.
I've determined that I am most definitely sane, as I checked KB n0 and he returned anti-town.
I checked BioSC n1 and he returned non anti-town. The reason I checked BioSC was that I knew someone was framed, and he had managed to stay fairly low profile. Bit of a waste in hindsight, but I had no idea he was about to be vig shot. At least it confirms my sanity. lol, 2 cops in a 15-man setup. We have a liar, ladies and gentleman. Read his filter, read my case, and then laugh at his claim. We're lynching him tomorrow.
This is a bastard game - set up and balance don't come into it
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 21 2012 14:35 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +On June 21 2012 14:30 xsksc wrote:On June 21 2012 14:29 HiroPro wrote:On June 21 2012 14:25 xsksc wrote:
I'm Sherlock Holmes, the Detective
Every night I can investigate a player, and I'll get told if they're anti-town or non anti-town.
I was told I could be sane or insane.
I've determined that I am most definitely sane, as I checked KB n0 and he returned anti-town.
I checked BioSC n1 and he returned non anti-town. The reason I checked BioSC was that I knew someone was framed, and he had managed to stay fairly low profile. Bit of a waste in hindsight, but I had no idea he was about to be vig shot. At least it confirms my sanity. lol, 2 cops in a 15-man setup. We have a liar, ladies and gentleman. Read his filter, read my case, and then laugh at his claim. We're lynching him tomorrow. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=326599 That game had 6 survivors and 2 serial killers. Town was a minority of 7 people. It is not comparable. And your behavior has already shown that you are scum. Your claim is just icing on the cake.
Also DTs were super nerfed and it was very lucky I worked out Cheese's role from the check result
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 21 2012 15:12 xsksc wrote:
DB, thoughts on me/Hiro's case?
Am I the only one that sees my claim as retarded as hell for scum?o.o
As I recently just played a scum detective... its over powered and allowed me to win the game single handedly but only because acro gave me the chance 
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 21 2012 22:12 Acrofales wrote:
Drazerk, I thought you had claimed VT, but in actual fact you haven't. Claim now.
I had and I did I just don't make a big song and dance about my role claims
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
I am guessing Hiro or DB is the MA since I see no other reason to lie / delay claiming other than being scum / third party / trolling
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
The two of us win if either of us is alive at the end of this game
This should be a very easy claim to check out...
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Also S+B I disagree one of you needs to die
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
You're aware only one of you need to be alive to win right?
On top of that it will auto confirm the other player as town limiting our search for targets and forcing scum to shoot that target taking the hits of townies rather than survivors.
Basically there is nothing to lose from killing one of you and everything to lose by keeping you both alive.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Also since VT is guaranteed in the game and no one is counter claiming it does that mean I am confirmed VT?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On June 22 2012 01:43 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 01:40 Drazerk wrote:Also since VT is guaranteed in the game and no one is counter claiming it does that mean I am confirmed VT? Yea bro, I was hoping I could be confirmed survivor, but I'm not 
We could always shoot your bro to make you one
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Scum make gambits
I do it all the time...
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
A) scum don't have to have KP especially in a mini
B) Its called a gambit its exactly that - A gambit
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE ALIVE TO WIN
If you actually want town to win you will have to admit we need to rule out the possibility of you pulling a pretty huge gamble to blind side us. Seriously if you're town or town aligned you should never be afraid of death especially when your win condition doesn't even need you alive.
And I'm not even saying you have to be todays lynch like acro I think your a third priority but you must die at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
