iGrok's Good Clean Old-fashioned Mafia - Page 3

On June 11 2012 18:29 Palmar wrote:


hehehehehhe.

So who's up for lynching meapak with me?

On June 11 2012 22:21 Palmar wrote:
To clarify, the logic is terrible, but that doesn't make him scum. While using bad logic may be an indicator of someone being scum, it's not conclusive, because townies tend to be well... dumb.

The point is that he's using bad logic to avoid reaching a conclusion. If he was using bad logic to actually do something with it, like conclude someone he wanted to lynch, or decide that someone is town, I'd not be so eager to kill him. It's the fact that he's basically saying nothing for no reason that makes him scum.

Now, about VisceraEyes, there isn't a case against him yet, and meapak is much more likely to flip scum anyway. VE has a nice habit of looking ridiculously much like town when he is one, so we'll know soon enough.

The reason VE has been getting mislynched is because mafia has been pushing the idea he's scum, not because he has been scummy, or that was at least the case in Liar Game. I was scum myself and just chose to ignore the fact he was looking pretty towny.

On June 11 2012 09:43 chaoser wrote:



The fact that you show no suspicion to the usage of terms along with the rest of your posting makes me extremely suspicious of you.

##vote: greymist

On June 12 2012 00:20 chaoser wrote:


http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=341558&currentpage=12#223

Your previous posts were the ones that lead me to be suspicious of you, your weird response to the townie/towny post (which might have just been me thinking everyone would think like me but they didn't so your reaction is less suspicious now though still in my mind) was just the last drop in the bucket.

And seeing as how you're here, you've got less than 12 hours till end of day yo. And you still haven't been doing much of anything.

On June 11 2012 13:37 GreYMisT wrote:
And woah woah woah. You are hesitant to vote VE because of misslynching him under completely different circumstances in a different game?

On June 12 2012 02:48 gonzaw wrote:


*sigh* LAL anyone?


I won't support a MZ lynch today, if we still have Greymist, Wiggles and maybe BrownBear still around.

I reread his filter and I don't find him as townie as I thought, but I don't want a bandwagon to form on him now, specially if nobody post why they wouldn't lynch Greymist or Wiggles instead

---

@Palmar: So, do you plan on commenting on this shit we've been doing these past few days or will you just try to live in your own little world up there?

Radfield is still disappeared...interesting.

On June 12 2012 04:01 gonzaw wrote:


It was sarcasm (lol I can't believe you guys keep falling for it).



You didn't post any thoughts about Greymist nor Wiggles, and the discussion pertaining those 2, for instance

---

@Meapak: I don't see you doing shit, I may end up supporting your lynch after all.
All these past few posts of you have been you bickering against Palmar and other people and not contributing at all.

On June 12 2012 04:26 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
And for those people who are complaining that I am "not contributing," relax. We have like 24 hours or something. I've already stated that I would support a greymist lynch, if you people actually need me to write a massive "analysis" (although it may not count because Palmar hasn't ordained it) I will.

chill people.

On June 12 2012 04:34 gonzaw wrote:


It was obvious it was sarcasm as soon as I mentioned the "Vanilla Towny" thing...which is why I did it.

I'd really like you to link those games you've played before (Student mafia was it? Or something)

And I'll give you the benefit of the doubt...mainly because you are active, and trying to do shit...even if that shit is absolutely nothing at all (and because nobody is pushing you right now and doing so would most likely mean me tunneling you and shitting the thread up).


Who would like a Wiggles or a BrownBear lynch?

On June 12 2012 06:31 Radfield wrote:


I'm considering it, but his demeanor is very unscumlike. That being said I think he has the ability to put up excellent defenses as scum when his back is against the wall. He had me second guessing myself in PYP:Int, and I basically had a red check on him.

He doesn't have anything expressly super-townie in his posts, but his overall in your face/antagonistic playstyle doesn't seem forced or fake. It seems like he doesn't really give a crap, which is a townie trait.

THAT being said, some of his posts raise flags(his early posts+ the VE post), but not really enough for me to want to lynch him.

I'm also realizing that it doesn't make particular sense to lynch you Day 1 either, as your town play tend to stand out, and you'll get significantly easier to read as the game goes on. It hinges on me finding another candidate though

On June 12 2012 19:10 Radfield wrote:


As far as I can tell this never happened. Care to point it out to me?




Can you elaborate on this? What kind of response did you expect to see from Greymist?

Greymist, what did you expect to accomplish from voting Ace? That seems like a fairly lame-duck plan to generate content.

On June 12 2012 07:07 Hesmyrr wrote:

I was actually waiting for you to post the analysis regarding VE, since I couldn't find concrete argument to merit analysis post yet. Currently I find MZ lynch to be better than that of Palmar but I am not going to get stuck on black-white thinking; the fact that GreYMisT+VE have voted him is cause for concern which is why I am reserving my judgment until the last moment.

Personally the interactions happened between VisceraEyes and you are making me extremely wary.