EPTI love MTG ne ways
/in
Magic: The Gathering Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
I love MTG ne ways /in | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
I like you more now Tunkeg <3 | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
I'll be doing different playstyle fyi #dontmetamebro | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
vanilla townie here | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
Wbg I thought you lurked d1s | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 21 2012 05:38 Acrofales wrote: Also, if all I had were town games in my history, discrediting any meta-analysis off the bat seems like a pretty good idea for scum. If you thought your playstyle was working, why change it up? of his last 3 games, he lost 2 of them, and was nearly mislynched in the other. I wouldn't define that as "his playstyle working". what kind of crappy misformulated discreditation is this? On May 21 2012 05:30 Acrofales wrote: Yo Tunkeg. Glad to see you got that first post out of the way. Always a bitch as scum. You wrote a wall of text which says jack diddly squat. Bugs posted some decent advice, Nova and I indicated who we're keeping eyes on. You just posted a load of nonsense about yourself that I for one am not interested in. his first post had 50x the content you had. then you try and buddy to nova saying you two are "keeping eyes on people"; all you posted was a joke accusation on Mattchew. On May 21 2012 07:23 Acrofales wrote: Hrmmm, Navillus, that's pretty interesting. Did Bugs give good advice or bad advice? Navilus also posted a semi joke accusation on bugs ("i only recognize 2 vets so i vote the one who has less votes") Found scum. that was easy. you play exactly like forumite's scum: ask tons of questions, do diddly squat ##Vote: Acrofales | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 21 2012 07:23 Acrofales wrote: Hrmmm, Navillus, that's pretty interesting. Did Bugs give good advice or bad advice? Navilus also posted a semi joke accusation on bugs ("i only recognize 2 vets so i vote the one who has less votes") but you take it seriously for some reason. You're all like "hmm I'm taking this joke accusation seriously to see if it's an angle that I can use to accuse WBG later on". what a joke. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
mattchew / mouldy jeb where you at? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
you ignored my points against you just saying | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
1. I haven't read his games either. Let's read Tunkeg's post (in this thread) Student Mafia– Town (vanilla) – Win. Newbie Mafia II– Town (Vanilla) – Loss. BC's Arkham City– Town (Veteran)- Loss. TL Mafia LI– Town (Vanilla) – Draw. I'm a cop you idiot Mafia– Town (Cop)- Loss I see 2 losses in the last 3. Even if you don't know circumstances behind the draw, it's clear he has been losing lately. Using my handy ol brain, I make the logical conclusion that Tunkeg wants to change his playstyle because it hasn't been successful. Continuing: On May 21 2012 16:38 Acrofales wrote: All I read was his post in which he said he thought it was working well. If he thinks it was working to hunt scum, then why change? Again, let's reference Tunkeg's post. Why change it up? Even though I think it was a great way of finding scum for me. It wasn’t necessarily good for town. Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive. It have also led me close to being lynched many times, and often put me on the defensive straight from the get go. Constantly defending yourself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting. You say "why change if he thinks it was working to hunt scum"? Using my handy dandy reading skills, I see that Tunkeg wrote that it wasn't good for town. He also says that constantly defending himself makes it hard to put effort into proper scumhunting. Using my handy ol brain, I make the conclusion that he wanted to change because it was leading to bad results. That wasn't so hard, was it? You on the otherhand, either lack reading comprehension, or are misrepresenting his posts to make him look bad. I think it's the latter, because I do not think you are stupid. 2. On May 21 2012 16:38 Acrofales wrote:2. Trolololol? THAT is content according to you? Let me summarize his post: Hi, I'm Tunkeg. I'm gonna play differently from my previous games, so don't bother reading my meta. Let's look at my original post: his first post had 50x the content you had. then you try and buddy to nova saying you two are "keeping eyes on people"; all you posted was a joke accusation on Mattchew. I make the statement that your intial accusation was not content at all. Therefore, when you make it seem like you and Nova were being constructive in contrast to Tunkeg, I saw that as irrational and incorrect. Neither you NOR Tunkeg have been scumhunting, but you tried to make it seem like you did more than him. That is scummy. Your response to my accusation was you bashing on Tunkeg more, instead of responding to the fact that you have been about as useful as a brick. This is scummy. 3. On May 21 2012 16:38 Acrofales wrote:3. If that is buddying with Nova and Bugs, then what you're doing is buddying with Navilus and Tunkeg. Clearly scum. I should disagree with EVERYTHING said and done in the thread ever, or am scum, because buddying. /facepalm I brushed along this earlier, but the reason why ur buddying there is scummy is because you are trying to make yourself seem constructive. To that end, you say Nova has also been a constructive poster, linking you two. However, since you haven't been constructive (because your Mattchew accusation at that point was NOT CONSTRUCTIVE), it seems like you're trying to make a positive link between you two. How was I buddying navilus? I said his accusation on WBG was a joke. Concerning Tunkeg, I am picking out your accusations as being IRRATIONAL and FABRICATED. That doesn't mean that I think he is town, nor am I promoting Tunkeg as a good poster. I am saying you are posting scummily. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 21 2012 17:23 Acrofales wrote: 2 seconds are over. Start posting. Fairly certain I only ignored the very very last point, because it was tangential and didn't actually try to say anything. Forumite's scum meta is neither here nor there, because I AM NOT FORUMITE. This game needs more Palmar or Sandroba to kill idiotic conclusions like that one. dood let me play dota when I want to play dota, lol | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
and Tunkeg actually lost 3 out of the last 4  which makes it even more easy to see why he would want to change playstyle lol | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 21 2012 17:19 Acrofales wrote: Hence, at the start of the game, everybody is scum. Of these, Mattchew is clearly the scummiest because all of statistics is a filthy lie that you're trying to use to clear my vote off your scumbuddy. ![[image loading]](http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120421140459/degrassi/images/9/96/SIMON-CONFUSED-GIF-2.gif) | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
I posted a gif bro. that's pretty unserious it's not just about finding scum, it's also about not getting mislynched yourself, and pushing your reads. tunkeg stated exactly why he wanted to change his playstyle. i don't think his post was a big contribution, but it wasn't a bad post. your response to it was bad. derp a derp am i tunneling or am i right? chime in ppls | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 21 2012 19:41 Nova_Terra wrote: This is the crux of the issue good at finding scum=good for town even if you die and you shouldnt be afraid of dying as town if you're dead you can't lynch scum. TL towns always ignore dead people's reads if you get mislynched you wasted town's time, and an entire lynch. In case you weren't sure, town can (barring vigis) only kill with the lynch. Tunkeg's old playstyle was bad for town. I can attest to that. I like his meta change. you guys are mean. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
so.... you scum marv? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
If you don't know the difference between an insult and analysis, then you're not going to be useful this game. what does this even mean? pls think a little more before you write your sentences pls | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
wbg or VE or whoever; do any of you guys recognize mouldy jeb? I doubt he's a noob, but I could be wrong. why would anyone want to kill Mattchew for posting MTG flavor text? That reminds me of when people wanted to kill Foolishness for his limericks. There's nothing inherently scummy about it unless he is really unclear and stuff I just skimmed the game but I need to re-read it. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 22 2012 07:59 marvellosity wrote: Ah yes, ET, I must have missed how posts like these are shining beacons of clarity he is saying 1. don't miss these things said in the past 2. don't ignore the fact that these comments were useless reading comprehension this reminds me of when people wanted to kill fourface for "trolling" I'm not saying he's town, but he's not autoscum for doing that, and ur either bad town or scum for talking like that. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
2. you said that they weren't clear, not that they weren't useful. they are clear. which makes ur original point moot. if ur not either then prove it lol derp a derp a derp | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
i think one of those should happen | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 22 2012 14:16 EchelonTee wrote: so who are we going to lynch? nothing's organized. I'd try to organize things but that never turns out well lmao VE, this is about the time where you take control and stuff | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
he had 3 pages in filter when the game was like 11 pages long, and those people are like never scum, which is why I said what I said. If he always posts like that then that's out the window when's deadline? sticking vote on Jeb while I read ##unvote ##Vote: Mouldy Jeb | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 23 2012 06:45 marvellosity wrote: You seem awfully certain, HiroPro. On May 23 2012 06:26 marvellosity wrote: I return. Funny how Zealos has gone quiet while all the action has been going down. funny how much can be said in just a few lines, eh? can anyone summarize the lynch candidates for me? I'm prepping for a show in 3 hours | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
sorry for being awol and voting down a townie LOL | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
I know you guys think ur all cool and stuff, and the b/c of "balance" you must be on opposing teams, but what if it's RNG? VE, don't you remember in SOAF when you, BH, and C_C were all town, then the "newbie scum team" raped u guys in the butt? I don't see THAT much mudslinging from wbg. try and work with each other and if scumminess becomes more apparent then go for the push. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
On May 23 2012 07:12 marvellosity wrote: Don't be silly dear, I'm not important enough to shoot I could see you dying if 1. all ur reads are right 2. wbg/VE reads are all wrong 3. one or both of them are scum WIFOM WARS GO I don't really know who else would die lol. no one has been that useful. I'm as useful as a carrot. they'll probably blue snipe | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
ve what the hell are you even arguing about? ur shitting up the thread. so is NT but you know better | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
all it takes to make your posts look good is solid logic. which is easy as shit to do but no one seems to have down right, which is why I always win as scum and never win as town sigh I don't want to lose | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
dude u better post ur reads. remember soaf | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
1. lurking for much of the beginning of the day. average scum trait you don't go for anyone until things have started chugging a long. in a mini like this, scum are going to hide around a lot. they probably goign to have a few active members, but the way you've been lurking, not pushing things or being provocative (save for your one single minded focus) seems like u want to avoid the spotlight, like ur disinterested in extensive scumhunting. 2. using faulty logic to push someone, crutched upon by a few points of decent logic. common scum trait ur initial reason for being susp. of marv was "voting w/o logic and buddying with nova" wasn't good at all and felt fake, just cuz u needed to vote. first point isn't true, second one isn't inherently scummy. ur later point of marv's change of opinion on NT is a decent point, but it looks like ur just trying to build and build and build a rolling case instead of actually try and re-examine ur case. it's prety common for scum to pick a candidate to tunnel for, preferrably one that isn't immediately going to be lycnhed, It makes you look constructive, but you don't take the blame for townie lynches if the lynch doesn't go through 3. didn't mention jeb at all. scum don't want to talk about mislynches as much as possible when there's a townie mislynch, scum often are one of the random single voters on other people (citation: Ver's Mafia guide). Most townies want to consoliidate a strong lynch so will focus on a few candidates. Scum would rather avoid the town bandwagons. The only townies who stay off the main candidates are especially stubborn players (Toad, VE), and I don't get that vibe from you | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
therefore GF often play provocatively and semi scummy, to encourage a check that will be wrong if everyone has town reads on them being a godfather doesn't mean anything, b/c neither a DT nor a vigi should target someone that looks townie. you GF? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
In my first scum game, I randomly mentioned GF once when it wasn't necessary. I was GF it's a psychology thing (protip, most important scum role is RBer) | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
we're all over the 5th grade right? it's easy as fuck to read things. it's really hilarious how your response is "no ur wrong read my posts" and OMFG can't you people REASON??????? look this is what you wrote On May 22 2012 18:02 Acid~ wrote: It looks like marvellosity's picked up right where Acrofales left off: buddying with Nova and voting without reasoning. ##Vote marvellosity you said "marv voting without reasoning". he HAD REASONING; you explained it right there in your posts! is it shitty reasoning, sure! but you fcking outright lied when you said "marv voted without reasoning" why is everyone so derp? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
yeah I guess ur response is prty good navi. I thought it was pretty cool when jackal shot L the godfather (TL L) Emotion is only going to cause you to do something you regret (like roleclaim and then write the game off, pretty much forcing town to mislynch you etc. etc. etc.) LMAO I already roleclaimed dood read ma filter be back later, showtime | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
Is the deadline 3:00 pm Pacific time? It says 14:59 PDT (-7), not completely sure on that. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
GG | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
 | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
I sensed Katina Zealos but didn't see Navilus coming. Shouldn't have lynched VE. But then again, VE could've made some good saves. I played bad; played too loosely and didn't think I would get shot. Was fun while it lasted though. Town gets into too many shit fests. Mattchew and Marv fought for literally 0 reason. GG | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5244 Posts
| ||
| ||
