Magic: The Gathering Mini Mafia - Page 8

On May 25 2012 07:32 VisceraEyes wrote:
Same shit with Mouldy. I think Zealos is the scummy candidate and Zelblade is the lurker candidate to me. *nodnod*

On May 25 2012 07:41 marvellosity wrote:
You do realise he said that in sarcastic reference to where he said the exact same thing about Mouldy earlier, right?

On May 25 2012 08:13 VisceraEyes wrote:
Okay, yeah...I don't know that it's scumminess that I'm seeing. Like, his logic is TOO bad to be like...contrived, or planned.

I'm not sure what to do this lynch, so what I'm going to do is vote for the person I'm most convinced is scum. That person is wherebugsgo.

##Unvote: Zealos
##Vote: wherebugsgo

*shrug*

On May 25 2012 18:56 Tunkeg wrote:
WBG is scum, so:

##Vote wherebugsgo

On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:
1. I will not be posting as much as before. I will try to post better and longer posts though. And less one liners and useless crap.

On May 25 2012 18:56 Tunkeg wrote:
WBG is scum, so:

##Vote wherebugsgo

On May 25 2012 19:08 Tunkeg wrote:


Yeah, really. Thats all you will be hearing from me for today. Do with it as you please...

On May 25 2012 19:09 Tunkeg wrote:



Or maybe I will post some right before the deadline. We'll see.

On May 25 2012 19:56 Tunkeg wrote:


It won't be a case. don't worry.

On May 25 2012 20:08 Tunkeg wrote:


Wrong again, there won't be any information that is relevant for todays lynch in it...

On May 25 2012 20:24 Tunkeg wrote:


Good observation.

On May 25 2012 20:59 Nova_Terra wrote:

totally agree
people in real life solve problems by shouting and even attacking eachother
not by just sitting down and letting themselves get kicked the crap out of

On May 25 2012 21:08 Mattchew wrote:

there is no way anyone who doesn't know tunkeg's alignment would come to this conclusion

stick with the zealos vote

On May 25 2012 14:46 zelblade wrote:

Another targert of intrest is Tunkeg. I already mentioned that I dont think that wanting to change one's meta is scummy, since players regardless of alignment might want to try out new styles of play. One point against him is that he didnt post that post before the game, but that is a minor factor to what I feel about his posting. He seems to emphasise that posting lists and reads gives "accountability", when in reality, it does nothing. How does knowing his reads, especially considering they are weak D1 reads which could easily be backpeddalled on, help town in anyway whatsoever? I have no idea what he means by accountability, considering townies can and will change their opinions overtime, and we do not need to know this. Notice how he also says that knowing his reads will help when someone is making a case on him. Wut? Why would a townie ever post something like that?

Lets lynch Tunkeg tomorrow after we get rid of zealos.

On May 25 2012 13:49 Ver wrote:
Similarly, in most cases someone who appears so unbelievably guilty yet isn't giving up is almost always going to be a townie.

On May 25 2012 21:55 Tunkeg wrote:
Allright got the warning. I will actually write some of what I would write if you guys lynched me. Hence my reply to WBG if I wanted a townie to get lynched.

Yeah, I wouldn't mind getting lynched at all. I think this game have taken the course as many games do, where everyone keep mouthing off about how everyone else is bad, stupid, fucking useless etc etc (I don't care if it is directed towards me or anyone else, for instance the way syllogism played in liars should be frowned upon be the entire community). This is an environment I don't want to play in. It annoys the fuck out of me that you guys aren't capable of playing this game through arguements, but have to resort to namecalling and domination techniques. It actually annoys me to such a degree that I can't read the thread properly, nor play the game properly, and start caring less and less about the game. If TL towns can't deal with badmouthing players ruining the townenvironment the scum will keep dominating.
I have told Artonis to do as he please about it. I won't bate you into lynching me as long as you guys don't bate me into writing obvious "LYNCH ME!" stuff.

On May 21 2012 05:12 Tunkeg wrote:

Many times it took up to much space, and some might even label it as disruptive.

2. I will control my temper. I will not be getting into any fights, I won’t be starting any and I will try not to get pulled into one.
3. I will try to post better analysis, and avoid insulting the ones I analyze. I can clarify, but I won’t argue with nitpickers.

My biggest weakness is ... my temper.

On May 25 2012 22:11 Nova_Terra wrote:
is it allowed to make the judgement that Tunkeg is town because artanis PM'ed him a warning?