|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 24 2012 20:14 Zealos wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 20:02 marvellosity wrote:
Yep, way to not be able to read and misrepresent what's been said. You're a real star. You're saying because I wasn't able to find, and vote for, a scum on day1, I'm mafia.
No, I'm saying that you COULD have done so. You abdicated searching for scum 7+ hours from the deadline, and the next day your reads all came from posts before that point.
You actively chose NOT to hunt for scum when judging by your later cases the evidence was there for you, and you chose to lynch a townie because you actively chose this option.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Anyway, this is entirely unconstructive, I promised I wouldn't argue with my reads. I don't have to convince you after all.
On another train of thought.
Zealos, is zelblade still your #1 scumread?
Nova, how's that case coming on?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 24 2012 20:28 Zealos wrote:
Marvel displaying his apt reading skills. Clearly hiro's my number one scumread at this point, his case at the start of the day literally screamed mafia to me.
So is it just that case? Or are there other surrounding factors? Could we just *remove sarcasm* for now please, I think we shit up the thread enough
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
EBWOP: I guess more specifically, what was it about the case that Hiro made that jumped out at you as being scummy
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Alright, cool. The issue I have is that Hiro being as aggressive as he is doesn't fit into what I believe his play to be as scum.
I just went over his filter in Newbie VI to check this out. For the large part he was calm, reasoned, and somewhat lurky. Here he is aggressive and indiscriminate.
What do you make of this difference? Clicky here for his Newbie VI filter.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I can at least understand where he's coming from with his case, even if I don't necessarily agree with it / it was badly presented. The big lists of questions, the fact that he said he was changing his meta AFTER roles went out (contrary to what VE remembered).
I just find it very hard to get to grips with atm that he'd change his scum meta from calm and reasoned to aggressive and pissing people off. It doesn't make sense to me.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 24 2012 22:49 Mattchew wrote:
##vote zelblade
Give reasoning plz
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 00:29 Nova_Terra wrote:
Nah thats just saying that i feel more comfortable with a lynch on acid, but i would still go to zealos
If you're town, do you see how much lynch bait you are by not posting constructively?
On May 24 2012 18:41 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 16:26 Nova_Terra wrote:
In fact, i would prefer a Katina lynch Bla de bla bla bla. Your filter is now 6 pages long. I do not want to see another post from you that isn't a decent case against who you want to lynch, and it should be more than 2 sentences long. Gogo.
Do this.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 00:33 Nova_Terra wrote:
Also im just tired from 2 nights in a row of 4 hours of sleep >.> i'll be posting like normal after tonight
The problem is your current posting is 'normal'. It's been going for 1.5 games now :/
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 00:59 Nova_Terra wrote:
By normal i meant more spammy, normal for me
Just make a fucking case already. So far you've said you wanted a Katina lynch, an Acid lynch, and you'd be ok with a Zealos lynch. Make a case. Stop making excuses.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 23 2012 13:39 Nova_Terra wrote:
hey at least with me here it looks like the game is really active and people take sides on stuff
Was just picking through your filter a little and found this. In what world, where you are townie, is getting a bunch of town to think you're scum a productive outcome?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 01:24 Nova_Terra wrote:Then theres a couple worthless short defenses of herself. then this wonderful gem: ..... Not only is this completely stupid to have not seemed to read the thread, she says that my spam is similar to a game i played mafia in But wait, i was just in a game with you where i was town AND I SPAMMED So now shes just throwing shit to try to get a nice mislynch, doesnt matter if it makes sense as long as it casts suspicion, amirite katina Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 06:52 Katina wrote:On May 23 2012 06:48 wherebugsgo wrote:
Regardless of his alignment nova seems to post a lot. Over the span of a week in games where he was scum and town he had 8-10 pages of filter in both.
Only his first game seems to be an anomaly with 5 pages after 9-10 days but that's still quite a lot (especially for a newbie game)
So why is it, Katina, that you're trying to pass off Nova's spam as exclusively a scum trait? I'm not. I'm just saying he has done it before.
Yay, Nova, a case! I've quoted the part I find particularly compelling. You see, you have a veteran player who knows how to play the game, and yet is lurky. This is at least forgiveable if when they do turn up, they say something of note.
But here it's: Nova spams! And her response to wbg is even worse - "I know it's not alignment indicative, I'm just saying he spammed before". Her filter is short enough that when she contributes with the weakest sauce possible, it's superbad.
What does everyone else think?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 01:43 wherebugsgo wrote:
Do any of you ever stop to think why Zealos may be impervious to a wagon?
Stop to think of why he may not be getting as many votes as we want him to.
Stop and reread his posts.
Instead of talking cryptically, why not just say exactly what you mean?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 01:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
My case on bugs is strong, and all of you are going to realize it when it's too late. marvellosity, I expected more from you.
##Unvote: wherebugsgo
##Vote: Zealos
Katina's probably town.
On May 23 2012 02:43 marvellosity wrote:
VE: I am dissapoint.
1-1 I guess? 
What makes you think Katina is town? What do you think of Nova's case, and specifically the part I quoted and commented on?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 01:46 wherebugsgo wrote:
Nvm
It should be obvious I want the townies in this game to do work.
If I just say everything then town dies when I die.
There's a difference between saying everything and saying nothing.
At the moment you are doing the latter.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
VE: answer my question please.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
There's a difference between lurking on one hand, and on the other when you do post being absolutely useless, which is what I'm (and nova originally) are trying to get at. You don't see anything in this?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
VE, why even post that when I'd actually asked you a question in the post above? Pointless.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 01:57 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 02:24 Mattchew wrote:@WBG/VERiches must be divided, but real wealth can be shared.+ Show Spoiler +The pain is so great, he can't help but share it with others. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/fgpyX.jpg) "Thoughts are commodities. Someone will pay a good price for them. Even ones as simplistic as yours . . ." —Ennor, mentalist
You've still not explained your vote on zelblade, you annoying person.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 25 2012 01:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
Meh...at this point it doesn't even matter. It's clear who town wants to follow. Let's see where he takes us.
Don't do that, it makes me feel icky 
On May 25 2012 01:53 marvellosity wrote:
There's a difference between lurking on one hand, and on the other when you do post being absolutely useless, which is what I'm (and nova originally) are trying to get at. You don't see anything in this?
Can you answer this? Or anyone? I want to try to clarify my thoughts on katina.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
