| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 22 2012 06:14 Mattchew wrote: "The Argivian University taught me two things: always look to the past, and never dismiss what appears useless." —Hanna, Weatherlight navigator | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
How are those 1 and 2 useful anyway again? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
My point is that townies should in general strive to be as lucid and clear as possible. Don't give a flying two hoots what you think, if Mattchew just talks in plain text, it will achieve this better than speaking in MTG speak or whatever. Frankly I'm bored with the sheer quantity of townies who seem to not want to do this. Hence the vote. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 22 2012 18:02 Acid~ wrote: It looks like marvellosity's picked up right where Acrofales left off: buddying with Nova and voting without reasoning. ##Vote marvellosity Apparently you can't read. Well done you. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
How is it different from LIV? Quite a few posts but generally not a lot of content, no? For now I'm going to answer 'who I'm suspicious of' as 'who I'd like to be dead'. So other than Matt, Nova, Acid, and to a lesser extent Jeb. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:22 zelblade wrote: So you think nova is town yet you want to kill him? I wouldn't mind him dead. I just came from playing scum in LIV where 3/5 of my team were mod-killed and we still scored a convincing victory with the entire fucking town voting with me to kill another townie at LYLO, making a total of 6 consecutive townie mislynches and 0 scum lynches. Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:32 Acid~ wrote: That's your reasoning. He didn't explain his. " I'll lynch you cause I don't like you !" that's not a reasoning. On May 22 2012 10:44 marvellosity wrote: no u My point is that townies should in general strive to be as lucid and clear as possible. Don't give a flying two hoots what you think, if Mattchew just talks in plain text, it will achieve this better than speaking in MTG speak or whatever. Frankly I'm bored with the sheer quantity of townies who seem to not want to do this. Hence the vote. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 22 2012 21:22 Acid~ wrote: 3. So I did actually look and this is just an outright lie. Nova's play was literally the opposite of what he is doing now : in that game he was against random votes, against bandwagoning, he played less aggressively and more analytically. lol? Taken from LIV: On May 07 2012 04:37 Nova_Terra wrote: Next, Kenpachi Absolutely worthless, if you consider his connection case useful i dunno what to say Vote: Kenpachi First time he mentioned Kenpachi was this. More analytical and against bandwagoning? mmkay. We're gonna disagree here. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2012 18:37 Mouldy Jeb wrote: hi- now my presence is known. saying "get rid of a veteran" indicates that you are worried that an experienced Mafia player will either weasel you out~ if your mafia or kill you if you are not so due to this rash decision to get rid of competition so on that note #vote:Nova_Terra I don't understand this. An experienced mafia player would kill nova as a prime target? Unlikely. On May 21 2012 20:54 Mouldy Jeb wrote: tera~ this game is full of people jumping to conclusions so don't get a bit pissed  This implies that his previous post was 'jumping to conclusions'. Basically admitting his last post was rubbish. On May 21 2012 21:39 Mouldy Jeb wrote: an apt point, i was making a split second judgement I'm not saying I'm against you I'm just stating at that time you seemed to have the most random vote based only on the fact he was a vet. also my vote isn't by far final He's voting for him, but he's not against him? A final sentence indicating he's happy to back down from his vote. Then why make it? Just because other people are doing so? On May 22 2012 07:10 Mouldy Jeb wrote: mattchew, just because im considering that my vote may have been based on an ill judgement doesn't mean im scum just means ill have to wait till tomorrow to consolidate all the evidence from each persons posts to conjure up a decision on who to vote for. Ok, we're gonna have evidence consolidated from each person's post leading to a reasoned vote. Glad to hear it. On May 22 2012 22:22 Mouldy Jeb wrote: early game i suspected nova because of rash decision making from his part and myself assuming the worst, matchew voting for me which wasn't given a viable explanation so i would be inclined to vote for matchew due to his random train of thought against others ## vote:mattchew Gonna have to disagree with Mouldy on what consolidated evidence means I think. "inclined" to vote based on "random train of thought against others" - what does this even mean? It rather seems he's jumping on an easy wagon that's already started, because he's been voted against by said player, with a nonsensical reason. On May 22 2012 22:41 Mouldy Jeb wrote: yeah i had a feeling (OOOH AAAH) that that wasn't going to be understood, to explain, originally he voted for me for a reason he has yet to conger up then because of that random vote i felt that he was having a random vote so i voted for him. as a result of this he is trying to incriminate me by the whole "it reeks of terror and chaos shit"~~short and simple i don't like him i think he's scum trying to save his ass. ??? Overall - votes for Nova and admits it wasn't a proper vote, wishy washy about what the vote meant - basically his posts are just setting himself up to back down from the vote on Nova. A promise of consolidated evidence instead followed by a vote with a barely understandable explanation. Also going back to my earlier posts, he is hard to understand and does not post his thoughts clearly (well, actually he seems not to have clear thoughts anyway). At this time I would prefer a Jebjeb lynch. His posting both seems scummy while at the same time hard to understand. ##Unvote: Mattchew ##Vote: MouldyJeb | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 22 2012 23:15 Zealos wrote: Lol. Gotta say I agree, I just don't understand what he's talking about o.O Terrible town, or terrible mafia imo. ##vote: MouldyJeb Do you not have an opinion which? And presuming you do, why? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 23 2012 00:00 Zealos wrote: Leaning on terrible town, because his team would have shut him up or at least coached him by now imo. Still strongest lynch atm though. Lurked to begin with, followed with nonsensical posting. You don't have a single scumread? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 23 2012 00:04 Zealos wrote: No strong ones, no, I haven't had a good enough look over the thread. I'll look over everything at the end of the night, because even if I tried to make a case now it'd probably be too late to get anything done about it. This isn't acceptable. You're effectively throwing your day 1 vote away because you can't be bothered to spend the time to form a proper opinion. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Katina: why are you avoiding interacting with the thread in any way? wbg has asked you a question on more than one occasion and you do nothing. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 23 2012 00:04 Zealos wrote: No strong ones, no, I haven't had a good enough look over the thread. I'll look over everything at the end of the night, because even if I tried to make a case now it'd probably be too late to get anything done about it. On May 23 2012 00:16 Zealos wrote: Not the case. My opinion is that Jeb should be lynched. The reason is twofold. 1. He is still a strong scumread, even though I said it was more likely that he is bad town. 2. That he has lurked, then been less than useless to town. I think he is a strong lynch, regardless of whether I have a strong scumread. So people, what do we think of Zealos? He votes on MouldyJeb who he thinks is bad town. He tells me he doesn't have a strong scumread. Then he reiterates that in fact Mouldy IS a strong scumread, even though he is likely town (seriously, wtf). Contradictions abound. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 23 2012 00:41 Nova_Terra wrote: T-T i hate defenses like this Me too. So what do you think of Mouldy and Zealos? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 23 2012 01:01 Nova_Terra wrote: I actually liked the tone used in zealos' early posts, but yeah, you pointed out some serious wtf stuff. I'm leaning scummy on him. Mouldy I think is just awful town. I don't think a scum could play like that. Hurts me inside As your vote is still on froggy, is he still your strongest read? Simply based on what you think is his flawed meta analysis? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 23 2012 01:20 Mattchew wrote: EBWOP: "Your strategy is marvelous. I've just made a few minor adjustments." —Veris, watcher of Indi Keep What in particular makes you lean town on one, scum the other? | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
BSL Open Qualifier
WardiTV Weekly
IntoTheTV X SOOP
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
IntoTheTV X SOOP
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
