|
explain why you did posts like these:
On May 30 2012 08:57 VisceraEyes wrote:
Okay, cool...Toad town...
......but why? Why would scum leave a soon-to-be-confirmed-town alive?
On May 30 2012 09:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
He might have been a blue-snipe. Not running for office and lurking into oblivion speak to me of scum aiming for blue....that's the only thing I can imagine is up with the Mattchew shot....but again...WHY NOT SHOOT THE SOON-TO-BE-CONFIRMED-TOWN?
when you're at it.
What's the point? To me it looks like confusion for no reason. I don't know why mafia did not shoot me, how do you expect anyone to know that?
So why do you post a question like that not only once but twice. Seems like it was kind of important for you.
Think I faked the mason?
|
I'm not going to vote gambit unless he refuses to give me the name of his char and I'd say a lynch on that guy is like flipping a coin.
|
On May 31 2012 03:07 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
I'm not going to vote gambit unless he refuses to give me the name of his char and I'd say a lynch on that guy is like flipping a coin. Why? Just saying that you don't like the lynch doesn't help us determine if the lynch is actually bad. If you don't want to see him lynched, you'll have to explain why.
I want to see him answer my question first. I don't want to answer that one for him for the ever so slight chance that I may actually be wrong about him
|
I'm a mason, that rules out third party for christs sake. What are you blabbering about
|
Screw this
Yes I think gambit is a mason.
Yes that's the reason I don't want to lynch him.
Yes it's because of something he has said and if you check my post earlier you quote (the one where I mentioned a 2nd mason for the first time) you will see that gambit posted only shortly before that as well.
I could be wrong about the mason tell however I think I'm right right now, that's why I want the name of his char before lynching him.
You do realize that you just made me claim another thing because of those retarded questions although I told people I don't want to talk about? I have a reason I don't want to talk about it and if I am right I just outed a blue. Thanks.
|
|
|
nope.
I'd say we look for a 2nd lynch while keeping Gambit as an option and just wait for his answer.
If he is not a mason we can lynch him although I still think theres better lynches around.
If he is a mason he lynch into something like VE / kita / zealos
|
On May 31 2012 04:20 wherebugsgo wrote:
The reason G32 is better than a phagga lynch is cause phagga didn't vote.
Most scum will vote just to stay alive but townies who go legitimately inactive won't usually vote without actually coming back to play.
okay if you had to lynch someone else than G32 who would you lynch instead?
I'm still waiting for his response, that's why.
|
I'd like a zealos lynch more than gambit as well. Obviously I'd like to lynch into a vet like VE or kita even more but that's apparently not going to happen.
|
I don't like the fact that you have been afk all the time today when people suggested to lynch gambit, not doing a thing at all.
And now that you're an option as well you get in here telling people you're done and will have a look over things. What time is it in the UK right now? 22:00? :p
|
On May 31 2012 06:00 Toadesstern wrote:
I don't like the fact that you have been afk all the time today when people suggested to lynch gambit, not doing a thing at all.
And now that you're an option as well you get in here telling people you're done and will have a look over things. What time is it in the UK right now? 22:00? :p
that was obviously directed at Zealos.
|
On May 31 2012 06:04 EchelonTee wrote:
wait, I'm up for lynch? :o
nope. Gambit or Zealos are up for a lynch.
And I could be wrong about the mason recruiter thing but that stood out and I thought about it because as mentioned I'm not a normal mason.
Now that everyone got on the recruiter part anyways:
The thing about my mason thing is that it's really not a mason like "you get to talk to this one guy". It's more like the gay-phone-session from AC.
That's why I said I'm secure against manipulation because I'm not just talking with one guy.
|
wait, it's 26 hours, isn't it?
|
I could be totally wrong and it's just a random thing he called me "mason recruited" instead of mason but as I said, that really made me think he might be a mason as well. But it was a thought and therefore I'd say we just wait to see if that was some kind of coincidence.
And obviously when I was referring to the gay-phone-session from AC I am referring to a phone-session without killing in the end. I'm not that mean.
|
On May 31 2012 06:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
The more I think about it the less that makes sense Toad. Think about it - two phone-booth circles going on simultaneously? I can't even wrap my brain around the implications, and if that's the case I'm going to literally eat my hat.
I know, I thought the same but I'm not sure 
Maybe there's some variations idk
|
On May 31 2012 06:32 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 06:30 Toadesstern wrote:On May 31 2012 06:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
The more I think about it the less that makes sense Toad. Think about it - two phone-booth circles going on simultaneously? I can't even wrap my brain around the implications, and if that's the case I'm going to literally eat my hat. I know, I thought the same but I'm not sure Maybe there's some variations idk How many games (Outside Responsibility) have you heard of that include different variations of the same role? I mean, is it possible? Yeah...obviously anything is possible. Probable? Meh. MEH. I don't think so sir. I think Gambit is a fine choice...Bugs, don't get buyer's remorse. Gambit is a fine lynch.
well the op says it's possible.
|
On May 31 2012 06:31 EchelonTee wrote:^ tons of us weren't in that game. What's differnece btwn mason and mason recruiter? I can't honestly believe that all of: Wiggles, Kita, MZ, VE, BH, WBG are ALL town. That would be like. OP. If I can't build a case on any of you, then I would support lynching one of Manason, G32, or Zealos, but I feel like going for a controversial lynch would yield bigger dividends. Higher risk, higher reward.
A phone booth is multiple people in one QT. A mason usually is just 2 people, the mason and the guy he masoned. The phone booth will last even if the guy who started it is dead (read: If I am dead the guys in my QT can still use it) while when a "normal" mason dies the mason QT is utterly useless because there's only 1 in there.
|
On May 31 2012 06:43 wherebugsgo wrote:I take back what I said earlier about the mason thing: Show nested quote +Not all of these roles will be in the game, but all roles in the game will either be on this list, or be variations of roles on this list. I suppose it is possible. Toad you need to be clear about this. Are you a mason recruiter or just a mason? If you die do you leave behind a QT that the people you add can use?Also on SnB: I agree with what ET just said, I don't think SnB's attitude is indicative of him being scum. Mattchew you're just tunneled too far IMO. We could be wrong but I don't think a mafia SnB would be as bold about his opinions as he has been so far. That's a pretty rare characteristic even among experienced scum.
I already answered the 2nd part: Yes when I die the people who are talking with me stay in that QT and I only have named MZ so far for obvious reasons.
About the mason recruiter or the mason: Idk really. It's a description of the role and I figured I'm a "mason" although that word never was used in my pm. When I read "Mason recruiter" I was shocked because it described both my flavor and my role perfectly because I am "recruiting" people on n1.
|
actually the fact that wiggles is voting gambit is one of the reasons I'd like to lynch zealos instead if we're really not going for kita or VE.
Not saying wiggles is mafia, but I still think the lynch on d1 was stupid and I'm having a null on wiggles.
|
On May 31 2012 07:40 VisceraEyes wrote:Toad do you think I'm scum? Really? Like, deep down? Because every time you mention me as a lynch candidate a little piece of my soul dies, so I wanted to be sure it wasn't all in vain.
I'm going to give you a read out my diary from yesterday that I left for my circle in case of preemptive face-lossage
3) VE is looking weird to me and I don't know what to make of him because I think he's town. Usually what happens between VE and myself is something like this: I get in the game, yell at him "you mafia bro" the first day because he does some incredible weird shit like fakeclaiming dayvig to win an election and I call him out on that shit not knowing if it has a town or mafia agenda. And during the next 24 or 48 hours of calling him mafia, making him reply to what I post no matter if honest or bullshit I figure him out. This game however I straight up had a townread on him, which is weird lol
weird as in I think you're 3rd party, as in I think you're trying to act like a townie rather than being the somewhat weird townie you usually are.
- As townie you have those weird moments that make me wtf for a moment and I have to figure out why you did that. Just like I did this game just the other way around. Remember when you fakeclaimed Day-vig to win an election as town? That's the kind of "weird" I'm referring to
- As mafia you're less weird and you're pushing mafia agendas or bussing without giving reasoning, just like mattchew did in holy roman.
- As third party you're usually trying to look good and contributing. Remember your win as SK? You were called Town-MVP and MVP in general if I remember correctly. I think I'm seeing the same here, not the MVP part ( :p ) but the trying part and I think it's way to good for your real town-self and I think you could not controle yourself like that unless you have to.
That's why a VE lynch would be a least hilarious, but yeah I really think you are 3rd party. If you're not 3rd party take it as a compliment but I doubt you're going to flip town.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
