On June 01 2012 09:16 marvellosity wrote:
EBWOP: in other words, the reason that NO SCUM WOULD EVER DO THIS can actually be a reason for scum to do this.

._.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 16:43 GMT

#2110

On June 02 2012 00:18 Manason wrote:

Show nested quote +

As it's already been explain to you Hyaach it's not so simple just getting VE to shoot someone, besides if we didn't lynch VE then D3 would be completely wasted talking about him.

Um, yeah but that only applies if you think he might be scum. You're saying you honestly thought he was a vig WITH a bullet and you wanted to lynch him??

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 17:24 GMT

#2114

On June 02 2012 02:07 Manason wrote:
I wasn't 100% sure he was a townie, however I didn't think he was scum. I never wanted to lynch him, I'm also curious to hear BH, what are your reasons for voting him?

I thought he was scummy. Believe it or not, some players vote to lynch scum, not town. At the time he was lynched, I still thought he was scummy, but G32 was clearly scummier and had claimed scum to the thread, so I voted G32.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 17:25 GMT

#2115

Wait why am I even answering your question? You THOUGHT HE WAS TOWN. and you LYNCHED him? But you never WANTED to lynch him

wat

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 17:52 GMT

#2118

On June 02 2012 02:43 strongandbig wrote:
Like srsly, you're saying you'd prefer a no lynch over lynching a player who you think is probably scum?

Quote where I said this, or stop putting words in my mouth.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 18:01 GMT

#2120

I voted for scum. Somehow, during D2 I got distracted from my tried-and-true tactic of tunnelling scum and thought "oh these people have legitimate arguments" but I will not listen to dumb ideas any more. Nothing will stop me from lynching G32 tomorrow. I have nothing more to say on the topic of the VE mislynch.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 18:03 GMT

#2121

Well, nothing so far. Someone might actually have a good question, point, or piece of analysis, and I'll have something to say about that, of course.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 18:26 GMT

#2123

I don't believe in the newb card. he sounds like he's TRYING to help in his own way though.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 18:27 GMT

#2124

actually his logic is pretty bad. I takei it all back

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 19:00 GMT

#2128

I don't understand your first post

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 19:00 GMT

#2129

I don't understand your second post either

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 19:02 GMT

#2131

Yeah wiggle-dawg has been kinda lurking since his D1 helpfulness.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 19:38 GMT

#2143

On June 02 2012 04:23 Mr. Wiggles wrote:

Show nested quote +

I haven't been lurking, I just haven't been around and have been busy the last couple days. I can't post when I'm not home, or doing something else.

You know as well as I do the problem with this kind of explanation. Obviously, it's possible you have been busy. Maybe you were. But if you are a lurking scum there's nothing preventing you from making the explanation, right? And wasn't a plank of your candidacy for mayor the fact that you'd be active? I think it's a fair statement that you're lurking more than would be expected.

On June 02 2012 04:23 Mr. Wiggles wrote:

Show nested quote +

You didn't answer my question. You nearly ended up causing a no-lynch, so I'm wondering what was going through your head at the time. There's no way you'd actually get enough people to switch within 5 minutes to be able to kill Gambit, but you still posted this, egging people on to switch with you:

Show nested quote +

So I'm wondering what exactly were you trying to do? Just make a statement? What? Obviously he wasn't going to die, so what else were you trying to accomplish? The only thing it could have ended with is a no-lynch, was that what you were shooting for?

On principle I will not stand for G32's kind of play. He is scum and he will die like scum. And honestly, if I ended up causing a no-lynch, then we'd still have our vigilante who handn't shot his gun yet. Yeah ok maybe it wasn't optimal play given what I knew at the time, but I did the right thing. I should have never unvoted G32, and I never will again so long as he's alive.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 01 2012 19:39 GMT

#2144

Like, if someone's gonna claim scum to the thread, there's no way I'm not gonna vote him. I'll vote G32 and write beautiful cases against him until he's dead.

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 17 2012 00:13 GMT

#3044

Gg wp Marv you are a truly terrifying player

Blazinghand

United States25559 Posts

June 17 2012 01:23 GMT

#3053

On June 17 2012 10:13 jaj22 wrote:
BH wasn't roleblocked. He deliberately left the bombs there. Apparently he didn't think he'd get shot, and that if Gambit wasn't lynched next day it'd be because he had a proven blue claim.

Actually, it's even WORSE than that. I didn't even have a bomb on you N1, and after D2, I MOVED it onto you. My only explanation is that I'm "good" at mafia.