TL Mafia LV - Page 141

On June 09 2012 07:28 Toadesstern wrote:
well you've got to admit that Wiggles pm that tells him he's town is quite a convincing argument. You've got to be mafia Kenpachi

On June 09 2012 07:34 austinmcc wrote:
Wiggles' argument is convincing, but then I noticed this post:



Clearly both town?

On June 09 2012 08:19 Mr. Wiggles wrote:

It's not an argument, I'm just not including myself in a list of suspects when I know I'm town. -_______-

[...]

On June 09 2012 08:19 Mr. Wiggles wrote:

It's not an argument, I'm just not including myself in a list of suspects when I know I'm town. -_______-


Scum could have easily been given the VT role PM. It's likely considering it's not in the OP and there needs to be a way to keep people from bread-crumbing their role PMs to confirm themselves to others with the same role.

Also, Kenpachi, my question isn't a piece of shit, so why don't you answer it? What do you not understand about the case on Maju? After 5 cycles, the best you can really say about him is that you're null? That implies you don't think he's town or scum one way or the other, unless you're just abusing the word null.

On June 09 2012 07:13 Kenpachi wrote:
if YOU would read the fucking thread, maybe EYE will read the fucking thread. OK?

On June 09 2012 08:28 Kenpachi wrote:
i wont answer it cause it is a piece of shit
Tell me this, what is scummy about maju? I can see where you're coming but i cant say hes mafia or town.

On June 07 2012 04:16 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
As for Maju, the thing that really typifies his play is that he always takes the path of least resistance. Examples of this are that his contributions on Day 1 are arguing against whether Toad's claim was good for his role (which doesn't contribute anything), then on Day 2 arguing against VE's breadcrumb. Both of these are easy to do, since the mason claim was bad, and the breadcrumb was bad. However, this is a huge majority of everything he's done this game. Arguing whether Toad's claim was good play or not was useless, because it doesn't matter now that's he's claimed. Then, when arguing against VE, he doesn't state reasons for why he thinks VE is scummy besides sheeping MZ's case. Everything to do with VE is just arguing against the breadcrumb. Both of these are easy to do, because they provide points of contention where you can argue without actually providing any thoughts on alignment to the thread. It's easy to take a stand, because both of them were bad moves, and that makes it really easy to tear into them. Additionally, on Day 3, he ends up voting for Gambit, but nowhere in his filter does he mention original reasons for wanting to do so. He says at one point he likes the case, and that's it. So again, he's just taking the path of least resistance forward.

Even now, when pressured to give some reads, he ends up posting about Hassy and papapanda, who were generally thought to be scummy, so he could blend in. Again, he's taking the path of least resistance. Even in his analysis, notice how unsure he seems to be than when he was arguing against VE or Toad. It's because now he's talking about thread behaviour, not just arguing with bad plays, so it's harder for him to fake analysis. This is further shown, when he's called out on the Hassy check. If he really thought Hassy was scum, he would just argue that he was framed, was the GF, or that Prob was insane and Toad was framed Night 1 or something. All of those are valid reasons that could explain why the check came back town, but he doesn't try to argue any of them. Instead, he backs off completely and says in his own words to disregard anything he said about Hassy. This shows that he just wanted someone to make an easy case against, and that he didn't believe any of it.

On June 09 2012 14:58 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

This is kenpachi setting up a "breadcrumb" mark my words...