EPTLiar Game Mini Mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
From: wherebugsgo [ 5459 posts | Profile | Buddy | Report ] Subject: Re: hey Date: 5/5/12 06:48 Anyway, we're getting off the path here. Will you send votes to Foolishness or me? Let me know within the next 4-5 minutes; it's fine if you just send all of them to either one of us | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
You do realize how easy it would be even for me as a townie to mess that up just to piss you off, or if I felt you were scum? why would you do that...as a townie? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 07 2012 23:36 syllogism wrote: Who do you think should be killed today, Chaoser? Everything we said about you on day 1 still applies, including what Foolishness said and he has flipped town. Have you been PMing anyone at all? Got logs with meapak and sandroba? The only people I've been in contact with in PMs is WBG and gonzaw. I sent foolishness a PM early on but it didn't amount to anything since he was townie. I don't think MZ should be lynched though. I thought he played the game in a very open manner at the start of the game and he was one of the few people that actually agreed with Ace that the palmar plan was stupid. Seeing as how right now it looks like only a survivor has KP, I'd suggest we drag this game out as long as possible. More voting data=more chances for foolishness-like voting analysis. Mafia have no KP and WBG has almost total control over round B and I very much doubt he is mafia since if he was he could have screwed over town supremely by now. I say we lynch one person a cycle. Time is obviously not on the mafia's side. I would like Sheth lynched today. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Original Message From Cephiro: May I know your reasoning for giving me 4 votes during round B? Original Message From chaoser: I gave my 4 votes early because of my cycle plan (you were next to me). Sandroba should have been lynched. what do you think of ET? Original Message From Cephiro: Okay, thanks for clarifying it up. At the moment ET seems quite okay to me. I currently wouldn't pressure him at all, if he's up to something I'd rather let him think he's safe. Original Message From chaoser: Does does that mean? if he seems ok, why would he be "up to something" and why would you want him to "feel safe"? Original Message From Cephiro: I'll try to make it easy: For now I'm ok with him = I don't think he is a threat = I am not currently getting very much scumvibes off him Being up to something IF he happened to be scum. That is still a possibility, although currently I do not find it likely. It's better for me if the scum thinks that they haven't been found, and then I can come and flip my tables. Original Message From chaoser: Who are your scum reads then? What do you think of BC and sandro? What about palmar and syllo? From: Cephiro [ 480 posts | Profile | Buddy | Report ] Subject: Re: Liar Game Date: 5/4/12 11:00 BC is fine, I don't really like sandros play atm, I think syllo is town but something just seems wrong about their duo/buddyplay. Needless to say I don't like Palmar atm either. PMs in order with him. He doesn't give me much to work with though, skips over my scum read question. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 08 2012 00:12 syllogism wrote: You don't seriously buy a claim from trolling mafia? How does it make sense at all for him to play survivor like that? Seems to me you are only believing it because it fits your agenda huh? was this directed at me? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 08 2012 00:32 syllogism wrote: Of course, you are the one who is building our strategy around a likely fake claim/joke I'm confused...I'm not building our strategy around a fake claim joke? I don't even mention him being a vigi as part of the plan? And I thought everyone already knows he's not a vigi. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 08 2012 00:40 syllogism wrote: Palmar implied that cephiro claimed that he is a survivor with kp, which he sort of did with his jackpot comment. Anyway, you are still building our strategy around an unlikely scenario. We've our own theories as to why there has been only one KP every night and they seem more likely than there being a survivor who can basically claim on day 1 and then just tell town to direct his KP Where does he claim survivor? Sloosh is the first person to talk about survivors in the first place On May 06 2012 14:28 slOosh wrote: Oh. I suppose a 3rd party w/ 1KP playing survivor is possible. Yea that makes more sense than town vig with multiple shots hitting townies / multiple vigs. Either way, let's say it's mafia that's somehow controlling that one kp, how does lengthening the game help them there? More information to work with is better. Every time I play mafia, I try to end the game as early as possible because I know the longer the game the more connections and posting that needs to be done so it's harder and harder for mafia to go by unnoticed. Having one KP in an 18 man game ain't that great for mafia in the first place. Obviously the way to win for them is to take control of round b and get multiple townies killed now that we've only seen one KP every night cycle. On May 08 2012 00:12 syllogism wrote: You don't seriously buy a claim from trolling mafia? How does it make sense at all for him to play survivor like that? Seems to me you are only believing it because it fits your agenda Are you sure you're not just trying to make things fit your agenda and gameview? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 08 2012 01:06 slOosh wrote: So we don't kill them not because they have a good chance of flipping townies but in order to extract more information? No? We don't kill multiple people cause they HAVE a chance of flipping townie. At the same time a longer game being more information. Why are you misrepresenting what I'm saying? The two things are not exclusive of each other. @Syllo On May 03 2012 18:32 Palmar wrote: The Ace kill was probably an attempt to kill scum, in any case it's probably helpful to us. I don't think a plan like gonzaw's is going to work at this point in the game, simply because now we have some pretty solid opinions about who we want to lynch. Do you think BC is going to comply with the plan if he's voted to be in the majority? The whole reason why my plan could've worked on day 1 is not because it allows us to specifically kill a certain player, it's because it allowed us to sort of figure out what people were doing and thinking while narrowing the pool of potential players to be lynched. The whole point was that we were not set in on whom we were going to lynch. Today, there is simply no way the prime suspects are going to comply with a plan, they'll just attempt to be in the minority at all costs. I think we're going to have to randomize our answers. Can you clarify something for me then. With your theories, why was Ace killed then? Either he was killed as "an attempt to kill scum" or he was killed because what he was saying was on the right track to finding mafia. The first one discredits Ace's posts indirectly by saying Ace's posts were scummy and thus not helpful. The second one would obviously mean Ace was on the right track. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Ok, so what are your theories on how the KP works. Either there's a third party SK or mafia control the KP. Do they share the KP? Is it alternating (one team gets it one day, the other the next day). None of those make much sense. Fact of the matter is, Ace was probably killed by mafia cause he was making sense. In both of those cases, where mafia only have limited KP, there's no reason, on day 1, for mafia to try to shoot other mafia. I told WBG about this but the ratio is 4:1:1 so both teams are outnumbered. Given the choice, mafia aren't going to be shooting people on day 1 cause they seem scummy, it's because they think they're trying to weed out town. Either way, lets get back to other issues, why do you think MZ should get killed? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
His activity has also drastically dropped when it became apparent palmar/me/wbg and foolishness got control of the game. You defending him for no reason only serves to increase our suspicions as chaoser/meapak team makes quite a bit of sense. lol...you played in the SS game with sandro. What did town do when sandro had all of the control? nothing. Like, the last few pages were literally VE screaming a bunch. If you notice, EVERYONE'S activity has dropped this game after control was taken. That's because there's nothing to do... | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 08 2012 01:59 syllogism wrote: Feel free to make a case on someone who can be lynched today, other than sheth of course. gonzaw Katina Liquid`Sheth Meapak_Ziphh Mr. Wiggles slOosh syllogism So from that? lol kinda slim picking seeing as how most of the people I think are mafia are in the minority list sandro/ceph/sheth/ET/Palmar | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 08 2012 02:08 syllogism wrote: Oh so you think one mafia team went 0-3 or 0-2 last night? Weren't you saying foolishness style voting analysis would be useful How does happening make it not useful? 1-2 isn't going to happen every round A, as people have said multiple times. Mafia are obviously going to 0-3 or 0-2 from time to time. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
| ||
