EPTHoly Roman Mafia - Page 119
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18317 Posts
I also kinda buy your story. Who do you want to lynch today? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18317 Posts
On May 15 2012 23:01 zelblade wrote: Acro I assume ur using your lynch on CC. Or someone else? I'm not sure yet. Still liking The_Bard over CC for a lurker lynch. Especially as it looks like CC is getting himself modkilled. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18317 Posts
So far all we know about 3rd party is that p-body was an anarchist. Anarchists sound like the kind of faction that would have mad hatter like chaotic destructive roles. As long as bluelightz wants to play along with town and not scum, I am in favour of letting him live. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
About 7 hours left to vote | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
I don´t understand this talk about Bluelightz. Everyone says he was better in WoF, he was definetly more assertive and seemed to care more about the game, but he didn´t try to lead town then and he doesn´t try to now. He´s just as confused as he was in that game, just like the rest of town. Many people have brought up metaarguments against BL but so far I´m not convinced that there´s anything weird going on that couldn´t be explained by this being a bigger game, and a Caller game. I´m still leaning town on BL. I want to lynch any two out of Bard, Jitsu and BagManager today. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18317 Posts
On May 15 2012 23:12 Forumite wrote: strongandbig, I see you posted a picture. Are you a fan of photography, perhaps from the beach, nudge, nudge? I don´t understand this talk about Bluelightz. Everyone says he was better in WoF, he was definetly more assertive and seemed to care more about the game, but he didn´t try to lead town then and he doesn´t try to now. He´s just as confused as he was in that game, just like the rest of town. Many people have brought up metaarguments against BL but so far I´m not convinced that there´s anything weird going on that couldn´t be explained by this being a bigger game, and a Caller game. I´m still leaning town on BL. I want to lynch any two out of Bard, Jitsu and BagManager today. So you don't think YES_THIS_IS_DOG is suspect? Or you think those three are more suspect. Please say what is scummy about Jitsu, I don't think anybody has ever posted a case yet and he is "scum by hearsay". I have tried to make a case that convinces me and found I wasn't convincing myself he was scum. He's confusing as hell and I don't like the way he's playing, but I'm not leaning scum anymore. But I would be happy to concede I'm wrong if you see something I missed. | ||
|
Carolus Magnus
France172 Posts
| ||
|
Carolus Magnus
France172 Posts
| ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
##vote: Bagmanager | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
| ||
|
YES_THIS_IS_DOG
United States88 Posts
On May 15 2012 19:35 Acrofales wrote: While I'm posting walls of text, lets make another one with Dog's suspicious behaviours. 1. He completely shat up the thread with a fake posting restriction. This was not a Foolishness posting restriction, where he made sense, but posted in limericks, nor a Drazerk posting restriction where he showered Caller in praise. This was a posting restriction where he figured creating an entire page of morse code woofs was somehow a good idea. P-Body then translated this into hex... which finally got translated into regular text. If the anarchists have a QT, look NO further than page 62 for an example of them jointly shitting up the thread COMPLETELY. Even if they don't have a QT, it was a golden opportunity for P-Body to create anarchy in the thread with that crap... and that opportunity was created by YES_THIS_IS_DOG's retardation. 2. Could this be Dog trying to divert the lynch off his scumbuddy? Why yes, it could. There is a townie explanation too, but lets not discard the excellent scum reason for this gem of a post. Fake surprise? 3. The rest of his filter is a discussion of the lurkers. Now I get that most of D2 has been about the lurkers, but some people are trying to make sense of other people too. Dog isn't. He's just blending in with the lurker discussion: a very safe place for scum to hide. 1. If I wanted to create more mayhem then I would have continued doing it-- I stopped doing it because a) people were starting to take the game seriously and b) because I realized I was shitting up the thread more than I intended. 2. Opposing the main lynch should never be considered scummy; it doesn't matter whether or not he flipped scum. I maintain that he didn't look very scummy at the time. 3. Of course the rest of my filter is going to be discussion about the lurkers-- would you rather it be filled with spam? Or Morse code arfs? | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Can we kill someone with a bull? | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On May 15 2012 23:22 Acrofales wrote: So you don't think YES_THIS_IS_DOG is suspect? Or you think those three are more suspect. Please say what is scummy about Jitsu, I don't think anybody has ever posted a case yet and he is "scum by hearsay". I have tried to make a case that convinces me and found I wasn't convincing myself he was scum. He's confusing as hell and I don't like the way he's playing, but I'm not leaning scum anymore. But I would be happy to concede I'm wrong if you see something I missed. DOG is a suspect, but I think the other 3 are more suspect, or at least he doesn´t lurk as much. He´s using words, and he´s more active, and occasionally give his opinion. Sometimes I even see a real post from him. I just don´t view him as a lurker and I wouldn´t mind seeing him. Jitsu, I don´t like that he was very late at voting yesterday, and his targets were zelblade, who would never get majority, and sinani, a vote on a scum when the lynch was basically decided. It was only when I asked him to vote for one of the primary candidates that he voted sinani, after that he went away for two days. He´s only posted once since the lynch. Bard, he has the longest posts but they have almost no content, also he ignored my request to clarify his opinions in general and his case on strongandbig. Lika you said, if he was really interested then he could have tried to clarify himself with much less text, or do like DOG in the beginning, quote several posts just to show if he agrees or disagree with the poster. BagManager is still lurking, I´m convinced he´s WBG and needs to die. Even if he´s not WBG he needs to die anyway. The only thing suggesting that he´s coming back to the game is one post 8 hours ago. We are 6.5 hours away from the deadline and we know nothing of him, if he doesn´t do anything to prove he´s playing this game soon then he needs to die. He especially needs to die if he votes. Quatol and Itouchyou need to die too, but expecting modkills. Perhaps we should leave the scummy lurkers left after the modkills to the vigi, but there´s so many of them. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
I'm going into the nature preserve and will probably lose signal for a few hours. I can provide pics if you want. For now, I'm voting Bagmanager. I don't think it's wbg, because he's too smart not to realize Forumite would know who his smurf is; but his play is too scummy by itself at this juncture. Other people I would be willing to vote for, to consolidate or whatever: - companion cube, his lack of response to the specific scum bard accusation is pretty damning - jitsu, I still don't like his obsession with the zelblade case, since it seems pretty much built on nothing or on trying to make towny behaviors seem scummy - not sure about bard, seems scummy but I don't want to let myself be blinded by the bad case he made on me like I did with prplhz in WoF; also his case on me, while wrong, wasn't entirely stupid IMO - I'm also curious why BL is so focused on mattchew, if he's third maybe he's got a target? Probably not though, just a thought. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On May 16 2012 00:08 Forumite wrote: Quatol has voted, he won´t get modkilled, that means he has to die, or get active in this thread. I think I will be the only one to be mod killed Seems to me caller wants me billed | ||
|
The_Bard
United States92 Posts
On May 15 2012 16:50 Forumite wrote: What about scummy active lurkers whith a weird posting restriction that is most likely faked, like Bard? Joined TL.net Monday, 7th of November 2011 On May 10 2012 05:03 Caller wrote: ALL PMS should be out. Sing, sing a song Sing out loud Sing out strong Sing of good things, not bad Sing of happy, not sad. Sing, sing a song Make it simple To last your whole life long Don't worry that it's not good enough for anyone else to hear Just sing, sing a song. On May 15 2012 18:43 Acrofales wrote: Gonna run with this case on S&B as it's the only new piece of information that might lead to scum. First a summary (I hope) and my own commentary, in words, rather than retarded songs: 1. S&B is trying to figure out who the smurfs are. Which is scummy because... ??? Bard, some help here? oh, hundreds of people left out in the cold Wearing the shoes that were silver and gold Useless information Tons of useless information On May 15 2012 18:43 Acrofales wrote: 4. People who vote late without a proper reason are scum ---> HAI GUYS, I was AFK ##vote Maju! Agreed. Then again, The_Bard, our messenger in this case ALSO voted at the last second (in fact, AFTER the last second). Bard: why should anyone trust you in this? On May 15 2012 19:07 Acrofales wrote: his propensity for posting walls of songtext with NO reason and his retarded vote on D1. ![[image loading]](http://newmediaandmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Internet-Disconnect.jpeg) Communication breakdown  On May 15 2012 18:43 Acrofales wrote: He does not post in songs and has not claimed devil (aka scum) in his very first post of the game.  On May 15 2012 22:47 strongandbig wrote: 4. Figuring out who smurfs are became important when wbg posted that scumclaim. And the word is no (no no no no no no no) And the word is no [B]On May 16 2012 00:34 strongandbig wrote: - not sure about bard, seems scummy but I don't want to let myself be blinded by the bad case he made on me like I did with prplhz in WoF; also his case on me, while wrong, wasn't entirely stupid IMO ^^^ | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18317 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
| ||
