EPTI'll look it into it more tomorrow (I don't think I noticed the ninja vote). Had a bit much to drink to try to think about it tonight. Not sure why I'm posting on TL mafia tbh
TL Mafia LIV - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'll look it into it more tomorrow (I don't think I noticed the ninja vote). Had a bit much to drink to try to think about it tonight. Not sure why I'm posting on TL mafia tbh | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 17 2012 12:43 Sinensis wrote: If I get lynched before this guy... shame on everyone. I think I agree with you here. grush is totally inexcusable | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 16 2012 12:19 Sinensis wrote: Papapanda I have a post on this exact same page that says who I'm thinking about. I am thinking about l10f, you, and grush. Grush only because he's still alive and was the first to claim blue... but that's really all I've got left. My two big picks for scum this game both flipped town and now everyone, grush aside, is starting to look the same to me. There's no way mafia would have hit some of the people that got hit before grush if he was town. l10f and papapanda are talking too much right now to justify voting them when grush is still around. I'm going to put my vote on grush. I'm still waiting for PaqMan to ask me questions if he has them, if you want to just vote for me though that's fine too. Your loss. On May 16 2012 12:20 Sinensis wrote: ##Vote: grush57 As pointed out by... you? if grush is town, why would scum be killing him. The reasoning makes no sense. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 16 2012 05:25 Sinensis wrote: I could go for either Papapanda or l10f just because I have a feeling. Though now that I think about it grush has been alive for an awfully long time considering he claimed blue so early, also probably the weakest filter left. Be back after work in 6 hours. Picked up on this while I was going over some things too. As far as I understand, he didn't claim a power role, he claimed blue, as in BLU townie (remember what was made of blubb's terminology slip early game). | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 to papapanda: apart from you and those you asked, I do not know | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
From my perspective we are lynching into grush, sinensis, and froggynoddy. As Sinensis wanted direct questions: Paqman has in his case(s) against you pointed out where you said that it was easy to bandwagon on to Nova, but you were also willing to vote for him. Why did you say he was easy to bandwagon on to and then say you were happy to bandwagon on to him? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2012 06:59 papapanda wrote: Grush is not the ideal target anymore. Him not being an asset was THE reason he was put up for lynch. He was an easy target, so the mafia would most likely keep him alive, which means he is most likely town. Therefore in LYLO, we should not lynch grush. I don't understand any of this logic. Two options, grush is town or grush is scum 1) grush is scum. obviously scum are not going to night-kill scum. grush lives 2) grush is townie. scum are going to keep grush alive as he has been playing so anti-town. grush lives In either scenario grush lives, him being alive is not alignment indicative. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2012 08:03 papapanda wrote: Marvellosity, are you saying you want to lynch grush too? Yeah, your post makes sense, but I think what I was ultimately trying to say he is town(a bad one, though) for me. Haven't you been pushing grush for a lot of the game? Why the change of heart? grush at the moment is my strongest read. Going to have to go over the filters of the guys I mentioned earlier because it's too important to be lazy about. That's tomorrow's job. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2012 13:02 PaqMan wrote: Hi, my name is PaqMan, and I am a tracker. + Show Spoiler [breadcrumb] + On May 05 2012 12:43 PaqMan wrote: Then what was your reason for voting her? Becuase all you said was + Show Spoiler + On May 05 2012 05:33 slOosh wrote: Bah isn't deadline in 30 minutes??? I'm down for a katina vote, as outlined by DYH and BH before me. Her filter shows that she has likes and dislikes of what's going on, but she doesn't take that into figuring out alignments. Easy explanation. You knew your scummates were inactive because they werent talking in your QT, so you bussed them. I don't see you coincidentally voting for the two scum that get modkilled. And now you're using that for town credit. Voting with BH because BH seemed town? Couldnt be much lazier. In BHs last game (LII) he tunneled marv his entire game. Guess what marv flipped (town). You say its bull now, but did you do anything to stop it? Nada! you let it run its full course without any objections whatsoever. I dont like theuls. Sloosh looks like scum. now excuse my, im not completely sober. TGIF ftw! I tried to spell out TRACKER but it's a hell lot harder than it looks. I forgot to put in the R also. theuls is sleuth spelled backwards, except I managed to spell it wrong. But it means detective, investigator, tracker. My results for tracking since N1 are as follows: + Show Spoiler [track results] + N1: I tracked SlOosh, no actions made. N2: I tracked layabout, no actions made. N3: I tracked Eiii, no actions made. N4: I tracked Sinensis, Roleblocked! N5: I tracked Sinensis, no actions made. The reason I didn't claim the day before is because only Vanilla Townies are notified if they are role blocked, so I didn't want to give myself away. The last two scum is Roleblocker and Godfather. This is significant information because it means that the last two scum are always visiting other people. The roleblocker is visiting someone to RB them, and the GF is visiting someone to send in the kill. They're always moving. This basically clears Sinensis as VT. The remaining people are: grush57, marvellosity, papapanda, and froggynoddy. Two of them are scum. I would be completely okay with lynching marv. In fact, last night I was pretty confident that either me or him would be killed. I was not expecting Eiii to die. I think the only reason they wouldn't kill him is because he might push a mislynch. I will go back and read into them but they need to be our main focus. Nice case. Oh wait :/ Really? You're gonna let scum wifom you with the night-kill. If you're telling the truth then the scum are definitely grush and froggynoddy. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2012 19:27 marvellosity wrote: Nice case. Oh wait :/ Really? You're gonna let scum wifom you with the night-kill. If you're telling the truth then the scum are definitely grush and froggynoddy. Further to this, as a logical problem, how do you know that the roleblocker is always roleblocking? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
His conclusion, however, is mindboggling. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2012 13:02 PaqMan wrote: In fact, last night I was pretty confident that either me or him would be killed. I was not expecting Eiii to die. I think the only reason they wouldn't kill him is because he might push a mislynch. If you read the thread you would find a very good reason why scum did not kill into me and you. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 19 2012 00:35 papapanda wrote: Hi, my name is papapanda. I am medic. Here's my breadcrumb: I am not sure how to explain it, but I had a feeling the either Marvel or Paqman is scum. So I changed the words in their own quote hoping they will catch on to my message. My reasoning for doing this I believe that Paqman/Marvel might be the next target, and forming a 3 way group might make whoever was the scum less likely to hit the other. And ofcourse, if I died, the other one would have been suspicious of the remaining one. Also, I requested 3 names from each of them. I wanted to use this information to find out which of them is scum. If Marvel and Paqman had said to prioritized A, B, and C, I would pick D to save because they now know who I am going to save. And if I indeed saved D, I would've used this information against them. Unfortunately, I didn't receive names in reply (or I missed itXD). I guess people don't really read quoted text. So none of my plan worked, but at least I hope this can clear my name from the list and narrow our lynch targets. Marv: When I said I would wait on last nights kill results before I say my vote, I thought it might have been you or Paqman. I am pretty certain one of you is scum. When neither of you died, it confused me but I think now that the reason is to keep the cover. However, even after Paqman revealed, he is not cleared yet for me. Right now I am leaning towards lynching you, if you have any information, please bring it out now. Yes, I do have further information to bring to light. Firstly, I recognised I saw your breadcrumb here: On May 16 2012 06:53 marvellosity wrote: EBWOP: papapanda, who is your strongest scum-read at the moment then? I looked through your filter after analysing your last post again, and it seems you have been suspicious of grush before. Is it still him, or do you have other reads? "after analysing your last post again" - I only saw the breadcrumb after I had posted my initial response. Further to this, I answered your question here: On May 18 2012 04:22 marvellosity wrote: Thread is dead to papapanda: apart from you and those you asked, I do not know those you asked = me/paqman (i am townie, have town-read on paqman) and you (for obvious reasons). Yet further to this, from looking at Paqman's posts following your breadcrumb it is clear that he did not recognise your breadcrumb or answer you in any way. Armed with this knowledge, answer me this papapanda: if I were scum, why didn't I just kill you? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 19 2012 02:55 papapanda wrote: EDWOP: nevermind I just reread youre post above, further confirming your status. Who do you think we should lynch today? We should be lynching grush followed by froggynoddy. I am as close to 100% certain on grush as I can reasonably be and about 90% on froggy, based on the process of elimination. I'm on board with your claim because it was well hidden, while Paqman's claim is very likely to be true. froggy is only not scum if Paqman's claim turns out to be false, while your claim + Paqman's claim + my read on grush means he should be a certainty. Apart from claims in general, a reminder of why I think grush is scum anyway: On May 11 2012 04:31 marvellosity wrote: I dislike everything I've bolded. You admit you don't bother defending yourself, you admit you only do one-liners. Is layabout duty-bound to do a case on the other main lynch candidate? And worst of all, you're only posting more because someone called you out! Did you not have the urge to do anything to contribute to town before that then? Or just happy doing fuck-all until someone calls you out for it? grush not scumhunting. grush not contributing unless a case is made. Such a clincher for me. Paqman made a case on Sinensis before his claim and subsequent belief that Sinensis is townie. Easy way out for grush: On May 17 2012 10:03 grush57 wrote: GEEET SENESISSS That's all we get. Unfortunately for grush, Paqman then comes out with his claim. On May 19 2012 03:55 grush57 wrote: Guys, its froggynoddy. ##vote: Froggynoddy Shit knows what this is. Just vote-switching for the hell of it now, he's almost mocking us. If froggynoddy is scum, he's been long-term bussing grush to try to get credit. Naturally grush has managed to avoid the lynch. Now because we've managed to nail them grush is desperately bussing froggy. What was the likeliest way grush would avoid the lynch today? By not killing into me/Paqman leading town into wifom-ing themselves into thinking that the scum is elsewhere. The easiest way for grush to get lynched would have been to kill into us two and it's predetermined. Now we have to discuss it instead. grush is scum and we must lynch him today. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 19 2012 05:36 Sinensis wrote: If you guys weren't so quick to speak up about things that don't concern you I might have gotten grush to vote Paq. ##Vote: grush57 Is anyone going to yell at me if I just vote for him and leave it at that? I don't really have much to analyze. ? I'm confused about the first sentence. ##Vote grush57 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 19 2012 09:59 PaqMan wrote: you might as well because i did not catch it. Why do you choose grush over froggynoddy? The explanation I was talking about at the time (not shooting into me/you) was papapanda's claim. If scum caught wind of it then shooting into me/you was not a high percentage play. I explained why grush over froggynoddy in my last post. froggy should be scum by roleclaim evidence and elimination, grush the same except I also have a strong read on him as well. At lylo I am only going to lynch the target with the absolute highest chance of flipping scum (i.e. grush is scum because he is scum and SUPPORTED by the claims, froggy is scum BECAUSE of the claims). | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 19 2012 21:52 grush57 wrote: Marv, why'd u have to be scum? It's me now?! | ||
| ||
